What do Virology, the Federal Reserve Board, and the USSR have in common?

They were foisted on us by the same people.

Amici,

The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth. – Niels Bohr 

 We live in a world of lies and mirrors. This 2022 election is a prime example for that, so was the 2020 election. Massive forces in America, including the institutional Republicans, pretend no cheating occurred. It is odious and insulting. But it is par for the course. We just get lied to continually.

The simultaneous rise of virology, the American National Bank (sketchily named "The Federal Reserve Board" (what is that supposed to be?), and Communism in Russia, were the products of collusion between Big Business combines and governments in the U.S. and Europe. Virology began to enslave us to the idea that we are at the mercy of microbes in a mortally threatening natural environment. The second devalued our money (throughout the 19th century, a dollar retained its worth; after the FRB, it began to shed value), and giving Russia – an incredible natural resource-rich world unto itself – to the Communists removed a major competitor to the Western Trusts and monopolies.

Those three developments were the then Latest and Greatest manifestation of the institutionalized greed that "makes the world go 'round". Today we have their latest iteration in the World Economic Forum and the mainstream science and political parties whose collusion enslaved us with the Covid fraud and that are fast creating a cashless utopia in which we can all be penniless slaves. (Sterile, childless, peons.)

Protestantism started it

How did this start? First of all, with lies. For generations, we've been taught one thing when the reality was something else. One big, enuring lie has been about the Protestant Reformation. We were taught how necessary it was, and how healthy for the Christian Faith, when in fact it was simply a revolt of the rich against the poor. The religious trappings of it, the theological disputes, the ecclesiastical fireworks, served as the smoke and mirrors. It was the beginning of the emergence and dominance of the nation state, of course, and the end of the Church's independence (whether that of surviving Catholic Churches in France and Spain, or the new nationalist Protestant Churches). Theologically, it was the "spiritualizing" of Christianity from being a God-Incarnationally-physically-present-with-us to a sort of Christianized Islam, no Real Presence but instead a holy book we could all argue endlessly over. Yet above all, it was a revolt of the rich against the poor, for the Church was the only "social services" administration going. The Church kept the rich humble and elevated the poor while honoring the middle class with their guilds. No one was cut adrift; it was a holistic society with everyone living in God's Incarnational Presence.

All that was stripped away. Life in post-Reformation Europe became a sort of Darwinian dystopia. The West has always valued individualism more than the East, back to Helen having more value in herself and worth a war over. (The Trojans said, what's your problem? She's just a ho. Get another.) And it is one reason why Christianity matched so well with the Western spirit. But with the Reformation, individualism became absolutely dominant. Martin Luther, a young academic rushed through a one-sided (Nominalist) education could publicly declare his personal opinion on Scripture was more valuable than that of a Church council! That's just nuts, and it is pure narcissism. (It can be no wonder that Narcissism is the fundamental trait of "moderns".)

And this was also the foundation of the world we have today where Big Corporations, especially banking concerns, run governments. On a global scale.

Holy Russia's place in the modern world

Two interesting articles at OnePeterFive, pieces that don't fit with that publication's usual line, discuss Russia's place in Christian history in light of the Fatima Prophecies. The second in the series is titled Christian Russia and the Western “Errors of Russia”, and the third is Russian Errors in Bolshevism, Vatican II and Schism. (Oddly, I can find no title or link to the first entry in the series.)

A note on this magazine: OnePeterFive is now a product of the Peter Kwasniewski, Timothy Flanders (1P5 editor), and Eric Sammons (editor-in-chief of Crisis Magazine) wing of American Traditional Catholicism. That's the group of mainstream, younger leaders who insist Bergoglio is actually pope, but who argue he's a bad one and that the papacy has to have its wings clipped and its power reduced in order to counter Bergoglio. They do not tolerate the argument that Bergoglio is not pope at all. Along with Ann Barnhardt, I think it manifestly obvious Bergoglio is no more pope than the local Lutheran pastor, and their ideas on circumscribing a pope's authority are, shall we say, egregiously wrong-headed.

Founded by Steve Skojec, who has become an agnostic (long story), today OnePeterFive is something of a clone of Crisis Magazine. Yet 1P5 still is very worth perusing because of the range of interesting articles beyond their pet papacy peeve that Flanders sometimes publishes.

Case in point are these two Russian articles by Caterina Lorenzo-Molo, PhD. L-M's basic point is fascinating: that Russia represents that last Christian country, i.e. one not affected by the secularizing acid of Protestantism, the Enlightenment, and the consumer economy, or not until of course the Communists seized it. And of course that's why they were so anxious to seize it. An element of Modernism, Marxism and Modernism remain the greatest Western Christian heresy (Islam being an eastern heresy against the Incarnation). It is Christianity's "kill shot" and Russia was THE perfect target.

The aspect of this most significant to me lies in the second article (Christian Russia and the Western “Errors of Russia”), wherein L-N details how the Communist Revolution was funded by Western corporations and approved by Woodrow Wilson. Plenty of evidence exists for this, and it is one of the most important bits of Western history everyone should know, but that very few seem to (and we who do are treated like cranks). L-N links to the work of historian Antony Sutton, who in his Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution (1974) lays out the evidence, some of which L-N reports on in her article. 

History no one wants to know

And this is my point here: American megabusiness interests in precisely the last pre-WWI decades created the modern world and its pathologies. Is it any wonder that "big corporations" unanimously support all the sexual perversion drowning Western culture? There's a reason for that.

In December 1913, just half a year before the war broke out, Congress created the U.S. Federal Reserve Board. It took control of our money. Serving as America's equivalent of the Bank of England – an institution that has ruled England since its creation – was not called "National Bank of America" because throughout U.S. history, the American people rejected such an entity. Such a bank existed for a short while until Andrew Jackson put an end to it in 1833. (Notice how the author describes Jackson; the author is definitely a "beta".)

Its 1913 re-creation represented the collusion of what today we call "the UniParty" in the U.S. politics, the big business elites of both the Democrats and Republicans working together to further their own interests and those of the wealthy. These people are not American politicians, then or now, but globalists, and their economic policies do not protect "main street" but "Wall Street". Today's globalists are direct inheritors of the early 1900s' elites who conquered Russia. (Regarding the Federal Reserve Board, see E. Griffin's (2010): The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve, for the depressing story.)

Russian-Japanese War

Speaking of Russia, the Tsarist government was weakened by the Russian-Japanese War (1904-1905). Japan was winning the battles but was utterly bankrupt, so the New York bankers (many of them Jews) got a loan together to keep the Japanese government solvent till a peace advantageous to Japan could be negotiated. These bankers loathed the overtly Christian government of the Tsar and especially its treatment of Russian Jewry.

    N.B. American President Theodore Roosevelt brokered the peace talks, probably in full knowledge of this banking collusion. The Japanese people, however, did not, and they deeply resented Roosevelt and American "meddling" in a war they thought they had won. They felt the Americans had betrayed them. This animus played a role, emotionally at least, in their decision to attack the U.S. in 1941. Had the Russians themselves known about Japan's predicament, they could have held on a bit longer, and Japan would have had to fold, producing a very different subsequent 20th century history.

Virology

Also in this same era, John D. Rockefeller, the oil oligarch and Bill Gates of his day (even to being a eugenicist), was investing heavily into medicine because his scientists discovered they could make many meds from petroleum. The "science" of virology was created by the same big business interests fighting Russia and creating an American national bank.

We have met the enemy, and ...

All this revelation demonstrates the truth of the cartoon character Pogo's famous 1971 comment, "We have met the enemy and he is us." That regarded pollution, but it is actually true about the Western World's spirituality. The Western world is materialistic, hedonistic, and atheistic. Five hundred bloody, depressing years downstream from the Reformation, that's our wretched world we wallow in. We're are the end of a river flowing down through Late Medieval Nominalism and its 16th century progeny Protestantism, the 18th century's destruction of logic (embodied by David Hume and Immanuel Kant, the Wallace and Gromit of philosophy), and on into Marxism and Darwinian materialism, and then broadening out into hedonism and greed enshrined in popular selfish and particularly narcissistic ideologies. Narcissism in probably the dominant character trait of the "modern" world.

And against this culture, even the image of a "Holy Russia" is intolerable. Caterina Lorenzo-Molo writes in the third article:

    In addition, Pope Benedict XVI’s opening to Russia, his favorable opinion of Putin, and closeness with Patriarchs Hilarion and Kirill, alerted the US and according to some documents from Wikileaks, prompted them to stir up an internal revolt within the Church.[20] Indeed all things Russia always seems to alert and heighten sensitivities from the powers and principalities.

The sad thing is, my friends, after two stolen national elections now, and the one in Brazil, and the evil fiasco in Ukraine, we can easily believe such things to be true, to have happened, and to be ordering out lives against our wills today.

Maybe the coming mass death will get their attention. Or those who survive. 

   An Préachán

Psalm 146 of the Douay-Rheims: verse 9:

Who giveth to beasts their food: and to the young ravens that call upon Him.

Dr. Malone has climbed halfway out of the Virus Cult, but he's not free yet.

 Dr. Robert Malone has an article here at his Substack site. At one point, Dr Malone wrote:

"And there is no way we can ever get back to that point in time, because almost everyone has either been vaccinated or infected at the present."

AnP

"Everyone ... infected at present." Dear Dr. Malone, NO ONE is "infected" because Covid doesn't exist. It's an umbrella term for a host of pneumonia-like illnesses, mostly derived from 5G EMFs and also things like Roundup being spread into the atmosphere via "bio-fuels". For FOUR HUNDRED years we've known that exposure to electricity can cause influenza – the long history of this revelation is thoroughly documented in the book, The Invisible Rainbow by Arthur Firstenberg. But "Big Pharma" can't money off of that! (And it is a threat to another world-wide business, Global Communication.)

This  is SO frustrating. In the entire history of Virology, from Louis Pasteur thinking the idea up and inventing the word "virus" when he couldn't prove bacteria caused all illnesses, up through the first "discovered" "virus" (the tobacco leaf mosaic virus in the early 1900s), through the application of the electron microscope when it was invented in the 1930s – after which for two decades virologists tried desperately to make it find viruses for them, only to get totally confused when they discovered exosomes – which look exactly like viruses are supposed to and which we are still learning about – to John Franklin Enders' 1954 invention of the "cell culture isolation" method that his own control experiment proved didn't work, down to today – when so many attempts have been made, as with the tireless researcher Christine Massey, to get government agencies and private labs to fess up to they're not having Covid virions, the theoretical form of a virus outside of a host cell, through Drs Malone and Peter McCullough turning partially against their former colleagues – all of this, and never once has anyone used a density-gradient method to "find" viruses because, of course, a method like that that could find them must not be used because it won't find them.

Most think this virus-doesn't-exist idea is pure insanity; I have a friend who earned a PhD in microbiology who just screams at me, literally, when I bring it up (no rational argument at all: he can't seem to even process the idea, and goes into meltdown), but when one bothers to read Firstenberg's history, or even the Method sections of the scientific papers supposedly "proving" Covid as Dr Andrew Kaufman has done videos on, one realizes they've proved nothing. (Kaufman notes that some authors of those early papers even admit this!) But the propaganda machine of Big Gov/Big Pharma/Big Medicine just keeps chugging away because this offers an endless supply of money for Big Pharma and and endless supply of zombies for Big Gov.

They will most certainly keep at it till they have all of us "vaccinated" a hundred different ways against simply living on Earth.

Does anyone bother to ask the obvious question? How did we ever evolve in so deadly a bio-dome in the first place? Or are they simply trying to vaccinate us from being human?

Drs Malone and McCullough have crawled sort of half-way out of "the Virus Cult" but still trying to square the circle. I hope they escape it before government/Pharma turns us all into the Borg.

  An Préachán

5G and Covid Eternal, Ireland Occupied, and The Year of Jubilee

 Friends,

An older person I know who is quite smart about many things but wholly given over to "us vs them" politics, recently wrote me the following line, in great glee:

"Republicans are dying of Covid at an alarming rate".

This is utterly silly and indeed, juvenile. No such fact is true, of course. Airplane pilots and athletes and everyone "vaccinated" are in trouble (for samples of the first two, see: 

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/are-100-dead-us-airline-pilots-trying. (Hat-tip to TR) Scoring cheap political points as the world's Big Tech and Big Banking is about to snuff out our lives? Petty, indeed. Besides, "Left" and "Right" are deceptions these days; it's all "Uniparty" now, and the Uniparty around the world worships "The Jab" (for me and thee, of course, not them). This radiated, polluted world is the future they've planned for us. Or I mean, for those of us who refuse the "vaccines" poisons they're demanding we take.

The Truth About Covid: Once Again

I'll write it out again, as obviously it must be repeated: Covid doesn't exist. Never has. Sounds crazy, but consider: there's no CDC or Health Ministry or even private lab in the world that has SARS-CoV-2 virus vesicles in their lab, found-in-nature virus vesicles containing the full genome of this virus, isolated and characterized. Not one. Let me repeat that: There's no CDC or Health Ministry or even private lab in the world that has SARS-CoV-2 virus vesicles in their lab. Not one. It is said two labs in the world (supposedly only two) have a few Variola virus vesicles in a freezer, though I don't know if they're Variola major and Variola minor. Variola virus is supposed to cause smallpox. And recently Bill Gates and even Biden has suggested a new smallpox epidemic is possible. (Gee, imagine that. They're clearly planning something nasty.) But NO ONE has SARS-CoV-2, even after supposed millions of deaths and millions more sick from it, even after frenzied world-wide study of it, etc. That's because "Covid-19" is a product of computer programs cutting and pasting bits of genetics obtained from the messy "cell culture isolation" method. And that method is a joke.

• "However, all of the computer models in the world don’t change the fact that the detected genetic sequences and proteins have never been shown to be part of a pathogenic virus. Due to its ongoing failures to demonstrate that alleged viral particles are capable of causing disease in a living host, virology is becoming nothing more than computer simulations. Omicron is the latest update in their virtual reality that is becoming increasingly disconnected from the natural world." Dr. Sam Bailey 

Virologists Themselves Affirm This

So, once again, the damn thing doesn't exist. At a recent symposium, a Chinese virology expert (20 years as the virology institute in Wuhan and 20 at Yale's virology department) was forced into admitting that the sputum of TEN-THOUSAND Covid-infected patients would not be enough to produce a sufficient supply of Covid viruses to be seen in an electron microscope. Maneuvered by Dr. Andrew Kaufman into admitting the sputum of two people, then five, then ten, then a hundred, etc., wouldn't be enough, Dr. Kaufman asked him if 10,000 people could provide enough sputum, and the virologist lamely said, "It's too small" and would answer no more questions.

Clearly, Covid is a fraud, and virology too, apparently. On February 16, 2016, the former virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka proved to the Federal Supreme Court of Germany (BGH) that virology had no evidence proving the measles virus existed. But Lanka, a true Richard Feyman or Kari Mullis type scientist, might as well "gone fishing" because the German government later re-mandated the measles "vaccine" for German children anyway. On top of that, ask any virologist anywhere whether a virus as ever been found (isolated and characterized) in any human being's body fluid. Ask them. It never has. In over 100 years of virology! This is one little window into the lying, deceitful "Alice in Wonderland" world of virology.

So, Why Do We Vaccinate?

I've written here before how Jenner's "vaccine cure" for smallpox actually didn't work, and how Polio just got itself renamed "Acute Flaccid Paralysis", which is "clinically indistinguishable from Polio." So let's cut to the chase:

1. For decades, Big Pharma via bought and paid for government officials have been pumping us full of God-only-knows-what and we just can't escape this trap Big Pharma and Big Government have sprung on us. We may live a bit longer in "developed" countries than our grandparents did, but we're far fatter and less healthy than they; we're overweight and full of allergies and chronic health conditions that were unknown even 100 years ago. Autism has gone from one in ten thousand to one in thirty or twenty-something, and in a couple of decades every other kid will be Autistic.
   
2. The Medical-Pharmaceutical Complex has us as trapped as the banks have us caged, if you consider our situation even for a moment. Today, we're all wage slaves in our own countries, hopelessly in debt, paying and paying and paying ever exorbitant prices (right now, especially so), and never catching up, like rats on an exercise wheel. And now the endless "vaccine" booster shots mimic even that. Charging interest rates on loans (traditionally known as usury, a sin) inevitably eventually places all the wealth of a nation's wealth creators in the hands of bankers (who never had to work to make anything).
   
3. The history of the Netherlands and Poland is the history of wealthy nations slowly growing broke as bankers concentrated their wealth in their own hands. Bankers sparked the American Revolution by getting Parliament to cancel the Colonies' colonial script money. 
4. Now Ireland is in the same Purgatory. The Irish are slaves in their own country, paying impossible prices for what their grandparents could easily afford; Ireland is a nation now ruled by multinationals and under occupation by foreigners from around the globe. Is it just a coincidence they are also in total lock down to Covid? They should arm themselves and drive out the banks like the American colonists drove out the British. Haha, right. They fought for 800 years to have Ireland for themselves and sold it away in half a generation. For the desire of money is the root of all evils; which some coveting have erred from the faith, and have entangled themselves in many sorrows. 1 Tim 6:10 Globalism kills, my friends, just as thoroughly as Big Pharma does.

5G and Covid

Meanwhile, as the powers-that-be dangle Covid in front of us to distract us from what is really happening, we are literally straining the gnat and swallowing the camel. Covid, and all its paraphernalia: the masks, the "vaccines" and the lockdowns and the ritual humiliations are just a distraction. A distraction from what? 5G is soaking the planet and messing up our bodies, because all life – human and otherwise – is essentially based on water and electricity. We are electrical beings. Therefore, when Elon Musk completes his planetary army of orbiting space bots soaking the planet with even more 5G, we're all going to be coughing up our last breaths. That, and let's not forget the use of "bio-fuels" that come from crops sprayed with the herbicide Roundup. (There's now a GMO soy that has Roundup genetically programmed into it! They couldn't just use GMO to make hardier, more nourishing crops, like the American Indians bred maze; nope, that had to have crops producing their own herbicide!) Burning bio-fuels soaks the atmosphere in Roundup particles, and they've known now for some time that cities using a lot of bio-fuels have much higher "Covid" infections.

But that is not on the evening news, is it? Neither is this:

• Wuhan city, a massive metropolis inundated with all the modern industrial pollution a developing region can churn out, was the world's first metro area to be fully wired for 5G. That was completed in September 2019, and the first supposedly Covid pneumonia appeared just a month later. And also, Wuhan is on the mighty Yangtze River, which is actually the longest river in all Asia and third longest in the world (after the Nile and the Amazon). Wuhan is downstream on the Yangtze from the vast farming provinces that river drains, provinces where Roundup is sprayed thickly. Wuhan is also a center for bio-fuel use, coincidentally. (Cough, cough.) You don't hear that on the evening news, do you.
  

As Dr Tom Cowan and Sally Fallon Morell write in:

The Contagion Myth (pages 139-140)

"Without getting too deep into the engineering of 5G technology, the important thing about 5G is that the pulsed millimeter waves, this new "spectrum" that will run our phones and computers faster, need to be "organized" by placing hundreds of thousands of satellites right into the ionosphere of the earth. These hundreds of thousands of satellites will emit their own electromagnetic frequencies that essentially beam these new, man-made signals down to the millions of receivers placed in our neighborhoods, stadiums, schools, nursing homes, hospitals, parks, farms, lakes, forests, oceans, and everywhere else on earth. The intention is to blanket the earth with these man-made electromagnetic fields. We know that these millimeter waves interfere with the availability of oxygen in the atmosphere and hence will also interfere with the ability of the mitochondria (bacteria) in our tissues to convert oxygen into energy. This is the main feature of 5G, exacerbated by aluminum poisoning, glyphosate poisoning, general air pollution, and all the many other toxins in our modern world – all contributing to the symptoms of 'Covid-19.'

"But none of this can match the consequence of putting hundreds of thousands of satellites into the ionosphere of the earth. If this is allowed to happen, not only will all life on earth be subject to the constant toxic effect of these harmful millimeter waves, as if that isn't bad enough, but the direct consequence of this folly is that the cosmic waves that from the furthest reaches of our cosmos will no longer be allowed to maintain their integrity in their journey to the earth... [thus, rather than forming naturally as it has from the beginning, earthly] Life will become formed under the influence of the computer code written by the self-styled new 'masters of our universe.' And, all this so we can have faster download speeds for our cellphones.

"Humanity is at a crossroads, and although we can present mitigation strategies that will transform the energy fields that constitute 5G technology...we should be clear. Covid-19 is the first wave of disease created by the introduction of this new technology. It is only the tip of the iceberg. Officials warn us that more waves are coming. They know."

Please take the time to read Cowan and Morell's book. Truly, it is vitally important.

Year of Jubliee

What we need is a Year of Jubilee. In the Old Testament, the Israelites had the Year of Jubilee every 50th year, and its "jubilee" consisted in releasing people from their debts, releasing all slaves, and returning property to those who owned it. (See Leviticus 25:1-13) It was a safety valve God designed precisely to prevent what we have now: the rise of the modern world of debt and bankers, which itself began when the Spanish exiled Jews from Spain and many of these exiles went to the Netherlands and Poland and Germany to set up banking houses. Jews themselves couldn't own land, etc., so trade and trade in money (money lending at interest) was a major source of income for them: think of the rise of the Rothschilds and Shylock in Shakespeare's play, and even Ebenezer Scrooge; he's actually a London Jewish money lender, of which many existed in Dicken's day. We need a revolution in thought wherein interest rates are legally kept very low and a debt-cancelling (especially health-debt cancelling) Year of Jubilee is applied to everyone, Jew or Gentile. It's the only way to break the economic cycle that's impoverishing us. 

Alas, I'm not going to hold my breath for that.

An Préachán

Lanka has proved the sequencing of the Covid genome was a fraud

 Friends,

This is perhaps my most important email.

As the world slides into Totalitarianism, led by Austria and Australia, and closely backed by many other countries and some American states – unless we the people truly rise up and put a stop to it, something not impossible as such revolutions often result when some otherwise insignificant Army major or police captain suddenly turns on their government, as happened at the end of the Soviet government in Russia – but as we slide into a very grim future dictated as much by eugenics and bio-terrorism as was done in Nazi Germany, Stefan Lanka has shown that the sequencing of the Covid genome, and indeed, the whole of virology, is a fraud.

How? What exactly did Lanka do? (Besides think for himself, that is?) This is so important that I took the time to transcribe a good bit of an October 23 interview with Dr. Tom Cowan where Dr. Cowan explains what Lanka did. I knew, and reported here, that he and Dr. Andrew Kaufman were supporting Dr. Stefan Lanka (formally a brilliant virologist but he tossed the "virologist" title in disgust some time ago) in Lanka's experiments to prove just this: the genome sequencing of the Covid vaccine was faked.

Here's the transcription. South African "Jerm" of "Jerm Warfare" was the interviewer. You can find the whole interview here. 

The excerpt:

(11:35 minutes in; Dr. Tom Cowan speaking)

When you ask medical doctors [how they know a virus is causing a disease], this is what they say: You take a person who is sick, or 100 people or a 1,000 people, they all have the same symptoms, like measles, chickenpox, or supposedly Covid, or mumps, or the flu – any quote "viral disease" – and you look through any biological fluid they have, blood, urine, feces, snot, eye fluid, any fluid, and you have to really listen to this. There's not one published study in world medical literature of any pathogenic – that is, a disease-causing virus –  being found in any biological fluid from any sick person, ever. (12:28) [Jerm says, "None?"] Dr. Cowan says: None!

...(12:35) Now, you may agree or not agree with that, but let me tell you the people who do agree [with the statement] "There is not one published study of any virus that supposedly causes disease being found in any fluid of any sick person." So, in writing now to 120 different health authorities like the CDC, the FDA, NIH, and South African Ministry of Health, they've all been asked, "Do you have any published paper of SARS-CoV-2 or any pathogenic virus being found in the bodily fluid of any sick person?" They said no. No! We've asked the authors of the six leading papers that were the six original papers saying that SARS-CoV-2, that's the name of the virus, is the cause of Covid, that's the disease, and the papers were titled "The Isolation and Characterization of SARS-CoV-2". "Isolation" means they found the virus, and we asked them, did you find the virus in any bodily fluid of any sick person? And they all said, "No, we did not attempt to do that." (14:00)  

Now, there's another person; so, the health authorities said I'm right, the authors of the six leading papers on SARS-CoV-2 said I was right, and then I was asked to give a talk about what I usually say to a group of world-wide activists and lawyers, you know, the intelligentsia of the freedom movement. Right? And they're not happy with what I'm saying. So they invited a couple of virologists, including a Chinese guy who is 20 years senior virologist at the Wuhan Center for Disease Control, Institute of Virology, and then 20 years at Yale University, senior pathologist and head of their Virology Laboratory. Right? 40 years. You would think this guy knows something about virology, right? He was there to say, "Tom is crazy." So, I did my thing and I said, "Is there any published case of a SARS-CoV-2 being found in the fluid of any person who is sick with Covid?" Answer: "No."

        "Why not?"

"There's not enough virus to see."

So, I was with Andy then [Dr Andrew Kaufman], and Andy had the presence of mind to say, "What about if you mix ten people's sputum together, would there then be enough virus to see?" He said "No." What about 100 people? "What about 100 people? You mix the 100 people – all of whom you say have Covid, their fluid – would there then be virus to see?" He said, "No". "What about 1000 people?" He said, "No." What about 10,000 people?" He said, quote, "There's not enough virus to see." And then he wouldn't answer any more. (16:04)

So anybody who thinks that you can find a virus in any fluid of any sick person, is just clearly and absolutely mistaken because that's never been done. Now, the question then, is that's how you should do it. You get a bunch of people who's sick and use a very specific technique – this is not a technical problem – you take that sputum, you macerate it (like put it in a blender), filter it, centrifuge it, get a band, you suck the band out, the only thing in the band is these particles the size and consistency of a virus, they have a protein coat, they have a genetic interior, you characterize it, and that is called "isolation" and finding the virus: that has never been done. So how do they do it? Why are there 2,000 to 10,000 papers called the isolation of the measles virus, the mumps virus, chickenpox, SARS-CoV-2, MERS, HIV? What do they do? Why are they writing a paper saying they found the virus? Here's what they did. And it started in 1954 when they realized they couldn't find the virus in any fluid of any sick person. (17:33); [This is where Tom discusses "Cell Culture Isolation" and John Franklin Enders, who won the 1954 Nobel for Medicine/Physiology, etc.]

(17:33) So, a guy named John Enders, he took snot from somebody with measles, he filtered it, which is not isolation, right? It's like making coffee. You grind it, you filter it, and you have coffee, which has lots of things in it. Then he put that with milk, then he mixed that with horse serum, bovine embryonic fluid, and fetal calf serum. And then he spread that on monkey kidney cells. And nothing happened. Then he took away the nutrients from the cells that were growing. He starved them, and nothing happened. And then he added antibiotics that are specifically toxic to kidney cells. And then the kidney cells broke down into a million pieces. And he said, "That proves there was a virus." (18:33)

And the particles it broke down in, he said, those are the measles virus. Now, here's what's interesting. He did the same experiment with the horse serum, the calf serum, you know, starved it on antibiotics, milk, etc. But the second time he didn't add anything from anybody with measles. Right, you with me? [Jerm, "Yeah."] And you know what happened? It broke down in exactly the same way. He said, quote: "The results were indistinguishable." Which means, it had nothing to do with measles, because there was nothing from the measles person in there. It was because he poisoned and starved the monkey kidney cells, or the horse serum, or something, broke down. And when tissue dies, it forms these little particles which we've known about for 80 years, which look like what are called viruses. (19:50)  [N.B. These vesicles are usually called "exosomes", I believe, and they're known to be indistinguishable from viruses. See below.]

...

(20:30) Now Stefan, Andy and I – Stefan (Stefan Lanka) was a virologist – and he reproduced this study. We helped support and fund it, and we did the whole thing all over again. We took cells, and we grew them and they were fine. And then we added calf serum, and they were fine. And then we added a little bit of antibiotics, and they were fine. And then we took away the nutrients, exactly like all of the isolation experiments, and then we added the same antibiotics that they had to all the isolation experiments, and the tissue broke down – proving it was a virus. But there was no virus anywhere in there. There was just normal tissue, fetal calf serum, antibiotics: take away the nutrients, breaks down. That is the proof that a virus exists. It's called the cytopathic effect. Means 'cells killing'. If they see the cells die, they say that proves its a virus. And we've proved that the cell killing comes because we starve and poison the tissue. There's no virus involved at all. And there we go. That's the whole story right there. (22:00)

(22:02) And so every analysis, every genome, every variant, is based on the breakdown of the tissue, [in] which there's no virus. And then by the way, so we had no virus, we added some RNA from yeast, and then we sequenced the entire SARS-CoV-2 genome. Which was never in there because there was nothing from anybody with Covid or anything. So we literally sequenced the genome just by adding RNA from yeast, which has no virus in it. Proving that the sequencing of the genome is a complete fraud. (22:47)

AnP again:

Nota Benes:

1. Stefan Lanka's recreation of the Covid genome by way of Enders experiments and the addition of a little yeast has to be the most outrageous revelation in medical (AND politcal) history. We MUST spread this news to as many as possible in order to bring and end of this madness. This has to stop, NOW.
   
2. Stefan Lanka's repeating the experiments of John Franklin Enders, both the original experiments and the "control" experiment – the one without Covid – should be itself put an end to the Covid hoax. Enders' "cell culture isolation" is ridiculous, manifestly so, but it has been how viruses have been "identified and characterized" since 1954. No. Enough. Just stop this. We must demand an end to this virology merry-go-round. We've been defrauded or 70-plus years. Now to the point of losing our liberties and our rights. No. Enough. (N.B. Enders' isolation is called "cell culture isolation" and the other one Dr. Cowan explained in depth is call "ultracentrifugation".)
3. Important to note: John Franklin Enders at least had the courage to run a "control group" experiment, and to actually report on it. This is a big mark in his honor. In publications in both 1954 and 1957, Enders clearly said his new method was hardly perfect, and more needed to be done. The unscrupulous bottom-feeders of virology have never really tried to match Enders' control group record. They almost never run a control group.
   
4. Remember that Enders' 1954 experiment resulted because virologists could not find viruses in the first place. After Louis Pasteur came up with the idea of viruses out of his imagination, basing the idea on bacteria, only much smaller, scientists tried various means to filter them and characterize them, without much success. Then in mid-1930s, the electron microscope came online, and scientists immediately used it to find viruses, only they couldn't. They found tiny vesicles, protein coated, near or with decaying or dying or dead tissue, and assumed these were viruses, but the variety of these particles (most are exosomes, etc.) gave them pause, as did the electron microscope's inability to observe any living matter at all: That made it useless to prove viruses and how they were supposed to behave. (A virus supposedly invades your body, attacks your cells, rapes them, impregnates them with its own defective DNA, and reproduces itself so lustily it explodes the cell! This has NEVER been seen to happen. It is a supposition.
   
5. Remember that exosomes look just like viruses. In his short work titled: Breaking the Spell The Scientific Evidence for Ending the Covid Delusion, Dr Cowan relates the following paper by Giannessi F, Aiello A, Franchi F, et al., i.e.: The role of extracellular vesicles as allies of HIV, HCV and SARS viruses. Viruses, 2020; 12(5):571. doi: 10.3390/v12050571). From that paper, Dr. Cowan quotes: "The remarkable resemblance between EVs [extracellular vesicles] and viruses has caused quite a few problems in the studies focused on the analysis of EVs released during viral infections.... However, to date, a reliable method that can actually guarantee a complete separation does not exist." "A reliable method...does not exist." Translated, that means, "We're clueless." (This new book has a chapter on exosomes with many academic references.)
   
6. Certainly, my friends, the testimony of the Chinese virologist with 40 years experience should most definitely be "Game Over" for the Covid fraud all by itself. Sputum is "saliva and mucus coughed up from the respiratory tract, typically as a result of infection or other disease " (online definition) and surely counts as relevant body fluid. Being unable to find a virus from the sputum of 10,000 people is absurd. SARS-CoV-2 is supposedly is highly infectious, blankets the planet, spreads aggressively everywhere by coughs and even breathing via body fluid droplets, soaks itself into environments of all kinds, and yet in the sputum of 10,000 (or obviously any greater number) of people, it cannot be "seen", no matter what? No, my friends, no, no; this is the definition of male bovine excrement. Drive this clown out of the room with brooms and mops and chase him, and just about every other virologist, down the street and out of town. By his obstinate and self-serving comments, he has shown – what with his high status in virology – that virology is a crap science. It was founded by a fraudster, Pasteur, and is itself a fraud. Alas, a world-wide Frankenstein-level fraud. Virology exists in a symbiotic relationship with Big Pharma: it produces viruses for Big Pharma to make money off of, and in return is fed big bucks to keep itself in existence. It's a parasite.
7. Simple query: If Covid is so small that 10,000 people can't cough up enough of it, why are we having to wear masks and "practice social distancing"? Hmmm?
   
8. Some time ago, Canadian lady also wrote Health Departments around the world using the Freedom of Information act, with the same results Dr. Tom mentioned. (Reported in LifeSiteNews.) Individuals in various countries have written their own heath departments, as well, with everywhere the same result: no actual Covid virus vesicles are in their possession. That's because the infernal thing doesn't exist. It's infected tens of millions and killed millions, and been researched like nothing else, but golly-gee, we just can't find it. Yeah, right.
   
9. Clearly, the word "isolation", like "inconceivable" as used by Vizzinni in The Princess Bride, "doesn't mean what you think it means." (Sometimes "purified" is substituted now in virology. Whatever. )
10. Many will ask, "If SARS-CoV-2 does not exist, what is killing people?" The answer is that despite fact the annual flu disappeared in 2020/2021, the world mortality rate (despite a few short spikes here and here, like NYC) did not rise; in fact, it was bit lower than average. It has, however, begun to rise very noticeably in 2021. Now, what do we have circulating around the world in 2021 that we didn't have in 2020? Think about it.

Pass this along, please.

An Préachán

"Are you a virologist?" Also, a powerful article, and a scary one...

 Friends,

Two related items in this email:

Firstly, occasionally, when one argues against a set idea, especially an idea that allows you to be a member of a cliquish group, snob faction, or dare I say it, a self-righteous "herd", you'll be confronted with the query: "What, are you a _ _ _?" As in "Are you a doctor?" "Are you a lawyer." Basically, "Are you an expert?" And the answer always is, of course, simple enough: "I can think for myself, which is apparently something a lot of folk just don't want to do for themselves."

An answer like that in Nazi Germany or Stalin's Russia or Mao's China would have got you dispatched from this world with celerity. We might be entering a time when that will soon be true again. Look at what is happening in Austria or Australia. But we are morally obligated by God to think for ourselves, since He made us in His image and likeness. Or also as Aristotle's "rational animal", thinking for ourselves is what makes us human. Animals themselves are not morally responsible but WE most definitely are. It's a gift, and a moral burden.

About a public policy that affects us all, and seems on course to remove all our freedoms to somehow "make us safe", as does the whole Covid fiasco, we need to know our history: to know, for one example from science, that Louis Pasteur was a fraud. This is well documented in his OWN private papers and was detailed in 2016 by Princeton University Professor Gerard Geison in his The Private Science of Louis Pasteur, (and actually, in effect, Pasteur himself admitted as much on his deathbed). And that is true for virology, because in the entire history of virology, viruses have never been proven to cause disease or to even exist – yes, that's true. Both allegations are, shockingly for those who don't know, historically true, if you bother to read the history and think for yourselves.

Bottom line: One must always beware of what Pasteur's French countrymen called the idée fixe. The "fixed idea". They should know. At one time, half of France had the fixed idea that Alfred Dreyfus was guilty of giving military secrets to the Germans. I'm sad to say, this was especially true of the Church in France (because Dreyfus was a Jew). No matter the evidence, no matter the proved guilt of the actual spy, none of it mattered. Then later they had the idée fixe that the Maginot Line would defend them from the Germans. They spent most of their military budget on it, so it had to be effective, right? How did that work out for them? Today, it's Covid.

Such is no way to live, my friends. It's no way to be human. Transhuman slaves, maybe, but not true human beings.

• BTW: We could all think – or so I hope – of snappy answers to this stupid question in the title, but I think my wife's is the best: "I'm not a mathematician, but I can count." (She politely doesn't add amadán, "dumbass!", but I'm not always so polite.)

Secondly, here's a powerful article from American Thinker, and a scary one, too. It, too, is about "herd thinking" and it opens with observations about Germany, but then goes on about the same attitudes manifesting in many Americans today. I'll excerpt just the first three paragraphs. Please, friends, read the rest. It is titled: "The Cruel Lesson to Learn from Austria's COVID Vax Insanity", by Joseph Kulve.

The excerpt:

Back in the late 1990s, I once complained about the quality of the tap water to my German colleagues in Bonn, Germany.  It was full of caulk.  Disgusting.  But they lectured me that the water was great and that it was full of caulk because it had to be reclaimed.  Otherwise, we would run out of water.  My mocking reaction that caulk is not water and that we were just a few miles from the massive Rhine river did not endear me to my colleagues.  Everyone knew that everything German was world-class, except me, apparently.

Memories of Germany came back to me when I recently read that Austria wants to remove the unvaccinated from society. Their crime?  Killing the vaccinated with the disease that the vaccines protect the vaccinated from (sounds as logical as the tap water thing).  I have not yet read that they want to kill anyone, but I am assuming they will remove them from society (concentrated in unvaccinated camps?) until they give in or have the jab forced on them.  Will Austria's unvaccinated have to hide in secret compartments in private homes until the insanity has run its course?

The details of what I read made it sound as if the extreme measures in Austria were motivated more by a desire to hide the previous failures of the Austrian kaisers' COVID policies than to protect the people.  As these COVID mandates start to look more like Frankenstein experiments gone wrong, those who mandated them will be looking for scapegoats — not unlike what happened with the failed economic management of the socialist governments in 1930s Austria and Germany.

AnP again:

As Sophocles observed 23 centuries ago, "Never say it cannot happen here."

An Préachán

Dr. Andrew Kaufman explains the scientific papers that started the Covid story

Friends,

I've said this before once or twice about some document or online interview, and it is definitely true with this one: listen to Dr. Andrew Kaufman go through the history of the science articles "proving" SARS (whether SARS-CoV-1 or SARS-CoV-2, a.k.a. "Covid-19"), and I guarantee you'll never believe another official "party-line" word about Covid, whatsoever.

I was listening to Dr. Andrew Kaufman, M.D., last night here at a lecture he provides on his website. And as I say, if you ever listen to one online explanation of what's going on, listen to this one. Why? Because Kaufman knows what he's talking about and he does a thorough job explaining his research.

One would expect that of a forensic psychiatrist who has, among other things, a Certification in Psychiatry and Forensic Psychiatry (2011) from the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology Board, a SUNY Upstate Medical University Fellowship in Forensic Psychiatry, and he was a Resident in Psychiatry at the Duke University School of Medicine. And among other things, Kaufman was a Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Vice President, Psychiatry Faculty Practice Corporation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, a Medical Director of Faculty Practice, SUNY Upstate Medical University, and an Assistant Director, Forensic Psychiatry Fellowship, SUNY Upstate Medical University. Interestingly, Kaufman has been a Consulting Expert Witness, Syracuse University Law School. Kaufman has also made it his business not to be too specialized in one discipline; he reads scientific papers of all sorts, especially in chemistry and biology because as he said in another talk, psychiatrists today pretty much just prescribe drugs, and he wanted to know just what the heck the drugs he was being recommended to prescribe actually did! (This is very important, actually, and below I include a short segment of his talk on this from an interview.)

So, like, yeah. He's credentialed. Credentialed and conversant with all things relating to medicine, not least of which is how people fool themselves, become mislead, and embrace falsehoods.

In his lecture linked to above, Dr. Kaufman details in a PowerPoint presentation how Nature, the most prestigious (certainly one of the top two or so in the world) of science publications, had an article out in 2003 about how researchers had fully "isolated" SARS-CoV-1; the 15 May 2003 article in Nature titled: "Koch's postulates fulfilled for SARS virus"; see https://www.nature.com/articles/423240a#Sec2.

As for the 2003 Nature article, the title says Koch's Postulates have been satisfied in isolating the virus; however, as soon as you begin to read the article, the authors immediately admit (in the second paragraph) that they're running a "bait-and-switch" on you. The Koch Postulate was a ruse. They in effect say: "We're not actually gonna use Koch's Postulates, but rather the six-criteria revision of them by Rivers".

Who is Rivers? Thomas Milton Rivers, 1888 to 1962, is described as "the father of modern virology, and back in 1937 Rivers "redid" Koch's Postulates. Rivers softened the strictures of Koch because Rivers admitted they had been unable via Koch to prove viruses cause disease! Imagine that. So right away, Nature LIES to its readers. Rivers' "new" version of Koch's Postulates is a watered-down version because, as noted, they had NEVER been able to fill Koch's Postulates regarding viruses.

Kauffman explains how Rivers had written in 1937: "It is obvious that Koch's postulates have not been satisfied in viral diseases." Kaufman avers that was true in 1937 and it is just as true today – something which modern "virology" would fight tooth and nail against admitting, although some honest people do exist in science, such as the German Stefan Lanka, who used to be a virologist till he came to understand it is bunk; Lanka is famous – or ought to be – for proving in court that measles are not caused by a virus.

• And you need to remember that the entire concept of a "virus" was made up by Louis Pasteur back in Koch's 19th century day; Pasteur imagined that there had to be something smaller than bacteria causing illness because he himself "discovered" bacteria (kinda sorta) and couldn't prove they caused all disease. So he "postulated" something smaller, which he called a 'virus', from the Latin for poison. Thus, when in the 1930s they developed the electron microscope, they found all sort of genetic bits and pieces floating about coated in protein, and they called these viruses.
  
• Note the electron microscope doesn't image living, moving-about things like a light microscope reveals bacteria doing. No one has ever seen viruses doing what they are supposed to do: i.e., attack and rape cells, impregnate the raped cells with their own DNA, get the cell to replicate the invading DNA until the cell explodes and "sheds" viruses everywhere. Remember how they talked about people walking around and "shedding" the virus?) Anyway, this is an amazing narrative of the ruthless, rampaging viri warriors, especially considering that viruses are not supposed to be alive in the first place!
  
• And also remember that Kari Mullis, inventor of the PCR test, before he died in Sep 2019, said repeatedly that it could not be used to find an HIV/AIDS virus because it could not distinguish between living and non-living material. You'll see a lot of official MSM "fact-checks" online that Mullis did not say the PCR couldn't be used on Covid – well, he died before the German, Christian Drosten, started using it for that.
  
• Bottom line: now we know a lot of what they saw with the early electron microscopes are exosomes, a fascinating subject in itself, but these come from our own cells. Britannica describes them as: "nano-sized vesicles secreted from different cell types that contain any of various bio-molecules, such as proteins or nucleic acids." Rivers himself, actually, suggested this back in 1937, using the phrase "Fabrications of autocatalytic processes" to describe them. Exosomes are the same size as viruses are supposed to be, and some argue that there's no such thing as viruses; that scientists confuse exosomes with them, etc. 

Back to the story:

Dr. Kaufman goes through – in detail, detail, detail – the footnoted scientific papers that the 2003 Nature article listed as proving that Koch's (er, Rivers') Postulates have been fulfilled. And Kaufman himself proves, detail-by-detail, paper-by-paper, how these scientific articles did NOT fulfill any of Rivers' postulates. So, beyond question, SARS-CoV-1, the original itself, back in the early 2000s, was NOT isolated, not remotely.

And then of course when SARS-CoV-2 came along, they immediately linked it (obviously so, considering what they named it) to SARS-CoV-1. And Kaufman tirelessly goes through a number of more recent scientific papers supposedly showing this and how the new illness is a supposedly virus-caused malady, but again, one-by-one, Kaufman shows how the papers are faulty and that none of them fulfill Rivers' postulates.

Now, Kaufman spends time pointing out that Rivers was not talking genetics, such as scientists stress today. Supposedly, we don't need to do "isolation" like they did "back in the day" because we have genetics and genomes. I have myself been told this online. But I've written at length to you before about how the genetics have been falsified in terms of "isolating" Covid, and won't repeat that here. Kaufman does discuss it in this lecture, though.

As I say, Dr. Andrew Kaufman goes through the whole thing in detail and reveals what all the science types ought to take the time to examine. Kaufman has before now said that the heavy specialization in science is very bad for the entire discipline.

At this site, Kaufman said:

(9:48) We're all more than these labels that represent the brief experience of our consciousness. And it would really be false to have to have everyone have a certain credential to speak about a certain thing because one one of the fundamental reasons why there's so much false results and findings in science is because of this compartmentalization and specialization and sub-specialization that people in one field don't have any idea what's going on in related fields that affect each other. Like even in psychiatry, for example, all the treatments in psychiatry are drugs these days and they're based on experiments done in brains of animals. And the psychiatrists do not actually look at that research or know how to evaluate it. So if that research is not valid, or doesn't really apply to the situation that they see in their clinical experience, they'll never know. So it is really important that scientists and physicians develop the ability to look at a broad range of different scientific material, and if you understand the method of science and the philosophy of science to challenge a thesis in order to validate it, and understand some statistics, then you should be able to read almost any scientific paper, and if you translate some of the language – because they use specialized terms – like I sometimes read papers in chemistry and physics just like I'm reading different area of biology, I've done research in the laboratory and worked in the biotechnology industry, and I've done epidemiology research and published research related to mental health and the law, and I've been a peer reviewer, and all of that has prepared me to be able to read scientific papers. 12:06

An P again:

To sum up, Dr Kaufman gives an excellent and easy to follow explanation of why "the science" behind Covid is both flawed and false. (The PowerPoint screens make him all the easier to follow.) And of course, Kaufman is not alone. Thousands of doctors and scientists have been questioning various aspects of Covid for over a year now, from many angles. The criticism is increasing, especially now that vaccines are being forced on entire populations. Kaufman and Dr. Tom Cowan and the biologist Stefan Lanka are extreme in their dismissal of the entire virus idea, but so what? That's science.

Science. It's based on observation of natural phenomena, hypotheses are developed from the observation, then long testing by both those who developed the hypothesis and many who have no stake in that particular hypothesis. Science is supposed to be "self-correcting", and peer-review ought to have dismissed the papers Kaufman reviews, yet peer-review is widely said to be completely broken.

But the Scientific Method as I described above must be understood. That's how the method worked with what Alfred Wegener did with plate tectonics. In 1912, Wegener noted how South America and Africa look to be made to fit together, and that observation of that natural phenomenon led him to develop a theory that continents move. He was of course ridiculed for decades, and by the time he died in 1930 (aged 50 years), still widely dismissed as a fool (about this hypothesis, at least; he was quite accomplished in other areas). Today, almost all geophysicists accept plate tectonics. 

So, remember this essential lesson: science takes time! Jumping on the idea that a virus caused the pneumonia-like illness in Wuhan, then jumping on the idea that it was related to SARS-CoV-1, jumping then to implement vaccines based on the rush-job genome developed for Covid-19, none of that jumping is how science is supposed to work.

Unlike either mathematics or metaphysics, wherein you can actually prove a theory, in Western Empirical Science you can only disprove a theory. You can build up a probability of a hypothesis being correct, even to a very high degree, over time, but by the nature of the discipline, you can't "prove" a scientific theory as you can with math or metaphysics. 

To me, Covid smacks heavily of the Global Warming (now "Climate Change") hoax. Two peas in a modern science pod, a pod of a plant that would turn Western Empirical Science into a form of magic reserved for a specialized priesthood who decide in a star chamber what was true and what was not. One of the biggest conflicts in Global Warming early on was that the early proponents of it would not share their research, so other could test their hypotheses. Michael Mann of the University of Pennsylvania still won't, despite long years of expensive lawsuits. Covid info gets shared well enough, and that is one reason why criticism of it can be brought to bear, as Kaufman does.

Therefore, if you are interested in why you have gone through a sort of Hell for the past year or so, listen to Kaufman.

As far as I am concerned, the whole Covid "spiel" is just a con.

An Préachán