False Pope Creating a False Church because Good Catholics Will Not Stop Him

 Amici,

Whatever Jorge Mario Bergoglio is creating in Rome via his "Synod", now extended apparently a number of years (we'll never get rid of it! You KNOW it is "Vatican III") – whatever it is, it is not the Catholic Church.

How obvious is this? Just reading, even skimming, some of the stuff going on at that Synod strikes me as completely alien to EVERYTHING Catholic. So, clearly, the false pope is creating a false Church.

Can we be remotely surprised?

Yes, Bergoglio is creating a false Church via his "Synod on Synodality". And good men like Cardinals Burke, Müller, bishops such as Bishop Athanasius Schneider, and of course a host of Conservative Catholics (Fr. Gerald Murray and Robert Royal are exemplars) and Trad Catholics – too numerous to count, but Professor Peter Kwasniewski is an excellent example, are letting him do it.

They're letting Bergoglio get away with it because they insist he is a valid pope, and actually occupies the cathedra of St. Peter. As I've written a number of times, Bergoglio is painfully obviously not a pope, and has never acted like one, so therefore insisting he is a valid pope leads inevitably to cognitive dissonance. You'll go cross-eyed insisting this fool – and no, I'm not very nice to "Bergi" – is an actual pope. In fact, you'll lose your faith if you insist on maintaining the charade.

Video Tells All

Ever see see that video of Bergoglio nine years ago walking along a hallway, spying two young altar servers, one with his hands in the classic prayer position? Bergoglio says something, then stops, and physically pulls the boy's hands apart, saying "Are your hands bound together? Seems like they're stuck." That little scene, right there, affirmed my growing suspicions and I've never believed he was pope after that. (If I ever really believed it before.)

He wears a diabolical pectoral cross, too, as I've written here.  And the man has consistently proven he is not a pope, nor a Catholic, and not even a Christian. Yet all these good men noted above insist he is actually pope and must be "resisted". Don't they comprehend doing that is driving a stake through the heart of the papacy? If it survives Bergoglio's wrecking ball at all, it will be stunted, shackled, and marginalized. Thanks to them.

And so will the Church.

Now, Ann Barnardt and her friends insist Benedict XVI did not validly resign in the first place. I think they make excellent arguments. Archbishop Viganò makes the superb argument that Bergoglio accepted his election without intending to serve as pope's are supposed to; it would be like a marriage being declared invalid because one of the partners had no intention of keeping any of his vows in the first place. Both these arguments are splendid, indeed, but for me, I think it is simply, horrifically blatant that there's nothing papal about this lout. So, GET HIM OUT! And any argument that can effect that is a most excellent argument, indeed!

Otherwise, all these well-meaning folk will do as much damage to Holy Mother Church as Bergoglio himself, and ALL his perverted peeps, are doing.

          AnP

Finally, the Coup de Grâce for Covid, revealing it as the Crime of the Century

Friends,

As pressure mounts ever higher – for example, Austria today will "lock-down" ALL unvaccinated citizens! That's millions of people – there's a new paper you must all read before the Internet is closed down. It's entitled The Covid-19 Fraud & War On Humanity, by New Zealand medicos Dr Mark Bailey and Dr John Bevan-Smith. It's a long article (46 pages), and in those 46 pages it gives the coup de grâce to the Covid fraud. "The Devil is in the details", and it has all the imps, hobgoblins, fallen powers and principalities of Hell "isolated" and "purified" (to use virology terms), all of them, and I highly recommend it. Read it and you'll know everything you need to about Covid.

• It's horrifying, but it must be read. And I'm sure more and more such papers will soon appear, what with the increasing national mortality rates being reported from many countries around the world, what with even mainstream news noticing the numbers of young athletes collapsing during matches and even dying from the "clot shot", what with average people having family and friends getting sick – and talking to more and more people about their situations. (News of that is all over the Internet and thus it must be closed down to stop people waking up. I myself just discovered a long-time friend, double-vaccinated, maybe treble, recently developed internal bleeding in the brain and was rushed to the hospital. He survived it, thank God.) And of course as governments such as those in Australia and New Zealand, and many "elsewheres" like Austria, institute ever-more crazy, "over-the-top" draconian strictures of all kinds – it is massively apparent we no longer live in (much of) a free society.

As for myself, over the past couple of years, I've sent around a lot of material on and about Covid. Since the story first began, I've been trying to follow it and, as I was trained as a journalist many years ago and after spending a working lifetime in various jobs that usually had research as an essential component, I know how to not accept what I'm told at "face value" – but to be skeptical, to take a second look, and to pry under a few mossy stones. That's especially true of anyone who might have cause to "not speak the whole truth" because huge amounts of money are involved, as with Big Pharma, or with bureaucratic types who've spent a lifetime manipulating governments. (What passes for journalism today would have outraged my long-dead university professors. It's essentially "journalism by men without chests, to paraphrase C.S. Lewis.) Now, there's a fine line between being skeptical and paranoid, and often – increasingly over time – I've held back in my writings to some degree because I didn't want to be labeled a paranoid.

Well, I've now seen evidence that we all need to be scared to death of what "Covid" is about.

Over the past year, I've called Covid a hoax and a fraud for many reasons, and over time I've read enough of virology science papers and their reviews by medically trained critics who know how to read the papers to reveal the lies, cheats, and non sequiturs that many of these "science" documents entail – so much so that I've come believe, like the exuberant German scientist Stefan Lanka, who refuses any longer to call himself a "virologist" – that virology is a crap science and I absolutely know SARS-CoV-2 (a.k.a. Covid, Covid-19, Coronavirus) doesn't exist, not in nature. (The science papers quoted by health authorities to prove it does actually say, in the details, that they haven't.)

Yes, this is literally true. It is a con. John Enders and two collegues won the 1954 Nobel Prize in Physiology/Medicine "for their discovery of the ability of poliomyelitis viruses to grow in cultures of various types of tissue." They invented "cell culture isolation" because no one could then, nor have they since, "isolated" or "purified" virus vesicles from other exosomes. The kicker is, Enders admitted his method didn't really work, either. But it has been used since then to "isolate" viruses. (I have an important note at the end of this email about that issue today.)

And on top of that, it's been proven the famous "spike protein" that "experts" and the media trumpeted supposedly made Covid so dangerous was legally patented before Covid ever appeared, patented in the U.S. Patent Office. This is for real. There are formal records of this, people. Official Patent Office records. It is not hearsay. And in any event, you cannot patent a naturally occurring substance (legally, at least). And this was done years ago. C'mon, talk about a "smoking gun"! Once this news came out, it should have been "Game Over" for Covid, but the media and government ignored it.

That's just one example of the fraud. This New Zealand paper is also important because for the first time I've seen the sequence of events and persons who created the Covid genome in China. It is all laid out here. The paper details just how "Covid" was conjured up and reviews the initial papers. And of course there's a thorough section on the wretched PCR test. (I see mobile PCR testing vans all over Budapest now. They might as well be labeled "Ministries of Covid Propaganda" or "Clot-shot Trailers" or "Free bloodclots 4 U!". I keep thinking of Professor Sucharit Bhakdi warning, "That blood is going to clot!")

Now these two New Zealand doctors have not only published a paper detailing the fraud of Covid on every level, they include an appendix of absolute horror about some autopsies on vaccinated people done in Germany done not long ago, and also statements by investigators into the Covid "vaccines" that show nanotechnology in the "vaccines". Yes, the nanotechnology evidence is now absolutely beyond refutation. You can see images of these, and not electron microscope images, but regular light microscope images! Regarding proof of this nanotechnology, I may be allowed to present a short excerpt (I detail more on it further below):

• According to the presenters, none of these objects has ever been found in traditional vaccines and should not be inside human bodies. Their shapes ranged from SIM-card lookalikes to long-beaded filaments and large rock-like shapes. They appear to be metallic structures. None of the experts knew what they were for. “Neither Dr Burkhardt nor Dr Lang had ever seen these objects in their many decades of experience”, yet “these non-biological materials have evidently “been injected into hundreds of millions of people.”(110) As Holger Fischer, a German attorney and panel member, opined, “We do not have to have the burden of proof. If you had a lemonade with this sort of contamination it would be off the market immediately.” Maria Hubmer-Mogg, a physician from (111) Austria, concurred. “These vaccinations need to removed immediately and their emergency use revoked.” Referring to the narrative of fear, she added, “People now want to vaccinate their children, even their toddlers. This is something unimaginable, this is pure madness, and this madness must be stopped. immediately.”
  
• (Note the Austrian physician; wonder if he'll be "locked-down today, or just "locked up"?)
  

Friends, all this is a crime against humanity. The Crime of this century, in fact, as the Holocaust and the Communist murder rampages were the crimes of the last miserable century. This truly is Nuremberg War Crimes Trial-level stuff. All of it involves governmental seizure of power and experimentation on entire populations. Did any of you really think the Nazis were unique? Hitler often plainly said he got his eugenicist ideas from 1920s American Eugenicists. Today, "Eugentics" is called by a new name: "Transhumanism".

As noted above, the paper is titled:

The Covid-19 Fraud & War On Humanity

The authors are:

Dr Mark Bailey and Dr John Bevan-Smith

I believe the Odysee presenter Dr Sam Bailey is his wife. Her website is:

https://drsambailey.com/

As of now, I think one might have to subscribe to her newsletter (it's free) to get a PDF file (free) of this article by Dr. Mark Bailey. Let me know if you cannot find it.

The entire article is 46 pages, therefore in lieu of my usual long excerpts, I will only copy the “Contents” to give you an idea of what it contains.

CONTENTS

Abstract 3

P A R T  O N E

The globalist agenda 4

The Trojan Horse 8

Virology’s double deception 9

The four pillars of the COVID-19 fraud 10

The first pillar: Isolation 11

P A R T  T W O

The second pillar: Genomic sequencing 20

The third pillar: PCR 22

The fourth pillar: Outbreak modelling 28

P A R T  T H R E E

In summary 32

Conclusion 33

POST SCRIPT

Crimes against humanity 35

The final insult 45

About the authors 46

An P again: More importantly (if that is possible) than all the fantastic detail on the Covid fraud, everyone needs to read the article's report on a press conference held on 20 September 2021 at the Institute of Pathology in Reutlingen, Germany, that I quoted from above. In part one of the press conference, pathologists who autopsied people who "died in temporal context of being administered Covid 'vaccines', including Comirnaty and Pfizer", discussed their findings, and the article has some of their report and also photos they took of human tissue. The second part of the conference is titled: "Undeclared Components of Covid-19 Vaccines". The researchers revealed what they found in "vaccine" samples: all sort of science-fiction like horrors. Long, weird objects of all sorts, and nano-machine-like things that look like computer chips and circuit boards. Non-biological items galore. They provide photos from the microscope. This part of the conference also featured "participants, including physicians across and outside of Germany."

• N.B. American Dr. Carrie Madej has been reporting similar findings for some months. People dismiss her as a nut no matter how she presents her research. Now these German researchers have found the same thing, and many others are speaking up. It is irrefutable.

What else can I say? Things are coming to a head. In the time left, please get the article. Read it to the end. Demand your government representatives read it, demand they end this insanity now. Although, sadly, it might be too late. Maybe God will intervene.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider says the one thing God won’t allow is human beings recreating the human race via genetic manipulation and nanotechnology. Why? That’s an absolute infringement on God’s creative role and a true Babel Tower program (if you don't know that story, it's at Genesis 11: 1-9).

An Préachán  

PS As I mentioned above: one final observation. It's from an interview Dr Tom Cowan gave to Mike Adams eight months ago: https://www.bitchute.com/video/UNIEtdTTTdYl/

Excerpt:

(42:10 Tom Cowan) All I can say is, science, logic, and common sense dictate that if you what to claim that something causes something else, you have to separate that from everything else. So I'm going to read you what a representative of the Robert Koch Institute in Germany said, when asked whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus was ever isolated and characterized. This is essentially the CDC in Germany. And I'm quoting from this: "I am not aware of a paper which purifies isolated SARS-CoV-2." Essentially, that's the end of the story. Because if you haven't isolated it, there's no way to say whether this piece of genetic material which you're doing a PCR test [to find it in you] could possibly have come from that virus. So, the whole thing breaks down. It's very simple, it's very clear, it's very logical and it's pure common sense. And it is about time we woke up and see what's happening. (43:17)

Mike Adams, the interviewer, then notes that this is a pretty shocking way of thinking but from time to time in history scientific revolutions occur where old paradigms are tossed out, and that this may be one of those times.

AnP finis  

Catholics Are Confused About Vaccines? Confusion is THE hallmark of the Vatican II Church

Amici, a Chairde,

Confusion seems to be the perpetual state of Catholics since the advent of Covid, and that is by design.

But we shouldn't be. St. John the Baptist wasn't confused about Herod committing adultery, even though John's preaching cost him his life. Our Lord wasn't confused, though it led to the Cross, nor were St. Paul or St. Peter, nor the saints and theologians of the Church for two millennia. Or not, at least, until Modernists seized the Church and our technological handiwork rivaled those who built the Tower of Babel.

 So, 60 years after Vatican II, we're confused, all right. That is not good. Had the Church been a clarion call of HEROIC morality for the past 60 years, we wouldn't be in this mess in the first place, having a "Catholic" president so pro-choice as Biden is, and who has married gay couples. Nor would we have an entire "Big Pharma" using murdered baby parts. Or a pope like Jorge Mario Bergoglio with so many bishops openly clamoring to "bless" "same-sex" unions.

We SO resemble the Anglican Church, which is not just confused, but brain dead. In 1930 they allowed contraception, but hedged it with so many IFs, ANDs, and BUTs, a boat-load of caveats, but of course contraception thereafter swept through the Protestant world. Can any common-sense person be blamed for seeing the same thing happening now, with the vaccines?

I'd just add that God didn't intend for us to be confused. He didn't intend for us to be hopeless sheeple. And being confused, while concurrently being obligated to obey the Magisterium as it deconstructed the Faith (and is now clearly literally deconstructing the Church) since the end of Vatican II, is THE hallmark of the Vatican II Church. The Reformers, the Modernists, callously took (and take!) orthodox Catholics' desire to obey the Church as a "Führerprinzip" they can remorselessly take advantage of.

 This is not good.

About Bishop Athanasius Schneider, he's not the Magisterium per se, but then, neither was his namesake, St. Athanasius, bishop of Alexandria. The parallel is striking. It's like the old Russian proverb: "The more things change, the more they stay the same."

An Préachán

Bishop Athanasius Schneider Speaks Out Against the CDF's Double-Talk Regarding Vaccine Use

Amici,

LifeSiteNews has Bishop Athanasius Schneider's answer to the CDF's miserable "nuanced" double-talk regarind Catholics' use of vaccine that are in come way wither made with, or tested through, the medium of aborted babies. 

It's titled, "The blood of murdered unborn children cries to God from abortion-tainted vaccines and medicines" and the subtitle: "Bishop Athanasius Schneider on abortion-tainted vaccines and the culture of death."

This is one of those must-reads if ever there was one.

Over at OnePeterFive, a lively discussion preceded the release of Bishop Schneider's piece, and a lot of commentators made the point that since we're Catholics, we have to recognized the authority of the CDF (the laborously called Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, what used to be the Holy Office and Inquisition). If the CDF says we can use vaccines involved in someway with fetal material, then it is a grave matter and we have to have compelling reasons, etc. To me, that sounds exactly as what the Anglican Church said when they legalized contraception back in 1930. It was a grave matter and had a ton of caveats, and of course in no time all Protestants were contracepting.

In aswer to this line of argument, I wrote the following:

Our being free moral agents doesn't stop at Baptism.

Our own responsibility for salvation doesn't stop at Confirmation, nor does it cease after a good Confession.

Nor is the Catholic Church an institution run on the infamous "Führerprinzip". (Leader principle: whatever the leader says we do, we do, regardless of conscious or morality.)

And on top of all that, Our Lord Himself said there would those who were "wolves in sheep's clothing". (St. Matthew 7:15; and related: St. Mark 13:12 or St. John 10:12; etc.)

The Catholic Faith

In Catholicism, Faith doesn't come in a storm of emotion at a "sawdust trail" tent revival but rather it comes (always, and ever) through the Holy Ghost via one's hearing the good news and then one's rational embrace of the doctrines and dogma of Holy Church. We embrace the dogmas precisely because they are rational, they agree with one's common sense, they "fit" and answer both the world that hates them and the human heart that (only too often) rejects them. We are called to be men, not sheep, still less sheeple. God gave us our rational minds and that is the part of us that touches Eternity. We're embodied rational souls that will survive death, leaving the body behind and being given a new one for good or ill, Heaven or Hell. And we're supposed to use rationality to say yes to God, not make subtle arguments on why we don't have to obey Him.

In the beginning, men could see Joshua of Nazareth "going about doing good" and they knew the Pharisees' argument that He was in league with the Devil couldn't possibly be true. It wasn't rational. It wasn't common sense. Then, after His Resurrection, when He appeared to many of the Apostles, and even to "500 of the Brethren" at one time, it was indeed rational to believe such a collective witness. (And 500 was the number of jurors in an Athenian trial for a man's life.) The Holy Eucharist, among other things, is a Blood Oath sworn on the very Body and Blood of God Himself that that first witness of the Resurrection was true. Generation after generation it has been so sworn, even if many involved in the oath taking had given up believing it. ("Sacrament" ultimately means "oath", to "seven oneself Covenantally.)

All this is to say that when the CDF decides something that doesn't seem right, and indeed is called out on it as Bishop Athanasius Schneider has done, then we have a right to query it.

By himself, Bishop Schneider isn't the Magisterium, but neither was the first Athanasius, the famous bishop of Alexandria who stood up to the Modernists of his day, the Arians.

An Préachán

The Crisis of Masculinity in the church

So much of what is going on is a result of this culture's crisis of masculinity. The Church seems to have few masculine men in leadership positions. Bishop Schneider is one such. American Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas, is another. But very few of our shepherds are men in the traditional sense.

What all this blather about "diversity of religions" being "the will of God" is septic tank overflow, sure, but it is feministic septic tank overflow. The true feminine spirit is reconciling, tries to defuse tense situations and comforts everybody; being "motherly" -- but that is native to it. Yet that is not something men should be trying to imitate, and certainly not emulate. A man's man would stand up to Cuomo, for example, or have that utter reprobate McCarrick literally thrown out on his ear, into the gutter where he belongs. (Well, that bum is dangerous and should be locked up with the key thrown away.)

But instead we get prelates, from Our Caudillo on down, who act the role of an emasculated, feminized man imitating what he thinks women would do. Hence we get Francis' endless slop about "Mercy" instead of clear, no-nonsense teaching and discipline regarding every mortal sin and yet, so oddly, Bergoglio is petty and vindictive, like a "bad girl" in a snooty Girls' School ragging on a student who doesn't fit into her clique. A sort of "Lady of the Flies" instead of "Lord of the Flies." And it is in that sense, the Vat2 word "pastoral" is code for doing nothing to a Cuomo or a McCarrick -- or for that matter, to a pope.

It's disgusting, but it is something found across the culture.

An Préachán