What do Virology, the Federal Reserve Board, and the USSR have in common?

They were foisted on us by the same people.

Amici,

The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth. – Niels Bohr 

 We live in a world of lies and mirrors. This 2022 election is a prime example for that, so was the 2020 election. Massive forces in America, including the institutional Republicans, pretend no cheating occurred. It is odious and insulting. But it is par for the course. We just get lied to continually.

The simultaneous rise of virology, the American National Bank (sketchily named "The Federal Reserve Board" (what is that supposed to be?), and Communism in Russia, were the products of collusion between Big Business combines and governments in the U.S. and Europe. Virology began to enslave us to the idea that we are at the mercy of microbes in a mortally threatening natural environment. The second devalued our money (throughout the 19th century, a dollar retained its worth; after the FRB, it began to shed value), and giving Russia – an incredible natural resource-rich world unto itself – to the Communists removed a major competitor to the Western Trusts and monopolies.

Those three developments were the then Latest and Greatest manifestation of the institutionalized greed that "makes the world go 'round". Today we have their latest iteration in the World Economic Forum and the mainstream science and political parties whose collusion enslaved us with the Covid fraud and that are fast creating a cashless utopia in which we can all be penniless slaves. (Sterile, childless, peons.)

Protestantism started it

How did this start? First of all, with lies. For generations, we've been taught one thing when the reality was something else. One big, enuring lie has been about the Protestant Reformation. We were taught how necessary it was, and how healthy for the Christian Faith, when in fact it was simply a revolt of the rich against the poor. The religious trappings of it, the theological disputes, the ecclesiastical fireworks, served as the smoke and mirrors. It was the beginning of the emergence and dominance of the nation state, of course, and the end of the Church's independence (whether that of surviving Catholic Churches in France and Spain, or the new nationalist Protestant Churches). Theologically, it was the "spiritualizing" of Christianity from being a God-Incarnationally-physically-present-with-us to a sort of Christianized Islam, no Real Presence but instead a holy book we could all argue endlessly over. Yet above all, it was a revolt of the rich against the poor, for the Church was the only "social services" administration going. The Church kept the rich humble and elevated the poor while honoring the middle class with their guilds. No one was cut adrift; it was a holistic society with everyone living in God's Incarnational Presence.

All that was stripped away. Life in post-Reformation Europe became a sort of Darwinian dystopia. The West has always valued individualism more than the East, back to Helen having more value in herself and worth a war over. (The Trojans said, what's your problem? She's just a ho. Get another.) And it is one reason why Christianity matched so well with the Western spirit. But with the Reformation, individualism became absolutely dominant. Martin Luther, a young academic rushed through a one-sided (Nominalist) education could publicly declare his personal opinion on Scripture was more valuable than that of a Church council! That's just nuts, and it is pure narcissism. (It can be no wonder that Narcissism is the fundamental trait of "moderns".)

And this was also the foundation of the world we have today where Big Corporations, especially banking concerns, run governments. On a global scale.

Holy Russia's place in the modern world

Two interesting articles at OnePeterFive, pieces that don't fit with that publication's usual line, discuss Russia's place in Christian history in light of the Fatima Prophecies. The second in the series is titled Christian Russia and the Western “Errors of Russia”, and the third is Russian Errors in Bolshevism, Vatican II and Schism. (Oddly, I can find no title or link to the first entry in the series.)

A note on this magazine: OnePeterFive is now a product of the Peter Kwasniewski, Timothy Flanders (1P5 editor), and Eric Sammons (editor-in-chief of Crisis Magazine) wing of American Traditional Catholicism. That's the group of mainstream, younger leaders who insist Bergoglio is actually pope, but who argue he's a bad one and that the papacy has to have its wings clipped and its power reduced in order to counter Bergoglio. They do not tolerate the argument that Bergoglio is not pope at all. Along with Ann Barnhardt, I think it manifestly obvious Bergoglio is no more pope than the local Lutheran pastor, and their ideas on circumscribing a pope's authority are, shall we say, egregiously wrong-headed.

Founded by Steve Skojec, who has become an agnostic (long story), today OnePeterFive is something of a clone of Crisis Magazine. Yet 1P5 still is very worth perusing because of the range of interesting articles beyond their pet papacy peeve that Flanders sometimes publishes.

Case in point are these two Russian articles by Caterina Lorenzo-Molo, PhD. L-M's basic point is fascinating: that Russia represents that last Christian country, i.e. one not affected by the secularizing acid of Protestantism, the Enlightenment, and the consumer economy, or not until of course the Communists seized it. And of course that's why they were so anxious to seize it. An element of Modernism, Marxism and Modernism remain the greatest Western Christian heresy (Islam being an eastern heresy against the Incarnation). It is Christianity's "kill shot" and Russia was THE perfect target.

The aspect of this most significant to me lies in the second article (Christian Russia and the Western “Errors of Russia”), wherein L-N details how the Communist Revolution was funded by Western corporations and approved by Woodrow Wilson. Plenty of evidence exists for this, and it is one of the most important bits of Western history everyone should know, but that very few seem to (and we who do are treated like cranks). L-N links to the work of historian Antony Sutton, who in his Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution (1974) lays out the evidence, some of which L-N reports on in her article. 

History no one wants to know

And this is my point here: American megabusiness interests in precisely the last pre-WWI decades created the modern world and its pathologies. Is it any wonder that "big corporations" unanimously support all the sexual perversion drowning Western culture? There's a reason for that.

In December 1913, just half a year before the war broke out, Congress created the U.S. Federal Reserve Board. It took control of our money. Serving as America's equivalent of the Bank of England – an institution that has ruled England since its creation – was not called "National Bank of America" because throughout U.S. history, the American people rejected such an entity. Such a bank existed for a short while until Andrew Jackson put an end to it in 1833. (Notice how the author describes Jackson; the author is definitely a "beta".)

Its 1913 re-creation represented the collusion of what today we call "the UniParty" in the U.S. politics, the big business elites of both the Democrats and Republicans working together to further their own interests and those of the wealthy. These people are not American politicians, then or now, but globalists, and their economic policies do not protect "main street" but "Wall Street". Today's globalists are direct inheritors of the early 1900s' elites who conquered Russia. (Regarding the Federal Reserve Board, see E. Griffin's (2010): The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve, for the depressing story.)

Russian-Japanese War

Speaking of Russia, the Tsarist government was weakened by the Russian-Japanese War (1904-1905). Japan was winning the battles but was utterly bankrupt, so the New York bankers (many of them Jews) got a loan together to keep the Japanese government solvent till a peace advantageous to Japan could be negotiated. These bankers loathed the overtly Christian government of the Tsar and especially its treatment of Russian Jewry.

    N.B. American President Theodore Roosevelt brokered the peace talks, probably in full knowledge of this banking collusion. The Japanese people, however, did not, and they deeply resented Roosevelt and American "meddling" in a war they thought they had won. They felt the Americans had betrayed them. This animus played a role, emotionally at least, in their decision to attack the U.S. in 1941. Had the Russians themselves known about Japan's predicament, they could have held on a bit longer, and Japan would have had to fold, producing a very different subsequent 20th century history.

Virology

Also in this same era, John D. Rockefeller, the oil oligarch and Bill Gates of his day (even to being a eugenicist), was investing heavily into medicine because his scientists discovered they could make many meds from petroleum. The "science" of virology was created by the same big business interests fighting Russia and creating an American national bank.

We have met the enemy, and ...

All this revelation demonstrates the truth of the cartoon character Pogo's famous 1971 comment, "We have met the enemy and he is us." That regarded pollution, but it is actually true about the Western World's spirituality. The Western world is materialistic, hedonistic, and atheistic. Five hundred bloody, depressing years downstream from the Reformation, that's our wretched world we wallow in. We're are the end of a river flowing down through Late Medieval Nominalism and its 16th century progeny Protestantism, the 18th century's destruction of logic (embodied by David Hume and Immanuel Kant, the Wallace and Gromit of philosophy), and on into Marxism and Darwinian materialism, and then broadening out into hedonism and greed enshrined in popular selfish and particularly narcissistic ideologies. Narcissism in probably the dominant character trait of the "modern" world.

And against this culture, even the image of a "Holy Russia" is intolerable. Caterina Lorenzo-Molo writes in the third article:

    In addition, Pope Benedict XVI’s opening to Russia, his favorable opinion of Putin, and closeness with Patriarchs Hilarion and Kirill, alerted the US and according to some documents from Wikileaks, prompted them to stir up an internal revolt within the Church.[20] Indeed all things Russia always seems to alert and heighten sensitivities from the powers and principalities.

The sad thing is, my friends, after two stolen national elections now, and the one in Brazil, and the evil fiasco in Ukraine, we can easily believe such things to be true, to have happened, and to be ordering out lives against our wills today.

Maybe the coming mass death will get their attention. Or those who survive. 

   An Préachán

Psalm 146 of the Douay-Rheims: verse 9:

Who giveth to beasts their food: and to the young ravens that call upon Him.

Part 2 of Covid is pure "in silico", a product of robots

Friends,

Part 2

In their interview, Sam Bailey and Eric Coppolino stress that Covid had always been, since it was supposedly first "discovered" in Wuhan, an "in silico" thing. "In silico", Merriam-Webster's says, means "in or on a computer: done or produced by using computer software or simulation."

That certainly defines Global Warming.

It certainly defines Covid.

Wikipedia says of "in silico":

• "In biology and other experimental sciences, an in silico experiment is one performed on computer or via computer simulation. The phrase is pseudo-Latin for 'in silicon', referring to silicon in computer chips. It was coined in 1987 as an allusion to the Latin phrases in vivo, in vitro, and in situ, which are commonly used in biology. The latter phrases refer, respectively, to experiments done in living organisms, outside living organisms, and where they are found in nature."

Except that with Covid, no experiments were done on living organisms except John Franklin Enders' soupy "cell culture" isolation procedure, which involves a potpourri of living bits. And one of the important points Coppolino discusses is that almost ALL of the so-called "science" of Covid is really just technology. "Trust the science"? No, not at all. It's a question of trusting the tech. The PCR test is technology as opposed to science. Remember, science requires control experiments and also repeatable experiments. One has to just repeat and repeat one's experiments, and others' experiments ad nauseam, carefully recording all changes, etc. But that was never done with Covid because it is a creation of tech. Tech seeks a product to market, not knowledge to contemplate. It rarely runs control experiements. Virologists rarely run control experiments. So, if a product seems to work or taste or act the way focus groups want it to, it goes on the market. Speed is of the essence.

Does that remind you of the "vaccines"? It should. Of course, this type of marketing is based on the oldest retail rule of all: "Caveat emptor." Each and every "vaccine" was applied "caveat emptor."

Coppolino also points out that the PCR is a robot. It doesn't walk around like science-fiction robots (techs are making ever more human-like 'bots already, of course, with many of them designed for carnal relations!), but the PCR is a robot, nonetheless. So Covid is not only our first PCR epidemic, it is our first robotic epidemic. (And the "clot shot" vaccines are just "'bot shots"!) Therefore, when you take a PCR test, you are merely digitally certified to be "pure" or "impure". By a 'bot.

Coppolino says that Covid was a story where everyone had skin in the game, because it was about them, everyday people, about their health. The powers-that-be, Coppolino says, could not get people so upset or worried about AIDS or Global Warming, but Covid was different. It played on people's narcissism. "I wouldn't be in the least surprised," Coppolino says, "if they employed industrial psychologists to produce this result." He says we know from Fauci that they employed focus groups to test their various narratives. "They admit they're using focus groups to test people's psychology, to find what they're afraid of and what they'll respond to." Coppolino observes they must have said, "We have to make the flu more sexier and more dangerous! I'm sure they studied and mastered the psychology of the digital environment in the process of coming up with the whole [Covid] package."

The idea to take away

Marshall McLuhan was a genius. He saw that "the medium is the message", that the first telegram message or phone calls or internet use were important not for their content but for what they represent: their technology reaching ever deeper into our lives, becoming every more essential to us. We are ever more global connected, ever more plugged in to the "world mind" as it were, with ever wider vistas to see, but ever less to actually look at, ever less ourselves, ever less free.

So of course a pandemic disease is just the thing to enslave us. Partly because government has conditioned us to be health conscious (remember the government-sponsored low-fat diet craze, to name just one item, or their "war on cancer"?). The digital tech of our civilization is perfectly poised to digitize us, ourselves. Where Hitler or Mussolini could use the power of radio to trap their audiences, today digital is everywhere, in our iPhones and in our computers and our cars (how many now can't travel without GPS to show them where they are and how to get home?).

No wonder the World Economic Forum can plan a world total conquest for a New World Order. They've been building up to this for a long time, and we've been programmed and primed to go. To Hell, as it were.

Do yourselves a favor and listen to the interview.

AnP

Part 2 A world without the Traditional Latin Mass: our culture's violence and hatred exemplified

Friends,

I'm considering why, today, in 2022, we have such outrageous, Hieronymus Bosch-freak show-level deviants rioting in the streets, demanding, DEMANDING, the right to murder babies and promoting deviant sexual carnality that always preceded a civilization's collapse.

1970 to 2022

One major social and cultural element that paralleled the moral collapse of Western society in the last half century was the trashing out of the Traditional Latin Mass.

1. This deconstruction of the Holy ("set apart") Liturgy began in 1964 with the closing of the Second Vatican Council, the official documents of which called for some liturgical change but only change deemed absolutely necessary.
2. It could be said to begin earlier when the Communist Frankfurter Schule's plan for social and familial dissolution began to show manifest progress.
3. It appeared over a decade after the U.S. in its attempt to keep Germany down, began to promote pornography and immorality in Germany (E. Michael Jones details this).
   
4. It manifested when the children born post-war, children who did not experience the privations and hardships of the Great Depression or World War II, came of age and found themselves awash in money and porn.
5. And most of all, it occurred in a Catholic Church trying to find a reason for its existence, unable to justify its conduct in either World War I or II, and prodded by Modernist theologians and their nouvelle théologie, the central tenant of which was everything evolves, even God.
   

All this lay behind the full occultation of the Traditional Latin Mass. (Thank God, like a full occultation of the moon, it did not – and could not – last.)

For decades after 1970, however, one simply could not find it. This sacred liturgy lived on in the memories of its forlorn, cast adrift adherents, of course, and in the Heavenly Liturgy which it represents. But it was otherwise non-existent except for the work of a handful, such as the incomparable Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who founded the SSPX in that pivotal year 1970.

But the people, the demos, the Church's hoi polloi, the public of the Church's res publica, kept the pressure on for its return. Finally, with that miserable effeminate recluse Paul VI finally dead, Pope John Paul II could let up on it a bit, although he met resistance and did not move too far. Pope Benedict XVI, though, opened the Church doors wide for it, and got deposed for it, too (believe it). Now the anti-pope Bergoglio is doing his damnedest to get rid of it again. He clearly hates it, and has gathered to his black standard those who loathe it. Currently, I see one of his American cronies, Wilton Gregory of D.C., is considering banning it from his archdiocese. Oh Lord God, save us from these imps and hobgoblins of Satan!

As far as I am concerned, as far as most traditional morality goes, a law that is immoral is no law, an order that is reprehensible (like, "Soldier! Shoot those Jews!") is no lawful order. Bergoglio and his homosexual lavender mafia have thus abdicated their positions in the Church by their actions, regardless of whether they were lawfully installed in the first place. (See this article at Ann Barnhardt's blog for an excellent essay on why Benedict's abdication is invalid.)

I think John Paul and Benedict acted the way they did regarding the TLM because they could easily see that the mainstream Church was collapsing in numbers: ever fewer active Catholics, ever fewer baptisms and marriages. Ever more divorces. Fewer and fewer laity believed in the Real Presence. These statistics were known. In 1963, 3/4s of Catholics attended Sunday Mass, by 1983, that was almost exactly reversed. So they pragmatically let the TLM in the back door. But for Bergoglio and his ilk, they're terrified of the TLM's success. That would invalidate their entire lives. "Latin Massers" may be still few in numbers compared to mainstream Catholics in raw numbers, but they still total in the many millions. They also have large families; the Mass and its adherents attract converts. (Bergoglio infamous called proselytizing "solemn nonsense".) AND they are much more likely to believe in the Real Presence and attend Sunday Mass without fail. They're a crack, elite unit of Catholics, a Catholic Marine Corps or Guards Army, and are leading the way to the Faith's Restoration. So of course, they have to be smacked down. Humiliated. Scourged.

It is highly significant that the evil Bergoglio has so far (as of this writing) said nothing about the Dobbs decision. No thanking God, no praise for this great work. (Haha, certainly no word of thanks to a certain Donald John Trump!) The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has commented, as have bureaucrats in the Vatican, but all that has so far been relatively muted. You don't need to be a Richard Feynman to realize they're not overjoyed by Dobbs. They are thus driving yet another nail in the mainstream/mainline Church's coffin because a large number of Catholic Christians have labored long to get ride of Roe, it's been the life's work and thousands, and now that it is gone, these heroes notice the crickets' muted chirping in the ruined choirs of the hierarchy.

What's so important about the TLM? Our Religious Hard-Wiring

What the Traditional Latin Mass did, besides wonderfully celebrate the Seventh Covenant, the New Covenant, the Most Holy Eucharist by participation in which we are saved (see St. John's Gospel, Chapter 6; St. Luke 22:19-20), was put people's mental framework in order. It reminded people – indeed, it actually leads people – into the threshold of the Divine World, the Other World of the Holy, the Sacred, the Divine Real Presence. 

That once-a-week hour worked on an individual on many levels. Almost all humans, of whatever culture, have some sense of the Sacred, the Holy, these words meaning literally: that which is 'set apart' from normal life. We seem to be hardwired to want that, although in theory this can be the only world we know. Maybe in small doses for most, but we want it. That's because we are hardwired to want God, to spend eternity with God, whether as adults we might reject God or not. Satan and his Fallen Angels were also made that way, and one of the worst pains of Hell is to still want that intimacy with the Divine yet be eternally denied it, eternally suffering Tantalus-like.

Now, I understand that not everyone has a strong sense of this desire for the Set Apart. Like curiosity or math ability, it is stronger in some than in others; but to be completely without it is somehow not to be human. And different Christian groups manifest different levels of desire for it. While never having been a Protestant, I grew up with them and believe I understand Protestantism inside and out. I work with them now, from time to time on editing projects. And in terms of the more "popular" versions, church-in-the-wildwood types I'm most familiar with, I can understand the desire to worship God out in the open air, as it were, so to speak, building an altar of unhewn stones and sacrificing the sheep and goats and oxen on it, setting the fire, and watching the smoke of the oblation ascend into the sky, "God-ward", my hands raised.

But then I also understand the innate desire to "Let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, lets us ascend unto Jerusalem, for I rejoiced when I heard them say, let us go unto the House of the Lord", to enter the outer courts, then the inner courts, getting ever closer to the Real Presence. (I can only imagine the music they had in the great Temple! Harps, lyres, lutes, the 12-string psaltery, the shofar horn, trumpets of various sorts, flutes/pipes, double oboes, timbrels-tambourines, sistrums, cymbals, bells.) I certainly understand what God inspired Solomon to create. King David represents the former, simpler open-air inclination, Solomon the high liturgical one. And I too desire to ascend, as it were. (There's a reason why, despite a few certain exceptions, usually Anglican in some way, that Protestantism never developed a monastic tradition.)

What this means "in the world"

Many mainstream Catholics react negatively to Trad Catholics, sneering, "You think you're better than us, don't you? That the sacraments are more valid in a TLM." I actually rarely hear that, but I can say that for us the entire Traditional liturgy is more "set apart", heightened, elevated God-ward for those of us bearing this appreciation. That is just a truism.

And of course, a man or woman or child who frequents such heights remains for life a bit more removed, a bit less attached, to the things of this world. The Divine World makes itself felt. It takes a much greater act of rejection of God to shrug it off. A Novus Ordo Mass with its talky vernacular, its marching-band everyone-in-lockstep praying, its overall more casual, more mundane spirit, its no damnation/painless salvation is just easier to leave, to put it simply. It's rejection lies more lightly on a soul.

Ergo...

Therefore, the evils of the world, all the "sex, lies, and videotape", or more traditionally the world, the flesh, and the Devil, present less of a counterpoint to the Novus Ordo than the TLM does. Only rarely does the Devil go in for a High Luciferian Satanism. His demons usually offer a much more mundane, casual, relaxed way in their temptation to evil. "No drama damnation", as it were, to match the modern "No drama salvation".

The one thing in which the TLM is definitely superior to the Novus Ordo, and it stands profoundly superior, is that it presents to this mundane world we reside temporarily in the Holy, the Sacred, The Other in its every fiber. The Holy Ghost worked through Churchmen for centuries to perfect that sense. Bugnini and the designers of the Novus Ordo consciously rejected all that because they thought it "medieval", and that modern man would not tolerate it. So, "the Bug" turned his back on it as fully as Luther did. (Luther did so for different reasons, but still.) And "modern man" was represented for the Bug and his would-be Reformers by the then archbishop of Milan, one mousey Giovanni Battista Montini, who carried a business man's brief case about with him. To them, Montini was the way, and the wave, of the future. Honestly, the future Paul VI carrying a briefcase excited a LOT of comment in the press.

It was just silly. And vacuous, as was so much of Vatican II and the infamous "spirit of Vatican II" that followed. And the new, practical, nonsensical, spiritually business man Church, the Vatican II Church and its "just business" liturgy sat uncomfortably without any continuity in the timeline of the Church's 2000-year past. No wonder if failed, and is about to pass with the death of Bergoglio. Either a more Bergoglio-than-Bergoglio will be elected, and if so I expect the College of Cardinals to fracture as that would be intolerable, or some more "conservative" prelate with be elevated, which whatever they might say about it, will represent the high-water mark of Vatican II. It begin a drain away, an ejection that will inevitably accelerate as the world crashes through war, starvation, energy blackouts, and the final putting down and execution of the latest eugenics idiots who run the World Economic Forum, 2030, the Great Reset, etc.

Sounds a bit fanciful?

After all, in the face of the absurd Covid fraud, the entire Vatican II Church basically dried up like a desert tumble weed, and blew away. How could it possibly deal with a real world crisis? War? Famine? The lights of this technological civilization going out?

  An Préachán

Part 1 A world without the Traditional Latin Mass: our culture's violence and hatred exemplified

Friends,

First, of course, all thanksgiving and praise to the Lord God Who provided this pro-life victory in the U.S. Supreme Court. All good things come from God; we're just instruments of His will. And of course we should thank President Donald Trump, the true U.S. President, exiled for now, and I do not doubt the the "powers-that-be" will stop at nothing to keep him out of power. However, he did what Reagan could not, and we need to appreciate his work in this.

But...

Why is it that today, in 2022, we have such outrageous, freak-show level deviants rioting in the streets, demanding, DEMANDING, the right to murder babies and promoting deviant sexual carnality that always preceded a civilization's collapse? Truly, is it not as though God replaced their living hearts with hearts of stone, and exactly, EXACTLY fulfilling St. Paul's famous observations in Romans 1:21-32. It is as though a divine hand has appeared and is writing on our civilization's wall.

How far we've come – how far we've fallen – since 1973. No riots of marauding sexual deviants filled the streets then, when Roe v. Wade was decided. And had the Supreme Court decided against Roe, there would have been no riots of marauding sexual deviants, ether. Now, though, look at how many people are today simply too degenerate to be imagined. Note the Roe date, 1973. The Novus Order Liturgy was foisted upon us by ecclesiastical fiat in late 1970. I think these dates are significant, as I'll explain below.

1973 to 2022

Hieronymus Bosch was a prophet. Since the the Dobbs Supreme Court decision last Friday, it seems like Hell has vomited its most disgusting Boschian entrails upon us. Have we seen anything like this since the Emperor Nero's prancing about? He's the patron saint of the homosexual movement and one of the first to "marry" a, well, non-woman. (A castrated boy.) Throughout this June, though, if one can stomach recalling it, throughout what they call "Pride" month, we've been inundated with the pukey, the vomity, the infantile and continual upchuck of the just simply Boschian-bizarre, insane cockroaches of modern sexual deviancy. (Haha, sounds like I'm referring to the Biden family or certain Catholic bishops and priests!)

Sodom and Gomorrah come again, indeed. One can easily imagine, were God to send a couple of angels to a "pride event" like the one in Chicago were people were just shot up (in that heavily gun-controlled city) – that the carnal zombies would, indeed, try raping them. It has to do with a lot more than the Dobbs v. Jackson decision, doesn't it? The reaction is too extreme, bizarre. The lizard 'ruler of the world' churns and wreathes in his hellish Pit.

Sure, Satan himself has take a blow to the head, Dobbs being a sort of upward palm to his crooked nose. He's reminded that even in what seems his hour of triumph, he's always and ever going to lose. So, of course, he lashes out. (It has to be frustrating, to always lose, and never lose with class.)

But part of it also goes back to that cadet academy of Satan, the infamous Frankfurter Schule in 1920s Germany, the group of Communists (many of them sexual deviants themselves) who promulgated the idea that the way to bring about their unholy and ultimately asinine and eternally exquisitely boring revolution was to destroy the Western family and Churches through sex stuff. Just spread lustful deviancy, make people morally and physically debilitated through carnal decadence and abasement, to simply dissolute the society to the point it collapsed. Roe v. Wade in 1973 was a "great leap forward" for that, actually. It in essence mandated worshiping Moloch nation-wide. It is extremely ironic that the sexually perverse are so proud of their perversions, when in fact they're just tools of long-dead Communist theorists. If you're going to throw away your soul, that's a poor reason for doing it

The Dobbs decision, however, is like taking a two-by-four (more like a four-by-four) and slamming it battery-ram style right to the face of all those years of effort. That's because Dobbs allows the people themselves, democracy-style, to debate these issues and actually decide on them through voting, as opposed to having all of it vomited on us by judicial fiat. Hence the brilliance of Clarence Thomas in saying the Dobbs opens the opportunity to reconsider a host of other imperial judicial fatwas, such as the idiotic Obergefell. (And of course of the rage of the Left at his comment is very enjoyable.)

Just as with the World Economic Forum and the Covid lockdowns, all of this has to be imposed on people from above. The people themselves would never vote for it. And of course it was the same for the Church's liturgical changes in the 1960s and '70s. We are constantly being imposed upon. Why do we let them?

One reason is that the Church has failed to stand up for us. I'll have more of that in Part 2.

   An Préachán

Extremely important Tucker Carlson opening: must see about Biden's Ukraine lies

Amici, friends,

More crazy news about Ukraine, and most of it we cannot believe. To go against "the narrative" the MSM and the Biden Regime are promoting can lead to one's "cancellation." Tucker Carlson must be therefore angling for Fox News to fire him. He really lambasted the Mainstream Media and the Biden Administration, and the Republican big shots, too, here. Tucker is all monologue here, and he is scalding. (The guy must have kids; he does, of course.) This is the proverbial "must see" video. (And also see Carlson's interview with Colonel Douglas MacGregor here. This will also get Carlson fired. After all, if they fired Lou Dobbs, they'll fire Carlson.) 

One Nota Bene: since Carlson's segments ran last night, so far as I understand it, the Polish government has put a stop to the insane U.S. idea of "gun-running" fighter jets from Poland to Ukraine. Either they were going to and quickly backed out, or the Biden Regime was out-and-out lying. (What else is new?) If that is true, thank God; we might avert a world war yet. It seems the Europeans are going to have to get tough with the reckless Biden regime, one way or another. At least, if the Euros want to continue living. Otherwise, they're going to have a full-scale war in Europe, brought on (so strange to write this!) by Americans. What do they want war for? Wipe out Europe, so it is like it was in May, 1945? Or what? Or is Ann Barnhardt right, and this is the Sodomite revenge on what remains of Christian Europe? And if that sounds "tin-foil hat country, look at these pics. (Zelensky is full abortion, full deviant rights, etc. At this point, my friends, I'm willing to believe anything.)

Carlson brought up a number of essential things, and one of them is food production, but a great article on the upcoming mass famine is here, a Mike Adams article: https://uncanceled.news/global-crop-collapse-now-a-certainty/.

Mainly, Carlson talked about the warmongers' moralisms. I'm beyond repulsed over the faux moral outrage about Ukraine being invaded. Drop the moral outrage, MainStreamMedia, drop the phony pity, American government. It's total hypocrisy. They treat the actual Ukrainian people no better than they treat their own!

And Carlson asks if war is so outrageous for them, why don't we read anything about the war in Yemen or the one in Ethiopia, or the 100,000 killed in Mexico over the drug cartel wars. (In contrast, 50,000-plus Americans were killed in the over-a-decade involvement in the Vietnam war. Mexico is a slaughterhouse.) And other "regional conflicts" exist just as brutal, right now, going on today. We never hear about those. But because Biden and Friends of Biden and corrupt American politicians like the Obamas and the Clintons (the latter have shamelessly restarted their "foundation"), and the RINOs and various business people have an apparently bottomless money pit well gushing dollars from Ukraine into their pockets, we only hear about the Ukraine.

Carlson asks, isn't anyone paying attention? Biden is getting NO push back. Biden apparently and the people who run him, i.e. Democrat, Republican, Deep State, World Economic Forum leadership grads –  for them, it's a Globalist World – so, these people want war. It'll will reduce world population and liquidate the nation-state. But if we crash the Russian economy, stop their exports of food and fertilizer – we will DESTROY THE WORLD. Hundreds of millions might starve, even if no missile is ever fired. In revenge, the Russians will just send both food and fertilizer to China and Iran, and open new markets in other parts of the world, because, or so I've heard it said, people need to eat.

Another Note Bene: some say Putin wants to conquer all of Ukraine, but that's not his stated terms for stopping the war. He could very well be lying, but what, do we continue the slaughter rather than find out? Others say that Russia will never give up Kiev, birthplace of Russian Orthodoxy. Maybe. Still others say that by hook or by crook: total conquest or "Findlandizing" Ukraine, he wants the wonderfully fertile soil of that region. It is as important a breadbasket for the world as is the mid-western U.S./Canada states/provinces. But then Mother Russia herself, as it is, remains a major world foodstuff exporter. And of course Putin sits on incredible oil and gas reserves. So, whatever. Time will tell.

America

But what IS it with the Biden Regime? Is the American government both trying to start a world war and also bankrupt the West – or as much as the world that doesn't go along with this insanity? Already the price of urea fertilizer in the U.S. has gone from $200-something a ton last year to $800 this year. We are all going to starve, thanks to the Deep State. Of course, the Bottom Line almost certain is the World Economic Forum wants to use all this to create a One World Government/Great Reset wherein we're all slaves. But as those people are not elected, we've no way to remove them from "office" (which they don't bother to have). Then again, America's leaders are fraudulently elected, and we can't remove them.

As Carlson says, the American government should be trying to de-escalate this war, but instead we're trying to escalate it. We could STOP this stupid war by stopping all plans of bringing Ukraine NATO or the EU. Simple. Putin only invaded right Ukraine after Kamala Harris, the Hetaira to Priapusian Democrat big shots (well, more a street-corner drachma type), when visiting Germany a fortnight ago, openly encouraged Ukraine to join NATO. This is true. Check the timeline. Putin invaded just days later. And he's warned for at least a decade or more that he would act in just this way were the West to try to get Ukraine into NATO/EU.

Moralizing Idiocy

And enough of this damned "Moral Panicking" shtick. First it was BLM and then Covid for the sake of which we were supposed to be morally outraged for – and in both cases, anyone and everyone who questioned the "narrative" was silenced, deplatformed, made "unpersons", etc. But almost none of the bull excrement propaganda narratives about either of these absolute fiascos were true, and now the new moral panic is "Russia, Russia!" So the solution is crashing the world economy and destroying the dollar and plunging the world into destruction like we didn't see even in the Great Depression!

And all for...hypocrisy, in spades

WHY? Because Putin wants Ukraine to be a neutral buffer state? Jack Kennedy nearly plunged the world into Nuclear War in 1962 because Khrushchev put missiles into Cuba. How is Putin's demand any different? One does NOT have to be "pro-Putin" or a "Putin puppet" to see Russia's point here. One does not have to condone Russia's actions to see that if Jack Kennedy had a point, so does Russia. Putin's issued his terms on what Russia wants from Ukraine to stop fighting, and they are fait accompli: mainly simply that Ukraine be formally politically and militarily neutral. (And formally recognize the Crimea as Russian and those two new "republics" Putin has declared are to remain, with the unstated desire of course for the Ukraine to be Putin's client state.) So...

STOP THE DAMNED INSANITY.

Oh, wait, we no longer have representative government. Our votes are useless. Our will is ignored, and our sovereignty vanished. We're slaves already.

We apparently missed the memo.

As "Jerm Warfare" writes:

"Naturally, those who know nothing about Ukraine's politics and history, are the ones with a Ukrainian flag on their Facebook profile. They're also the same ones who tell others to get the jab.

"It's not about understanding anything. It's about signalling one's virtue. Displaying one's superior sense of morality to the world. Following the herd and looking like a good person. Being woke while simultaneously being asleep.

"In other words, like former KGB operative Yuri Bezmenov warned about during the 1980s in an incredible interview, the West's cultural Marxist shallowness will lead to its own demise."

An Préachán