False Pope Creating a False Church because Good Catholics Will Not Stop Him

 Amici,

Whatever Jorge Mario Bergoglio is creating in Rome via his "Synod", now extended apparently a number of years (we'll never get rid of it! You KNOW it is "Vatican III") – whatever it is, it is not the Catholic Church.

How obvious is this? Just reading, even skimming, some of the stuff going on at that Synod strikes me as completely alien to EVERYTHING Catholic. So, clearly, the false pope is creating a false Church.

Can we be remotely surprised?

Yes, Bergoglio is creating a false Church via his "Synod on Synodality". And good men like Cardinals Burke, Müller, bishops such as Bishop Athanasius Schneider, and of course a host of Conservative Catholics (Fr. Gerald Murray and Robert Royal are exemplars) and Trad Catholics – too numerous to count, but Professor Peter Kwasniewski is an excellent example, are letting him do it.

They're letting Bergoglio get away with it because they insist he is a valid pope, and actually occupies the cathedra of St. Peter. As I've written a number of times, Bergoglio is painfully obviously not a pope, and has never acted like one, so therefore insisting he is a valid pope leads inevitably to cognitive dissonance. You'll go cross-eyed insisting this fool – and no, I'm not very nice to "Bergi" – is an actual pope. In fact, you'll lose your faith if you insist on maintaining the charade.

Video Tells All

Ever see see that video of Bergoglio nine years ago walking along a hallway, spying two young altar servers, one with his hands in the classic prayer position? Bergoglio says something, then stops, and physically pulls the boy's hands apart, saying "Are your hands bound together? Seems like they're stuck." That little scene, right there, affirmed my growing suspicions and I've never believed he was pope after that. (If I ever really believed it before.)

He wears a diabolical pectoral cross, too, as I've written here.  And the man has consistently proven he is not a pope, nor a Catholic, and not even a Christian. Yet all these good men noted above insist he is actually pope and must be "resisted". Don't they comprehend doing that is driving a stake through the heart of the papacy? If it survives Bergoglio's wrecking ball at all, it will be stunted, shackled, and marginalized. Thanks to them.

And so will the Church.

Now, Ann Barnardt and her friends insist Benedict XVI did not validly resign in the first place. I think they make excellent arguments. Archbishop Viganò makes the superb argument that Bergoglio accepted his election without intending to serve as pope's are supposed to; it would be like a marriage being declared invalid because one of the partners had no intention of keeping any of his vows in the first place. Both these arguments are splendid, indeed, but for me, I think it is simply, horrifically blatant that there's nothing papal about this lout. So, GET HIM OUT! And any argument that can effect that is a most excellent argument, indeed!

Otherwise, all these well-meaning folk will do as much damage to Holy Mother Church as Bergoglio himself, and ALL his perverted peeps, are doing.

          AnP

The New Dubia and St. Paul's opening to the Galatians

 Amici,

Five Cardinals have issued a new Dubia to Bergoglio. They first wrote a letter and when "Tucho" Fernández responded in Bergoglio's name, they formally arranged their questions into the "Yes or No" Dubia format and re-issued them publicly. They're still waiting for an answer.

How hard is this? 

St. Paul himself laid it out as plain as it can be. 

From Galatians 1, starting at verse 6:

• 6 I wonder that you are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ, unto another gospel.
• 7 Which is not another, only there are some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
• 8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema.
• 9 As we said before, so now I say again: If any one preach to you a gospel, besides that which you have received, let him be anathema.
• 10 For do I now persuade men, or God? Or do I seek to please men? If I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.
• 11 For I give you to understand, brethren, that the gospel which was preached by me is not according to man.
• 12 For neither did I receive it of man, nor did I learn it; but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.

All this is obvious. It's "Biblically obvious." Bergoglio is promoting, and has promoted, has never ceased to promote, a "gospel of man;" it is not the real Gospel. 

What more needs to be said? "Pope Francis" is anathema. Since his "election" (an installation, of course) a decade ago, Jorge Mario Bergoglio has shown he is only interested in teaching another Gospel. The first set of Dubia questions asked Bergoglio directly whether he was a heretic or not. He just ignored them. Chances are he will ignore these, or get the loathsome "Tucho" Fernández to do his usual verbal snake dance. Either way, Bergoglio is anathema. Can't we all quote St. Paul's Galatians opening together? "I wonder that you are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ, unto another gospel."

Bergoglio is anathema. Period. Full stop. So why do we call him "Pope"? Why do we tolerate this farce? He has condemned himself as anathema, "accursed" or however one wants to translate "anathema".

As I have written before, and I'm sure many others have observed, nothing happens without God allowing it. God even uses the Devil to bring about the Divine Will. The Lord God is doing so with Bergoglio. "Bergi" is flaying the Vatican II Church alive, just doing a Viking "red eagle" on it, and he's got the Traditional Catholics back into the Catacombs.

Good. From this terrible trial, the True Church will emerge all the stronger and Faith-filled. Why? Because we'll realize what we're losing, what's at stake in this struggle. Bergoglio is forcing us off the fence. At last. He's closing down the Great Pilgrimage that is the Faith, tearing down the great shrines and turning the churches into shanty barns abandoned in forgotten fields. So much about Catholicism involves a losing, and then a finding again, doesn't it? Think of Our Lady of Walsingham, its loss and restoration. So it is, and will be, with the larger Church. Amen.

 An Préachán

Modern heraldic achievement

for Our Lady of Walsingham 

Ordinariate

Bishop Strickland's new letter: God does not and cannot bless sin

Amici,

Bishop Strickland has a new pastoral letter out; this one issued on the eve of the infamous and utterly anti-Catholic "Synod on Synodality" that is expected to change Church teaching on a host of carnal-related issues. So Strickland tackles the "same-sex blessing" insanity in his letter. Read it here at LifeSiteNews. "God does not and cannot bless sin." 

Oh, really? Someone please inform the "Pope". 

Making Himself a Target

Bishop Strickland knows this new letter will enrage the "homosexualist" (what's that even mean? Supporter? Advocate?) Bergoglio and the infamous Fr James Martin, (a.k.a. Pope Francis' pinkie finger, Francis' rent boy, and other monikers too disgusting to pass on). It will stir up a lavender hornets' nest. No other American bishop, and apparently few in the world but the African bishops, stand tall for traditional Church teaching against Sodomy.

Bishop Strickland knows the hammer will fall soon, I am afraid; thus, he "goes for broke." For as surely as the insane Argentine (and I mean nutso: he clearly believes à la "Tucho Fernández that he has oracle-prophetical semi-divine powers and can redefine "Catholic" to suit his will, and that we must all obey his every whim: see this article for details.) is especially in favor of homosexuals and sexual predators in general (like that rapist and incompetent, cartoonish "artist" Jesuit Marko Rupnik).

Bishop Strickland wrote: "The truth is, at the core of our existence is Love, and there is no power in Heaven or on Earth that can keep the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit from loving us fully and completely." Right, but what does 'love' here mean? "The core of our existence is Love" – as in I guess, from the capital L, God. I don't know why Christian preachers of the Faith can't clearly say, as Fr Ripperger does, that "love" means "will the good." To say "God loves you" sounds maudlin, or squishy, or feel good: but to say "God wills your good" – which is what the phrase means – bears a clear, no nonsense understanding of what is meant. To say "God is love" is to say God is ontologically The Good. Goodness in itself, Good as such. Omnibenevolence (supremely good) is the formal term. It's one of the divine attributes, like Omniscience and Omnipotence. 

God thus wills our good because He is Good Itself, and any so-called "good" we humans pursue – like carnal satisfaction, money, fame, etc. – leads us away from The Good, and therefore into Hell. Thus, Heaven or Hell, no in-between. What's wrong with putting it this way?

Because of course the squishy Vatican II Church would get the vapors. It would pass out and need revived with smelling salts. The Vatican II three-year cycle of Mass readings took out most references to Hell, eternal damnation, all that. No doubt secular Jewish psychologists (very big in the '50s and '60s) told them that such language and imagery would turn off "modern man". Any Vatican II priest who preached "hellfire and damnation" sermons would be assigned to the local lunatic asylum or defrocked. But now a new Pharaoh has arisen, one who did not know John Paul II, etc., and this new Pharaoh is iron-handedly slapping down and defacing the squishy Vatican II Church with a sado-masochistic relish, making its conservatives squeal as he imparts homosexual blessings and the Seven Sacraments on egregious, unrepentant mortal sinners. Bergoglio says priests in the confessional must always forgive even when the "penitents" are not sorry for their sins, as most homosexual and adulterous people are not. 

• Because these "conservatives" (and even many Trads) insist Bergoglio is pope, they just must bend over in awe as he violates everything they thought they believed about Catholicism. I am sure he relishes their pain he is inflicting.

So, we go down our merry way, traipsing along to a general ecclesiastical and secular Armageddon. Be prepared for what's coming, and pray for Bishop Strickland.

    An Préachán

Bergoglio about to remove Bishop Strickland? Ramifications

Friends, a chairde, 

A widely reported rumor now circulating hints strongly that Bergoglio will "ask" Bishop Joesph Strickland of Tyler, Texas, to resign. See LifesiteNews for details. 

Should this prove true, you-all can know for certain that no matter how holy and faith-filled Bishop Strickland is, and no matter how carefully he's run his diocese (which is flourishing, and with a full seminary, etc.), they can find something or other, even (as with Roe v. Wade) a "shadow of a shadow", i.e., a penumbra, of something that could be critiqued and "cried up". I won't be surprised at how shrilly they decry him. The truth is, of course, that he's "America's bishop" because he really believes the Catholic version of Christianity, lives it and promotes it, and in short simply does what every other bishop in the U.S. ought to be doing, and is increasingly (slowly but steadily, too slowly for some, to quickly for Bergoglio's Clown Posse) growing in opposition to the Beast Bergoglio. And therefore he makes the other bishops out to be time servers and bench sitters.

Should Bergoglio make this damnable move – and it is damnable: just look at how badly the American bishops govern their dioceses, closing churches, dioceses empty of aspirants to the priesthood, swamped with homosexual and other deviants in their clergies – then the moment has come. If Bishop Strickland refuses to resign, then the revolution against the tyrant Anti-Pope has begun. Bishop Strickland will have raised Our Lord's Royal Standard for us all to support. If the Bishop knuckles under to the Ogre, however, well, that's about it for the official American Catholic Church, a.k.a. the Vatican II Church. Out with a whimper, as began to collapse earlier under the Covid fraud.

Fundamental Point: Bergoglio is moving forward with this ridiculous and heretical "Synod on Synodality" and the ordination of women and the formal recognition of the German bishops blessing "gay unions", etc. That Bergoglio is taking a wrecking ball the the Catholic Church is manifest, as mainline "Conservative Catholic" commentator Fr. Murray wrote about back in February! Well, Fr. Murray, guess what? Bergoglio hasn't "stopped it" as you demanded (yes, demanded) in that article; he's sped it all up!

Observation: Why is it so hard for Fr. Murray and Dr. Taylor Marshall and so, so many others not to simply say, as Ann Barnhardt says, Bergoglio is not the pope. Ann has great reasons. Fr. Altman gives 20 examples of reasons why Bergoglio can't be pope in his wonderful sermon here: Bergoglio is not the Pope; Fr. Altman Talks. As I keep saying, what does "Bergi" have to do? Add Martin Luther to the calendar of Catholic saints, or maybe Muhammad? Does Bergoglio have to declare a "Holy Duality" and nix the "Holy Trinity"? What? What does the man have to do to get it into their heads that he is destroying their Church, full stop? 

Review this article on a little commented on or observed move Bergoglio has done. It's about

the Apostolic Letter Spiritus Domini of January 2021, in which Bergoglio universally changed canon law for the whole Church regarding the so-called “lay institutes” of Acolyte and Lector. 

• It's about women doing SSPX,those jobs, of course, setting them on the way to priestly ordination. That ordination of women gutted what was left of the Anglican Church; you would think the Catholic Church's Modernists would know that; however, my friends, I suspect they know it all too well. They want to create a New World Order Church.

"The Church", the True Church, will survive, because of Our Lord's solemn promise. It'll be underground, found here and there, and in the SSPX. It will use the Trad Latin Mass, teach the Deposit of Faith (i.e. Tradition) and will survive the coming horrors long foretold by the Blessed Mother, and others. Assuming there's a post-Apocalyptic future, it will be here, doing what's it's done for 2,000 years (sans the Vatican II Interlude).

Dáil trócaire orainn, a Dhia.

         AnP