Covid Is a Ponzi Scheme Racket Run by Big Pharma/Big Government Players

 A Chairse, Friends, Amici,

A friend commenting to me on the current situation, wrote that "we are stuck forever with a mutation virus that no one can kill. God help us."

I wrote back that God won't. Why should He? There's no virus, mutating or otherwise; I've become convinced of this because of the evidence – let me repeat that – I've become convinced because of the evidence, both current and historical, that there's no Covid virus – but I recognize for most it requires a conscious effort of "out-of-the-box thinking" before this idea gels because the 100-year-old story we've been fed since Pasteur's day is a narrative of "Germs, germs, germs!"

• We have been conditioned to fear "contagions". It's been bred into us; it's our programming.
  

What there is an absolute pandemic of in today's world, however, is humanity's inhumanity to man: we're constinually us screwing ourselves over ceaselessly, just like in the days of Noah and then later Nimrod. (And in just about every civilization recorded.) But this current mess can't go on forever. The doomsday signs are clear: We're about to drown ourselves in our own lies and bury ourselves alive in a new Tower of Babel.

It's the few insiders screwing over the mass of mere mortals to achieve power for money. Always money, at least, for money buys power for the weak (think "Bill Gates", the very definition of a putz, think "George Soros", a living caricature of the Emperor Palpatine).

1. Always money. They use our money to fund the insanity that they in turn make money from.
   
2. The virus spiel is a Ponzi scheme: it's about Big Pharma claiming cures for new and dangerous viruses galore that the CDC and the WHO announce every year or so to garner limitless wealth from us "suckers" (great American expression).
   
3. Bureaucratic chiefs of CDCs and Health Ministries around the world, and the WHO, play musical chairs with Big Pharma. True symbiosis.
   
4. And lowly hack virologists drones in turn get themselves soaked in grant money from government and Big Pharma, with Fauci & Co., a.k.a. the FDA, the CDC, NIAID, etc, being the middle-men.
   
5. And of course Global Warming is an exact parallel! It's how the system works and what a "World Government" would look like.

That's it in a nutshell, my friends. We're all like rats chasing each other in a spinning exercise wheel.

For example: the money and research hours that monkey-brained cretin 'Jaws' Fauci (whoops, I've just defamed our Simian brethren!), his Deep-State orangutans (apologies to the esteemed Dr. Zaius) and the equally prosimian-brained lab-coated Chinese and American bio-techs cranking out microscopic Frankensteins wasted our tax dollars on no virus. They have probably made an armada of bio-chemical weapons galore, that's true, for future use on us (of course; see my article on the upcoming sallpox resurrection), but not viruses. These Covid "vaccines" definitely load us up with nanotechnology – this is not debatable now because more and more labs are filming the evidence! (I've seen the films; I saw one of the sci-fi multi-legged bugger moving about!) So, what's that for? Making us into the Borg?

Covid itself is caused by no virus. The various illnesses under the umbrella term "Covid" are caused ultimately by us, ourselves, in our own bodies via living off of modern "processed foods" as we do; "foods" that starve our bodies of nutrients. (We've known this for years: author Michael Pollan published a book tiled "In Defense of Food" back in 2009, for example. Iowa-born Gastroenterologist Walter L. Voegtlin first popularized the paleo diet in the 1970s, for Heaven's sake.) Our modern food makes us ill. It fills our bellies yet starves our cells. But more directly, more immediately – outside of any biological component to the over-all disease, i.e. a possible parasitical infection that Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine deal with – "Covid" is caused by two powerful weapons. The first of these is the new and powerful EMFs (electromotive forces) and EMPs (electromagnetic forces), such as 5G, that we poison ourselves with. The second, believe it or not, is the new fad of using bio-fuel

Wuhan, 5G and Bio-fuels

Wuhan was the first city in the world to be completely wired for 5G. The system went active there in that most polluted of towns in September, 2019. Covid appeared soon after. Amazingly enough, Wuhan also makes heavy use of bio-fuels, which globally are made from corn, soy, canola, even hardwood trees – all of which are heavily dosed in Roundup – a globally wide used weed and grass killer. The Roundup is generally on our food, for despite efforts to clean it, bits of it remain. (You know how everyone is told to wash the veggies they bring home" Indeed.) And Roundup and its fellow chemicals certainly get processed into the fuel, made as that is from crops in no way meant for the table, but rather industrial use, thus it is not subject to thorough cleaning. Therefore it (and other agricultural chemicals) get into the atmosphere when the fuel is burned in factories and cars.

• So, guess what? This isn't a new thing. We're repeating the same idiocy we did "back in the day" when we sprayed fruits with a bug poison using arsenic, and then by WWII, exchanging the arsenic with DDT. They even sprayed DDT on people! (On kids playing in the streets and on the beaches.) When the arsenic spray started in the U.S. in the later 19th century, that's when Polio began to occur widely. It was called 'Poliomyelitis' after similar historical illnesses, one clinically described in 1789. It seems to have been rare, however, until the arsenic spray. When DDT came in, the Polio changed slightly, suggesting strongly that DDT closely served as an agent of the disease. But that wasn't a politically popular idea at the time so it was hushed up. When DDT ceased to be used after the world finally learned it is a pretty deadly poison (thanks to the book "Silent Spring"), of course Polio vanished.
  
• And of course the virological mountebanks of the time immediately proclaimed to the Heavens: "The vaccine! The Salk vaccine stopped Polio!" An amazing coincidence. To the present, this polio vaccine "narrative" is a major reason vaccines are believed to be helpful to humanity. Today, India is said to be a perfect example of the global importance and worth and value of vaccines because the Polio vaccine eradicated Polio from the Subcontinent. Ahem, well, what you won't find proclaimed to the Heavens is the fact that India today is afflicted with a wide-spread illness called Acute Flaccid Paralysis, and just coincidentally, just by pure happenstance, golly-gee, "AFP" is said to be "clinically indistinguishable from Polio." Image that. "Clinically indistinguishable from Polio"! Yeah, right.
  

Bio-fuel

In his book The Contagion Myth, Dr. Tom Cowan describes the researches of Stephanie Seneff, PhD, who has demonstrated that the quote: "...early epicenters of Covid-19 correspond with areas of high air pollution – Wuhan, China; the Tristate region (New York, New Jersey, Connecticut) – northern Italy; Spain; and Jefferson Parish, Louisiana – and particularly with the use of biodiesel. She notes a Harvard Institute for Public Health study that found a strong correlation between exposure to particulate air pollution and Covid deaths. The researchers found that an increase of only one microgram per cubic meter in fine particulate matter was associated with a 15 percent increase in the Covid-19 fatality rate. It bears repeating that atmospheric dust (that is, pollution) can exacerbate the effects of EMF." (page 101)

My friends, Dr. Cowan goes into detail listing Seneff's findings corroborating the connection between bio-fuel use and Covid, all over the world, and how Europe imports Roundup-doused soy from Argentina. (Specifically, that's a GMO crop of soy that has Roundup bred in it!) And: "The Chinese produce biodiesel from canola (rapeseed), which is highly sprayed with Roundup, much of which grows along the Yangtze River, which cuts through Wuhan." (page 102)

Imagine that.

And he has a slew of other examples, as well. Example after another after another. One should really read the book.

1. As for me, the past year has been a true "learning curve". I could go on and on and on and on.
   
2. Even the story of Edward Jenner eradicating smallpox from England is a lie. They had their biggest outbreaks of that disease in their history after the smallpox vaccine of the day was mandated by Parliament in the mid-1800s. (Twice! Once in the 1840s and again in the 1850s.)
   
3. Smallpox only slowly went away as cities developed extensive sanitation, toilet "water closets" put into use, and when horses ceased to fill the street with their poo and pee.
   
4. Vaccination was quietly eased off on as public policy as numerous anti-vax societies and associations sprang up. Whether The National Anti-Vaccination League of Great Britain still exists, I don't know.
   
5. I tried to find out but ANY internet search reveals a titanic septic tank of official bigshots denying any and all "Anti-Vax" comments or ideas or persons to be anything but evil crazies. It's a hornets' nest, asking anti-vax questions. It's insane. It's a propaganda battleship trying to sink a sampan. And to REALLY muddy the waters, they mix in autism. A cacophony of fevered propaganda spouts and spews and erupts and flows like Vesuvius and Mt. Etna combined on a bad day.

However, historically one English city, Leicester, rejected vaccination in favor of sanitation. Smallpox was soon gone. Contemporary to that, the public health history of Cleveland, Ohio, mirrors the Leicester story exactly. You can find articles about that on the internet, but of course they all say the city fathers were crazy and only the vaccine saved England (or Cleveland). Yeah? Right.

READ this very closely:

And I just bet that unless you-all happen to be crime history specialists, you don't know that "Jack the Ripper" kept ripping on long after he supposedly stopped. This is true. The police got the newspapers to just stop reporting it. Honestly, this is true. They thought it imperative to stop the city-wide panic. Without his audience, "Jack" slowly wound down; maybe he just died of old age?

Folks, you've been lied to again, and again, and again, and again. It just never stops. The lies are constant.

Time to demand the lies stop. Before, indeed, we allow them to do what they so desperately want to do – turn us into the Borg.

An Préachán

Science News: Comet, Dino Eggs, Venusian Colonies, and more!

It's been a while since I sent around a "science news" report.

Big news -- the "near approach" of a comet! https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/12/04/now-visible-comet-as-big-as-the-full-moon/

On Dec. 16th, Comet 46P/Wirtanenwill approach Earth less than 11.5 million km away–making it one of the 10 closest-approaching comets of the Space Age. It’s a small comet, with a nucleus barely 1 km wide, but such proximity makes even a small things appear large. The comet’s gaseous atmosphere is now as wide as a full Moon.

Despite its close approach, 46P/Wirtanen will never become a Great Comet like Comet Hayakutake in 1996 or Comet Hale-Bopp in 1997. Wirtanen’s relatively small core of dirty ice cannot produce enough gas and dust to create a really bright, flamboyant tail. The best case scenario is probably a big diffuse cloud of magnitude +3 or +4, barely visible to the unaided eye but an easy target for binoculars and small wide-field telescopes.

Sooner or later, one of these comets or asteroids won't miss. It's one of those government snafus that is so frustrating. All the money spent on Global Warming -- a least half of it should be spent on asteroid protection and CME defense -- a coronal mass ejection of the right magnitude and timing would create an EMP that would send us back to the Iron Age and billions would starve in a very, very short time.

I find this one interesting: https://pjmedia.com/drhelen/can-a-man-be-too-handsome/

An excerpt:

Funny that women's hotness gets them ahead and men's seems to leave them behind. But isn't that the way it is with so many gender stereotypes? Men are often the ones being discriminated against while women are always told it's only them.

Well, that explains a lot in my life.

There's also this:

https://pjmedia.com/faith/madam-im-adam/

An excerpt:

It really is all relative. A new study revealed that all humans are descendants of the same man and woman who lived 100,000 to 200,000 years ago. Our communal mom and dad got together after a “catastrophic event” almost wiped out the human race,  the Daily Mail reported of the study.

What was interesting was the Commentary: Monkeys throwing their poo! Creationists and anti-Creationists in full blood-sport. Of course the point is not that the Earth was created 6,000 years ago -- there are "Young Earth" Creationists who believe that -- but that humans are descended from one couple -- that's "worth the price of admission" if you've been following the century-old argument about human origins, whether they developed in Africa or in various places, all that.

Space:

This one here is space-related but so frustrating. We should have had blimps and dirigibles in Venus' atmosphere for some years now. Grrrr:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-6279161/NASAs-brilliant-plan-cloud-city-airships-atmosphere-Venus.html

For other interesting space news, see sciencedaily.com, like this article: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203111612.htm

An excerpt:

Astronomers using a combination of ground and space based telescopes have reported more than 100 extrasolar planets (exoplanets) in only three months. These planets are quite diverse and expected to play a large role in developing the research field of exoplanets and life in the Universe.

Then this:

https://www.space.com/42612-nasa-osiris-rex-arrives-asteroid-bennu.html

We'll be mining asteroids pretty soon. The Japanese land craft on one a couple of months ago. https://www.space.com/41912-japanese-hopping-rovers-land-on-asteroid.html

Asteroid mining will transform the wealth of the world. It's a great future, if we don't wreck our civilization first.

Archaeology

In archaeology, the big news is Pontius Pilate's ring: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/30/world/middleeast/pontius-pilate-ring.html

And in the same vein for those into Biblical archaeology, there's this:

https://www.timesofisrael.com/straight-from-the-bible-tiny-first-temple-stone-weight-unearthed-in-jerusalem/

(This has to be one of the coolest archaeology stories I've seen all year. Check it out for the photo of the tiny weight, with its Hebrew character.)

And if you have the time, my favorite Biblical archaeologist, David Rohl, has a great video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEm-ovpMM5c

I have his book A Test Of Time: Volume One-The Bible-From Myth to History, 2001, and highly, highly recommend it. This video I've linked to has even newer info and wow, absolutely fascinating.

I try, always and ever, to follow Dino news and this science daily site is excellent for that: https://www.sciencedaily.com/ Search for whatever you're interested in.

As per Dinos, there's this: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/10/181031141548.htm

An excerpt:

According to researchers at Yale, the American Museum of Natural History, and the University of Bonn, birds inherited their egg color from non-avian dinosaur ancestors that laid eggs in fully or partially open nests. The researchers' findings appear Oct. 31 in the online edition of the journal Nature.
"This completely changes our understanding of how egg colors evolved," said the study's lead author, Yale paleontologist Jasmina Wiemann. "For two centuries, ornithologists assumed that egg color appeared in modern birds' eggs multiple times, independently."
The egg colors of birds reflect characteristic preferences in nesting environments and brooding behaviors. Modern birds use only two pigments, red and blue, to create all of the various egg colors, spots, and speckles.

Of course, the big questions is, did Tyrannosaurs have lips? This report, from last year, says no: https://www.livescience.com/58474-new-tyrannosaur-had-no-lips.html And this from the year before -- same website -- says yes: https://www.livescience.com/54912-did-t-rex-have-lips.html

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180823140932.htm

The suspense builds.

Someone actually asked this question: https://www.quora.com/Who-would-win-in-a-fight-between-an-elephant-and-a-T-rex

I take it I don't need to go into details.

Here's an interesting one: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/11/181129142423.htm An excerpt:

Rivaling the evolution of feathers in dinosaurs, one of the most extraordinary transformations in the history of life was the evolution of baleen -- rows of flexible hair-like plates that blue whales, humpbacks and other marine mammals use to filter relatively tiny prey from gulps of ocean water. Now, scientists have discovered an important intermediary link in the evolution of this innovative feeding strategy: an ancient whale that had neither teeth nor baleen.

This is, clearly, a massive mystery. What mammals ever had anything like baleen? How can genetics produce something it doesn't have code for? How can hair/fingernail materials grow in the mouth, replacing teeth? In this case, one might ask how'd these intermediaries could eat? But they weren't intermediaries of anything. Although the article says they're intermediary links, in classic "evolution speak", we're actually not talking about of some "intermediate" "missing link," for such don't exist. What exists are stable species, doing their thing for a million years or whatever, as in the Natural History of the equine family, Equidae, one of the best documented natural histories we have.

Each different version of the equus species was perfectly adapted to its environment as a species, doing its thing for however long. We can see they're intermediary between horses as we know them, and Eohippus, the first of the family. But they couldn't "evolve" anything; they just were. And quite successful at being. Nature didn't select them -- or anything else -- because nature has no consciousness. We have minds and extrapolate reasoning and finding the useful and the good and thus automatically transfer that to Nature, but Nature cannot think, or plan, or reflect, or know.

And it is more than just semantics. Poor Darwin. He rightfully hated the word "evolution" because it was solely used (back then) for human being evolving whatever (clothes styles, political systems, art). The word was foisted on him against his wishes, but then his preferred phrase, "Natural Selection" is an oxymoron self-contradiction. Nature can't select anything. He was told that, repeatedly. Also, of course, Darwin didn't understand ecosystems very well, thought that nothing in Nature was long-term, and he certainly didn't believe species actually existed. Yep. Wrote a book about the Origin of Species and didn't believe species was a thing. (It's sort of an inside joke, this. :) He thought all tigers, for example, were more or less tiger-like, depending on their place in an evolutionary arc from pre-tigers to post-tigers, each one a little more or less advanced at becoming something entirely different. All of them malleable, changing, shifting, improving according to the environment situation. It was merely human errata, human misconception, that labeled them all tigers.

But today we know species are stable. They resist change and tolerate only so much genetic mutation. For example, Luther Burbank (1849-1926) came up with Burbank's law about species: you can only breed "improvements" in individuals of a species up to a point, then they fall back to where their descendants fall back to where they were. Valuable info this is in trying to create new lines of seeds and livestock. If I were teaching high school science, I'd make 'em learn about Luther Burbank: an amazing scientist and creator of something like 800 plant varieties and strains. Like your russet potatoes? I love 'em. Guess where they came from? Burbank actually developed the strain, or I suppose improved it, to help the Irish, as it is somewhat blight resistant. What a guy! He'd definitely be in the forefront on genetic crop development, and an opponent of the Luddites who are against it.

But I digress. It's fun to tweak evolution and Global Warming, but "life goes on." Here are some more interesting science items.

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46358789

The rhino, Elasmotherium sibericum, was thought to have become extinct between 200,000 and 100,000 years ago.

By radiocarbon-dating a total of 23 specimens, researchers found the Ice Age giant in fact survived in Eastern Europe and Central Asia until at least 39,000 years ago.

They also isolated DNA from the ancient rhino for the first time, showing it split from the modern group of rhinos about 40 million years ago.

The extinction of the Siberian unicorn marks the end point of an entire group of rhinos.

Rinos are certainly related to each other! They have that "family face", you might say.

And DNA seems to be the main road now to discuss Natural History of Species.

Moving on into Environment:

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1050724/China-sandstorm-Zhangye-wall-of-sand-Chinese-fog-China-Meteorological-Administration-Gansu

300-foot wall of sand engulfs city! Check it out. Wanna move to Mars? You'd have to get used to this.

Sand engulfs. So does snow. Remember this story about the 5,000-year-old Bronze Age "Iceman" now named "Otzi" whose body was found in the Austrian Alps? Here are some great photos and a bit of info:

http://boredomtherapy.com/hikers-snow-discovery/ Lightweight article, but fun. And Otzi left behind a curse, too! Like King Tut. Check it out.

Speaking of snow, we have this concerning climate:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/11/25/claim-particle-physics-is-stagnating-because-of-groupthink/

Why is climate science stagnating? One thing we have seen over the years, in Climate Science nobody ever loses. As long as your estimated climate sensitivity is above 1.5C and not too much higher than 4.5C, your estimate will be accepted by the community as reasonable. If your sensitivity estimate is less than 1.5C, you’re a denier. If you make a truly ridiculous claim, such as predicting an ice free Arctic in the next couple of years, you might attract a pithy comment from Gavin Schmidt. But overall everyone’s career is safe, providing you churn out lots of papers which conform to the community view of what your results should be. There is no sense of urgency, no sense of concern, that the field of climate science is not advancing.

Similarly in Physics, according to Lee Smolin and now to Sabine Hossenfelder, your career is fine as long as your research proposal falls within the parameters of what everyone else thinks it should be.

Everyone knows I'm an unrepentant "climate denier" but t'is no matter. President Trump treats it as fluff and I see Macron is backing down in face of the incredible protests in France: http://fortune.com/2018/12/04/macron-fuel-tax-protests/ and https://euobserver.com/tickers/143591

I had thought Global Warming (a.k.a. Climate change, Weather, etc.) would go out quietly, with a whimper -- like the 1970s talk of a new Ice Age went out or the 1980s talk about landfills smothering us all. Maybe, though, this whole French thing is a sign it'll go out with a bang as fed-up working people demand an end to it.

Those with more wisdom than I have foreseen this, based on just who is "into" AGW and who isn't:

Global Warming only plays to the elites: http://thefederalist.com/2018/12/03/liberal-elites-driving-climate-change-hysteria-hurting-democrats-electoral-chances/

The liberal elites constitute only 13 percent of the electorate; by comparison, the Democratic-leaning blue-collar voters represent 27 percent. In addition, the liberal elites are whiter than the overall population (and much whiter than Democrats as a whole), more formally educated, and considerably wealthier.

This profile of the liberal elite is broadly consistent with the recent “Hidden Tribes” report from the left-of-center group More in Common, which found a similar but even smaller group of progressive activists were outliers on issues like political correctness and affirmative action in college admissions.

Also: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/12/french_retreat_on_fuel_tax_increase_worries_delegates_to_climate_change_conference.html

That's the real story of the revolt against the fuel tax.  The burden of saving the Earth will fall most heavily on those least able to pay for it.  European elites, congratulating themselves on their "courage" in foisting these burdensome carbon taxes on their people, just don't get it.

People get angry when asked to do with less for a goal that rich people are saying is for the best for everyone.

But whatever about AGW, much more seriously, the discipline of Western empirical "science" overall is in big trouble, and for a number of reasons, as detailed in this shocking article: https://amgreatness.com/2018/12/02/the-impending-death-of-science/

And excerpt:

There were approximately 2.5 million scientific papers published last year. Think about that. A researcher would have to read nearly 300 papers an hour, non-stop, just to keep up. And that is not accounting for the more than 50 million scientific papers that have been published since the 17th century. If the researcher somehow managed to read 600 papers an hour (that’s 10 scientific papers each minute) in order to catch up with the established scientific literature, it would still take him 20 years to consume all the papers written. Once again, this is assuming that he didn’t eat or sleep, and was somehow able to read and absorb 10 technical papers each minute.

Needless to say, the readership of any particular paper is abysmally low.

Now imagine taking the time to test and reproduce the results of each paper. It shouldn’t surprise anyone that scientific inquiry has suffered from a “reproducibility crisis” over the past few years. Some surveys have suggested that more than 70 percent of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist’s experiments. In one of the largest replication studies conducted, 60 percent of psychology studies examined failed the reproducibility test. A research project attempting to replicate social science experiments failed eight out of 21 times to obtain any observed effects consistent with the original findings. These findings deliver a devastating blow to the credibility of the current literature in both the natural and social sciences.

In theory, science has mechanisms in place to safeguard the knowledge it cultivates. But an overly bureaucratic and esoterically compartmentalized academia with perverse funding incentives will doom the practice of science no matter the methodological guardrails. These theoretical guardrails mean very little if they are not practically enforced. After all, the Soviet Union’s constitution had some beautiful, yet ignored, language about freedom of expression and the press.

But even if the guardrails are consistently enforced, it still takes time for incorrect scientific knowledge to be refuted. It takes time to review a study’s methodology, to reproduce the study, and then to test the refutation. This process can take years.

This article is in the same vein: http://thefederalist.com/2018/09/12/journals-universities-deep-six-study-noticing-men-women-different/ 

Groupthink is bad enough, but Politically Correct Group Think is a disaster.

Whatever. I'm still trying to recover from the visuals of that poor elephant meeting a hungry T-Rex.

An Préachán