As promised, the segment on The Delta Variant "the Illusion of Demand"

Friends,

As I promised a few days ago, here is the Delta Variant segment of the testimony Reiner Fuellmich receives from David Martin, CEO and Chairman of M·CAM®, an international intangible asset underwriter and analyst firm spanning work in innovation finance, trade, and intangible asset finance.

Find the interview here on Brighteon. 

1. N.B. You'll need to know what GISAID is. From https://www.gisaid.org: The GISAID Initiative was established to champion (and enhance) rapid sequence data sharing for seasonal and pandemic influenza preparedness – a global public health imperative. GISAID's success exceeded our expectations and provides an important model for rapid data sharing for other pathogens with pandemic potential.
2. Second N.B. When David Martin says below that, "And the problem is, that because of the nature of the way in which we currently sequence genomes, which is actually a composting process, it's what we call in mathematics an interleaving. We don't have any point of reference to actually know whether or not the thing we're looking at is in fact distinct from either clinical or even a genomic sense." This is in fact what I reported on some time ago from Drs Tom Cowan and Andrew Kaufman: i.e., Covid has never had its genome "isolated" because modern "isolation" techniques involve inserting body fluid/mucus into a cell culture, growing the mix, then treating it in various ways (radiation, starvation, antibiotics), and finally sorting the resulting soup through a specialized computer, picking out the genetic bits one wants to find. Therefore, David Martin's comments here constitute an independent confirmation of  Cowan and Kaufman's description of the "isolation" method and how it doesn't work. -An P
   

The Delta Variant 

(My transcription) 56:16 mins in; DM (David Martin): There is no such thing as an Alpha or Beta or Delta variant. This is a means by which what is desperately sought is a degree to which individuals can be coerced into accepting something that they would not otherwise accept.

There has not been in any of the published studies on what is reportedly the Delta variant, there has not been a population ... calculated, which is the actual replication rate. What has been estimated are computer simulations. But unfortunately, if you look at GISAID, which is the public source of uploading any one of a number of variations, what you will find is that there has been no ability to identify any clinically altered gene sequence which has then a clinically expressed variation. And this is the problem all along, this is the problem going back to the very beginning of what's alleged to be a pandemic: Is we do not have any evidence that the gene sequence alteration had any clinical significance whatsoever. There has not been a single paper published by anyone that has actually established that anything novel since November of 2019 has clinical distinction from anything that predates November 2019.

(58:01)The problem with the 73 patents that I described, is that those 73 patents all contain what was reported to be novel in December and January of 2019/2020 respectively. So the problem is that even if we were to accept that there are idiopathic [i.e. "relating to or denoting any disease or condition which arises spontaneously or for which the cause is unknown."] pneumonias – even if we were to accept that there are some set of pathogen-induced symptoms, we do not have a single piece of published evidence that tells us that anything about the subclade SARS-CoV has clinical distinction from anything that was known and published prior to November 2019 in 73 patents dating to 2008.

[At this point, one of Reiner's staff has a question. DM reacts:]

This is where we see an enormous amount of reflexive behavior to media hype. There is no evidence, and I'm going to repeat this, there is no evidence that the Delta variant is somehow distinct from anything else on GISAID. The fact that we are now looking for a thing doesn't mean it is a thing, because we are looking at fragments of things, and the fact is that we could choose any fragment; I could come up with, you know, the 'Variant Omega' – tomorrow. I could say "I'm looking for this substrand of either DNA or RNA, or even a protein." And I could run around the world saying, "Oh my gosh, fear the Omega variant!"

And the problem is, that because of the nature of the way in which we currently sequence genomes, which is actually a composting process, it's what we call in mathematics an interleaving. We don't have any point of reference to actually know whether or not the thing we're looking at is in fact distinct from either clinical or even a genomic sense.

And so: We're trapped in a world, where unfortunately you go, as I have, and look as I have at the paper that isolated the Delta variant, and actually ask the question: is the Delta variant anything other the selection of a sequence in a systematic a shift of an already disclosed other sequence? The answer is: a it's just an alteration of when you start an stop the reading frame. There is no novel anything. (1:01:22)

(1:02:00) (Generalized transcription follows)

From patent materials, David Martin shows how if you actually look at the genome sequences the published sequences, we realize that depending on where you clip the actual sequence string, you'll have the same thing or a different thing, but it's nothing more than on where you decide to parse the clip! clip! And he points out how the patents plainly say these are artificial sequences! They're not natural. And these nucleotide sequences can overlap, etc. "It's a caprice determination" he says. This is important because, he says, "If we're going to find out what exactly is being injected into people, we're going to need exact sequences. Not a kind of or similar to; we need the exact sequence. But neither in the FDA or the EU – we have no way of verifying

 

David Martin pointed out that his researchers had heavy going through the patent records, because: "You have to reconstruct the genomes by hand. This was a manufactured illusion."

He also said, "They changed the pathogen from influenza to Covid in order to scare people to take the injections."

(1:14:07) David Martin:

"You need to create the illusion of demand, and there's nothing right now that does a better job right now that creates the illusion of demand than the urgency of an event that you've manufactured."

End transcription

Final note and summation

I sent around a link to an article by Vasko Kohlmayer here at American thinker yesterday and if you read the whole article, Kohlmayer makes the argument that the "vaccines" are not working (and using Boris Johnson and his health minister, Sajid Javid, as poignant examples) because the Covid variants are being naturally evolved so fast that the "vaccines" simply can't keep up.

• Kohlmayer is actually reporting here a mainstream medicine argument against over-vaccination. So, the author argues it is insane to keep vaccinating. He writes: “Trying to beat this disease with inoculations is like playing cat and mouse, where we can never catch up with ever-new variants of the rapidly morphing virus. In other words, because of its nature, the virus will always be one step ahead in the vaccination game.”

Theoretically, this should be the entire Western medical field's critique of the crazy "vaccination" push, but it most definitely is not. This strange fact ought to raise "red flags" everywhere, and with every government, but oddly, it does not. That in itself should scare everyone! Just what is going on?

The author of this Boris Johnson piece, Kohlmayer, sums up, writing:

The question is: what for? Why would anyone in their right mind want to get injected with the dangerous concoctions whose long-term effects are unknown that will not keep one from Covid or the quarantine?

And...

Why are so few people asking this question?

HOWEVER: this standard sort of medical wisdom is NOT what David Martin is saying in his testimony to Reiner Fuellmich. Martin is saying there are NO mutations and the whole thing is made up by Big Pharma, using already patented genomes and vaccines!

Please keep that in mind. A realist could say, naturally enough, that EITHER WAY, this whole, entire Covid "pandemic" and "vaccine" narrative is not just wrong, but desperately wrong, and dangerous.

All of this is extremely damning, my friends. Extremely.

That's why I take the time to write about it to you.

An Préachán

Patent lawyer/auditor discovers Covid was patented years ago, as were vaccines

 Friends,

I never thought of this, but incredibly, Big Pharma and the mega-rich behind the Covid pandemic have been busily patenting their genetic inventions for decades, and an American expert in the patent field reveals the extent of their fraud. None of you will like this news, but you need to know the unbelievable extent we've all be scammed over Covid.

Usually, regarding Covid, I work from a medical angle and/or a science one. But Dr. David E. Martin is an expert in patent law and in international cheating on the various bio- and chemical-weapons treaties. In an over an hour interview, Dr. David Martin of M·CAM® Risk Management talks with German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich about something very few of you know (I sure didn't): the incredible patent records detailing the long history of what we know as SARS-CoV-2 (a.k.a. coronavirus, Covid). We were told it was a new virus developed in a Chinese lab. The key science word was "novel". None of that is true.

Martin has the evidence. It's all in the U.S. Patent Office anyway. Now Reiner Fuellmich has Martin's full records.

Dr. Martin has a long history of investigation in patents. His M·CAM organization first audited the European Patent Office (Munich) in 2003 and 2004, where they showed that somewhere between 20 and 30 percent of the patents in Europe were functional forgeries, meaning they were copied from previous patents. Martin says, "The German representation of the European patent office lost their mind at the notion that they were doing anything remotely wrong." Then the EU commissioned Martin's org to examine software patents a few years later at the request of the Swedish delegation to the EU. Martin's org showed hundreds and hundreds of patents that were illegally granted by the EU through the EPO. Martin says, "We found out it was German patent examiners and German patent practitioners were responsible for their filing. We once again found that there was an enormous outcry. So what happens is they have a dogmatically held position which says that even though the European patent office is supposed to be pan-European, there is still in the minds of the German patent establishment, a supremacy over the rest of Europe."

Regarding Covid, the gist of it is that Dr. Martin gives at least 40 minutes to going through the U.S. Patent Office records showing – and mind you, he reads the specific patent numbers, so this is all exact and precise – the history of the use of the naturally occurring coronavirus by Big Pharma in their 20+ years effort to use coronavirus as a medium carrying RNA vaccines for AIDS/HIV and also, concurrently, the efforts to use it as a bio-weapon. AND incredibly, he has found that twice in the past two decades, coronavirus "vaccines" were patented before the patents issued on the virus themselves! He's found where Big Pharma got a naturally occurring genome patented, something that's supposed to be against U.S. law. Forget the Chinese (not that they don't necessarily want a weapon, of course). But it is Western companies, many in the U.S., and DARPA, the military bio-weapon people, who have been working for decades with this coronavirus.

• N.B. The ludicrous idea of using a naturally occurring cold virus to spread vaccines is just the type of idiot idea idiot scientists would come up with. Michael Crichton wrote Jurassic Park on this principle that scientists are so keen on doing X, Y, or Z, so keen on making it happen, that they never regard what might occur once they actually create when they bring their crazy idea to life. (Unlike in the movie, where the scientist escapes, in the original book, a Utah raptor dinosaur eats him.)

Most emphatic point made in this Covid interview: Covid is NOT a "novel" virus, and the mRNA "vaccines" are NOT vaccines. The Patent Office told Anthony Fauci that himself years ago, as you can see in my extract below. Dr. Martin reads from the Patent Office's rejection of Fauci's patent attempt. This is extremely important.

FULL INTERVIEW: There is no variant... not novel... no pandemic. Dr David Martin with Reiner Fuellmich

• Dr. David Martin founded M·CAM® in 1998 and has served as its CEO and Chairman since that time, M·CAM® has been an international intangible asset underwriter and analyst firm spanning work in innovation finance, trade, and intangible asset finance.
• ( https://www.m-cam.com/about-us/ )

Interview notes at Patreon:

• ... not "novel"... no pandemic.. no variants... campaign of coercion & terror to address a stated objective. Dr David Martin, who can tell us what the Vaxxed can do about this synthetic recombinant chimera protein? "There was no novel Coronavirus. Check of gene sequence vs all patent records showed it is not "novel" since 1999! There are 120 patented pieces of evidence showing the total fallacy of claim 'novel'!

• A manufactured illusion. Dr David Martin with Reiner Fuellmich 9/7/21

An P: Here follows my typed transcript of an important section of the interview:

(45:00 mins in: Reiner Fuellmich) This is a tool (Coronavirus) in creating a biological weapon, and this is a tool for everything else that latches on to this, including population control, for example.

(45:16; David Martin) Well, listen, this – we have to stop the mainstream narrative even in our own line of questioning, because the fact of the matter is, this was seen as a highly malleable bio-weapon. There's no question that by 2005, it was unquestionably a weapon of choice. And the illusion that we continue to unfortunately see very well-meaning people get trapped in, these conversations about whether we're having a vaccine for a virus – the fact of the matter is, we're not. We're injecting a spike protein mRNA sequence which is a computer simulation – it is not derived from nature – it is a computer simulation of a sequence that has been known and patented for years, and what we know is that sequence as reported, is reported across things like the very reliable phone conversations that took place between Moderna and the Vaccine Research Center by self-report. Where, I don't know, if you were on a phone call and you heard (sequence of letters) is there any chance you might get a letter dropped here or there. The ludicrous nature of the story that this is somehow prophylactic or preventative, flies in the face of 100% of the evidence because the evidence (i.e. long, long history of various patents Dr. Martin details previous to this section) makes it abundantly clear, that there has been no effort by any pharmaceutical company to combat the virus. This is about getting people injected with the known-to-be-harmful S-1 spike protein. So the cover story is if you get an expression of the spike protein, you're going to have some sort of a general symptomatic relief. But the fact of the matter is, there has never been an intent to vaccinate a population as defined by vaccination universe. (time 47:37)

And it is important, let's review for the record, what Anthony Fauci tried desperately to get some of his quote "synthetic RNA" vaccines published, he had his own patents rejected by the patent office. And I want to read what the patent office told him, when NIAID's own Anthony Fauci told him when he thought he could get an mRNA vaccine patented as a vaccine. And here's the quote: (48:00) "These arguments are persuasive to the extent that an antigenic peptide stimulates an immune response that may produce antibodies that bind to a specific peptide or protein. But it is not persuasive in regards to a vaccine." Ok? This is the patent office. This is not some sort of public health agency. This is the patent office. "The immune response produced by the vaccine must be more than merely some immune response, but must also be protective. As noted in the previous office action, (the art?) recognizes the term vaccine to be a compound which prevents infection. Applicant (Fauci) has not demonstrated that the instantly claimed vaccine meets even the lower standard set for the specification, let alone the standard definition for being operative in regards. Therefore claims 5, 7, and 9, are not operative (as the anti-HIV vaccine which was what Fauci was working on) is not patentable utility. 

So Anthony Fauci himself was told by the patent office themselves, that what he was proposing as a vaccine does not meet the patentable standard, the legal standard, or the clinical standard. (49:39)  

(49:39 RF) I know a lot of our viewers are really shocked, David. I can see that from the responses. Our PCR specialist, Professor Kemala, she can believe what's going on here.

(49:56 DM) The sad and sober irony is that I raised these issues beginning in 2002, after the Anthrax scare, and the tragedy is, we're now sitting in a world were we have 100s of millions of people who are being injected with a pathogen stimulating computer sequence which is being sold under what the Patent Office, what the Medical profession, and what the FDA under its own clinical standards, would not suggest is a vaccine. But by using the term, we are now subjecting 100s of millions of people to what was known to be, by 2005, a biological weapon. (50:54)

End Dr. Martin's quote.

There's a lot more, especially about the non-existence of the Delta variant. (Or any other "variant".) I've transcribed that discussion and will post it online later because of its importance and how Martin discusses how we "isolate" genomes today, which dovetails into what I've been writing about for months and months.

Of course, there ought to be Congressional hearings, a special meeting of Parliament, governments around the globe should be demanding answers, and so on. But as of now, unless something changes profoundly, it looks like the bad guys will win.

I've never believed the Covid "narrative" because no one outside of Wuhan ever keeled over from coughing and fever and died on the spot, as video from Wuhan led people to believe. Also, the "pandemic" seems very choosy, killing a good few old folks in certain areas and not others (Lombardy, NYC). Then we come to find out the governor of NY (and Michigan and PA, etc., Democrats all) shipped dying Covid patients to nursing homes! No wonder the elderly died like flies. Also odd was that the usual, yearly flu vanished. Odd was the payment to hospitals and doctors when a patient died "of Covid" that were not paid if they died of something else. Very odd was the great lengths gone to to prevent use of Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. That was very suspicious. On and on.

I researched germ theory, the origins of the idea that viruses existed in the first place, and then that they performed like aggressive rapists when in your body, attacking your cells, taking them over, something never actually seen. I was amazed to discover electron microscopy can't tell the difference between a virus and a exsome produced by one's own body! And why in the world rely on PCR testing when the inventor, Kary Mullis, warned years ago that it could not be used to diagnose illnesses (at the time, he was refering to Fauci trying to use it for AIDS). It was so strange to rely on such a test to begin with, and then I found out the German Christian Drosten re-arranged the PCR test after Mullis died. What is staggering is that all Covid diagnosis is based on this one test, a test easily manipulated. Very easily manipulated.

Most odd of all was how every nation (with the partial exception of Sweden) goose-stepped in unison, locking down entire nations, killed 10s of 1000s from suicide and overdose and despair (there's been a new report on overdose/suicides recently in the U.S. during the lockdown), and crashing the middle class into pauperism. The lockdowns never made any sense: they were something new in pandemic management. And they've been an utter disaster. See this article at AIER. Yet as this article shows, countries just keep hammering away at a failed procedure. Einstein is supposed to have said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

Bottom line: Covid is as much a fraud as Global Warming. And interestingly, both our computer-based: one on computer-created genomes and the other on computer climate models. In any event, Dr. David Martin has the evidence and I hope and pray Reiner Fuellmich and other courageous lawyers can bring an end to the madness.

An Préachán