Friends,
Part II on Dr. Bryan Ardis
Jack Chick redivivus?
This interview Dr. Ardis gave that I am quoting from in Part I was recorded about the end of January of this year.
A lot has
happened since then, mainly the continuously breaking news about how
the powers-that-be grotesquely and fraudulently increased the official
Covid mortality rate while they erased the deaths Remdesivir caused and
the insane mortality and increased illnesses the "vaccines" caused in
2021. "Breaking news" on the fraud is never-ending. And, unbelievably,
the CDC, FDA, NIAID, NIH, and so on, along with such organizations in
the rest of the "Western" world, STILL promote Remdesivir and this diabolically insane "Standard of Care" forced on doctors.
- But the big news I took away from this interview with Ardis consisted in him pinning the cause of the entire Covid fiasco squarely on the Catholic Church.
Once Ardis
starts on this explanation (at time 38:23 into the video), he suddenly
sounds like Jack Chick redivivus (the late Chick was notorious for his incredibly
absurd, idiotic anti-Catholic "comic books"). Ardis' interviewer, conservative commentator and radio host J.D.
Rucker, didn't challenge Ardis on this, but I would have let him have
his rant and then I would have simply said, "Oh? The Catholics? I thought it was the
Jews. Didn't the Jews cause Covid? Or maybe it was the Freemasons?"
Yes, I ridicule; I'm sarcastic. Just too Irish. But there does need to be a serious answer here.
Now,
one might be naturally tempted to disregard everything Dr. Bryan Ardis
said previous to this accusation of his. After the accusation, one might
be similarly inclined to totally dismiss the man. But A, he's
been around arguing manfully against the homicidal Covid regime since
May 2020, and he associates with some of the greatest names in the
anti-Covid movement, and B, he's obviously VERY angry and enraged at how this fraud has been perpetrated. SOMETHING huge
and powerful had to be behind it since this occurred all over the
planet at the same time and in the same degree, with the only three
heads of state opposing the Covid tyranny being killed or overthrown, it
makes sense to wonder!
Jesuits
But
the Catholic Church? If Ardis, a Texan, has a certain type of
Protestant background, he naturally would go after the Jesuits and
Francis Jesuito Bergoglio, a Jesuit pope who ordered Catholics to take "the Jab"; in essence, he did exactly this. At Lifesitenews, this article reports:
A Westminster diocese spokeswoman told The Sunday Times, “The Catholic Church’s position is clear that take-up of the Covid vaccine is to be encouraged for the good of all. This has been clearly stated on a number of occasions in correspondence from Bishop Sherrington to Mother Marilla, in which he shared the Pope’s comments and the guidance from the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales in support of the vaccine programme.”
I
personally cannot overstate my horror and disgust at this. It is
insane. It was mad to begin with, forcing anyone to take experimental
(truly jut out-of-the-box untested) medical technology for a "virus" that they ALL
knew, by the time the "vaccines" appeared, to be no more deadly than
the annual flu; since then, we know how obscenely the Covid mortality
rake was inflated. But to keep this up, NOW, is an utter, and wholly
damnable, insult to God and our fellow men. I personally know, as I've
written before, seven or eight men and one woman who became very ill
with bloo-clot type sickness, and shingles, after taking the injection.
Me, myself, I personally know these folks.
Anyway,
Bergoglio, sans medical or science degree, certainly so peremptorily
ordered everyone working at the Vatican to take the Jab. And as noted,
recommends it to all the laity, along with hundreds of his brown-nosing bishops. And never forget, most of these Devil's potions in some degree use aborted baby parts or genetics. As for
the Jesuits, they have a rotten, and rotting reputation today, but they
had a bad reputation with Protestants initially because, during the
Counter-Reformation, they served as secret agents much of the time,
working with great élan. At that time, even Austria was described as "a
Protestant country with a Catholic ruling dynasty." But the Jesuits
reversed a great deal of that and restored southern Germany, Poland,
part of Lithuania, and other areas to the Faith. Their efforts in the
British Isles were significant. Beyond Europe, they nearly won over both
Japan and China. They enabled large areas of the Orthodox regions to
align with Rome, as well, and that is where the Eastern-Rite Catholics
come from (much in the news now with the Ukraine war). They made great
advances for the Faith in the New World, too, north and south. No wonder
the Protestants loathed them and the godless of the day hated them.
Regarding the latter, the various Bourbon dynasts in Europe (either
atheist themselves or employing atheist ministers), eventually saw to
their total destruction. A later pope, Pius VII, after Napoleon fell,
tried to restore them but they were never the same; today, they are
infamous as the most irreligious and 'gay' of all Catholic religious.
(They're so gay that, as Patrick Coffin says of Gay Germany, "You can
see it from space.")
- And
I wrote earlier, Ardis asks what medical degree does the pope have. I
would ask what theological degree or doctorate in Ethics has Bergoglio
that he would so crassly, wantonly deny people's right to free will. Oh,
right; how could I forget: Marx taught there is no free will.
Any truth to some of this, remotely? Where did it come from?
- Ardis points out that the Vatican is tight with the Chinese Communist Party, which is true.
- He points out that the Vatican is getting a lot of Chinese money, which is true. He points out that China is making huge profits from "human trafficking" for body parts and prostitution, which is true.
- And Ardis discusses this from the
perspective of a previous interview in which he talked to a man who
tries to rescue Asian children from being shipped to China for rape or
their body parts. I'm sure all that is true.
- We know the horrors the Chinese are perpetrating on Uighur children, women, and men. (See this VOA news article).
- And
Ardis discusses the child rape and sexual perversions of many of the
Vatican II's clergy. (The Vat 2 Church sex scandals for the past few
decades has given every Jack Chick wannabee or anti-Catholic atheist
endless ammunition and almost irretrievably damaged the Church's
reputation among Christians and other religions.)
- But
Ardis insists that the Church is actually the originator
of all this,
and the banker of China to whom the deadly Chicoms owe allegiance. He
doesn't think China is manipulating the ever-broke Vatican; rather, he
thinks the mismanaged, perceptually broke Vatican orders Red China
around!
- He insists the pope controls all the evil men like Soros, Schwab, and Gates, rather than them being Bergoglio's puppet masters.
How absurd is this fantasy?
Of
course, anyone who knows anything of the Church knows how incompetent
it is, in general, and how it would make a very poor "Deep State on the
World's Stage" conspirator or éminence grise behind the
"Great Resent" world
domination. Also, historically, the Catholic Church has had very little
power to influence
the European nations since The Thirty Years War. That war destroyed the
Counter-Reformation Church and high-level Catholics made that happen:
i.e. Cardinal Richelieu and Pope Urban VIII, the notorious Maffeo Vincenzo Barberini.
(If Dante had been alive then, he'd have them both roasting deep in his
Inferno.) In both World War I and II, the Church might as well have
been on Mars. History continuously
demonstrates its weakness. The inexorable rise of Communism, despite all
the efforts of Popes Leo 13, St. Pius 10, Pius 11, and Pius 12, along
with the Russian Bolshevik Revolution and the Soviet seizure of
eastern/central Europe after WWII, demonstrates that; the three-year Cristero War, also known as the Cristero Rebellion or La Cristiada,
in Mexico (1926-1929), demonstrates that, copiously. The rise of
pornography and sexual dementia to the level of world domination after
World War II also demonstrate that. The Vatican II Church's surrender to
the world's zeitgeist demonstrates that. I could go on and on.
- John Paul II, however, is the exception that tests the rule. Because Karol Józef Wojtyła was from Poland, and because he had fought with Communists for decades, he could, via collaboration with Reagan and Thatcher, effect an extremely significant influence in Poland; Wojtyła led by heroic example, however, not ruthless power. It was not through the employment of cunning, secret agent-type Jesuits, such as the Counter-Reformation popes employed, that brought Communist Poland down, but intense, saintly moral power, and prayer. (Not to mention the Solidarity movement and the Soviet Union's bankruptcy.)
Today,
Bergoglio himself rules
as ruthless, brutal, merciless as any Renaissance pope, and is becoming
comparable to the truly disastrous popes of the 10-11th centuries. He's
hell and death to Traditional Catholics, certainly, as well as to
traditional morality, millennia of prayer, and saintly religious
formation; but could the Vatican's own modern-day Juan Peron be the true
manager of this crazy world, of all this evil? Besides, he plays second
(or tertiary) fiddle to Bill Gates, George Soros, and Klaus Schwab.
He's turned the one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church into just
another sleazy NGO run by pro-aborts. This guy is behind Covid?
For
myself, I know the Vatican is thoroughly reprehensible since Bergoglio
took over, and I agree whole-heartedly with all the criticisms put forward by the great
Archbishop Viganò. And I remember when Bergoglio called for
everyone to receive the "clot-shots" and demanded everyone working in
the Vatican take them. All evil. Dr. Bryan Ardis is right about that.
And I agreed completely with Bishop
Athanasius Schneider's critique of the Congregation for the Doctrine of
the Faith's complicated, wheedling regimen for Catholics trying to
decide whether taking these damnable and evil "vaccines" was moral.
(When One Peter Five still took comments, myself and a few others
arguing strenuously against the CDF's weasel words, and I wish I could noe see the faces of those who argued against us.) Bishop Schneider is a
saint; "Bergi" not so much.
We
live in an age of filth and degradation of all that's true, good, and
beautiful. Is it any wonder that a new spiritual-holocaust is upon us?
I'll finish up in Part III with a discussion comparison of the Church in general and its hierarchy to the Jews; the parallels are fascinating.
An Préachán
