I renounce, denounce, and repudiate Bergoglio as pope – because...

...Because it is obvious he's out to destroy the Catholic Church.

Yes, that's right. It is obvious, especially after this doleful trip to Canada wherein Bergogio engaged in a pagan seance, opening his stupid self – and the prelates there with him – to demonic possession! It's insane. INSANE. And so I'm taking off the gloves. No more Mr. Nice Préachán. (And anyway, after 60 years of "turning the other cheek" to these people, enough is enough.)

Attack on the TLM intensifies

As we approach the establishment of One World Religion with the opening of the Abrahamic Covenant House in Abu Dhabi, attacks on the TLM intensify. And now the anti-pope Bergoglio is directly attacking the TLM, trying to close them wherever they are, using Cupich in Chicago,  Gregory of Washington D.C., and now the bishop of Arlington, Virginia, Michael F. Burbidge, to do so. (This tactic is being repeated all over Europe as well as North America or anywhere on the planet.) Of course Bergoglio's attack on the Traditional Latin Mass is a direct attack on Holy Church. Why?

1. Because a Church or any religion "is how it worships".
   
2. The traditional Latin saying for this is Lex orandi, Lex credende. "As you pray, so you believe". 
3. Its the style, form of worship that creates a religion's paradigm.
   
4. Making Muslims worship like Mormons or Hindus like Baptists is just as insane as making Catholics worship like Methodists. (I grew up with Methodists, and the Novus Ordo is often exactly that style of worship.)
   
5. The leaders of the Catholic Church have been launched on one huge "psy-ops" for over a half-century now, a cognitive-dissonance psy-op. The results are obvious.

More and more "mainstream" Catholics are cottoning on to the truth that is Lex orandi, Lex credende; one's worship forms one's belief. As the soul is the form of the body, so the liturgy forms the Church. When the soul departs at death, the body putrefies. We have all of us, Catholic, Protestant, Jew, Muslim, Hindu, have see the Catholic Church literally decompose over the past half century. Benedict tried to reverse it with his Summorum Pontificum. and was overthrown. His 'installed' replacement, Bergoglio, has wielded his axe against S.P.

This is inherently cruel. Bergoglio's cruelty is not remotely Christian. It is not honorable pagan. We KNEW Bergoglio was bad news when he crucified the Franciscans Friars of the Immaculate, which various "Church Lady" busybodies, true imps, "accused of focusing only on the Extraordinary Form", so the bureaucracy under Benedict in 2012 launched a visitation (a formal investigation) and Bergoglio, installed March 13, 2013, in 2013 smacked them down. Hard.  

What about the current TLM smack down?

Consider this sorrowful lament – and damning indictment – of both the remorseless cruelty of Bergoglio an the screaming stupidity of Bergoglio and his henchmen. The author describes the devastation wreaked on a southern Maryland TLM parish:

"Catholics who don’t hew to the official program of mind control which views 2,000 years through the exclusive lens of one pastoral council, which occurred over a period of a few years in the 1960’s, must be monitored closely and accompanied into the true Church as envisioned by prelates promoting LGBTQ+, transgender ideology and Communion for adulterers, just for starters." (We should all memorize this!)

The author of this excellent article, Father Kevin M Cusick, notes that the parish simply cannot afford to lose the TLM: only 20 to 30 Novus Ordo parishioners show up on a Sunday, and the parish just spent a bunch of money on restoring the Church for the TLM, as well. Just a mess. People are, to use that poignant Irish phrase, "gob-smacked". In this one area, three-hundred TLM parishioners from three parishes will be herded into a mission church with room for only half that number (and apparently with little or no parking). Father Cusick likens the parishioners to being prisoners of war, herded into official camps, or to 19th century American Indians forced onto the reservation.

With all this, we can truly say, Damn you, Beregoglio, and the horse you rode in on.

Then in this article, well-known and widely respected mainstream "Trad" Dr. Peter Kwasniewski writes another of his very learned and wise articles on how the Church is in such a free-fall catastrophe, and at least we can toss the "forced optimism" that has characterized Catholic prelates and commentators for 60 years. Prelates and theologians and priests galore smiled their Joker-smiles and repeated ad nauseam how much better things were getting. Liars. The Vatican II reforms, at least as implemented by those "in the spirit of Vatican II" are an unmitigated disaster. We don't have to pretend any longer. Also, Professor Kwasniewski "goes for broke" and clearly says the Novus Ordo has no future, that the TLM will be fully restored:

I will regretfully but more truthfully stick with the language of crisis. We will never find a solution to this churchwide crisis until we reclaim our Roman Catholic birthright, our innermost identity through the celebration of our traditional sacred liturgy. When the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the Divine Office, and the sacramental rites of the Church are once again offered to God in a manner truly in continuity with tradition, then, and only then, will come that “Second Spring” about which postconciliar Popes have spoken with such premature confidence; only then will a new age of evangelization begin in earnest, with the Mass of the Ages as its pulsing heart.

And:

In short, if the Catholic Faith survives in any given diocese of the West, it will survive either by embracing the Tradition of the Church, or by dwelling beneath the shadow of the wings of that Tradition. Liberal territories are drying up; the moderate or eclectic approach has shown itself weak and spineless, incapable of responding effectively to the aggressive and even demonic secularism of our time.

 

The Canadian Trip

This article at LifeSiteNews is an excellent source what what happened in Canada, while this article details some of the shocking things Bergoglio is saying about the TLM. He clearly has no clue about what attracts people to the TLM and thus you get all his commentary (and his supporters ominous wording) about how Trad Catholics need to be "re-educated". Sounds like Communist re-education camps, doesn't it? Many of his people are saying the TLM will only be allowed as a half-way house to full-scale re-education.  

The Irony of it all

Ironically, if Bergoglio's goal is to destroy Traditional Catholicism, he'll only succeed in destroying Pope Paul's creation, the inherently "disgraced" Church John Paul II kept going for 30 years. (Somewhere in these articles, one of the insightful authors wrote of the Novus Ordo that the only thing that distinguished it was the collapse of Mass attendance it caused!) Whereas another John Paul II-type pope would have killed us with a thousand cuts, Bergoglio is the axe wielder. God allows all this because the Lord wants His bishops on Earth, what used to be called the Church Militant, to show themselves to themselves (and everyone else) to be gutless cowards, knaves, and "disgraced" fence-sitters. It's a divine effort to get them to "wake up" and "repent" before they die. And as Bishop Athanasius Schneider says, the restoration of the Latin Mass is the work of the Holy Ghost and cannot be stopped. They need to get on board, or drown.

Destroyer of Church Government

Before I finish, let me take a moment to explain just how bad it is if one pope undoes, formally declares null and void, what a previous pope promulgated. Take birth control for an example. The Church has always damned artificial birth control and counseled abstinence, etc., instead. Love it or hate it (and if you hate it, you don't understand the teaching), that's the Church's rule. But if Bergoglio refutes that and supersedes it with a contrary law, then he's murdered the Papacy. Sound crazy? It's not. Why? Because the Church operates on Stare Decisis. It's governing system stands or falls on Stare Decisis.

• A pope is chief legislator and chief jurist and chief exec of the Church: he has carte blanc power – but only to defend the deposit of Faith.
  
• He's like Aladdin's genie, unlimited power but confined to a lamp – he has a very restricted use of his power.
  
• Unlike the president of the Mormon Church or a willful Protestant, like Luther, a pope cannot break precedent.
  
• As St. Paul wrote in 2 Thessalonians 2:15 "… 14 To this He called you through our gospel, so that you may share in the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. 15 Therefore, brothers, stand firm and cling to the traditions we taught you, whether by speech or by letter."
  
• A pope is as bound to that as is any lay Catholic or parish priest.

Luther broke the Tradition, coming up with a novel revelation about Romans 3 while sitting on a toilet; in contrast, a Mormon president can make it by saying he has had a prophesy to reveal, such as the decision to repudiate "plurality of wives" that Mormon president Wilford Woodruff made in 1890 (after a business trip to San Francisco). No pope can do that. If a pope were to start overturning precedent, he has dynamited the Church's government. He's cut its throat.

• Bergoglio has already done this on a number of levels, such as with capital punishment, a Church teaching since St. Paul himself. See Romans 13:4 For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. John Paul II tried to nibble away at that, and Bergoglio has broken it, changing the Catechism (which no one reads anyway). His next step would be to excommunicate Catholics who still hold the traditional teaching.
• Because Bergoglio has set this new precedent, the next pope can overturn everything Bergoglio did, without even having to declare him an antipope. Or a pope could overturn any basic dogma. Recreate the religion in his own image. This what Bergoglio has done, and the world's bishops let him get away with it.

Bergoglio is also clearly relaxing (previous to truly changing) Church teaching on homosexuals and their behavior, (Many Progressive bishops, esp in Germany, have already done so! See this LifeSiteNews article for details.) But regarding the Traditional Latin Mass, Bergoglio, with Traditiones Custodes and its later supposed Dubia, and Archbishop (and Progressive flunky and former ice-skater) Arthur Roche's anti-Trad rulings, Bergoglio the Accursed is clearly moving toward an outright suppression of the TLM. Many commentators expect this to come in 2023. As noted above, he's allowing it a limited existence now in order to "re-educate" us.

Again, taking off the gloves, not trying to mince words and not trying to be "nice" about it, the New Mass has been an act of cognitive dissonance. It has never been accepted by everyone in the Church, beset as it has been from the beginning by controversy, bringing with it rampant abuses, scandal, sacrilege and loss of faith. (Did you see the news from Italy of the priest who celebrated Mass in the surf, on a floating altar?) As noted above, the only constant by which the Novus Ordo can be measured is a continuing decline in attendance.

So, my friends, all things Catholic are in turmoil. But secluded havens exist, such as Dom Alcuin Reid's haven in the South of France, the Monastère Saint-Benoît. And there's Silverstream Priory in Ireland. About them, too, "allegations were made" but investigation by both Irish police (The Garda) and Church authorities found "no cause of action". (It just never lets up, does it?) And of course Clear Creek Abbey in Hulbert, Oklahoma. And everywhere, too, we'll be seeing the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass offered in the proper way despite the screechings of the Progressives. (Can't someone tell them the Age of Aquarius has passed?) With God's blessing, we'll have a myriad of other such havens of the True Faith. So, keep praying!

  An Préachán

Psalm 146 of the Douay-Rheims: verse 9:

Who giveth to beasts their food: and to the young ravens that call upon Him.

TLM Parishioner laments Wilton Gregory's closing of the TLM in D.C.

Amici,

Rampaging Bergoglio is the Boar that has entered the vineyard to ravage it. How else can he be described in his insane attack on Latin Massers? Below is a cri de coeur about this from Washington D.C., and I had to pass a bit of it on. It is, of course, one of many. Very, very many.  And they're not just from D.C. as is this one below, but from Chicago and Savannah and wherever these ogres try their best to Cancel Catholicism. No other way exists to describe it. They want to cancel the Traditional Latin Mass because that IS Catholicism, the way it has been since the beginning, a long-process organic development like a great tree.

But why? Why would they care? They care because the Traditional Latin Mass threatens their "legacy", their lives' work. The Novus Ordo can't compare to it for being Catholic. Although Latin Massers are still few in number, their growth arc is amazing. All this attention accelerates that. Even an oaf like Jorge Bergoglio can see it, or at least sense it. And thus, they have become true Pharisees. For example, from what I understand, there's been a host of letters written to Wilton Gregory imploring him not to cancel the Latin Mass, etc., in D.C. Priests, too, have pleaded with him. Theologians. Professors. All sorts. To no avail. So, here's one "cry of the heart". An excerpt (it should be all highlighted):

The Mass suppression becomes effective September 21 of this year, giving TLM parishioners at churches such as Saint Mary Mother of God (where this writer has attended for over 26 years; the parish had the TLM from 1845 until 1969, then again from the mid-1980s until now) just nine weeks to pack up and say goodbye. To say goodbye to where I was married. To say goodbye to where I served as godfather for baptisms. To say goodbye to the Gregorian chant schola I have sung in for nearly three decades. To say goodbye to the church where I attended around 2,000 traditional Latin Masses, numerous baptisms, and many nuptial and Requiem Masses. To say goodbye to where I made many of my friends. To say goodbye to where TLM parishioners -- from Antonin Scalia to Pat Buchanan to Nellie Gray to James Buckley to young adults and large families -- spent countless hours at coffee and donuts socials after Sunday Masses. To say goodbye to the Blessed Karl Mass and the epicenter for March for Life TLMs. To say goodbye to my spiritual home.

AnP again:

How can I add anything to that? Anything to something so noble, so sad, as sad as when Virgil "poemed" the hero Aeneas exclaiming: “Sunt lacrimae rerum et mentem mortalia tangent.” “These are tears of things, and mortal matters touch the mind.”

The author of the piece above will be going across the river to the diocese of Arlington, Virginia, which "has the most amount of TLMs per parish than anywhere in the world". The author says a couple of Masses there will probably be canceled later, what with that bishop also being under pressure from the Ogre Bergoglio – I think I'm going to change that to "Bergoglio the Accursed", because that is what he is, him and Cupich and this faggot Wilton Gregory – all of them denizens of the Sodomical Modernist Hierarchy, all of them "soul-mates" of the unspeakable former Cardinal McCarrick. (And before him, there was the Satan-worshiping Joseph Bernardin, who died in late 1996.)

What Bergoglio and peeps are doing is also SO Matthew 23 (an excerpt)

Matthew 23
13 But woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; because you shut the kingdom of heaven against men, for you yourselves do not enter in; and those that are going in, you suffer not to enter.

14 Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites: because you devour the houses of widows, praying long prayers. For this you shall receive the greater judgment.

15 Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; because you go round about the sea and the land to make one proselyte; and when he is made, you make him the child of hell twofold more than yourselves.

(And on and on, a great 'rant' from God Himself!)

Honestly, this is SO spiritually putrid. So obscenely Satanic. No other word for it. (Maybe "Freemasonary"....) Again and again these bags of human sludge, seeping into damnation themselves, proudly war like Dante's Demons on the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. How many souls have they lost? I reflect on it, as Odin ponders the news of his ravens, I ponder my long memory and wonder how I would have turned out differently had I had the TLM from the mid-'60s to Benedict's Summorum Pontificum (July 2007).

Does this anti-TLM rage make sense to anyone? Catholicism – not just the "Roman" Catholicism – has TWENTY-THREE rites, most of them Eastern. So, why not a 24th, the  TLM? Because they know the power of the TLM and that its return will destroy EVERYTHING they labored for. What does NOT make sense is for any Catholic of any orthodox sort to tolerate these clowns five seconds.

• Yes, on one level, this is just the last of the fading Vatican II-era prelates – Bergoglio was the first "pope" (if he's pope, I'm the Aga Khan! i.e. the Imām of the Nizari Ismāʿīli Shias) ordained a priest in the Novus Ordo rite – on their way to exist as fertilizer. Bergoglio is about already room temperature himself, it seems. So he's desperate to defecate all over the only part of the Church that is growing and faith-filled and YOUNG. He says the TLM Catholics are "rigid", "old" and all that claptrap, but the opposite is true. Everyone who is honest about the Church's situation knows this.
• So, all this hate from the Vatican (Traditionis Custodes, Archbishop Roche's degrees, his answers to Dubia that weren't even asked, and now Cupich's and Gregory's antics) constitute the detritus of the Vatican II Council as it dissipates into putrescence.
  
• And Bergoglio thinks the next pope will be "Francis II". Bergi has tried his best to ensure that, and it might happen. But any strong ruler, certainly any overbearing one, makes so many enemies that his successor often repudiates him, as Khrushchev repudiated Stalin. And Bergoglio is our Stalin. Another example is how the American public voted to "cancel" Woodrow Wilson's era as president in 1920. The whole Vatican II Era is like the last, nightmare years of the Wilsonian Regime. It will be repudiated. So, I wouldn't be in the least surprised if Bergoglio's successor removes most of all this. 
• And finally, should a Bergoglio 2.0 be elected, he'll serve as a focal point of Schism. In fact, a "conservative" pope will probably create a Schism, with heretics starting their own version of Catholicism. The Church is in Schism right now, just a not too openly declared one.
  

And another reason for optimism is that the papacy can't survive the Bergoglian Model: i.e. Tyranny, plain and simple, from Hell's dimension. If fact, it is Anarcho-Tyranny, what the Democrats/Communists in the U.S. are doing now, reigning by executive orders signed by a non compos mentis puppet. If one pope can just by fiat cancel another pope's rulings, the  papacy must collapse. That's because it only works based on Tradition, stare decisis in legal terms. Pope C has to try to support Pope B's rulings, and Pope B had to try to build directly on Pope A. But if Pope B can totally cancel the work of Pope A, then Pope C can just turn around and cancel Pope B's decisions. Utter chaos. Each new pope would create a new Church. And that is perhaps Jorge Mario Bergoglio's biggest legacy to the Catholic Church. Creating a new Church is what he's attempting. 

Most prelates have to understand that. Only the most hard-core of his followers (Cupich, Roche, the Tobin in NJ, that POS in San Diego, etc.) would go the "Full Jorge". And then another aspect to this is that just as Bergoglio the Accursed has done in China, where he has succeeded only in driving the true Catholics even deeper underground, so the TLM is not going away. This isn't the '70s. Go ahead and try to cancel it. Make the SSPX 20x the size it is now, make Dom Alcuin Reid found monasteries across Europe. He might well start a new Clunaic Reform! Go ahead.

I for one will stand up and say to Bergi's face (he could care less about me, obviously) that I reject him, his papacy, and his demands that I (or any Catholic) accept Vatican II. Dar Crom, what CATHOLIC Modernist has accepted the Vatican II documents over the past 60 years? They just ignore them and make up whatever they want in the "spirit of Vatican II". Vatican II has been made absurd by its most vocal defenders! How's that for irony?

But many, many souls will be lost, as I wrote above. They're being lost by the second. As the Great Chastisement engulfs us, we must pray for them, and one must even try to pray for the Scribes and Pharisees of today. Pray for their conversion to Catholicism before they croak. Because croak they will and they're not now Catholic, any more than is the Imām of the Nizari Ismāʿīli Shias.

   An Préachán

Psalm 146 of the Douay-Rheims: verse 9:

Who giveth to beasts their food: and to the young ravens that call upon him.