Anthrax, Pasteur, an the Never-Ending Fraud of Modern Medicine

A Chairde, Amici,

Still worried about viruses? Don't be. The charlatan who dreamed them up, Louis Pasteur, was SUCH a fraud that he'd make the worst sort of used car salesman look like Sir Galahad.

The estimable Steve Kirsch, who has been fighting the Covid vaccines like a hero but who himself still believes in the virus fraud, has an article up about the many reasons why universities should halt all "vaccine mandates" forthwith.

Kirsch writes as reason number one: "Mandates are unethical because the harms clearly outweigh the benefits; it isn’t even a close call." 

Hmmm...

Let's think about this a second. Universities are supposed to be places wherein smart people dwell and work up smart solutions to the world's problems. By definition, they're supposed to be "egg factories" producing "eggheads" smarter than the rest of us. Yet look at how unutterably stupid the people teaching these intellectual havens of misrule seem to be. They totally miss Kirsch's "close call." What gives?

If such a thing were only an occasional flaw, we could say it's happenstance or coincidence. But it isn't remotely happenstance. It is absolute. Totally ubiquitous. So, as Bugs Bunny used to say, "What gives?"

Conclusion: Since this "missing the clues" is so ubiquitous a thing, we can conclude it is not accidental. Therefore, it is intentional. The Powers-that-Be are organized for our destruction in no small part by taking over our academic "egg head" factories to in order to produce rotten eggs. As I wrote in a recent essay, Monolith of Lies Cracking, our modern civilization is simply choking to death on lies. 

As a case in point: this article by Sally Fallon Morell, discusses the history of anthrax. In detail. Especially about that old fraud Louis Pasteur and his "anthrax vaccine" for sheep.

Anthrax was a common problem for European sheep back in those days (later 1800s). And in France a competition for a cure was developed and promoted – with big cash prizes – for anyone who could develop a "vaccine". So, off to the races! Scientists and veterinarians and whoever else tried to develop a vaccine on the pattern of Edward Jenner's smallpox vaccine. I.e. they tried to attenuate anthrax down to a benign form so they could inject that into sheep in order for the sheep to develop anthrax immunity. Morell discusses how Pasteur cheated and falsified his findings in order to win. This is true. Much of it is in his surviving papers made public a few decades ago. After Pasteur celebrated winning, orders came pouring in for his anthrax "vaccine".

However, the stupid thing didn't work – of course – not from the beginning, and Pasteur received letters from all over Europe – even from Hungary where the Préachán currently roosts – about how sheep were dying en masse who had been given it. Now, the kicker is, anthrax mirrored arsenic poisoning, and as arsenic was removed from sheep dip over the following decades, sheep anthrax disappeared.

This story parallels polio. How polio appeared in late 19th century America after an arsenic-based fruit-tree spray had been introduced. When DDT replaced the arsenic-lead concoction, the polio changed to mirror that. Eventually, with the dropping of DDT, polio disappeared! And virologists took the credit! Gee, imagine that. (Actually, the polio fraud is incredible: the "vaccines" didn't remove it from the world, but where it still exists, as in India, the medicos changed its name; it is now called Acute Flaccid Paralysis, AFP).

So, my query is, why isn't this WIDELY known? What doesn't EVERY academic institution remotely involved with medicine know about this? It ought to be a famous case, on many levels. Pasteur was treated as a god in his day, but that was then. We OUGHT to know all this now. Yet all we get is crickets.

Again, this failure is too ubiquitous to be accidental. There's a great medical/health fraud being perpetrated on us all, for a century, while common sense seems to be completely alien to the discussion. It is like academia self-selects for sheeple, not people. And any actual people who try to get through the "sheep dip of academia" are in effect given Pasteur's anthrax vaccine.

An Préachán

Pasteur being worshipped.

Once again: Jenner's smallpox vaccination did NOT stop smallpox in England

Friends, 

It's time to "think the unthinkable". What with all the lies our governments our spreading, lies about war, food production, "green" energy, Global Warming (now the even more vague "Climate Change"), and of course the grotesque authoritarianism in the U.S. Federal Government, not to mention the most putrid lies of all that come from the Bergoglioan hierarchy of Church destroyers, it is time to review just how long and how thoroughly we are lied to. It is time to "think the unthinkable". Scotsman Neil Oliver has a great talk on that here. 

To that end, here is Part I of a series I am endeavoring to start on how we've been lied to, let's consider medicine, specifically vaccines.

I had sent something similar to this around months ago, but it is time to consider it again. We've been told for two hundred years the legend of Edward Jenner, a plucky English physician eliminating the dreaded smallpox plague via vaccination, beginning this work in the 1790s. Jenner, 1749 to 1823, is known as "Father of Immunology".

It is an old story, and a hallowed one. But it is not true.

Despite Jenner's inoculations, Smallpox reigned in England in the mid-1800s, and they suffered the worst Smallpox outbreak in their (recorded) history between 1871 and 1880, but it has been like finding hen's teeth to uncover information on it. The bottom line is that Jenner's Smallpox "vaccine" did not work. IT DID NOT work, not the way it has been historically related. 

What got rid of the pox, then? Sanitation. Installing urban sanitation systems, sewers, what the Brits have always called "water closets" (toilets with drains to sewers) and other "boring, nuts-and-bolts" civil engineering stuff. Urban sanitation. 

So, despite the fame of Edward Jenner and his smallpox vaccine (called "inoculation" in 1796, a somewhat different protocol from vaccination, per se), smallpox remained a plague in England for a long lifetime. Contrary to the Jenner legend, and despite of – or because of – England's vaccination laws, between 1871 and 1880, 57,016 smallpox deaths occurred in Britain. 57,016 people in nine years, mind you, with a version of the famous vaccine BEING REQUIRED BY LAW. Smallpox was so common in the early 1800s that Parliament passed laws mandating the use of vaccination. (Sound familiar?) Smallpox looked as inevitable as ever.

• It looks as though the anti-smallpox inoculations caused more smallpox than they stopped. Actually, this was noted simultaneously in France regarding Louis Pasteur's anti-rabies inoculations. Back in 1909, a Dr. Montague R. Leverson wrote that Pasteur's anti-rabies inoculations "afford the most decided test of the pernicious character of that method of treatment. During the 23 years preceding the use of anti-rabic serum, there were 685 deaths from rabies in all France, or an average of 30 per annum...with a continually increasing number each year, so that according to the official returns the number of death from rabies in France for the year ending in June, 1907, was just about 300. In truth, as Professor Peter said, in his address to the Academy of Medicine in Paris, on the 11th of January, 1887, "M. Pasteur does not cure rabies, he imparts it!" (13:20 of https://odysee.com/@hipsterious:3/Dr.-Sam-Bailey---What-About-Rabies:c)

Regarding smallpox in England, something major changed dramatically, however, for between 1911 and 1920, only 110 English deaths occurred from smallpox. By that time, vaccination had evaporated as a national policy. But as noted, for years vaccination had been national policy for the British government made Smallpox vaccination a requirement in 1853, with the Compulsory Vaccination Act, with a more stringent version in 1867.

A Dr. Hadwen wrote: "After about 40 years of compulsory vaccination, Britain suffered the worst smallpox epidemic in its entire history, with the highest death rate in history." What vaccine brought smallpox to an end? No vaccine at all. Rather, sanitation policies brought smallpox to an end. City reformers in Leicester set the example: they rejected vaccination in favor of sanitation. Yes, friends, this is true. Sanitation. Boring. Unexciting. "Un-legendable". I've always said that the invention and use of soap saved more human lives than any other thing in all history. With sewers and indoor plumbing and a ban on vaccination, smallpox disappeared from Leicester, and eventually from England. 

The same thing happened in Cleveland (of all places!). A Dr. Friedrich, in charge of the Health Board of Cleveland, abolished vaccination "absolutely" and promoted sanitation. Smallpox vanished. (As reported by a Dr. John Hodge in 1902.) Clearly, sanitation played the major role in ending Smallpox. Everyone, and I mean EVERYBODY, needs to know these facts. Please, pass it on, folks. Vaccination has NEVER BEEN the panacea it has been cracked up to be, and it is time this info gets broadcasted. (Same with polio, which did not come from a virus but arsenic/lead-based fruit tree insecticide, and later DDT; once these were discontinued, so vanished the polio, or it was just renamed: "Acute Flaccid Paralysis", which is formally said to be clinically indistinguishable from polio.)

In fact, most important to comprehend of all: we have been as consistently lied to about vaccination and the Germ Theory of Illness as we have been lied to about every other category I opened this essay with.

Another name for Hell is "The Kingdom of Lies" and we've been long-term residents therein. 

An Préachán

Psalm 146 of the Douay-Rheims: verse 9:

Who giveth to beasts their food: and to the young ravens that call upon Him.

Michael Yeadon has turned against Germ Theory, and Dr. Zach Bush's extraordinary interview

 Hi Everyone,

Regarding Covid, medicine, etc., we have turned a corner.

Two H.U.G.E. developments in the Covid fraud fiasco. First, Michael Yeadon, famous for being a former Pfizer vice-president in charge of viruses/vaccines who turned totally against the whole vaccine spiel – a perfect example of being "red pilled" if ever there was one – has now gone in "whole hog" and has declared viruses aren't respiratory pathogenic, don't cause respiratory disease, and maybe even that they (as we've understood the idea of them) don't exist at all.

This is stupendous. Like the Mormon president becoming a Baptist or the King of Saudi Arabia becoming Catholic. That is the scale it is on. (And how long can long-time friends of Yeadon's, like Robert Malone or Reinder Fuellmich, keep believing the Pasteur Pastiche? One wonders, indeed.)

See Yeadon here: Dr. Mike Yeadon Concludes, "There Are No Respiratory Viruses!"  (He even references Dr. Tom Cowan, Dr. Sam Bailey, etc.! And this article has a link to a longer version.) Or see a longer, but different interview, here.

Then there's this young Dr. Zach Bush making a brilliant case for Terrain Theory and skewering Germ Theory. This a just on-the-target 100 percent explanation that you all will want to read. This is truly a "must read" for anyone remotely interested in or curious about the Covid fraud and the entire Western Allopathic Medical Construct: Children's Health Defense org Zach Bush on humans and our microbiodome. 

You are definitely going to want to pass this on to everyone you know. 

I mean, this article is actually "mind-blowing" because it is now so public, so patently obvious that the standard, Western, Pasteur-derived "Germ Theory" is going down. It's going to crash. It has caused woe, death, and destruction for 100 years. Covid – the spiel, the lockdowns, the medical larceny and murder of it all – represents the highest achievement of the Virus Theory. And like Icarus, from its dizzying height, it is about to free-fall into an utter crash-and-burn. Governments will still try to apply lockdowns and promote "vaccines", but the word is out, Pandora's box (or bag or whatever it was) is opened.

• Why? There was always a "Minority Report" and popular media and Big Pharma/Big Med has suppressed it. So now, although it has been ignored for a century, it is finally getting attention because A, our actual science, our actual understanding of our world, or biodome, is rapidly expanding because of our communication technology. (Like me writing you-all, etc.) And B: people are just desperate to escape this lockdown nonsense, this global warming crap. No one in their right minds wants to eat bugs. No one wants to "own nothing and be happy" per the World Economic Forum.
  

• This Covid fraud, so lockstepped internationally, so unquestioned, so dropping diaboli ex machina on us out of the blue, has forced ever more people to realize it is B.S. That, and that the older, more holistic ideas of healing are innately sound. A "major tremor in the force" is that Dr. Michael Yeadon now as joined Tom Cowan and the Baileys, and a thoroughly vetted physician such as Zach Bush is getting a serious platform at the Children's Health Defense Fund.
  

So, we've turned a corner.

As this Dr. Bush says in the interview:

But the last 20 years of scientific discovery about how a healthy human body is inhabited by trillions of microbes, including bacteria and viruses, and how the body relies on the presence of these microbes to function, have “disrupted” this model, Bush said.

“We’re finding our way in allopathic Western medicine to an unfortunate conclusion that we were wrong, and that all the other ancient sciences were right.”

For thousands of years, Bush said, ancient health sciences — such as Ayurvedic medicine and Chinese traditional medicine — have affirmed a model of the “complete oneness in biology” that regards human life as inherently in relationship with the rest of nature, rather than a view of human beings as separate from and at odds with other manifestations of biological life on Earth, such as microbes.

In this ancient science model “you can’t separate out a single species” as separate from the rest of nature because human beings derive their sense of health — including physiological coherency, mental sanity and personal identity — through being in communicative relationship with the rest of biology, according to Bush.

Germs and humans: not ‘us versus them’ but a ‘cooperative relationship between many species’

Bush explained how scientists such as Louis Pasteur developed a germ theory of disease based on the idea that humans are always under attack from disease via the presence of germs, including hostile viruses and bacteria.

Other scientists during Pasteur’s era, such as Antoine Béchamp and his colleagues, disagreed with Pasteur’s germ theory.

According to Bush, these other scientists said the notion of an “us versus them” reality of microbes attacking human beings didn’t make sense because humans never would have existed if it weren’t for microbes.

“[Microbes] were here long before us,” Bush explained, “then we emerged from this environment of microbes, so there’s no way they’re against us.”

In fact, recent research suggests the human body contains a vast microbiome of helpful bacteria, fungi and viruses so small they are invisible to the naked eye — but without them, we wouldn’t be alive.

AnP again:

So, for Heaven's sake, and your own sanity, pass this Dr. Zach Bush interview on!

    An Préachán

Psalm 146 of the Douay-Rheims: verse 9:

Who giveth to beasts their food: and to the young ravens that call upon Him.

Ursula Van Der Leyen calls for end to Nuremberg Code, and Howard Springs internment camp

 Friends,

Things have taken a very nasty turn. One of the Globalist elites has openly called for the repudiation of the Nuremberg protocols. Those were established to defend everyday people from eugenic experiments, but certain elements in the Global intelligentsia have never given up on the idea of improving, or dare I say it, evolving the human race further. In an essential way, that is ultimately what Covid is all about. 

Background to ending the Nuremberg Code

Of the very few things I can boast about is that I'm always learning new things. Or at least, I try to keep my eyes open to new ideas as well as being willing to defend an established "narrative" if the evidence seems to support it. Alas, one of the things I've learned is that established narratives tend to be set in concrete not because they've been proven true (sometimes they are, but if so, all the more reason to double-check them from time to time) but because they're making too many people too money for these narratives to be overturned by evidence, no matter how substantial that evidence is. Covid and Global Warming is live-time examples of this.

In this regard, I've recently I've learned that the long-standing but easily repudiated Charles Darwin idea about the endless, brutal warfare between lifeforms that Darwin called "Natural Selection" heavily influenced the biologist Louis Pasteur.

I should have figured this out. I read it in Tom Cowan's book, The Contagion Myth. But I'm a dunce; it is so obvious. And after all, Darwin's notions influenced many others beside Pasteur. You know, like Adolf Hitler and Karl Marx. And Louis Pasteur.

1. Darwin published his Origin of Species in 1859 and Union and Confederate officers were discussing around in campfires in during the U.S. Civil War.
   
2. Naturally, Darwin's ideas were all the rage in the 1860s European intelligentsia (Marx and Engels were enthusiasts, though they developed their own version of the idea). As for Louis Pasteur, he had been experimenting before then.
   
3. In 1855, Pasteur discovered beer and wine became sour due to bacteria growing in them, and he developed a "pasteurizing" method of boiling the beer and wine and cooling the result, thus killing the bacteria.
   
4. In 1856, this achievement resulted in him returning to his old school as a professor.
   
5. By 1864, five years after Darwin's Origin of Species, Pasteur was studying bacteria again, in-depth and as to where it came from, and in 1864, he was also arguing that bacteria caused disease, and most histories of Pasteur at this point will assert that he proved bacteria were the cause of illness. (N.B. I'll go into this in more detail in a subsequent essay.)
   

Bottom Line: Pasteur naturally saw life in contention. Bacteria caused disease because life is in contention. Darwin proved that, right? Darwin proved for life to even exist at all it had to be in merciless contention. Life is a constant battle to survive, and that drove the variety of life on Earth. We humans fight the bacteria because we ourselves have to fight to survive and evolve. We see this in play now with the "vaccines". Darwinian. Pure Darwinian. The "vaccines" are the new step in human evolution, don't you see? They're making us "better" than our ancestors – or those of us, like myself – who refuse to have anything to do with these diabolical "vaccines". I don't want to be "new and improved", thanks very much NOT; I'm content to be a "pure blood" human, made by God rather than Tony Fauci or Pfizer or whoever.

In Globalist-Scientism eyes, that makes me a dinosaur, ripe for extinction.

Therefore:

Now that the German governments – despite a desperate last stand by 12 million holdouts of "pure human" Germans) – are rapidly showing their Darwinian colors, these colors turn out to be some old colors we've ALL seen before...

This is NOT hyperbole. Ursula Van Der Leyen, the EU commission chief, no less, told the press on the first of December that she is in favor of discarding the long-standing Nuremberg Code and forcing people to get vaccinated against COVID. They fully intend to force the 12 million German holdouts (and the same "resist" crowd in Austria) to be "Jabbed" starting in February. (That would amount to government-sanctioned rape.) This is what is called a "trial balloon", an outrageous idea floated to see if enough people react negatively enough that it has to be dropped, or perhaps can be kept, if the reaction is tepid enough.

Though Ursula Van Der Leyen has seven kids, she and her husband's family are Protestants. She has Protestant English ancestry, as well. Ursula's her great-grandmother was from Charleston, South Carolina, and Ursula even used her name during her education at one point because the Red Army Faction wanted to kidnap her. To look into her biography is to see a person given the best education and a truly international one, being educated in many countries. She's the very definition of a Globalist. So how can we be surprised at her views? (She also believes in same-sex "parents" adopting children.) As she rose in politics, by the way, that didn't hurt her husband's career; having a medical background, Heiko von der Leyen became in December 2020 the "Medical Director of the US biotech company Orgenesis which is specialized in cell and gene therapies."

How apropos. C'mon. These people are caricatures. My friends, these shallow, well-educated but soulless caricatures are the sorts of people promoting "the Jab" – they're "the in crowd" with all the Globalists running the show on Earth right now.

And what they have planned for us this young Australian women explains in some detail. Hayley Hodgson, 26, is an everyday person the Nuremberg Codes were designed to protect. Take the time to listen to Hayley tell her tale of being incarcerated in the Howard Springs Covid camp. She's you and me and all of us and what happened to her will most certainly be applied to all of us eventually. Only there'll be no being released.

Believe it.

(N.B. About the flag image, it too is not hyperbole. Especially obnoxious is that the current EU blue flag with gold stars is said to be the Blessed Virgin Mary's crown, which the original EU enthusiasts picked because they were all Catholics.)

An Préachán

"Are you a virologist?" Also, a powerful article, and a scary one...

 Friends,

Two related items in this email:

Firstly, occasionally, when one argues against a set idea, especially an idea that allows you to be a member of a cliquish group, snob faction, or dare I say it, a self-righteous "herd", you'll be confronted with the query: "What, are you a _ _ _?" As in "Are you a doctor?" "Are you a lawyer." Basically, "Are you an expert?" And the answer always is, of course, simple enough: "I can think for myself, which is apparently something a lot of folk just don't want to do for themselves."

An answer like that in Nazi Germany or Stalin's Russia or Mao's China would have got you dispatched from this world with celerity. We might be entering a time when that will soon be true again. Look at what is happening in Austria or Australia. But we are morally obligated by God to think for ourselves, since He made us in His image and likeness. Or also as Aristotle's "rational animal", thinking for ourselves is what makes us human. Animals themselves are not morally responsible but WE most definitely are. It's a gift, and a moral burden.

About a public policy that affects us all, and seems on course to remove all our freedoms to somehow "make us safe", as does the whole Covid fiasco, we need to know our history: to know, for one example from science, that Louis Pasteur was a fraud. This is well documented in his OWN private papers and was detailed in 2016 by Princeton University Professor Gerard Geison in his The Private Science of Louis Pasteur, (and actually, in effect, Pasteur himself admitted as much on his deathbed). And that is true for virology, because in the entire history of virology, viruses have never been proven to cause disease or to even exist – yes, that's true. Both allegations are, shockingly for those who don't know, historically true, if you bother to read the history and think for yourselves.

Bottom line: One must always beware of what Pasteur's French countrymen called the idée fixe. The "fixed idea". They should know. At one time, half of France had the fixed idea that Alfred Dreyfus was guilty of giving military secrets to the Germans. I'm sad to say, this was especially true of the Church in France (because Dreyfus was a Jew). No matter the evidence, no matter the proved guilt of the actual spy, none of it mattered. Then later they had the idée fixe that the Maginot Line would defend them from the Germans. They spent most of their military budget on it, so it had to be effective, right? How did that work out for them? Today, it's Covid.

Such is no way to live, my friends. It's no way to be human. Transhuman slaves, maybe, but not true human beings.

• BTW: We could all think – or so I hope – of snappy answers to this stupid question in the title, but I think my wife's is the best: "I'm not a mathematician, but I can count." (She politely doesn't add amadán, "dumbass!", but I'm not always so polite.)

Secondly, here's a powerful article from American Thinker, and a scary one, too. It, too, is about "herd thinking" and it opens with observations about Germany, but then goes on about the same attitudes manifesting in many Americans today. I'll excerpt just the first three paragraphs. Please, friends, read the rest. It is titled: "The Cruel Lesson to Learn from Austria's COVID Vax Insanity", by Joseph Kulve.

The excerpt:

Back in the late 1990s, I once complained about the quality of the tap water to my German colleagues in Bonn, Germany.  It was full of caulk.  Disgusting.  But they lectured me that the water was great and that it was full of caulk because it had to be reclaimed.  Otherwise, we would run out of water.  My mocking reaction that caulk is not water and that we were just a few miles from the massive Rhine river did not endear me to my colleagues.  Everyone knew that everything German was world-class, except me, apparently.

Memories of Germany came back to me when I recently read that Austria wants to remove the unvaccinated from society. Their crime?  Killing the vaccinated with the disease that the vaccines protect the vaccinated from (sounds as logical as the tap water thing).  I have not yet read that they want to kill anyone, but I am assuming they will remove them from society (concentrated in unvaccinated camps?) until they give in or have the jab forced on them.  Will Austria's unvaccinated have to hide in secret compartments in private homes until the insanity has run its course?

The details of what I read made it sound as if the extreme measures in Austria were motivated more by a desire to hide the previous failures of the Austrian kaisers' COVID policies than to protect the people.  As these COVID mandates start to look more like Frankenstein experiments gone wrong, those who mandated them will be looking for scapegoats — not unlike what happened with the failed economic management of the socialist governments in 1930s Austria and Germany.

AnP again:

As Sophocles observed 23 centuries ago, "Never say it cannot happen here."

An Préachán

What drives the viral and vaccine business: Money, of course

Amici, a Chairde,

As we keep struggling along with the ramifications of Covid, as I sit on a bus, wearing a useless mask, which thanks to Tony Fauci's emails, we know HE himself knew how useless masks are, a fact that also fit any number of previous studies over decades. (Also about Fauci, see this article on how Fauci and important U.S. doctors conspired to disqualify hydroxychloroquine as a Covid treatment, thus condeming many to death.) 

In any event, I think it is important to remember that a serious argument exists which says the entire thing is a fraud, down to the idea that viruses cause illness.

Now, I know that sounds crazy but I've been researching it for some time, and the more you know about the history of the idea, and how it came to be so widely accepted, the more incredulous you become. Dr Andrew Kaufman is someone who carefully explains the many aspects of this question. He has an excellent and clear interview here with Søren Ventegodt.

They cover a LOT of material, much of it how science works, or is supposed to work, how scientists are supposed to function, and the history of virology. For example, from 6:49 to 9:15 there's a discussion of how researchers fraudulently "isolate" viruses, and it goes beyond that latter time stamp. We've generally covered this issue before, so I'll provide here my transcript of their discussion of just WHY they use the tissue culture method of virus "isolation" (remember, it doesn't remotely "isolate" any virus). The initial part of that discussion is the famous (or infamous) spike protein on the Covid virus casing, the protein the "vaccines" are chockablock full of and which are supposed to get the body to resist the virus, but also which doomsayers assert will start ripping up arteries and veins.

(N.B. Whether the vaccines eventually result in wide-spread death, as some are predicting, I have no clue: we have wait to find out; but as of now, over 5,000 vaccine-caused deaths are recorded and the CDC's VAERS pages. That's supposed to be between one and ten percent of the total, although were that huge number true, the MainStream Media would never tell us.)

However, should Kaufman, and Dr Tom Cowan, and the German scientist Stefan Lanka, among others, be correct, then whatever the "vaccines" are, they're not doing anything to stop a virus, because viruses either don't exist or do not cause disease. And they cannot stop Covid, in particular, because Covid was never isolated, as Kaufman patiently explains.

Then I skip ahead to Kaufman's explanation of just what makes the whole virus-is-deadly-and-needs-vaccines "narrative". The short answer is money, of course. Always, always follow the money.

The infamous "spike" protein

29:50 In order to say there's a spike protein – because that's what we're talking about that's from a virus – would be to actually take a spike protein right off the envelope of a virus and study it; then you can sequence that protein and match it up to a gene. If it matches a gene, you can do it that way. But these experiments have never been done; they've never ever taken a spike protein from a virus particle because they've never actually purified any virus particles. So what they did was, and they did this from the beginning, they came up with a theoretical genome based upon these crazy computer experiments but never taking the genetic material from a virus, only piecing it together from big mixture of lots of organisms with random fragments of genetic material. And the computer models this and comes up with this sequence and calls it a gene and says it's the spike protein. But how do we know it has anything to do with nature, because it's never been shown to exist in nature. (31:19)

What drives the viral business: Money, of course

37 minutes in:

Exsomes are cell particles that escape cells that are damaged or dying. They have developed procedures to purify those out of people. And there are lots of published papers – they've even taken them out of lung fluid directly. So if they can do this procedure so readily with exosomes, which are small in number in fact, according to the theory of what they are, they're supposedly fewer than viruses, a much smaller number than viruses, they should have no problem doing it (isolation) for a virus.

(37:46) They tried this, BTW, in the 1930s and '40s after the electron microscope had been invented but they gave up in the early 1950s because they came to the conclusion that all we see are random particles of dying cells. (An P: i.e., the electron microscope allowed them to look for the tiny disease-causes particles Louis Pasteur theorized 100 years before; however...) ...There's no one predominant particle that would represent one entity. (i.e. They couldn't prove Pasteur's theory). And so they gave up until this tissue culture experiment was created by John Enders in 1954.

(38:13) And that tissue culture isolation method combined with the (then) new theory of DNA and the recently reported double-helix to lead to this re-invigoration of the virus idea, which was re-conceptualized as having genetic material. They named this new experiment "isolation", which really obfuscated the true issue, and it really propelled the whole thing (the virus idea), the real kicker of why this thing took off. These tissue culture experiments that I told you are not able to prove a virus but they are offered as the proof, is also the technique for vaccine manufacture. So that same tissue culture experiment, they take the fluid off that and that is what they call a "live virus vaccine". And if they take that fluid and put it in another culture, grow that culture and take the fluid off that and grow it in another culture, and take that fluid, that's called an "attenuated live virus vaccine". (39:20)
So, in other words, with one experiment, you can both prove the existence of a dangerous virus and manufacture a vaccine for that dangerous virus. And THAT's what's driven the science of virology, really. Because remember there are no treatments that are successful for viral illnesses. (N.B. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin are for parasitical infections, not viruses, though they work wonderfully well against Covid.) There are some very toxic drugs that are used but none of them claim to cure a viral illness, so the main industry is the vaccine industry that addresses these viruses, and it is one of the biggest revenue generators for the pharmaceutical-medical industrial complex. (40:02)

An P again:

This last point is significant. Since traditionally, standard medicine practitioners say viral illnesses can only be protected from vaccines, as opposed to commonly available drugs like Hydroxy or Ivermectin actually curing the illness – that puts the "Big Pharma" conglomerates in a wonderful money-making monopoly. So, clearly, they had every reason to hide the effectiveness of Hydroxy and Ivermectin against Covid. 1, We now know that use of these Lysosomotropic drugs would have meant no need for any vaccines, and so no money for Big Pharma; and 2, malarial/parasitical medicines working against a supposedly viral illness would have destroyed the entire Covid narrative, for it would mean that either Covid is not a viral disease or viruses don't cause disease in the first place.

There's a lot more to the interview than these bits, and especially fascinating (and depressing) is the history of how they "proved" a virus causes Polio or the insane (and unsuccessful) lengths they went through to infect volunteers during the Spanish Flu pandemic. So if you are interested in THE big issue of the day, you ought to listen to some of it, at least.

Truly, acta deos numquam mortalia fallunt.

An Préachán