War with Russia is (apparently) imminent. "The most reckless foreign policy in our history..."

My friends.

A week ago last Monday, Tucker Carlson, now the most popular cable news host in the U.S., presented a very disturbing commentary about the imminent war – quite possibly a nuclear war – between the U.S. and Russia. 

I've been reading scores of articles, posts, interviews, about the coming civilizational disaster. (Even Bergoglio is sounding the alarm! Imagine that!) But I'll choose this article from Tucker Carlson as one to send around to you. It appears on LifeSiteNews.

Carlson demonstrated that major figures in the U.S. government are hell-bent on war with Russia, and provided a number of clips of Democrat Congressional bigshots talking up such a war. Then Carlson explained the main reason for all this had nothing to do with Ukraine, but everything to do with Democrats seeking revenge for Donald Trump's 2016 election victory. For details, if you are interested, watch Carlson at the LifeSiteNews link, or read the article at the link. For a taste of it:

“This is the most reckless foreign policy in our lifetimes, in American history,” Carlson said. “You are watching a group of decadent, in some cases, senile leaders, casually dismiss the consequences of going to war with the nuclear-armed nation, dismiss the consequences of nuclear war, like it’s not even worth thinking about.  But it is worth thinking about!”

AnP again:

And it isn't just the Democrats. A large portion of Republicans seem as utterly mindless and stupid about this as the Democrats. They are consumed by "Neo-Con" and other imbecilic hubris. A senseless blindness seems to have turned them all into 'bots ('robots). 

As this is going on, we have Democrat mobs rioting outside Supreme Court justices' homes and pro-abortion (also known as Moloch worshipers) attacking Catholic (and a few other types of) Churches in an effort to punish and intimidate pro-life Catholics. In general, we have mobs of pro-abortionists (a.k.a. Baby-Killers "R" Us) shrieking much like the demons sometimes do when they are expelled from possessing a person (e.g.: Mark 1:26, 9:26) or a place, as witnesses reported happened at the Pantheon in Rome.

And have any of you asked why Western Europe is committing cultural and population suicide via insane immigration policy, as highlighted here regarding Sweden? It is much like the U.S. open borders with Mexico, actually, when simultaneously we're also blithely going to nuke millions of Caucasian Europeans (not to mention millions of Americans of every color)?

Doesn't this sound/seem utterly diabolic? On every level?

And doesn't this remind you of God blinding Pharaoh so that God could punish him? "I will harden Pharaoh's heart." (Ex. 4:21) And "He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them." (John 12:40, quoting from Isaiah.)

And of course it is a literal, living manifestation of the ancient saying, "Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad." (Wrongly attributed to Euripides.)

My friends, a wise man lives as though each day were his last, but it takes focus, and prayer, to bear such doom as we face. Pray. For if this isn't the maul of Armageddon we're walking into, I would hate to see what is.

An Préachán

War with Russia, or divide up the country?

 Friends,

The Democrats are going to categorically deny Republican wins this November, in whatever way they have to. This will eventually lead to war, civil war, just as it did when Democrats refused Lincoln's election in 1860. That is, unless Biden gets us into a war with Russia first. Both wars are very possible and war is what Democrats do, historically. The list is long:

1. The War of 1812
   
2. The War with Mexico
3. The U.S. Civil War
   
4. World War I (when they first ran totally roughshod over Americans' civil rights)
   
5. World War II
   
6. The Cold War (not a shooting war, or not much, but still...)
   
7. The Korean War
   
8. Vietnam 
9. (I dunno, does Kosovo during Clinton's years count as a "war"?)

The Republicans* got us into:

• The Spanish-American War
• Iraq 1
• Iraq 2
• Afghanistan

*One might argue that the Republicans only came into existence in the 1850s, but before that, the Whig Party filled the same opposition role, and they were against the Mexican War, etc.

The Spanish-American War was William Randolph Hearst's doing, a mainstream media-created war (mainstream media then was called "yellow journalism") and the other three the miserable Bush family hatched when they ran the U.S., i.e., in other words, "Deep State" wars. Had the pitiful Al Gore been installed in 2000 instead of the second Bush, he would have started a war, too; it's what Democrats do. It's their fall-back position. The Bushes and Obama/Clinton and now Biden, are all "Uniparty" hacks. So essentially, that leaves us with eight Democrat wars versus one Republican war. (The Spanish-American War was called "the splendid little war", BTW.)

This article in The Federalist goes into detail about how the Dems are psyching themselves up to reject any Republican wins this coming November. Many such articles probably are being published. But this paragraph is quite telling:

Once you discard the idea that Republicans are relatives, friends, or neighbors who may disagree with you about politics but who also mean well and instead view them as the moral equivalent of Germans who voted Adolf Hitler into power, talk about defending democracy becomes a life and death struggle. That means defeat can never be accepted and must be averted at all costs, no matter what it takes.

In other words, "demonizing the Other." So, get ready for war. It would be beneficial to just split the country up, wouldn't it? Like cutting off a gangrene infection. We could give the entire Federal Government to the Democrat-controlled new country, along with New England and the urban megaplex of the "Acela Corridor" (Boston, NYC, Philadelphia, Baltimore and D.C.). Grant all that to the Dems, along with the coastal fringe of the three Pacific states, and of course putrid Chicago (no one wants Chicago or Detroit!). But of course such a "Democrat Communist Republic of America" would be instantly broke, as the only people "making" anything would be the Federal employees, and they are only capable of just making more bureaucracy. They don't make wealth. Basic economics: wealth has to be created by competent manufacturing/farming people; wealth does not consist of goods or money traded or taxed; it consists of goods created, goods that people want.

This putative new country's only other population would be a perpetually grievance-spouting, rioting Lumpenproletariat burning down their own neighborhoods, and snooty cultural elites, a perverted, mostly childless population who – regardless of their actual individual education levels – can't screw in a light bulb. All Leftists are like that: incapable of maintaining our industrial civilization, or even feeding them selves. Do you think Lenin or Trotsky or Mao or Pol Pot could have fixed a house's plumbing or raised a crop, if necessary? But they sure are capable of endless moralizing and the bossing of other people about, staffing a "Deep State" and taxing the rest of us to death. Why can't we get rid of them? They're parasites. Grubs. Larva.

However, the imbecilic Biden and his utterly incompetent foreign policy team are about to stumble us into war with Russa. So, war is coming our way whether we want it or not. Maybe. Keep praying!

Regarding such a Russian war, see this quite interesting article for some unique insight. 

Excerpt:

The current propaganda meme in Washington is that Russia is going to “invade Ukraine” and absorb it. It will not: Ukraine is a decaying, impoverished, de-industrialised, divided, corrupt and decaying mess; Moscow does not want to take responsibility for the package. Moscow is fully aware that while its troops will be welcomed in many parts of Ukraine they will not be in others. Indeed, in Moscow, they must be wishing that Stalin had returned Galicia to Poland rather than giving it to the Ukrainian SSR after the War and stuck Warsaw with the problem. This does not, however, rule out the eventual absorption of most of Novorossiya in ultimo.

And on Biden's foreign policy team:

Unfortunately the Blinkens, Sullivans, Farkas’, Nulands and others who seem to be driving USA policy don’t understand any of this. They remain convinced that the US is a mighty power, that Russia is feeble and fading, that Putin’s position is shaky, that sanctions are biting, that Russia’s economy is weak and so on. And that they understand modern warfare. Everything in the past twenty years contradicts their view but they hold to it nonetheless.

Take, for example, Wendy Sherman who was the principal American negotiator in Geneva this month. Look at her biography on Wikipedia. Social worker, money raiser for Democratic Party candidates, political campaign manager, Fanny Mae, Clinton appointee to the State Department, negotiator with Iran and North Korea. Is there anything in that record to indicate any knowledge or understanding of Russia or modern war? (Or skill at negotiations for that matter?) And yet she’s the one on point. Jake Sullivan: lawyer, debate preparer, political advisor, ditto.

As Biden might say, c'mon man!

See this article here for a more "mainstream" consideration: 

So much for our "happy new year", huh?

AnP