Monkeypox, Covid, and more! (May we please put an end to this?)

 Friends,

With all the talk about Monkeypox and the Devil knows what else his minions have cooked up, I think it is time to share two articles about viruses and virology. If this is too much of "flogging a dead horse" to anyone, just remember, zombie horses are running the world right now, zombie horses and zombie jackasses. You-all know to whom (they are legion) I refer.

The first article is by Jon Rappaport, here at his blog. Jon's been at this a lot of years, and he writes very well. Here are a couple of excerpts (note that were I to yellow highlight them, I'd have to highlight all of materiel):

Here’s another fun fact. The entire medical cartel thrives on the insane proposition—launched with fervor more than a hundred years ago—that people suffer from thousands of distinct diseases, each of which is caused by a single germ, which must be treated by a toxic drug and prevented by a toxic vaccine.
It is this great lie that that has killed millions upon millions upon millions of people.
Therefore, the very real question about the existence of viruses in general is more than a weird preoccupation.

AnP again:

As I have written before, if our natural habitat, our "biosphere" is so murderously dangerous as "scientists" and "physicians" (ahem, who work for Big Pharma) would have us believe, how did we ever evolve in the first place? (Or if you believe in Creation, then the natural question is why God would make so dysfunctional a world? And were you to posit He did in fact do so, why would, on the Seventh Day, He bless it and make His first Covenant with it, with ALL of it, us too? Or if this germy world is the result of the Fall, how does it serve us or make us useful to God to die of all the bugs in it before we have time to do good or evil?)

And then there's this insight; think about this seriously for a full 60 seconds:

NO ONE who is reading this article has ever been in a virology lab and witnessed the step by step process of “discovering a new virus.” I find that stunning. And yet all sorts of people are quite ready to assert with great finality that they know all about isolating viruses.

If by chance, someone reading this article HAS actually been in a lab and “discovered a virus,” you can bet your bottom dollar he won’t let you or me in there with a full film crew and our outlier experts asking very pointed questions about each “scientific” move he makes, as he “isolates a virus.”

To which somebody might reply: “Well, I’ve never seen a car being made in a factory, but I drive one with full confidence.”
Yes, but when the “virus discovered in a lab” results in you or someone you love being dosed with a drug or vaccine that maims you or kills your family member, you damn well should want to get into “that factory where the car is made.”

But you can’t. They won’t let you…
…Despite the fact that, as I’ve documented many times, the US medical system kills, by a very conservative estimate, 225,000 people a year, or 2.25 million people per decade. [0]

(N.B. I've seen it conservatively estimated to be at least 150,000 to 200,000+. And that was before Covid; so, this fits.)

AnP again

Do yourselves a favor and read the whole piece. How many friends do I know who took the "vaccine"? A lot. Some apparently have little problem, others have become extremely ill, most with some sort of blood problems (bleedings, strokes, etc.). Now "the WHO" (not the rock group) are at it again, crying up Monkeypox, supposedly a variety of the dreaded smallpox. (Er...didn't Edward Jenner cure the pox via his cowpox injections? Like you know, over 200 years ago? As I have been a some pains to point out before in these pages, the answer is N.O.!!!)

Then there's the fascinating site: Viroliegy. This particular Introduction article is fascinating. 

An excerpt:

Purification be done various ways and is usually a combination of multiple methods including:

    Centrifugation
    Filtration
    Precipitation
    Chromatography

Yet here is where we hit another road bump. Even though the methods of purification exist, virologists rarely if ever use them. In fact, they regularly claim that purification can not be done in order to get the desired particles and they will provide many excuses for why this is the case. Often, you will see excuses such as:

    There are not enough “virus” particles in the sample
    The “virus” particles are damaged and lost during purification
    “Viruses” need a host cell and must be cell cultured in order to grow enough “virus” particles

...the author details a number of excuses from famous scientists...

and...

What virologists call an isolate is the fluid from the sick host with everything included. The unpurified fluids (containing host materials, bacteria, microorganisms, etc) are mixed with many other materials such as antibiotics/antifungals, blood from baby cows, chemicals and minimal “nutrients,” etc. and are added to a cell culture normally consisting of African green monkey kidneys or a cancerous cell line from humans. After culturing for days, virologists look for evidence of cell death known as the cytopathogenic effect (CPE) to claim a “virus” is present within the unpurified soup. There are, however, two problems with this:

1. The CPE in the cell culture which virologists look for as evidence is not specific to “viruses” and can be caused by numerous other factors.
2. The mixture of the unpurified fluids from the host with many contaminants and foreign elements is the exact opposite of purification and isolation.

AnP again:

On and on it goes. In the entire history of virology, they've never truly isolated/purified a virus. Dr. Tom Cowan describes virology's "cell culture isolation" as though someone wanted to get a corkscrew out of his kitchen utensil drawer. So he doesn't just open the drawer and root around for the corkscrew, but takes the entire drawer out, goes over to a large box full of utensils and kitchen appliances, of all sorts, then dumps the drawer into the box, shakes it all up, then adds non-kitchen items, and only then tries to sort through the resulting mess for the corkscrew!

Friends, we're about to be inundated with demands for mask-wearing, lockdowns, forced vaccinations, and the Dear Lord God knows what else. Perhaps they hope it will distract us from the coming starvation, inflation, and civilizational collapse. (They just don't want anyone noticing the deaths of a few billion people.) As I have written many times, this is our last summer of freedom (barring some titanic changes), so take the remaining opportunities to learn what you can while you can.

An Préachan

Covid Is a Ponzi Scheme Racket Run by Big Pharma/Big Government Players

 A Chairse, Friends, Amici,

A friend commenting to me on the current situation, wrote that "we are stuck forever with a mutation virus that no one can kill. God help us."

I wrote back that God won't. Why should He? There's no virus, mutating or otherwise; I've become convinced of this because of the evidence – let me repeat that – I've become convinced because of the evidence, both current and historical, that there's no Covid virus – but I recognize for most it requires a conscious effort of "out-of-the-box thinking" before this idea gels because the 100-year-old story we've been fed since Pasteur's day is a narrative of "Germs, germs, germs!"

• We have been conditioned to fear "contagions". It's been bred into us; it's our programming.
  

What there is an absolute pandemic of in today's world, however, is humanity's inhumanity to man: we're constinually us screwing ourselves over ceaselessly, just like in the days of Noah and then later Nimrod. (And in just about every civilization recorded.) But this current mess can't go on forever. The doomsday signs are clear: We're about to drown ourselves in our own lies and bury ourselves alive in a new Tower of Babel.

It's the few insiders screwing over the mass of mere mortals to achieve power for money. Always money, at least, for money buys power for the weak (think "Bill Gates", the very definition of a putz, think "George Soros", a living caricature of the Emperor Palpatine).

1. Always money. They use our money to fund the insanity that they in turn make money from.
   
2. The virus spiel is a Ponzi scheme: it's about Big Pharma claiming cures for new and dangerous viruses galore that the CDC and the WHO announce every year or so to garner limitless wealth from us "suckers" (great American expression).
   
3. Bureaucratic chiefs of CDCs and Health Ministries around the world, and the WHO, play musical chairs with Big Pharma. True symbiosis.
   
4. And lowly hack virologists drones in turn get themselves soaked in grant money from government and Big Pharma, with Fauci & Co., a.k.a. the FDA, the CDC, NIAID, etc, being the middle-men.
   
5. And of course Global Warming is an exact parallel! It's how the system works and what a "World Government" would look like.

That's it in a nutshell, my friends. We're all like rats chasing each other in a spinning exercise wheel.

For example: the money and research hours that monkey-brained cretin 'Jaws' Fauci (whoops, I've just defamed our Simian brethren!), his Deep-State orangutans (apologies to the esteemed Dr. Zaius) and the equally prosimian-brained lab-coated Chinese and American bio-techs cranking out microscopic Frankensteins wasted our tax dollars on no virus. They have probably made an armada of bio-chemical weapons galore, that's true, for future use on us (of course; see my article on the upcoming sallpox resurrection), but not viruses. These Covid "vaccines" definitely load us up with nanotechnology – this is not debatable now because more and more labs are filming the evidence! (I've seen the films; I saw one of the sci-fi multi-legged bugger moving about!) So, what's that for? Making us into the Borg?

Covid itself is caused by no virus. The various illnesses under the umbrella term "Covid" are caused ultimately by us, ourselves, in our own bodies via living off of modern "processed foods" as we do; "foods" that starve our bodies of nutrients. (We've known this for years: author Michael Pollan published a book tiled "In Defense of Food" back in 2009, for example. Iowa-born Gastroenterologist Walter L. Voegtlin first popularized the paleo diet in the 1970s, for Heaven's sake.) Our modern food makes us ill. It fills our bellies yet starves our cells. But more directly, more immediately – outside of any biological component to the over-all disease, i.e. a possible parasitical infection that Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine deal with – "Covid" is caused by two powerful weapons. The first of these is the new and powerful EMFs (electromotive forces) and EMPs (electromagnetic forces), such as 5G, that we poison ourselves with. The second, believe it or not, is the new fad of using bio-fuel

Wuhan, 5G and Bio-fuels

Wuhan was the first city in the world to be completely wired for 5G. The system went active there in that most polluted of towns in September, 2019. Covid appeared soon after. Amazingly enough, Wuhan also makes heavy use of bio-fuels, which globally are made from corn, soy, canola, even hardwood trees – all of which are heavily dosed in Roundup – a globally wide used weed and grass killer. The Roundup is generally on our food, for despite efforts to clean it, bits of it remain. (You know how everyone is told to wash the veggies they bring home" Indeed.) And Roundup and its fellow chemicals certainly get processed into the fuel, made as that is from crops in no way meant for the table, but rather industrial use, thus it is not subject to thorough cleaning. Therefore it (and other agricultural chemicals) get into the atmosphere when the fuel is burned in factories and cars.

• So, guess what? This isn't a new thing. We're repeating the same idiocy we did "back in the day" when we sprayed fruits with a bug poison using arsenic, and then by WWII, exchanging the arsenic with DDT. They even sprayed DDT on people! (On kids playing in the streets and on the beaches.) When the arsenic spray started in the U.S. in the later 19th century, that's when Polio began to occur widely. It was called 'Poliomyelitis' after similar historical illnesses, one clinically described in 1789. It seems to have been rare, however, until the arsenic spray. When DDT came in, the Polio changed slightly, suggesting strongly that DDT closely served as an agent of the disease. But that wasn't a politically popular idea at the time so it was hushed up. When DDT ceased to be used after the world finally learned it is a pretty deadly poison (thanks to the book "Silent Spring"), of course Polio vanished.
  
• And of course the virological mountebanks of the time immediately proclaimed to the Heavens: "The vaccine! The Salk vaccine stopped Polio!" An amazing coincidence. To the present, this polio vaccine "narrative" is a major reason vaccines are believed to be helpful to humanity. Today, India is said to be a perfect example of the global importance and worth and value of vaccines because the Polio vaccine eradicated Polio from the Subcontinent. Ahem, well, what you won't find proclaimed to the Heavens is the fact that India today is afflicted with a wide-spread illness called Acute Flaccid Paralysis, and just coincidentally, just by pure happenstance, golly-gee, "AFP" is said to be "clinically indistinguishable from Polio." Image that. "Clinically indistinguishable from Polio"! Yeah, right.
  

Bio-fuel

In his book The Contagion Myth, Dr. Tom Cowan describes the researches of Stephanie Seneff, PhD, who has demonstrated that the quote: "...early epicenters of Covid-19 correspond with areas of high air pollution – Wuhan, China; the Tristate region (New York, New Jersey, Connecticut) – northern Italy; Spain; and Jefferson Parish, Louisiana – and particularly with the use of biodiesel. She notes a Harvard Institute for Public Health study that found a strong correlation between exposure to particulate air pollution and Covid deaths. The researchers found that an increase of only one microgram per cubic meter in fine particulate matter was associated with a 15 percent increase in the Covid-19 fatality rate. It bears repeating that atmospheric dust (that is, pollution) can exacerbate the effects of EMF." (page 101)

My friends, Dr. Cowan goes into detail listing Seneff's findings corroborating the connection between bio-fuel use and Covid, all over the world, and how Europe imports Roundup-doused soy from Argentina. (Specifically, that's a GMO crop of soy that has Roundup bred in it!) And: "The Chinese produce biodiesel from canola (rapeseed), which is highly sprayed with Roundup, much of which grows along the Yangtze River, which cuts through Wuhan." (page 102)

Imagine that.

And he has a slew of other examples, as well. Example after another after another. One should really read the book.

1. As for me, the past year has been a true "learning curve". I could go on and on and on and on.
   
2. Even the story of Edward Jenner eradicating smallpox from England is a lie. They had their biggest outbreaks of that disease in their history after the smallpox vaccine of the day was mandated by Parliament in the mid-1800s. (Twice! Once in the 1840s and again in the 1850s.)
   
3. Smallpox only slowly went away as cities developed extensive sanitation, toilet "water closets" put into use, and when horses ceased to fill the street with their poo and pee.
   
4. Vaccination was quietly eased off on as public policy as numerous anti-vax societies and associations sprang up. Whether The National Anti-Vaccination League of Great Britain still exists, I don't know.
   
5. I tried to find out but ANY internet search reveals a titanic septic tank of official bigshots denying any and all "Anti-Vax" comments or ideas or persons to be anything but evil crazies. It's a hornets' nest, asking anti-vax questions. It's insane. It's a propaganda battleship trying to sink a sampan. And to REALLY muddy the waters, they mix in autism. A cacophony of fevered propaganda spouts and spews and erupts and flows like Vesuvius and Mt. Etna combined on a bad day.

However, historically one English city, Leicester, rejected vaccination in favor of sanitation. Smallpox was soon gone. Contemporary to that, the public health history of Cleveland, Ohio, mirrors the Leicester story exactly. You can find articles about that on the internet, but of course they all say the city fathers were crazy and only the vaccine saved England (or Cleveland). Yeah? Right.

READ this very closely:

And I just bet that unless you-all happen to be crime history specialists, you don't know that "Jack the Ripper" kept ripping on long after he supposedly stopped. This is true. The police got the newspapers to just stop reporting it. Honestly, this is true. They thought it imperative to stop the city-wide panic. Without his audience, "Jack" slowly wound down; maybe he just died of old age?

Folks, you've been lied to again, and again, and again, and again. It just never stops. The lies are constant.

Time to demand the lies stop. Before, indeed, we allow them to do what they so desperately want to do – turn us into the Borg.

An Préachán

Lanka has proved the sequencing of the Covid genome was a fraud

 Friends,

This is perhaps my most important email.

As the world slides into Totalitarianism, led by Austria and Australia, and closely backed by many other countries and some American states – unless we the people truly rise up and put a stop to it, something not impossible as such revolutions often result when some otherwise insignificant Army major or police captain suddenly turns on their government, as happened at the end of the Soviet government in Russia – but as we slide into a very grim future dictated as much by eugenics and bio-terrorism as was done in Nazi Germany, Stefan Lanka has shown that the sequencing of the Covid genome, and indeed, the whole of virology, is a fraud.

How? What exactly did Lanka do? (Besides think for himself, that is?) This is so important that I took the time to transcribe a good bit of an October 23 interview with Dr. Tom Cowan where Dr. Cowan explains what Lanka did. I knew, and reported here, that he and Dr. Andrew Kaufman were supporting Dr. Stefan Lanka (formally a brilliant virologist but he tossed the "virologist" title in disgust some time ago) in Lanka's experiments to prove just this: the genome sequencing of the Covid vaccine was faked.

Here's the transcription. South African "Jerm" of "Jerm Warfare" was the interviewer. You can find the whole interview here. 

The excerpt:

(11:35 minutes in; Dr. Tom Cowan speaking)

When you ask medical doctors [how they know a virus is causing a disease], this is what they say: You take a person who is sick, or 100 people or a 1,000 people, they all have the same symptoms, like measles, chickenpox, or supposedly Covid, or mumps, or the flu – any quote "viral disease" – and you look through any biological fluid they have, blood, urine, feces, snot, eye fluid, any fluid, and you have to really listen to this. There's not one published study in world medical literature of any pathogenic – that is, a disease-causing virus –  being found in any biological fluid from any sick person, ever. (12:28) [Jerm says, "None?"] Dr. Cowan says: None!

...(12:35) Now, you may agree or not agree with that, but let me tell you the people who do agree [with the statement] "There is not one published study of any virus that supposedly causes disease being found in any fluid of any sick person." So, in writing now to 120 different health authorities like the CDC, the FDA, NIH, and South African Ministry of Health, they've all been asked, "Do you have any published paper of SARS-CoV-2 or any pathogenic virus being found in the bodily fluid of any sick person?" They said no. No! We've asked the authors of the six leading papers that were the six original papers saying that SARS-CoV-2, that's the name of the virus, is the cause of Covid, that's the disease, and the papers were titled "The Isolation and Characterization of SARS-CoV-2". "Isolation" means they found the virus, and we asked them, did you find the virus in any bodily fluid of any sick person? And they all said, "No, we did not attempt to do that." (14:00)  

Now, there's another person; so, the health authorities said I'm right, the authors of the six leading papers on SARS-CoV-2 said I was right, and then I was asked to give a talk about what I usually say to a group of world-wide activists and lawyers, you know, the intelligentsia of the freedom movement. Right? And they're not happy with what I'm saying. So they invited a couple of virologists, including a Chinese guy who is 20 years senior virologist at the Wuhan Center for Disease Control, Institute of Virology, and then 20 years at Yale University, senior pathologist and head of their Virology Laboratory. Right? 40 years. You would think this guy knows something about virology, right? He was there to say, "Tom is crazy." So, I did my thing and I said, "Is there any published case of a SARS-CoV-2 being found in the fluid of any person who is sick with Covid?" Answer: "No."

        "Why not?"

"There's not enough virus to see."

So, I was with Andy then [Dr Andrew Kaufman], and Andy had the presence of mind to say, "What about if you mix ten people's sputum together, would there then be enough virus to see?" He said "No." What about 100 people? "What about 100 people? You mix the 100 people – all of whom you say have Covid, their fluid – would there then be virus to see?" He said, "No". "What about 1000 people?" He said, "No." What about 10,000 people?" He said, quote, "There's not enough virus to see." And then he wouldn't answer any more. (16:04)

So anybody who thinks that you can find a virus in any fluid of any sick person, is just clearly and absolutely mistaken because that's never been done. Now, the question then, is that's how you should do it. You get a bunch of people who's sick and use a very specific technique – this is not a technical problem – you take that sputum, you macerate it (like put it in a blender), filter it, centrifuge it, get a band, you suck the band out, the only thing in the band is these particles the size and consistency of a virus, they have a protein coat, they have a genetic interior, you characterize it, and that is called "isolation" and finding the virus: that has never been done. So how do they do it? Why are there 2,000 to 10,000 papers called the isolation of the measles virus, the mumps virus, chickenpox, SARS-CoV-2, MERS, HIV? What do they do? Why are they writing a paper saying they found the virus? Here's what they did. And it started in 1954 when they realized they couldn't find the virus in any fluid of any sick person. (17:33); [This is where Tom discusses "Cell Culture Isolation" and John Franklin Enders, who won the 1954 Nobel for Medicine/Physiology, etc.]

(17:33) So, a guy named John Enders, he took snot from somebody with measles, he filtered it, which is not isolation, right? It's like making coffee. You grind it, you filter it, and you have coffee, which has lots of things in it. Then he put that with milk, then he mixed that with horse serum, bovine embryonic fluid, and fetal calf serum. And then he spread that on monkey kidney cells. And nothing happened. Then he took away the nutrients from the cells that were growing. He starved them, and nothing happened. And then he added antibiotics that are specifically toxic to kidney cells. And then the kidney cells broke down into a million pieces. And he said, "That proves there was a virus." (18:33)

And the particles it broke down in, he said, those are the measles virus. Now, here's what's interesting. He did the same experiment with the horse serum, the calf serum, you know, starved it on antibiotics, milk, etc. But the second time he didn't add anything from anybody with measles. Right, you with me? [Jerm, "Yeah."] And you know what happened? It broke down in exactly the same way. He said, quote: "The results were indistinguishable." Which means, it had nothing to do with measles, because there was nothing from the measles person in there. It was because he poisoned and starved the monkey kidney cells, or the horse serum, or something, broke down. And when tissue dies, it forms these little particles which we've known about for 80 years, which look like what are called viruses. (19:50)  [N.B. These vesicles are usually called "exosomes", I believe, and they're known to be indistinguishable from viruses. See below.]

...

(20:30) Now Stefan, Andy and I – Stefan (Stefan Lanka) was a virologist – and he reproduced this study. We helped support and fund it, and we did the whole thing all over again. We took cells, and we grew them and they were fine. And then we added calf serum, and they were fine. And then we added a little bit of antibiotics, and they were fine. And then we took away the nutrients, exactly like all of the isolation experiments, and then we added the same antibiotics that they had to all the isolation experiments, and the tissue broke down – proving it was a virus. But there was no virus anywhere in there. There was just normal tissue, fetal calf serum, antibiotics: take away the nutrients, breaks down. That is the proof that a virus exists. It's called the cytopathic effect. Means 'cells killing'. If they see the cells die, they say that proves its a virus. And we've proved that the cell killing comes because we starve and poison the tissue. There's no virus involved at all. And there we go. That's the whole story right there. (22:00)

(22:02) And so every analysis, every genome, every variant, is based on the breakdown of the tissue, [in] which there's no virus. And then by the way, so we had no virus, we added some RNA from yeast, and then we sequenced the entire SARS-CoV-2 genome. Which was never in there because there was nothing from anybody with Covid or anything. So we literally sequenced the genome just by adding RNA from yeast, which has no virus in it. Proving that the sequencing of the genome is a complete fraud. (22:47)

AnP again:

Nota Benes:

1. Stefan Lanka's recreation of the Covid genome by way of Enders experiments and the addition of a little yeast has to be the most outrageous revelation in medical (AND politcal) history. We MUST spread this news to as many as possible in order to bring and end of this madness. This has to stop, NOW.
   
2. Stefan Lanka's repeating the experiments of John Franklin Enders, both the original experiments and the "control" experiment – the one without Covid – should be itself put an end to the Covid hoax. Enders' "cell culture isolation" is ridiculous, manifestly so, but it has been how viruses have been "identified and characterized" since 1954. No. Enough. Just stop this. We must demand an end to this virology merry-go-round. We've been defrauded or 70-plus years. Now to the point of losing our liberties and our rights. No. Enough. (N.B. Enders' isolation is called "cell culture isolation" and the other one Dr. Cowan explained in depth is call "ultracentrifugation".)
3. Important to note: John Franklin Enders at least had the courage to run a "control group" experiment, and to actually report on it. This is a big mark in his honor. In publications in both 1954 and 1957, Enders clearly said his new method was hardly perfect, and more needed to be done. The unscrupulous bottom-feeders of virology have never really tried to match Enders' control group record. They almost never run a control group.
   
4. Remember that Enders' 1954 experiment resulted because virologists could not find viruses in the first place. After Louis Pasteur came up with the idea of viruses out of his imagination, basing the idea on bacteria, only much smaller, scientists tried various means to filter them and characterize them, without much success. Then in mid-1930s, the electron microscope came online, and scientists immediately used it to find viruses, only they couldn't. They found tiny vesicles, protein coated, near or with decaying or dying or dead tissue, and assumed these were viruses, but the variety of these particles (most are exosomes, etc.) gave them pause, as did the electron microscope's inability to observe any living matter at all: That made it useless to prove viruses and how they were supposed to behave. (A virus supposedly invades your body, attacks your cells, rapes them, impregnates them with its own defective DNA, and reproduces itself so lustily it explodes the cell! This has NEVER been seen to happen. It is a supposition.
   
5. Remember that exosomes look just like viruses. In his short work titled: Breaking the Spell The Scientific Evidence for Ending the Covid Delusion, Dr Cowan relates the following paper by Giannessi F, Aiello A, Franchi F, et al., i.e.: The role of extracellular vesicles as allies of HIV, HCV and SARS viruses. Viruses, 2020; 12(5):571. doi: 10.3390/v12050571). From that paper, Dr. Cowan quotes: "The remarkable resemblance between EVs [extracellular vesicles] and viruses has caused quite a few problems in the studies focused on the analysis of EVs released during viral infections.... However, to date, a reliable method that can actually guarantee a complete separation does not exist." "A reliable method...does not exist." Translated, that means, "We're clueless." (This new book has a chapter on exosomes with many academic references.)
   
6. Certainly, my friends, the testimony of the Chinese virologist with 40 years experience should most definitely be "Game Over" for the Covid fraud all by itself. Sputum is "saliva and mucus coughed up from the respiratory tract, typically as a result of infection or other disease " (online definition) and surely counts as relevant body fluid. Being unable to find a virus from the sputum of 10,000 people is absurd. SARS-CoV-2 is supposedly is highly infectious, blankets the planet, spreads aggressively everywhere by coughs and even breathing via body fluid droplets, soaks itself into environments of all kinds, and yet in the sputum of 10,000 (or obviously any greater number) of people, it cannot be "seen", no matter what? No, my friends, no, no; this is the definition of male bovine excrement. Drive this clown out of the room with brooms and mops and chase him, and just about every other virologist, down the street and out of town. By his obstinate and self-serving comments, he has shown – what with his high status in virology – that virology is a crap science. It was founded by a fraudster, Pasteur, and is itself a fraud. Alas, a world-wide Frankenstein-level fraud. Virology exists in a symbiotic relationship with Big Pharma: it produces viruses for Big Pharma to make money off of, and in return is fed big bucks to keep itself in existence. It's a parasite.
7. Simple query: If Covid is so small that 10,000 people can't cough up enough of it, why are we having to wear masks and "practice social distancing"? Hmmm?
   
8. Some time ago, Canadian lady also wrote Health Departments around the world using the Freedom of Information act, with the same results Dr. Tom mentioned. (Reported in LifeSiteNews.) Individuals in various countries have written their own heath departments, as well, with everywhere the same result: no actual Covid virus vesicles are in their possession. That's because the infernal thing doesn't exist. It's infected tens of millions and killed millions, and been researched like nothing else, but golly-gee, we just can't find it. Yeah, right.
   
9. Clearly, the word "isolation", like "inconceivable" as used by Vizzinni in The Princess Bride, "doesn't mean what you think it means." (Sometimes "purified" is substituted now in virology. Whatever. )
10. Many will ask, "If SARS-CoV-2 does not exist, what is killing people?" The answer is that despite fact the annual flu disappeared in 2020/2021, the world mortality rate (despite a few short spikes here and here, like NYC) did not rise; in fact, it was bit lower than average. It has, however, begun to rise very noticeably in 2021. Now, what do we have circulating around the world in 2021 that we didn't have in 2020? Think about it.

Pass this along, please.

An Préachán

Stefan Lanka's court case

 A Chairde,

As promised yesterday, more on the German court case disproving measles cause illness. This passage is from the The Contagion Myth, by Dr. Tom Cowan. He discusses German scientist Stefan Lanka's court case about the Measles virus.

Excerpt:

One disease blamed for Native American death was measles, considered to be a viral disease. But on February 16, 2016, the Federal Supreme Court of Germany (BGH) made a historic ruling: there is no evidence for the existence of a measles virus. The case grew out of a challenge by German biologist Stefan Lanka, who offered a sum of one hundred thousand Euros to anyone who could supply proof that the measles virus existed. A young doctor, David Bardens, took up the challenge, providing Lanka with six studies as proof that the measles virus did indeed exist. When Lanka claimed that these studies did not meet the evidence needed to claim the prize, Bardens took him to court. The (lower) court sided with Bardens and ordered payment of the prize.

But Lanka took the case to the Supreme Court, where the judge decided in his favor and ordered the plaintiff to bear all procedural costs. Lanka was able to show that the six studies misinterpreted "ordinary constituents of cell" as part of the suspected measles virus.

According to Lanka, decades of consensus-building processes have created a model of a measles virus that doesn't actually exist: "To this day, an actual structure that corresponds to this model has been found neither in a human, nor in an animal. With the results of the genetic tests, all thesis of existence of measles virus has been scientifically disproved."

The existence of a contagious measles virus justified the development of the measles vaccine, which has earned the pharmaceutical industry billions of dollars over a forty-year period. But if such a microorganism does not exist, said Lanka, "This raises the question of what was actually injected into millions of German citizens over the past decade. According to the judgment by the Supreme Court, it may not have been a vaccine against measles."

But what about measles parties? What about successful attempts by parents to infect their  children with the common childhood diseases like measles, chick pox, and mumps? And what about sexually transmitted disease (STD) like syphilis -- said to be a disease that the Europeans contracted from the Native Americans? The mystery of childhood illnesses and sexually transmitted diseases will be addressed in chapter 7.

An P again: Definitely, Dr. Cowan's book is one that needs to be read. I highly recommend it.

I'll make a couple of notes:

1. First, Stefan Lanka is working on a long, involved experiment, one definitely involving a control group (as many Covid experiments didn't), that will finally and scientifically prove viruses don't cause disease. As I understand it, he's about 2/3s of the way through this effort. Lanka started out as a virologist but no longer calls himself that. Some important virologists in past decade or so have confessed their profession is in deep trouble, on many levels, and Lanka often speaks of those problems. There were problems with Pasteur and Koch 100 years ago, after all. They had fierce critics, who, though long forgotten, are being read again.
2. Secondly, note Lanka's phrase "decades of consensus-building processes". The truth is, most "scientists" today are either technicians or hacks, "hacks" meaning anyone, politician, artist, scientist, whatever, who are just in it for the retirement benefits. People "go into science" for a number of reasons, but it can be a very boring, tedious field. I've personally known two scientists in genetics, who, bored out of their wits, strove to keep their jobs. One had a family and no spouse and so kept her job, the other quit and went into something quite different. My point is: when the talk of "scientists" and "decades of consensus-building" surface, we're not necessarily talking about real scientists. Consider some truly famous scientists: Einstein, first and foremost, but also Richard Feynman and Kary Mullis. Or Robert Oppenheimer. Or the man I often refer to who thought up plate tectonics, Alfred Wegener. Wegener spent a great deal of time out in the field. (He actually died in the field, in Greenland in 1930, trying to bring help to others.) One could go on. In fact, Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch must be included in my list. They, too, went against the establishment of their days, and if time proves them wrong, they nonetheless stand out. My point is these guys are very different from the usual faceless, "hack" "scientist" navigating the warren of academia or big corporations and who are building "decades of consensus".
   

So what to call them? Technicians. Techs  are not scientists. I suspect there is no such thing as a computer scientist, for by definition they're technicians. Same thing with most medical doctors: "body techs", you might say. Certainly ANY review of the great scientists of the past will demonstrate that they weren't the go-along-to-get-along type of guys. They often went against the grain. Pasteur and Koch as well as Mullis and Feynman. Einstein, certainly. Fought against the establishment of their days. So often did that happen in science history that it became a sort of cliché in novels and movies.

Maybe Stefan Lanka is such a one. Only time will tell.

But remember the name. Stefan Lanka.

All the best,

An Préachán

Did European viruses lay waste to North American Indians? Some considerations

 A Chairde,

As I keep saying, there's always a "Minority Report", always another side to any coin. We've been told for hundreds of years that European diseases wiped out Native Americans. How much truth is there to that claim? For example, consider the upper-midwest Mandan tribe. One a populous and successful farming tribe, the story is that in 1781 an epidemic decimated the Mandan villages. It was smallpox. It had broken out in Mexico City some decades before slowly traveled north. It badly affected settled populations, like the Mandan.

Some preliminary observations:

1. Smallpox has a record of breaking out in large population centers, such as Mexico City and many cities in Europe and elsewhere. It was less known among sparsely settled populations. (Same was true with the Medieval Black Death, of course, and contagious diseases in general.)
   
2. But the Mandan were successful agriculturalists living in large villages. Native North Americans sometimes developed large urban populations like Cahokia, the mounds of which stand across the Mississippi from St. Louis. Cahokia rivaled in sized some of the great cities of Meso-America and medieval Europe, during its greatest era.
3. But often these "cities" became what are called "population sinks". The more people crowded into these centers, the quicker they caught contagions and died. Whether European or America, they had no specific hygienic facilities. The necessity for these was not understood after the fall of the Roman Empire. Disease flourished. This is true in Medieval and early modern European cities as well as Native American ones.
   
4. This was very true of English cities in the 19th century. Despite the fame of Edward Jenner and his smallpox vaccine (1796), smallpox remained a plague in England for a long lifetime. Contrary to the Jenner legend, and despite of or because of England's vaccination laws, between 1871 and 1880, 57,016 smallpox deaths occurred in Britain. 57,016 people in nine years, mind you, with a famous vaccine being required by law. Something major changed, however, for between 1911 and 1920, only 110 English deaths occurred from smallpox. By that time, vaccination had evaporated as a national policy. But for years, vaccination had been national policy, for the British government made Smallpox vaccination a requirement in 1853, with the Compulsory Vaccination Act, with a more stringent version in 1867. (Does this sound familiar to anyone reading this today?) A Dr. Hadwen wrote: "After about 40 years of compulsory vaccination, Britain suffered the worst smallpox epidemic in its entire history, with the highest death rate in history."
5. What vaccine brought smallpox to an end? No vaccine at all. Rather, sanitation policies brought smallpox to an end. City reformers in Leicester set the example: they rejected vaccination in favor of sanitation. Yes, friends, this is true. Sanitation. I've always said that the invention and use of soap saved more human lives than any other thing in all history. With sewers and indoor plumbing and a ban on vaccination, smallpox disappeared from Leicester, and eventually from England. The same thing happened in Cleveland (of all places!). A Dr. Friedrich, in charge of the Health Board of Cleveland, abolished vaccination "absolutely" and promoted sanitation. Smallpox vanished. (As reported by a Dr. John Hodge in 1902.) Clearly, sanitation played the major role in ending Smallpox.
   
6. The Mandan didn't know this. The contagion arrived and killed a majority of them. Those who survived to moved north and put up two new villages and associated with a confederate tribe. Living as they had traditionally lived, the Mandan thus recuperated and slowly restored their population until 1837. In that year, another smallpox plague almost entirely wiped them out, leaving only 125 people. (They still survive today, amazingly, with a little over a thousand people registered officially as having some Mandan ancestry, while a little less than 400 claim to be full-bloods.)
   

So, with all that a necessary background, consider what this passage from the The Contagion Myth, by Dr. Tom Cowan, reveals. He discusses other possible causes of mass Native American death.

(Starting at page 61.)

In 1617-1608, just prior to the arrival of the Mayflower, a mysterious epidemic wiped out up to 90 percent of the Indian population along the Massachusetts coast. History books blame the epidemic on smallpox, but a recent analysis has concluded that it may have been a disease called leptospirosis. Even today, leptospirosis kills almost sixty thousand people per year.

Leptospirosis is a blood infection similar to malaria, associated with various forms of spirochaete bacteria. Other forms of spirochete parasites characterize syphilis, yaws, and Lyme disease. Humans encounter these spirochetes through animal urine or water and soil contaminated with animal urine coming into contact with the eyes, mouth, nose, or cuts. The disease is associated with poor sanitation. Both wild and domestic animals can transmit leptospirosis through their urine and other fluids; rodents are the most common vector, and the beaver is a rodent. [Image: Native Americans trade beaver skins with European colonists for liquor and other times that made them vulnerable to disease.]

One important factor omitted from discussions about Native American diseases is the disruption of the salt trade. The first European explorers in the New World did not come to the East Coast but to Florida and the southeastern part of the North America. During the 1540s, eighty years before Plymouth Rock, the explorer Hernando de Soto led the first European expedition deep into the territory of the modern-day United States. They traversed Florida, Georgia, Alabama, and possibly Arkansas, and they saw the Mississippi River.

Some anthropologists have insisted that the Native Americans did not consume salt, but de Soto received "an abundance of good salt" as a gift from the Native Americans, and he observed the production and trade of salt in the southeastern part of the country. In the lower Mississippi Valley, he met traveling Native American merchants selling salt. According to de Soto records, lack of salt could lead to a most unfortunate death.

[And excerpt is included here from de Soto's records describing the most horrible deaths resulting from salt paucity in the native diet.]

The most important sources of salt were the salt springs that dotted northwestern Louisiana, western Arkansas, and the Ohio River Valley. Archeological remains in these areas indicate that the Native Americans evaporated the brine in shallow clay salt pans, most likely by adding hot rocks to the brackish water. They also retrieved salt from the ashes of certain plants and from salt-impregnated sand; they sometimes gathered rock salt. Well-defined salt trails allowed the transport of salt to the east. Coastal Native Americans generally got their salt through trade rather than the evaporation of seawater, as wood for making fire is sparse near ocean beaches, and the moist sea air is unconducive to evaporation.

Salt traders did not belong to any tribal group but traveled alone from tribe to tribe carrying baskets of salt gathered from salt lakes, along with other goods. As Native American cultural life crumbled in the face of the European invasion, the salt trade would have been an early victim of this disruption. Salt is critical for protection against parasites. We need the chloride in the salt to make hydrochloric acid; without salt the stomach will not be sufficiently acidic to kill parasites.

The point is that the so-called "infectious" diseases that caused so much suffering did not arrive until after a period of disruption and nutritional decline; and fear and despair almost certain played a role. When disease broke out in a village, the afflicted often found themselves abandoned by those still healthy, so they had no one to care for them. Unable to get water for themselves, they typically died of thirst. This may explain why the death rates during outbreaks were so much higher for the Native Americans (typically 90 percent) than for Europeans (typically 30 percent).

One disease blamed for Native American death was measles, considered to be a viral disease. But on February 16, 2016, the Federal Supreme Court of Germany (BGH) made a historic ruling: there is no evidence for the existence of a measles virus.

An P again: See a subsequent email discussing this measles court case.

 

How Big Pharma calculates their testing, which of course is fraudulent

 Hi all,

I came across Dr. Tom Cowan talking about this here at bitchute.  

22:16 minutes in:

You have to read the fine print to see what they did. They have sophisticated – and not so sophisticated, ways of reporting data. For instance, they always use risk reduction instead of absolute numbers, and that guarantees numbers like 94 percent efficiency. Which is complete nonsense. What I mean by that is, if you did 100 people in the medicine group and 100 in the control group, and then for whatever symptom or outcome you're looking for, if 2 of the people in the control group got the disease or the symptoms, and 1 in the injection or medicine group got the symptoms-disease, most people would say that's a difference of between 2 percent and 1 percent; which is a 1 percent improvement. But they (Big Pharma) say that's a 33 percent improvement, because 1 plus 2 is 3, and 2 is 66 percent of 3, and one is 33 percent of 3, and so there's a difference of a 33 percent improvement. So obviously that's a 33 percent improvement. That's how they get to the 94 percent efficiency numbers. Most, all most all, medicine trials are reported that way these days because they don't want to tell you the actual numbers.

(23:00) And then when it comes to the side affects, they allow there was a .4 percent in the placebo and whatever, a .6 percent in the vaccine group, so that's only a difference of .2 percent, which would be a difference maybe of 80 percent if they did it the same way (as noted above). So they use absolute numbers with the side-effects, and relative risk with the benefit, so the whole thing is complete nonsense. They also do things like, they only look at symptoms two weeks out, after two weeks, knowing most of the symptoms will be in the first two weeks, and then there's a sort of recovery period, and so they know you'll have fewer symptoms starting at two weeks because of what they put in the injection and (it) had nothing to do with any prevention or treatment. (23:57) 

Interesting, isn't it? It's called "cooking the books" or it is also known as fraud. But they get away with it.

An P

Now I finally know how they "isolate" the Covid-19 genome. It is absurd

Amici,

Old Saying: If you love law and sausage, don't look into how they are made.

There's a lot of Covid news out this week, much of it about the vaccines, with the Johnson&Johnson vaccine being stopped while "further studies are made". But that's not why I am writing. I've been looking for some time into how SARS-CoV-2 was "isolated" so they knew what sort of monster they had to deal with, and why the lockdowns and the endless vaccines were needed to combat it. But the result is like the old saying about law and sausage. It's all a fraud and a con. Therefore, I'm writing this essay to explain how the Covid Sausage is made.

I keep poking around in the Covid literature, sort of a grey-bearded Advocatus Diaboli, always searching out "the Minority Report" just to be contrary, because, after all, there's always a Minority Report. Always. Besides, the "big megaphones" control the media and we usually get only the propaganda we're supposed to hear. We know what they want us to know, and in the 20th century, the result was governments telling us what they wanted us to hear resulted in them killing over 100 million of their own citizens. We need to remember that. Especially as our governments today seem to be turning into true authoritarian states.

Yet it is easy to do a bit of searching and discover a completely different narrative than the official "party line". Also, I loathe the way the "big megaphones" have instilled such fear into people. We live in a different world now than it was a year and a half ago. Right now, it seems, the U.S. government is letting big corporations create vaccine passports. True fear. I see it in the way people behave; I see it in their faces – what I can see of their faces behind the masks. (Masks! Didn't anyone take high school biology? Breathing your own carbon dioxide is going to make yourself sick. Or ever wonder why states and countries with the strictest mask mandates have the highest sickness and mortality rates? This should not be "rocket science".) Yet contrary to this world-wide propaganda creating all the fear, a different "narrative" lies out there, my friends, an "undiscovered country" that is easily discovered. Searching as I do, I keep finding out all sorts of simply shocking, unbelievable fraud being perpetrated.

That's the reason we have a growing wave of people countering the Covid narrative. Doctors, scientists, lawyers, everyday folks. It is why we have the Great Barrington Declaration (https://gbdeclaration.org/). As time drags on, more sign on to it. The criticism of the whole Covid story is not going away. Whether one cares about such individual observations by experts, or (as with The Great Barrington Declaration) groups of people, we must recognize a Minority Report is collectively growing, and that something is going on in order to produce such severe criticism. It makes you realize why the famed lawyer Reiner Fuellmich is busy proceeding with his Nuremberg 2.0 lawsuit. 

More power to him.

As for myself, after a lot to digging, I've learned via a scientific paper done in Australia on just how they did the genome "isolation" of the Covid virus. The chief author of the paper is Leon Cally, and it was published back a year ago on March 9, 2020, and titled:  

The Isolation and Rapid Sharing of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, from the first patient diagnosed with Covid 19 in Australia
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32237278/

There is a lawsuit being developed there against the Aussie government's lockdown policies, and this paper is important evidence of the fraud.

• To say I was sickened by the fraud I found is an understatement.

The more I know about Covid research and, indeed, the more I know about the whole historical 'Germ Theory of Illness', the more I reject it. (Not completely, of course. But the learning  process taking some time.) Yet at least EVERYONE should know how they claim to "isolate" Covid, so you can draw your own conclusions. Just understanding how they "isolate" the Covid genome, by itself, should shock anyone out of believing any of the virus "narrative".

Review: The Virus Theory

• First, remember what viri (one of the plurals for 'virus') are supposed to be: a peculiar type of genetic material boxed in a protein cover. (In Covid's case, this is RNA wrapped in a protein cover.)
  
• They're peculiar indeed as apparently most scientists don't think viri are "alive" or could be classed as "organisms". They're a sort of undead parasite. (Yes, that's the theory: bacteria are actual living organisms; viruses are not. Historically, we treat viruses that prove particularly deadly, like Smallpox, with vaccines, and treat bacterial infections with antibiotics.)
  
• Viri go about through life – some of them not harmful, some harmful, à la bacteria. We have more bacteria cells in our bodies, possibly, than human cells, and altogether we have an amazing amount of cells. (The count comes to around 30 trillion. Yes, that's a lot.)
  
• But when viri are harmful viruses, they attack a host's cells: brutally attack, they mount, "rape" the cells (no better description) and "impregnate" them with their own faulty RNA/DNA, etc.
• After being violated, the raped cell then begins to produce new versions of the rapist virus, so much so the cell explodes, utterly destroyed. The undead virus' genetics take over the host cell, use it to reproduce itself, then blows it up; that's the theory.
  
• The newly generated viri of the exploded cell acquire a protein shell for each of themselves, then go off Frankenstein-like, to rape more of your cells and start the process over again.
  
• Now, remember, all this aggressive behavior is on the part of non-living organisms. This sounds insane, however, the theory is Darwinian, i.e. the Theory of Evolution teaches that life came from non-living things, and viri are sort of an in-between element in that developmental arc.
  
• Your immune system recognizes the foreign invader and tries to coat the virus with antibodies and render it inert.
  
• So the battle for your soul – er, cells – rages on and you are sick until the contest is decided, with you either alive or dead, depending.

Two Competing Theories of Nature

Perspective:

This virus tale belongs to the theory that Nature is ceaselessly competitive. It is "red in tooth and claw", animated solely by a brutal law of the jungle in which death and destruction are permanent. Darwin based his Evolution theory on this life-view: kill or be killed, fight ceaselessly to survive and succeed by leaving offspring, or fail. (A Saudi prince with dozens of concubines and hundreds of kids is a Darwinian hero.) In fact, evolution can only occur at times of great stress, Darwin taught, when survival is at stake.

This is opposite the theory of nature as being essentially cooperative and that life isn't a ceaseless consumption, but rather a ceaseless reinforcement, a harmonious symbiotic interdependence. Competition does exist, carnivorous prey on herbivores, and herbivores prey on plants, parasites of all kind prey on everyone, but it isn't the fulcrum of life. Interestingly, the harmonious theory would define life in the Garden of Eden; the competitive theory defines life of the cursed outside Eden. So this is, ultimately, a religious question.)

Louis Pasteur

Remember also this fighting-attacking eternal war Germ Theory of Illness was developed by Louis Pasteur, first with bacteria attacking you, and then when he couldn't account for all illnesses via bacteria, he thought up the idea of viruses. He (as it were) raped the Latin word for "poison" and made it his concubine for his idea that there existed a much smaller intruder than bacteria attacking your cells. This was his supposition. About four decades after Pasteur in 1895 went to the great Academic Review Board in the sky, scientists invented the electron microscope (which, remember, only sees dead, unmoving, things) and researchers found bits of genetic material detritus lying about diseased and dead flesh – a very much smaller version of what Pasteur had seen bacteria doing in his microscope – and they said, "Voila! Here are Pasteur's viri!"

• However, so far as I know, no one has actually seen viruses behave as insane rapists in real time. It is all supposition.
• Maybe Pasteur was right about the bacteria, or maybe he was only correct sometimes since we know how helpful many bacteria can be, Pasteur found a house on fire and assumed the firemen (the bacteria) were there to start the fire instead of putting it out! (Yes, every coin has two sides, Monsieur Louis.)
• This idea of Pasteur's was then (germ-like) replicated when the new technology (electron microscopes) came online: viruses were found –  but contra Pasteur's theory, perhaps they were not the cause of the illness, rather the unliving genetic detritus left over in the wake of the illness.
  
• This version viruses at least has the virtue of saving us from believing unliving bits of genome can cause such havoc, and also saves us from the ultimate point Germ Theory is making today: that we cannot survive in the biosphere we evolved in (or God set us in), without massive, continuous, and ever-expanding man-made chemical and genetic interference in our very beings.
  

The Australian Paper

Now, I was recently arguing these issues in a series of Comments at OnePeterFive, when someone who asserted he knew the science told me how stupid I was, that one does not "isolate" a virus like one "isolates" a bacteria, and that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has had its genome thoroughly and scientifically isolated. Genetic isolation, I was told, is FAR more secure and sure a procedure than the old methods using centrifuges, and all that. I responded with a bit of what I'm going to provide below, and they never wrote back.

So let me review two major points about the Australian paper and how they "isolated" the genome. (I am indebted to Dr. Tom Cowan for much of the following.)

1. On page three of the Aussie paper, the researchers note that when they looked through the cell culture they had cultivated from a sick Australian, they didn't see any spike protein. (BTW, they have to try to grow viri in cell cultures cooked up in the lab because A, viruses are so small it is hard to find enough of them to study, and B, they're pretty fragile, so the great invader/attacker of life seems a weakling, actually.)
2. They looked carefully where they thought the virus ought to be lurking, but no luck.
   
3. So the paper explains how they then added trypsin, which is a pancreatic enzyme whose function is to digest proteins, which is what the outer covering of a virus is supposedly made of. (Dr. Cowan actually read this from the paper, mind you.) So the outer coating of the virus was partially digested by the trypsin.
   
4. Cowan read that the "adding of Trypsin to the cell culture immediate improved the morphology of the virus." (The paper's words.) It was only then that they could see the spike proteins. (By 'morphology' they just mean the 'appearance' of the protein.)
   

Think about that for a moment.

Cowan says this would immediately make anyone think the only reason they could see the spike proteins is obviously because the trypsin disolved the coating, which would naturally leave little spikey things protruding out from the chewed on, half-wrecked membrane.

• Dr. Cowan says that this is like one having a box full of wooden shapes of all types, but you want a star, and there's no star in your box, so you get a saw and cut a few wooden circles into stars, and then say, "Hey, I found stars! The stars were there all along, and I just had to help it a bit."

This is fraudulent, of course. It is "gaming the system" and "weighting the dice." Cowan summed up: "The fact of the matter is there was no spike protein in the culture, and of course the whole culture is nonsense. If that's not the wackiest thing I've ever seen!" Ah, yes, but this was a MAJOR Australian scientific paper by the premier virologist in Oz, Leon Cally. It was also possibly the FIRST such paper and parade marshal for those that followed. As Cowan added, "I that's not the wackiest thing I've ever seen, well, then came the next section of the paper."

Viral Genetic Analysis; the next section

So now that they fraudulently "created" the spike protein that is the hallmark of Covid-19, they then went on to verify that they had the right coronavirus. This is in the section titled Viral Genetic Analysis.

The material (snot, etc.) received from a patient is "cultured" or grown in a lab mix of biological and other materials (sometimes antibacterials are included!) in order to produce enough virus to detect. When they think they have the mix right, they put it with monkey kidney cells, the standard material they use in testing the lethality of the virus. If nothing happens, they up the ante, starving the mixture or even radiating it, until the monkey kidney cells start to die from all the toxicity.

At this point, the cultured mix is then fed through screening devices hooked to a computer. The computer then searches for the Covid-19.

• To search for Covid, it has to have a template, a go-by, a paradigm. I can't think on its own, after all.

This in practice means the computer searches through 30-50 million or more base-pair nucleotides in the lab culture "brew" (that's what it is) for the 30,000 base pairs of RNA a Covid virus is supposed to have. Of course, the computer has a Covid template with which to search, and the result is, in effect, 100 monkeys typing out Hamlet on 100 typewriters, all of which just happen to be connected to a computer having the Hamlet template. As a new letter that fits the next template word of the drama is randomly typed (i.e. when a nucleotide is "discovered"), then the computer registers it, putting it in order according to the template, thus producing Hamlet. Or "recognizing" Covid! So of course the 30,000 Covid base-pairs get found.

• This is, of course, absurd. But it is what passes for "science" today.

FWIW, as I understand it, the researchers acquired the original template for the virus from the Chinese – remember when it was solemnly announced by Chinese researchers that it came from bats? The Chinese alleged that in the beginning. And the template quickly went around the world so researchers everywhere could test patients for Covid in the same manner; patients who, miraculously, just happen to turn out to have the same 30,000 RNA pieces as the template has. Also, central to this, oddly enough, the computers usually get a tiny, tiny fragment of their matching wrong, like .01 percent or so: this is a standard sort of tabulating computer error. But here's the kicker, and I hope you are sitting down: when this tabulating error happens, the researchers shout, "Aha! It's mutated! We've found a new Covid variant!"

As Homer Simpson would say, "Duh!"

• That's a short description of how Covid is "isolated".

 Summation

1. In short, we have no clue whether SARS-CoV-2 even exists.
2. Also, since we have many people who test positive for it but never have any symptoms, and then again many, many others who test positive who have light symptoms – whereas others become gravely ill or die – perhaps we therefore should conclude we're dealing with different actual infections? (Or we could conclude that our bad medical practice caused the deaths, such as overuse of ventilators, and those who refrained from treatment were sometimes wise not to; it is a possibility.
3. We could conclude that a wide-spread use of Vitamin D and a Lysosomotropic drug early on could have prevented most of the deaths. But Fauci and the WHO couldn't "think outside the box", as discussed here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/us-medical-expert-dr-fauci-fdas-woodcock-responsible-hundreds-thousands-american-deaths-smearing-hydroxy-video/
4. The "Spanish Flu" is now, I believe, generally recognized as consisting of various contagions, not just one – it spread so fast and so globally, remember – and also, over the past year or so, the flu seems to have vanished, and little is said of pneumonia. (In fact, there's a new joke: "What's the one good thing Covid did? It made the flu nonexistent.") They probably contribute to "Covid deaths" totals, but that definitely doesn't fit the narrative. (Pneumonia is the greatest killer of humans, dispatching the old and infirm, which sounds like what Covid is said to do.)
5. The early videos of people in Wuhan just collapsing in the streets has NEVER happened in outside China, so we were either conned by the CCP or they had a very different contagion. The cruise ships were perfect laboratories for the virus, but you notice how they're never mentioned? The facts they revealed didn't support "the narrative". About Wuhan (and China, in general) we know the standard, mainstream news narrative was definitely false.
6. Or another possibility, as is said SO very often: the PCR tests for Covid are as useless as the guy who invented PCR testing says it is for Covid. This is probably the most outrageous truth getting the least attention! It is fundamentally important to the whole discussion because if it is true, then the entire Covid story has to be rewritten.
7. Also, since the long-standing Lysosomotropic drugs (Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin) have such success with Covid (admitted now that Trump is gone), maybe what we collectively call "Covid" is in part caused by a parasite, since Lysosomotropic drugs work on those? Why conclude the villain is a virus? One reason is because the Germ Theory of Illness reigns supreme, of course. Standard medical people undergo an intense training, as is well known, but part of it could be compared to brainwashing, and those who question the orthodoxy are shunted off to "Kook-land".
   

Finally, we know from evidence such as I discussed above that one thing must necessarily be true: the "vaccines", whether traditional sorts or the new mRNA ones, can't possibly work. That's because the subject of their attention, what we call SARS-CoV-2 – even if it exists in some way – has never been "isolated" and thus the vaccines that are built upon a false "isolation" are necessarily wrong. Wrong, and possibly dangerous, and one doesn't even need to bring up conspiracy theories (which might prove conspiracy fact) that the vaccines are for sterilizing large swathes of people.

Smallpox note: The Smallpox vaccine was the first and greatest vaccine achievement, and nothing else comes close to it. Certainly not the polio vaccine, usually the runner-up (it is interesting that Jonas Salk gave it to humanity, though, and didn't patent it; these new vaccines are patented and you have patented material in your body, if you take them). Of the new Covid vaccines, we cannot ask, "What was the outcome of the Phase 1, 2, & 3 Trial?" Those fundamental, essential trials have not come about and the FDA has not given its certification; rather, emergency use was allowed for these new vaccines, on literally hundreds of millions of people, something forbidden by the Nuremberg Trials.

My point in this essay, however, is that whether the vaccines work or not or whether the Germ Theory is true (100 percent true or 50 percent true, etc.): we simply cannot expect much good to come from medical treatments on a disease vector we know so little about.

Bottom line: Whenever you read or hear someone say "We still don't know a lot about Covid" – haha, that's probably far truer than the commentator meant!

I don't know, of course, the whole truth. Will we ever find out? I don't know that, either. In fact, viruses might actually seem to be what they would look to be if you weren't yourself operating from Louis Pasteur's "template": i.e., avoiding his "red in tooth and claw" view and see viri as genetic detritus left over after some illness wreaked havoc on your cells, and not themselves the cause of the havoc.

It would take a paradigm shift in human thinking to even half switch to this belief, however, and although paradigm shifts have happened, one can never expect when they'll occur, because they occur so suddenly. Besides, from the looks of it, we're all about to be shunted off into George Orwell's 1984 dystopia.

I wonder how long I'll be allowed to write what I do, whether it is truth or fiction, or – as is so often the case – a good mix of both?

From the looks of it, we're all about to be shunted off into George Orwell's 1984 dystopia.

An Préachán

Viruses might actually seem to be what they would look to be if you weren't yourself operating from Louis Pasteur's "template": i.e., genetic detritus left over after some illness wreaked havoc on your cells, and not the cause of the havoc.

Ron