Dr. Malone has climbed halfway out of the Virus Cult, but he's not free yet.

 Dr. Robert Malone has an article here at his Substack site. At one point, Dr Malone wrote:

"And there is no way we can ever get back to that point in time, because almost everyone has either been vaccinated or infected at the present."

AnP

"Everyone ... infected at present." Dear Dr. Malone, NO ONE is "infected" because Covid doesn't exist. It's an umbrella term for a host of pneumonia-like illnesses, mostly derived from 5G EMFs and also things like Roundup being spread into the atmosphere via "bio-fuels". For FOUR HUNDRED years we've known that exposure to electricity can cause influenza – the long history of this revelation is thoroughly documented in the book, The Invisible Rainbow by Arthur Firstenberg. But "Big Pharma" can't money off of that! (And it is a threat to another world-wide business, Global Communication.)

This  is SO frustrating. In the entire history of Virology, from Louis Pasteur thinking the idea up and inventing the word "virus" when he couldn't prove bacteria caused all illnesses, up through the first "discovered" "virus" (the tobacco leaf mosaic virus in the early 1900s), through the application of the electron microscope when it was invented in the 1930s – after which for two decades virologists tried desperately to make it find viruses for them, only to get totally confused when they discovered exosomes – which look exactly like viruses are supposed to and which we are still learning about – to John Franklin Enders' 1954 invention of the "cell culture isolation" method that his own control experiment proved didn't work, down to today – when so many attempts have been made, as with the tireless researcher Christine Massey, to get government agencies and private labs to fess up to they're not having Covid virions, the theoretical form of a virus outside of a host cell, through Drs Malone and Peter McCullough turning partially against their former colleagues – all of this, and never once has anyone used a density-gradient method to "find" viruses because, of course, a method like that that could find them must not be used because it won't find them.

Most think this virus-doesn't-exist idea is pure insanity; I have a friend who earned a PhD in microbiology who just screams at me, literally, when I bring it up (no rational argument at all: he can't seem to even process the idea, and goes into meltdown), but when one bothers to read Firstenberg's history, or even the Method sections of the scientific papers supposedly "proving" Covid as Dr Andrew Kaufman has done videos on, one realizes they've proved nothing. (Kaufman notes that some authors of those early papers even admit this!) But the propaganda machine of Big Gov/Big Pharma/Big Medicine just keeps chugging away because this offers an endless supply of money for Big Pharma and and endless supply of zombies for Big Gov.

They will most certainly keep at it till they have all of us "vaccinated" a hundred different ways against simply living on Earth.

Does anyone bother to ask the obvious question? How did we ever evolve in so deadly a bio-dome in the first place? Or are they simply trying to vaccinate us from being human?

Drs Malone and McCullough have crawled sort of half-way out of "the Virus Cult" but still trying to square the circle. I hope they escape it before government/Pharma turns us all into the Borg.

  An Préachán

Stefan Lanka's court case

 A Chairde,

As promised yesterday, more on the German court case disproving measles cause illness. This passage is from the The Contagion Myth, by Dr. Tom Cowan. He discusses German scientist Stefan Lanka's court case about the Measles virus.

Excerpt:

One disease blamed for Native American death was measles, considered to be a viral disease. But on February 16, 2016, the Federal Supreme Court of Germany (BGH) made a historic ruling: there is no evidence for the existence of a measles virus. The case grew out of a challenge by German biologist Stefan Lanka, who offered a sum of one hundred thousand Euros to anyone who could supply proof that the measles virus existed. A young doctor, David Bardens, took up the challenge, providing Lanka with six studies as proof that the measles virus did indeed exist. When Lanka claimed that these studies did not meet the evidence needed to claim the prize, Bardens took him to court. The (lower) court sided with Bardens and ordered payment of the prize.

But Lanka took the case to the Supreme Court, where the judge decided in his favor and ordered the plaintiff to bear all procedural costs. Lanka was able to show that the six studies misinterpreted "ordinary constituents of cell" as part of the suspected measles virus.

According to Lanka, decades of consensus-building processes have created a model of a measles virus that doesn't actually exist: "To this day, an actual structure that corresponds to this model has been found neither in a human, nor in an animal. With the results of the genetic tests, all thesis of existence of measles virus has been scientifically disproved."

The existence of a contagious measles virus justified the development of the measles vaccine, which has earned the pharmaceutical industry billions of dollars over a forty-year period. But if such a microorganism does not exist, said Lanka, "This raises the question of what was actually injected into millions of German citizens over the past decade. According to the judgment by the Supreme Court, it may not have been a vaccine against measles."

But what about measles parties? What about successful attempts by parents to infect their  children with the common childhood diseases like measles, chick pox, and mumps? And what about sexually transmitted disease (STD) like syphilis -- said to be a disease that the Europeans contracted from the Native Americans? The mystery of childhood illnesses and sexually transmitted diseases will be addressed in chapter 7.

An P again: Definitely, Dr. Cowan's book is one that needs to be read. I highly recommend it.

I'll make a couple of notes:

1. First, Stefan Lanka is working on a long, involved experiment, one definitely involving a control group (as many Covid experiments didn't), that will finally and scientifically prove viruses don't cause disease. As I understand it, he's about 2/3s of the way through this effort. Lanka started out as a virologist but no longer calls himself that. Some important virologists in past decade or so have confessed their profession is in deep trouble, on many levels, and Lanka often speaks of those problems. There were problems with Pasteur and Koch 100 years ago, after all. They had fierce critics, who, though long forgotten, are being read again.
2. Secondly, note Lanka's phrase "decades of consensus-building processes". The truth is, most "scientists" today are either technicians or hacks, "hacks" meaning anyone, politician, artist, scientist, whatever, who are just in it for the retirement benefits. People "go into science" for a number of reasons, but it can be a very boring, tedious field. I've personally known two scientists in genetics, who, bored out of their wits, strove to keep their jobs. One had a family and no spouse and so kept her job, the other quit and went into something quite different. My point is: when the talk of "scientists" and "decades of consensus-building" surface, we're not necessarily talking about real scientists. Consider some truly famous scientists: Einstein, first and foremost, but also Richard Feynman and Kary Mullis. Or Robert Oppenheimer. Or the man I often refer to who thought up plate tectonics, Alfred Wegener. Wegener spent a great deal of time out in the field. (He actually died in the field, in Greenland in 1930, trying to bring help to others.) One could go on. In fact, Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch must be included in my list. They, too, went against the establishment of their days, and if time proves them wrong, they nonetheless stand out. My point is these guys are very different from the usual faceless, "hack" "scientist" navigating the warren of academia or big corporations and who are building "decades of consensus".
   

So what to call them? Technicians. Techs  are not scientists. I suspect there is no such thing as a computer scientist, for by definition they're technicians. Same thing with most medical doctors: "body techs", you might say. Certainly ANY review of the great scientists of the past will demonstrate that they weren't the go-along-to-get-along type of guys. They often went against the grain. Pasteur and Koch as well as Mullis and Feynman. Einstein, certainly. Fought against the establishment of their days. So often did that happen in science history that it became a sort of cliché in novels and movies.

Maybe Stefan Lanka is such a one. Only time will tell.

But remember the name. Stefan Lanka.

All the best,

An Préachán

Famous Mainstream Vaccine Expert Issues Covid Vaccine Warning, and Dr. Carrie Madej and Dr. Andrew Kaufman

 Amici,

As you know, I don't have much (really, any) faith left in mainstream medicine now regrading the Covid vaccines, for a variety of reasons. However, I keep reading up on all positions, and this one is something EVERYONE who believes in the current virus-causes-illness meme and the vaccine regime resulting from it, needs to know about.

Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche is the expert, and he makes a very logical case within the usual virus-causing narrative of illness (founded by Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch, etc). To wit, mass Covid vaccinations across the population while the virus is widely infecting people will only succeed in creating a super virus. “The more we use these vaccines for immunizing people in the midst of a pandemic, the more infectious the virus will become,” Vanden Bossche writes. I've been wondering when this would come up, because, again assuming the standard narrative, this is exactly what one would expect the rampaging and highly mutable virus to do.

Now as I say, for myself, I think the whole Covid fiasco is The Great Reset/New World Order twaddle, a twin sibling to Global Warming, designed to condition us to a 1984 type of dystopia. For a discussion on that aspect of this, see this interview between Drs. Carrie Madej and Andrew Kaufman.

The first 25 minutes will shake your believe in government oversight of infectious diseases, as Dr. Madej recounts how the CDC and the local public health authorities dealt with her when she had patients who experienced a mini-surge in Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. (The authorities all illegally tried to force her to shut up and not treat her patients!) Once Dr. Madej and Dr. Kaufman start discussing vaccines, though, it's a true horror show. (As some years ago the Vatican discovered in Latin America: a vaccine for Tetanus, I believe, turned out to be sterilizing women! Intentionally so. This is now regarded as historically true.)

I'm just a "tin-foil hat" kook to folks until they themselves learn of actual cases like that. Vanden Bossche is as mainstream as they come, however, and what he's saying needs to be heard.

Read the whole article for contra views presented at the end. Note that Vanden Bossche is giving what I like to call "the Minority Report", and naturally the "Majority Report" people have to try to eviscerate him. Ying and Yang. (Or of course in classic Sun Tzu teaching, Chapter 5 of his Art of War, we're referring to the 'normal' force, cheng, and the the 'extraordinary' force, ch'i. Cheng and ch'i often interchange their roles during battle, and that switch could easily happen with Majority/Minority reports, if only people were honest.)

An Préchán

Dr. Lee Merrit discusses Covid and its vaccines, and other important issues

 Dr. Lee Merrit MD Interview

(https://www.brighteon.com/b95f1834-1283-4866-b16e-fb6bf9092aeb)

Amici,

A friend of mine sent me this interview about Covid and I've spent some time transcribing parts of it for you. It is excellent, and if you want to be informed about Covid and the Covid vaccines and much more, you really ought to listen to it.

Whether you want to be informed about Covid, and the larger issues it raises, is of course your business. I merely offer the info should you be interested. Socrates was famous for saying the unexamined life wasn't worth living, and I've been a disciple of that all of my life. But, as I am over 60 years old and a historian, I can honestly say this past year has been just utterly astounding. Covid is one part of a much larger series of closely related developments that deeply affect all of us. "Something isn't right" about the last year's events – they don't "feel" right nor "smell" right, and we need to be very, very observant – and skeptical.

After his introduction, the interviewer here lets the doctor talk at length. Doctor Lee Merrit has had a very wide and long experience of both medicine and military life. Her long military medical service makes her insights all the more relevant and interesting. She is a life-long member of the Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society (est 1902), she's the past president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, and a former board member of the Arizona Medical Association. Dr Merrit got her medical degree from the School of Medicine at the University of Rochester, and interned at the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland, in internal medicine, and she did her residency in orthopedic surgery at the San Diego Naval Medical Center, spent ten years as a military surgeon... (etc., etc., etc.) ... and, as the interviewer says, "She is something of a free thinker."

That's definitely true.

Overview

1. Dr. Merrit makes the case that coronaviruses are both naturally occurring and benign, (coronaviruses cause the common cold, but that's about it), yet they are extremely small and very contagious.
   
2. So, she thinks the Chinese bio-weapons lab people used this benign but contagious virial family as the transmission vehicle, a delivery device, to launch a much more dangerous illness.
   
3. Historically, she says, we had various bio-weapons, but they were either hard to distribute or we had cures for them.
   
4. She uses the example of anthrax being mailed in paper envelops to politicians. "It's hard to distribute anthrax," she said.
   
5. So she thinks the Chinese used the coronavirus, easily transmissible and very small (she is insistent that masks do not work, at all). "You can't hide from it behind a mask," she says; "it's just incredibly transmissible, but it is very benign."
   
6. So the Chinese added a "warhead" to it, the infamous "spike protein" that gets into your heart, brain, etc., via what sounds like "H-2 pathways" (but I can't really hear that "pathway" bit clearly). It is this spike protein that can kill you.
   
7. She suspects (but doesn't know) that it was released accidentally, and that the first generation of it was more deadly that subsequent versions, and like all viruses, she says, it has mutated into successively milder forms.

Begin transcription:

Toward the end:

(26:26) You should be aware of the defense (i.e. Lysosomotropic Drugs such as Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin). We should stop lying about the defense. And we should tell people –  I have a little Covid kit in my office. It's NAC (i.e. N-acetylcysteine, NAC, an over-the-counter supplement that may help relieve or improve various medical issues), Vitamin C, Vitamin D, Zinc, Selenium and Quercetin (N.B. the latter a supplement I can't get in Hungary; one may not be able to get NAC, either). Six things. And if you do that, you can improve your immune response and your own ability to fight this off and not get terribly sick. It's possible that they're going to come around with more dangerous things in the future, and then we need more than that. So, that's – we have to get the truth out, push around the news about treatment, and patients aren't getting it. Patients are afraid to go to hospital because they know they're not going to get the right treatment. That is sad.

I would just make this point to doctors. I get it if you're in training and you can't speak out. You're stuck. I don't fault you. I do fault everybody above that. The people that are taking the money from (Anthony) Fauci, the people that are taking the money from the NIH, that are willing to take the money and push Remdesivir and kill people. Not necessarily that they're killing them with Remdesivir, but they're killing them by omitting treatment early on as outpatients. And doctors below those that are out of training, they have to make a moral decision because we should be prophylactic-ing with people in nursing homes, we could be saving lives for $5 a week, we could be saving a lot of these old people. But they don't want to. They're not considered contributory to society. That's where the Nazis went with this, people who are not worthy of living.

We have to get over that. Because the doctors making the choice to stay quiet because they've got a mortgage and two kids, they don't want to lose their university salary, it's time to rethink your position. I think everybody in the medical community needs to man up and be honest here. The information's out there. Don't tell me there's no evidence. They're lying to you about the evidence. If you make ANY effort on the Internet, you will find the evidence. And if not, you can go to America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS.com), you can go to the AAPSOnline.org (Association of American Physicians and Surgeons). And many other organizations are speaking up now. There's also the Great Barrington Declaration (GBDeclaration.org).

I would say if you want to get out of the pandemic right now, it's really easy. You turn off your TV and take off your mask, you re-open your business and you live your life. Hug your relatives and go see your old relatives, and you have neighborhood parties. Because let me tell you, we cannot live in a basement. Even if you think masks work, don't do this to your children. How many decades are you going to do this? Every winter, every year, masks from now on? No!

These are serious assertions. Dr. Merrit lays the groundwork for them early in the interview.

Earlier on in the Interview:

(13:8) Why don't they want you to know (about the already existing Lysosomotropic agents effective treatments of viruses), well, the $69 billion a-year-vaccine-business goes to zero. But even more than that, if we are in bio-warfare right now, as a part of this multi-dimensional warfare, if you have a treatment in your back-pocket, they cannot terrorize you with viruses.

This is important, because the way they made this experimental thing is – it's not a vaccine – whatever they're calling this mRNA vaccine (Pfizer, Moderna), by their own admission, it doesn't prevent transmission, ok, and even if it did, it is created to act upon the warhead part of this (Covid) deal, this spike protein. So the next year, these guys with their bio-weapons – this is one of the other things I've learned, sadly, is that there are these bio-weapon engineers – we have funded them, we have literally – think about this: we have funded a PLA virologist (People's Liberation Army) in our Army bio-weapons lab. That is the height of insanity. Under the Clinton Administration, it was completely illegal to have non-aligned foreign students. So if you were from Iran or someplace not one of our allies, you couldn't even work in a biology lab that worked with lesser pathogens. Any pathogens that could be used as a biological (weapon). So suddenly, we've gone from that stance under the Clinton Administration to the Obama Administration actually funding PLA Communist Chinese working in our labs. It's absolute insanity. But I found out we have more bio-weapon engineers than I anticipated. I knew the Soviets had them around ... So now they have the "missile technology" (i.e. the way to deliver the virus weapon) and they can put whatever they want in there, so every year you'll need a different vaccine. So even if you think this vaccine will work, and I don't, but even if you believe that (i.e. the vaccine will work) you need a new vaccine each year.

A vaccine is not a permanent solution. Viruses are all around us. They're a part of nature. We've lived with them for millennia. If we survive (this current insanity), we'll live a few more millennia with them. But we need a solution that doesn't involve a vaccine – of any kind. And we have solutions. We have treatments. So not only is hydroxychloroquine good for treatment, it's good for prevention. The other thing is, you can improve your own immune system through supplements. "Big Pharma" never wants you to do that, but there's no question ... for all the billions of dollars we pay the CDC (Centers for Disease Control), why do they not drill down on the people getting really sick and dying? Because if you notice, there was a bi-modal distribution. Most people walk away from this thing (Covid), most people never really get sick with this thing, maybe a little sick or a flu-like thing, but they walk away from it. But then there's these small percentage of people in the ICU who are dying. Who ARE these people?

The CDC, for all that money, never looked at it or they didn't tell us. But the Indonesians did, and they found it out was almost – they looked at a bunch of different things – but the biggest, biggest thing was what your vitamin D level was. Because if was above 30, your chances of being in the ICU was less than 4 percent – OF SICK PEOPLE IN THE HOSPITAL. (That percentage) would be much less if you looked at the entire population. So the biggest thing people can do is get their vitamin D level up, and the sun doesn't do it.

So that's my biggest over-all view on this thing, and I do think it is all part of the take-down of America. (16:54)

(19:00) We are NOT getting informed consent on what these vaccines are. They are programming mRNA. MRNA is kinda like a computer chip you put into a 3D printer, and it tells the printer what you want it to make, and it prints it out. This (mRNA vaccine) is the biologic equivalent. ... What they've done is create a piece of mRNA to create in every cell in your body that spike protein (that Covid has). Or at least part of it. That spike protein – you're actually creating that pathogen in your body. ... The animals tested with earlier versions of mRNA vaccines all died from Immuno-Enhancement or Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE). 

...

This is the perfect binary weapon. There's no way I know what that mRNA is programmed to do, and most doctors don't know. The doctors can't get at that data. The guys at the very top of this project know, but we don't know. They SAY it is for the spike protein, but we don't know. So after a couple of years, whatever else is in this weapon can activate, and you can die.

End of Transcription

An Préachán

France and the U.S. FDA both approve Chloroquine for immediate use / other news

Great news regarding HydroxyChloroquine developed over the weekend.

France:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/03/france-sanctions-chloroquine-after-78-of-80-patients-completely-recover-from-covid-19-within-five-days/

and the U.S. FDA:

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/breaking-fda-issues-emergency-authorization-of-hcq/

These moves are apparently predicated on news from French Dr. Didier Raoult's most recent test, first reported on three days ago. 

And also on NYC Dr Vladimir (Zev) Zelenko's astounding news: 

this is great news, indeed.

Late-breaking news on the H-C front again stronglz suggests that "the powers that be" expect great things from the drug combo. 

Now, I know some say I'm just reporting useless "spin" and these tests haven't been clinically verified by the FDA and the host of government agencies (like the CDC) and so on; however, the fact that both France's government and the FDA has now approved H-C (Hydroxychloroquine) indicates that the evidence exists for H-C's use.

Two caveats. First, H-C is used successfully in combination with an antibiotic, azithromycin (Z-Pak), and zinc sulfate. It is not just H-C by itself. Secondly, these high success rates are based on getting the patients medicated early, not long after they exhibit CoVid-19's symptoms. ("CoVid-19", "COVID-19", etc., re: spelling.) If one waits too long, success is not as pronounced, and fatalities can occur. That was the case with Dr. Raoult, wherein an 86-year-old died, being relatively far gone when the test began.

Also, significantly, two other aspects of this to keep in mind. Doctors (and nurses who can get it) are using H-C as a prophylactic to prevent them from developing CoVid-19. You see this in the blogs and the Comments sections. And also, on Tucker Carlson the other night, this past week, Carlson was interviewing a NYC doctor who, toward the end of the interview, mentioned he himself was taking Plaquenil, a brand name for H-C. Carlson had asked the doc how the doc was avoiding infection, and Carlson missed the significance of the reference, and ended the interview. But I caught it, and so did Carlson's producer, who told Carlson but too late to ask the doc about it.

Obviously, the medical professionals who are "on the front line" are not messing around waiting for FDA/CDC approval (which has now been given).

The other significant point to make is that a good number of clinical or quasi-clinical tests began last week with H-C, in many quarters, most particularly NYC, and we'll be hearing a lot about that in the immediate future. Be on the lookout.

Finally, Drs Fauci and Birx over the weekend, in TV interviews, made extraordinary claims about fantastic fatality projections: Fauci saying we could possibly see 100,000 to 200,000 deaths in the U.S. and Birx saying COVID-19 would  have killed 1.6 to 2 million Americans if the U.S. government had not established the lockdown and cratered the economy.

These numbers seem to contradict what both individuals have said very recently, and published (for example, Fauci in the New England Journal of Medicine). Caution is required, because the media is crying up "Disaster! Woe!". Fauci has to be listened to at length, and was basically saying we are not ready to let up the lockdown (to the extent one formally exists, the less shocking term being "social distancing") quite yet, that we need more widespread testing in regions not hit so hard. (That's because we don't really know how many have actually had the virus and were not been too adversely affected by it -- we need to do massive testing with new tests that show whether one has had the virus of the past few months; such tests are being made available now.) Clearly, such testing can’t be in regions such as New York and New Orleans and other cities, currently flooded with the virus. As for Fauci, in his Sunday interview on CNN, he seems to be doing a lot of "hemming and hawing" (as the old saying has it) and not saying much anything definite. Also, important to point out, Facui did say these computer models are based on assumptions and, in his experience, the worst case scenario rarely happens.

However, it is these models -- such as issued by Neill Ferguson at the Imperial College, London (now massively reconfigured downward), and by the U.S. Democrat group "COVID Act Now" were what caused such panic in the first place.

At American Thinker, Clarice Feldman as a good article here: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/03/numerators_and_denominators_in_the_coronavirus_saga.html in which she provides long quotes and links to an even better article by Daniel Horowitz. Always, remember, there are lies, damned lies, and statistics. A good article showing how the MSM "spins" these statistics is here:

https://pjmedia.com/trending/what-the-media-isnt-telling-you-about-the-united-states-coronavirus-case-numbers/

Quite fascinating, actually. The same data can be presented in myriads of ways. And I know some friends of mine will be quick to say that Drs Raoult and Zelenko can alter their stats too, but in their case, we will be quickly seeing whether their info is reliable; certainly, the governments of France and the U.S. think so.

One interesting point was made in a comment at the blog Wattsupwiththat about hurricane predictions. Hurricane prediction models often mispredict where the hurricane is going, until the storms get closer and closer to shore, and also, somehow, rates of success of such predictions are calculated over an 80-year period. Certainly the Global Warming predictions of 20 years ago (tempus fugit) are all wrong in general, and most often in detail. It is a commonplace, however, that you just never see MSM reports on how so far off these predictions often were. Remember the Global Overpopulation scare of the 1980s? Same with the COVID-19 predictions.

Horowitz, in the article linked to in the Conservative Review piece linked to here makes an excellent point that it is stastically impossible for COVID-19 to only have arrived here in the West at the end of January. Because of the volume of traffic from China (and less to China) it is certain that it got here in December. A lot fo the people who died in January and February and are listed as having died of the flu (which is a killer), but they could have had COVID-19. No one here was looking for it and assumed it was just a flu death. 

We just don't know. But it is possible, therefore, that we are seeking peak virus infections now. Interesting idea. We've no way of knowing. But were it true, it means COVID-19 kills at a low rate indeed, in terms of what has been shouted from the rooftops of the MSM, at least.

Now, I am NOT denigrating SARS CoVid-19. It is causing havoc in the medical systems of every country that it gets a hold in. And it got a hold in Italy (because of Italy's close connections to China) and the U.S. (in Seattle first, then NYC, from a European-derived strain of the virus) before anyone really grasped what was going on. That's the fault of China, and once this mess is cleared up, there will be repercussions, serious ones.

Also, COVID-19 is deadly to older folks and people with pre-existing conditions like myself (COPD in my case), and it can kill younger people: https://www.france24.com/en/20200327-she-just-had-a-cough-teen-s-covid-19-death-shakes-france

But there also has to be a balance between protecting (and curing) people and crashing Western Civilization. That cannot be our two options. Right now, we seem to be cutting off our nose to spite our face, or as one internet wag put it, committing suicide because we fear dying.

Most important point to make: Everything these days is political, even the weather! (I.e., Global Warming.) Marriage is political ("same-sex" marriage) and even the nature of the sexes, being male and female, is political. It's all insane. https://www.dailywire.com/news/attorney-general-barr-weighs-into-trans-suit-no-biological-boys-shouldnt-be-allowed-to-compete-against-girls

There's nothing not soaked in politics. Why has the MainStream Media (MSM) be so opposed to Hydroxychloroquine, for example? Because Trump is for it. This "politicking" the coronavirus is ubiquitous. Now Nancy Pelosi is suggesting Trump should be impeached for his handling of the virus breakout!

Therefore, one must be extremely skeptical of a great portion of the news about the virus. I suspect H-C might be a civilizational life-saver, but I don't know that, and anxiously await news this week of how the current tests turn out. But the governments of France and the U.S., their announcements reported over the weekend, seem to strongly indicate H-C does work as advertised.

RBC