Bergoglio about to remove Bishop Strickland? Ramifications

Friends, a chairde, 

A widely reported rumor now circulating hints strongly that Bergoglio will "ask" Bishop Joesph Strickland of Tyler, Texas, to resign. See LifesiteNews for details. 

Should this prove true, you-all can know for certain that no matter how holy and faith-filled Bishop Strickland is, and no matter how carefully he's run his diocese (which is flourishing, and with a full seminary, etc.), they can find something or other, even (as with Roe v. Wade) a "shadow of a shadow", i.e., a penumbra, of something that could be critiqued and "cried up". I won't be surprised at how shrilly they decry him. The truth is, of course, that he's "America's bishop" because he really believes the Catholic version of Christianity, lives it and promotes it, and in short simply does what every other bishop in the U.S. ought to be doing, and is increasingly (slowly but steadily, too slowly for some, to quickly for Bergoglio's Clown Posse) growing in opposition to the Beast Bergoglio. And therefore he makes the other bishops out to be time servers and bench sitters.

Should Bergoglio make this damnable move – and it is damnable: just look at how badly the American bishops govern their dioceses, closing churches, dioceses empty of aspirants to the priesthood, swamped with homosexual and other deviants in their clergies – then the moment has come. If Bishop Strickland refuses to resign, then the revolution against the tyrant Anti-Pope has begun. Bishop Strickland will have raised Our Lord's Royal Standard for us all to support. If the Bishop knuckles under to the Ogre, however, well, that's about it for the official American Catholic Church, a.k.a. the Vatican II Church. Out with a whimper, as began to collapse earlier under the Covid fraud.

Fundamental Point: Bergoglio is moving forward with this ridiculous and heretical "Synod on Synodality" and the ordination of women and the formal recognition of the German bishops blessing "gay unions", etc. That Bergoglio is taking a wrecking ball the the Catholic Church is manifest, as mainline "Conservative Catholic" commentator Fr. Murray wrote about back in February! Well, Fr. Murray, guess what? Bergoglio hasn't "stopped it" as you demanded (yes, demanded) in that article; he's sped it all up!

Observation: Why is it so hard for Fr. Murray and Dr. Taylor Marshall and so, so many others not to simply say, as Ann Barnhardt says, Bergoglio is not the pope. Ann has great reasons. Fr. Altman gives 20 examples of reasons why Bergoglio can't be pope in his wonderful sermon here: Bergoglio is not the Pope; Fr. Altman Talks. As I keep saying, what does "Bergi" have to do? Add Martin Luther to the calendar of Catholic saints, or maybe Muhammad? Does Bergoglio have to declare a "Holy Duality" and nix the "Holy Trinity"? What? What does the man have to do to get it into their heads that he is destroying their Church, full stop? 

Review this article on a little commented on or observed move Bergoglio has done. It's about

the Apostolic Letter Spiritus Domini of January 2021, in which Bergoglio universally changed canon law for the whole Church regarding the so-called “lay institutes” of Acolyte and Lector. 

• It's about women doing SSPX,those jobs, of course, setting them on the way to priestly ordination. That ordination of women gutted what was left of the Anglican Church; you would think the Catholic Church's Modernists would know that; however, my friends, I suspect they know it all too well. They want to create a New World Order Church.

"The Church", the True Church, will survive, because of Our Lord's solemn promise. It'll be underground, found here and there, and in the SSPX. It will use the Trad Latin Mass, teach the Deposit of Faith (i.e. Tradition) and will survive the coming horrors long foretold by the Blessed Mother, and others. Assuming there's a post-Apocalyptic future, it will be here, doing what's it's done for 2,000 years (sans the Vatican II Interlude).

Dáil trócaire orainn, a Dhia.

         AnP