Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Britain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Britain. Show all posts

Friday, June 15, 2018

Lamenting the Irish Americans and the Irish 19th Century Church


Irish Americans.
Irish Americans.

What is an Irish-American (formally spelled with a hyphen, and thus Theodore Roosevelt's "hyphenated American" put down)?

Good question. 

Most Irish Americans don't know they're Irish. Where I grew up (by odd circumstance) was on the Appalachians borderlands, where Catholics were rare or, if found, German or Italian. (Not many of either of those, to be sure). But a great many of the people had red hair, drank whiskey, fist-fought at the drop of a pin, and told wondrous stories. They were the Ulster Scots, of course. 

Ulster Scots, with a good mix of non-Ulster Scot Irish, too (I knew Casey's and so on with Irish-names who were as Protestant as John Knox).

"The Peopling of Ireland" is a complex tale, We don't know even when the Celtic language arrived, or where from. It has been there so long, however, as J.R.R. Tolkien once noted, as to have done most of it's evolution there. Unlike English, which was a mostly evolved language when it came to Prydain (Britannia, Britain, Alba, as the big island in the archipelago is known; the Welsh call England Lloegyr, the lost territories).

And if you travel about The West in Ireland, you'll note -- if you've traveled in Spain -- how many of them look like Spaniards or Portuguese. Once, in Donegal at the great Irish course in Gleann Colm Cille, a drought was on, and the whole area turned brown. It looked exactly like Galicia. And it made the black-haired locals look all the more Iberian. All that because Ireland, Brittany, and Galicia/Portugal are "Atlantic Europe", and you can see on a globe (a flat map won't do it) how close they are to each other.

But as for the Irish Americans, in the sense of what I'd call the "city Irish," who were, originally, mostly Catholic, it's easy to disparage then. I've been disgusted with them far more often than not. I well remember an Irish priest of my acquaintance, an old man, Irish-born, you understand, berating a guy dressed in a pathetically outrageous Irish leprechaun costume (this was years ago) at the Dublin (Ohio) Irish Festival.

But as a blogger One Peter Five wrote, "The Irish should be Catholic, not Irish, the latter being." as the blogger wrote: "...largely a filth culture which emphasizes wicked practices such as drunkenness, immodest dancing, and a permissiveness to blatant paganism under the guise of 'culture', because it's 'Irish'. "

Assume for a moment that is mostly true, and alas, it too often is, on both sides of the Atlantic. But I would stress where we got that miserable culture of drink, dance, and the devil. Take dancing for example; Traditional dancing in Ireland was group dancing, and when one danced, one danced with the whole village, in essence. Who invented modern dance? A person gyrating in sexually suggestive gyrations, alone, in a mass of other zombies doin' the same, all to "music" so loud it would deafen a basalt rock?

The Irish embraced "rock and roll" but they didn't invent it.

We got that foreign, outside culture from the Outside, and the Church in Ireland, the 19th century Church, now, facilitated that, all in order to remove from the Irish their own culture and language, all in order to make them "West Brits". And it was THAT Church that drilled into us the Three Unbreakable Commandments: Pray. Pay, and Obey. It was that Church, a materialistic one, a promoter of "prosperity" and "modernism" before even the Protestant  Germans got around to inventing "Modernism" in the 1860s (the Tübingen School of theology) that laid us low and removed our defenses and ancient cultural immunity against foreign contagion.

And, friends, is it now a wonder at all that their "spiritual descendants" of Vatican II and that Ilk (both in Ireland and the largely Irish-derived American Catholic Church) left us with this mess of an abortion regime coming to Ireland?

“So in the Libyan fable it is told
That once an eagle, stricken with a dart,
Said, when he saw the fashion of the shaft,
With our own feathers, not by others' hands,
Are we now smitten.”
―Aeschylus

RC

Tuesday, August 1, 2017

Martyred by the Culture of Death

Sorry for this "downer" of a post, but as a father of four, and as someone who worked for years to save his ancestral language, and as someone who actually lives "on the front lines" in Europe, I have some bit of a right to pass on the following essays. 

As you-all know by now, little Charlie Gard will die. The British "justice" system dragged it all out so long that he won't make it. The quote in this email's title is from a John Zmirak essay, which I've linked to below, but before that, here is one article on the decision process involved in his death, plus a couple of Comments (these stress the political aspects to the decision whereas Zmirak's discusses the spiritualproblems Charlie's story reveals).
Bureaucracy is the mother's milk of socialism. By having endless channels and forms and committees, they empower themselves and appear as a de-facto powerful entity by mere size and complexity alone.
In my military days it amazed me how much trouble it was to get a light bulb changed in our shop.
Something socialists and statists tell you: when the government's paying the bills, the government gets to make the decisions.
They also don't tell you that they regard human beings as members of a collective, not as individuals. They do not believe that every life is sacred. They do believe that any life can and should be sacrificed for the "common good." In that scheme, little Charlie's death is sad but necessary. Public resources must be allocated in the most efficient way.

As all this may sound extreme to you, check out this article: 
Dutch politicians are considering changing euthanasia laws so that healthy people can die whenever they want. In an interview, the leader of the political party that introduced the bill said, “You didn’t ask to be brought into the world,” and explained that his party’s goal is to make euthanasia freely available to all.
The idea that death is a human right is gaining traction in the U.S., too. In fact, arguments that we should kill terminally ill infants are respectable enough for the New York Times.

Ron again: This reminds me of Ray Bradbury's 1951 Illustrated Man, one of the stories of which was about the last human culture voting to murder all its children. 

Really, this is sick. And grotesquely stupid. As a father of four kids, one of whom is autistic, I'm fed up with this unholy mess. The "West" is perverse, on many levels. And the Church, which birthed, nursed, trained, and blessed the West, needs to "be there" for it now, and it isn't. That' s Bergoglio's greatest sin and worst dereliction of his duty. John Zmirak explains that in his article, co-written with Jason Jones. Please note that it was published before Charlie's death-sentence. But it is a sharply worded, no-holds-barred take down of the kind of thinking that rules so much of Europe (and the American Left) today. as well as excoriating Bergoglio and his pathetic gay henchman, Paglia. It is really a must-read.


By JASON JONES & JOHN ZMIRAK Published on July 11, 2017 • 21 Comments
The plight of Charlie Gard and his parents is awakening consciences around the world. What could be more clear-cut than this case? Parents who love their baby have found the money to try a treatment that just might save him. But doctors, British courts, and the European Court of Human Rights (Ministry of Love, anyone?) are all colluding against them. Against a baby.
Why? That’s the staggering question. What do all these powerful people care if two parents try this treatment? Are they afraid that it won’t work? Not at all. They’re straining at the leash to shut off his food and water. To turn off his respirator. Are they scared it will cause him anguish? Zero evidence for that.
A “Life Unworthy of Life”
No, the British doctors, judges, and the European court are afraid that the treatment might work. That it might save a “life unworthy of life.” It might set a troubling precedent: that the handicapped have value. That life is sacred and suffering is redeemable. Even that something matters more than piling up happy moments before you die. This spectacle of people around the world contributing to help two loving parents care for their sick, crippled child, who willingly embrace the sacrifices entailed … It shames them. They find it repulsive. It reminds them of the Cross.
No treason could be more perfect.
Western Europe has gone beyond rejecting the supernatural. It can barely contain its revulsion at nature and life itself. Few countries in Europe have enough births to replace the dying. Eurocrats have chosen to outsource the grubby work of reproduction to the Muslim world, in the form of “refugees.” What more comprehensive way on earth could there be for them to reject their ancestors? To salt the earth against descendants? No treason could be more profound and perfect than to sterilize themselves and hand the Continent over to total strangers.
Erasing Our Ancestors, Aborting Our Descendants
Childless elites rule Europe in secret through unelected commissions — it sounds like some crazy futuristic novel, doesn’t it? But it’s the cold, unvarnished truth. These oligarchs loathe their subjects. They despise more than anything those who cling to one piece or another of their grandparents’ natural and supernatural pieties:
·        The duty of parents to educate and advocate for their children, despite the State.
·        The rights of voters to direct their nations’ futures.
·        The duty of nations to guard their own borders and sovereignty.
·        The right of churches to pass along their doctrine, unpoisoned by modern sexual ideology.
The suave and rootless Citizens of International Business Class have their own set of deep-seated feelings. Most of them start with scorn.
They loathe people like Charlie Gard’s parents. “Ignorant” Britons who support measures like Brexit. “Benighted” Poles who won’t legalize abortion. “Bigoted” Hungarians who won’t let “the Turk” reoccupy their country. “Racist” Americans (of every race) who voted for Donald Trump.
Charlie Gard has become a symbol, whose influence will live on. His parents are doing what’s healthy and natural. So are the voters in Poland, Slovakia, and Hungary. And yes, so were we in our last presidential election.
These elitists are desperate to keep real decisions out of the hands of voters. To concentrate power upward, in the hands of the few. To manage the media, censor Facebook, terrorize populists and patriots. And to stigmatize as “extremists” those who still think and speak as Churchill, De Gaulle, and Adenauer once did — of freedom, faith, and Western civilization.
The Pope as Gravedigger of Christendom
We were ashamed to see the Vatican’s Academy Council for Life weigh in against the rights of parents. Against the value of Charlie’s life. We are appalled to read that Pope Francis wants to grant more powers to the European Union, at the expense of elected governments.
Yes, it’s true that Pope Francis, after a week of backlash among Catholics, overruled his handpicked choice to run the Pontifical Council, Archbishop Paglia. Yes, the pope finally weighed in on the side of life. But no one should be impressed until he fires Paglia, and the pro-abortion thinkers whom Paglia brought into the Vatican — replacing real, heroic pro-life intellectuals at the nerve center of the worldwide pro-life movement.
We can’t say whether Charlie Gard will live or die. That’s in God’s hands now. But we do know this: He has become a symbol, whose influence will live on. His parents are doing what’s healthy and natural. So are the voters in Poland, Slovakia and Hungary. And yes, so were we in our last presidential election. So are the countless patriotic citizens in other lands who cling to their national heritage, and refuse to be dispossessed. To be tyrannized in secret, then brow-beaten and humiliated by strangers who hate their values.
It’s Always About a Baby
We don’t know if doctors will let little Charlie receive the medicine that could save him. Or if Europeans will take the only remedy that could redeem them — the faith of their ancestors in Jesus Christ.
But it’s fitting that the fate of an almost childless continent might be changed by the life of a baby. Let us pray that in two decades a grown-up Charlie Gard will look around with wonder — and see a Europe renewed, restored, set free. … A Europe that finds its identity not in gadgets or slogans or ideology, but in that baby Who long ago lay helpless in a manger in Bethlehem.
NOTE: The European Court of Human Rights is not controlled by the members of the EU, but rather by the more broadly-based Council of Europe.