An absolute must-read: The Non-existent Virus

 Friends,

This is one of those absolute must-reads: The Non-existent virus at Jon Rappoport's blog.

A researcher over the past year, using Freedom of Information acts in various countries, has found no country has an actual SARS-CoV-2 virus in a government or (apparently) private lab, even when a nation's laws require that. And in the interview this researcher, Christine Massey, shows that this sort of lying by Canadian government health agencies about public healthcare goes back decades, specifically about fluoride in the drinking water. That's what proved to her that governments won't hesitate to lie about public health.

An P Rant: The fact the CDCs and FDAs of many countries do not have an actual material sample of the SARS-CoV-2 virus on file, a sample "isolated" or "purified" (since "isolated" is so compromised a term, being used of the ridiculous "cell culture" "isolation") from multiple sources "in the wild" has been known for some time; for instance, I remember researchers in Ireland finding this out about the Irish government last year.

But now in this interview, we learn about Canadian researcher Christine Massey, who has been quietly collecting responses from her Freedom of Information Requests she sent around the world and the answers she has received corroborate what I've been hearing. This is crucial news for EVERYONE to know about. Please understand this: The genome sequence fed into PCRs to test for Covid was extracted from a single pneumonia patient in Wuhan in 2019, and the "isolation" was via cell culture (if you don't know what that is after all my writing about it, read the interview); the Chinese then provided it to the rest of the world via computer. But no government agency actually has the physical virus itself for study. No one has it.

Now, supposedly, only two physical copies of the Smallpox virus remain in existence, both in secure labs in the U.S. and the Russian Federation. They are kept for study. The Herpes Varicella-zoster virus that supposedly causes chickenpox and shingles is kept widely on file, so far as I know, having been isolated before the rise of the cell-culture isolation method in the middle 1950s. (Attempts to experiment on these to "prove" this herpes virus causes chickenpox have not been very successful, by the way. Inject this supposedly hyper-contagious virus in to people and only sometimes do they develop symptoms: it could be equally true that the presence of this virus stimulates the bodies of some individuals to automatically develop the condition, and others not.)

So now we have the greatest epidemic in a full century, in a full 100 years, with our medical technology far beyond what we had in 1918, yet nobody has even one sample of the actual virus? A world thrown into turmoil and chaos, with civil rights destroyed and jobs lost and psychological nightmares and suicides and paranoia on an international scale and a brutal wrecking of national healthcare systems everywhere – even the military is being eviscerated! – and yet no one has a copy of the bug supposedly responsible?

No, this is not right. We've been lied to. And everyone of you who took a "vaccine" for this non-existent bug ought to be supremely angry. And scared. Just what did they give you? The know. You do not. Remember, Big Pharma knows all of this. They knew there was no virus. Whether it was a biological weapon of some sort developed by China, or that Fauci used the Chinese to develop, or whatever the truth is: they knew it wasn't what they said it was.

If you've never been scared of anything in your life, be scared of governments that, working as extensions of the big pharmaceutical companies and secretive agencies within government, are able to lie to you, deprive you of your rights, sicken you and maybe kill you. That's where we're at today.

The interview:

"With a background in biostatistics, Christine Massey has been using Freedom of Information (FOIA) requests as a research tool, as a diamond drill, to unearth the truth about SARS-CoV-2. As in: Does the virus exist?

"Her approach has yielded shocking results."

An excerpt:

Q: You and your colleagues have made many FOIA requests to public health agencies around the world. You’ve been asking for records that show the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists. How did you develop this approach?

A: In 2014, a lady in Edmonton submitted a freedom of information request to Health Canada asking for studies relating to the addition of hydrofluorosilisic acid (industrial waste fluoride acid) to public drinking water (water fluoridation). Health Canada’s response indicated that they had no studies whatsoever to back up their claims that the practice is safe or effective.

A few years later, some high quality government-funded studies showed that common fluoride exposure levels during pregnancy are associated with lower IQs and increased ADHD symptoms in offspring. Nevertheless, dentists and the public health community continued to promote and defend the so-called “great public health achievement” of forcing this controversial preventative dental treatment onto entire communities, and were dismissive of those studies. So I used freedom of information requests to show that various institutions promoting and defending water fluoridation in Ontario, Alberta and Washington State could not provide or cite even one primary study indicating safety with respect to those outcomes.

So once I learned from people like David Crowe, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Stefan Lanka and Dr. Thomas Cowan that the alleged [COVID] virus had never been isolated (purified) from a patient sample and then characterized, sequenced and studied with controlled experiments, and thus had never been shown to exist, I realized that freedom of information (FOI) requests could be used to verify their claims.

Most people are not going to take the time to check all of the so-called “virus isolation” studies for themselves, so FOIs were a way to 1) ensure that nothing had been overlooked, and 2) cut to the chase and back up what these gentlemen [Kaufman, Cowan, Crowe, Lanka] were saying, if they were indeed correct.

So in May 2020 I began submitting FOI requests for any record held by the respective institution that describes the isolation/purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” from an unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient, by anyone, anywhere on the planet.

Q: How many public health and government agencies have you queried with FOIA requests?

A: I have personally queried and received responses from 22 Canadian institutions. These are public health institutions, universities that claim to have “isolated the virus”, and 3 police services – due to their enforcement of “COVID-19” restrictions. I have also personally received responses from several institutions outside of Canada including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). I await responses from a number of additional institutions.

Many people around the world have obtained responses to the same/similar, or related, [FOIA] requests, from institutions in their own countries. One person who has done a lot of work on this in New Zealand and other countries is my colleague Michael S. Also a fellow named Marc Horn obtained many in the UK. A handful of other people obtained several responses, and lots of people have obtained 1 or 2.

I have been compiling all of the responses that are sent to me on my FOI page, and as I type this (October 4, 2021) we have FOI responses from 104 institutions in well over 20 countries all relating to the purification/existence of the alleged virus. Additionally, there are court documents from South Africa and Portugal. In total, 110 instructions are represented at this moment on my website. There are FOI responses from more institutions that I haven’t had a chance to upload yet.

Q: How would you characterize the replies you’ve gotten from these agencies?

A: Every institution without exception has failed to provide or cite even 1 record describing purification of the alleged virus from even 1 patient sample.

Twenty-one of the 22 Canadian institutions admitted flat out that they have no such records (as required by the Canadian legislation). Many institutions outside Canada have admitted the same, including the CDC (November 2, 2020), Australia’s Department of Health, New Zealand’s Ministry of Health, the UK Department of Health and Social Care…

And in some cases, silly excuses were provided. For example, the Norwegian Directorate of Health’s response was that they do not own, store or control documents with information about patients. Public Health Wales told Dr. Janet Menage that they have not produced any such records, and that while they would normally be willing to point her towards records that are in the public domain it would be too difficult in this case.

Brazil’s FDA-like injection-approver, the Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa), told Marcella Picone that they have no record of virus purification and are not required to by law, thus it is (in their minds) not their obligation to make sure that the virus actually exists.

End of excerpt.

Read the whole interview. There's a tremendous amount of information in it, and it is not very long.

An Préachán

Dr. Andrew Kaufman explains the scientific papers that started the Covid story

Friends,

I've said this before once or twice about some document or online interview, and it is definitely true with this one: listen to Dr. Andrew Kaufman go through the history of the science articles "proving" SARS (whether SARS-CoV-1 or SARS-CoV-2, a.k.a. "Covid-19"), and I guarantee you'll never believe another official "party-line" word about Covid, whatsoever.

I was listening to Dr. Andrew Kaufman, M.D., last night here at a lecture he provides on his website. And as I say, if you ever listen to one online explanation of what's going on, listen to this one. Why? Because Kaufman knows what he's talking about and he does a thorough job explaining his research.

One would expect that of a forensic psychiatrist who has, among other things, a Certification in Psychiatry and Forensic Psychiatry (2011) from the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology Board, a SUNY Upstate Medical University Fellowship in Forensic Psychiatry, and he was a Resident in Psychiatry at the Duke University School of Medicine. And among other things, Kaufman was a Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Vice President, Psychiatry Faculty Practice Corporation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, a Medical Director of Faculty Practice, SUNY Upstate Medical University, and an Assistant Director, Forensic Psychiatry Fellowship, SUNY Upstate Medical University. Interestingly, Kaufman has been a Consulting Expert Witness, Syracuse University Law School. Kaufman has also made it his business not to be too specialized in one discipline; he reads scientific papers of all sorts, especially in chemistry and biology because as he said in another talk, psychiatrists today pretty much just prescribe drugs, and he wanted to know just what the heck the drugs he was being recommended to prescribe actually did! (This is very important, actually, and below I include a short segment of his talk on this from an interview.)

So, like, yeah. He's credentialed. Credentialed and conversant with all things relating to medicine, not least of which is how people fool themselves, become mislead, and embrace falsehoods.

In his lecture linked to above, Dr. Kaufman details in a PowerPoint presentation how Nature, the most prestigious (certainly one of the top two or so in the world) of science publications, had an article out in 2003 about how researchers had fully "isolated" SARS-CoV-1; the 15 May 2003 article in Nature titled: "Koch's postulates fulfilled for SARS virus"; see https://www.nature.com/articles/423240a#Sec2.

As for the 2003 Nature article, the title says Koch's Postulates have been satisfied in isolating the virus; however, as soon as you begin to read the article, the authors immediately admit (in the second paragraph) that they're running a "bait-and-switch" on you. The Koch Postulate was a ruse. They in effect say: "We're not actually gonna use Koch's Postulates, but rather the six-criteria revision of them by Rivers".

Who is Rivers? Thomas Milton Rivers, 1888 to 1962, is described as "the father of modern virology, and back in 1937 Rivers "redid" Koch's Postulates. Rivers softened the strictures of Koch because Rivers admitted they had been unable via Koch to prove viruses cause disease! Imagine that. So right away, Nature LIES to its readers. Rivers' "new" version of Koch's Postulates is a watered-down version because, as noted, they had NEVER been able to fill Koch's Postulates regarding viruses.

Kauffman explains how Rivers had written in 1937: "It is obvious that Koch's postulates have not been satisfied in viral diseases." Kaufman avers that was true in 1937 and it is just as true today – something which modern "virology" would fight tooth and nail against admitting, although some honest people do exist in science, such as the German Stefan Lanka, who used to be a virologist till he came to understand it is bunk; Lanka is famous – or ought to be – for proving in court that measles are not caused by a virus.

• And you need to remember that the entire concept of a "virus" was made up by Louis Pasteur back in Koch's 19th century day; Pasteur imagined that there had to be something smaller than bacteria causing illness because he himself "discovered" bacteria (kinda sorta) and couldn't prove they caused all disease. So he "postulated" something smaller, which he called a 'virus', from the Latin for poison. Thus, when in the 1930s they developed the electron microscope, they found all sort of genetic bits and pieces floating about coated in protein, and they called these viruses.
  
• Note the electron microscope doesn't image living, moving-about things like a light microscope reveals bacteria doing. No one has ever seen viruses doing what they are supposed to do: i.e., attack and rape cells, impregnate the raped cells with their own DNA, get the cell to replicate the invading DNA until the cell explodes and "sheds" viruses everywhere. Remember how they talked about people walking around and "shedding" the virus?) Anyway, this is an amazing narrative of the ruthless, rampaging viri warriors, especially considering that viruses are not supposed to be alive in the first place!
  
• And also remember that Kari Mullis, inventor of the PCR test, before he died in Sep 2019, said repeatedly that it could not be used to find an HIV/AIDS virus because it could not distinguish between living and non-living material. You'll see a lot of official MSM "fact-checks" online that Mullis did not say the PCR couldn't be used on Covid – well, he died before the German, Christian Drosten, started using it for that.
  
• Bottom line: now we know a lot of what they saw with the early electron microscopes are exosomes, a fascinating subject in itself, but these come from our own cells. Britannica describes them as: "nano-sized vesicles secreted from different cell types that contain any of various bio-molecules, such as proteins or nucleic acids." Rivers himself, actually, suggested this back in 1937, using the phrase "Fabrications of autocatalytic processes" to describe them. Exosomes are the same size as viruses are supposed to be, and some argue that there's no such thing as viruses; that scientists confuse exosomes with them, etc. 

Back to the story:

Dr. Kaufman goes through – in detail, detail, detail – the footnoted scientific papers that the 2003 Nature article listed as proving that Koch's (er, Rivers') Postulates have been fulfilled. And Kaufman himself proves, detail-by-detail, paper-by-paper, how these scientific articles did NOT fulfill any of Rivers' postulates. So, beyond question, SARS-CoV-1, the original itself, back in the early 2000s, was NOT isolated, not remotely.

And then of course when SARS-CoV-2 came along, they immediately linked it (obviously so, considering what they named it) to SARS-CoV-1. And Kaufman tirelessly goes through a number of more recent scientific papers supposedly showing this and how the new illness is a supposedly virus-caused malady, but again, one-by-one, Kaufman shows how the papers are faulty and that none of them fulfill Rivers' postulates.

Now, Kaufman spends time pointing out that Rivers was not talking genetics, such as scientists stress today. Supposedly, we don't need to do "isolation" like they did "back in the day" because we have genetics and genomes. I have myself been told this online. But I've written at length to you before about how the genetics have been falsified in terms of "isolating" Covid, and won't repeat that here. Kaufman does discuss it in this lecture, though.

As I say, Dr. Andrew Kaufman goes through the whole thing in detail and reveals what all the science types ought to take the time to examine. Kaufman has before now said that the heavy specialization in science is very bad for the entire discipline.

At this site, Kaufman said:

(9:48) We're all more than these labels that represent the brief experience of our consciousness. And it would really be false to have to have everyone have a certain credential to speak about a certain thing because one one of the fundamental reasons why there's so much false results and findings in science is because of this compartmentalization and specialization and sub-specialization that people in one field don't have any idea what's going on in related fields that affect each other. Like even in psychiatry, for example, all the treatments in psychiatry are drugs these days and they're based on experiments done in brains of animals. And the psychiatrists do not actually look at that research or know how to evaluate it. So if that research is not valid, or doesn't really apply to the situation that they see in their clinical experience, they'll never know. So it is really important that scientists and physicians develop the ability to look at a broad range of different scientific material, and if you understand the method of science and the philosophy of science to challenge a thesis in order to validate it, and understand some statistics, then you should be able to read almost any scientific paper, and if you translate some of the language – because they use specialized terms – like I sometimes read papers in chemistry and physics just like I'm reading different area of biology, I've done research in the laboratory and worked in the biotechnology industry, and I've done epidemiology research and published research related to mental health and the law, and I've been a peer reviewer, and all of that has prepared me to be able to read scientific papers. 12:06

An P again:

To sum up, Dr Kaufman gives an excellent and easy to follow explanation of why "the science" behind Covid is both flawed and false. (The PowerPoint screens make him all the easier to follow.) And of course, Kaufman is not alone. Thousands of doctors and scientists have been questioning various aspects of Covid for over a year now, from many angles. The criticism is increasing, especially now that vaccines are being forced on entire populations. Kaufman and Dr. Tom Cowan and the biologist Stefan Lanka are extreme in their dismissal of the entire virus idea, but so what? That's science.

Science. It's based on observation of natural phenomena, hypotheses are developed from the observation, then long testing by both those who developed the hypothesis and many who have no stake in that particular hypothesis. Science is supposed to be "self-correcting", and peer-review ought to have dismissed the papers Kaufman reviews, yet peer-review is widely said to be completely broken.

But the Scientific Method as I described above must be understood. That's how the method worked with what Alfred Wegener did with plate tectonics. In 1912, Wegener noted how South America and Africa look to be made to fit together, and that observation of that natural phenomenon led him to develop a theory that continents move. He was of course ridiculed for decades, and by the time he died in 1930 (aged 50 years), still widely dismissed as a fool (about this hypothesis, at least; he was quite accomplished in other areas). Today, almost all geophysicists accept plate tectonics. 

So, remember this essential lesson: science takes time! Jumping on the idea that a virus caused the pneumonia-like illness in Wuhan, then jumping on the idea that it was related to SARS-CoV-1, jumping then to implement vaccines based on the rush-job genome developed for Covid-19, none of that jumping is how science is supposed to work.

Unlike either mathematics or metaphysics, wherein you can actually prove a theory, in Western Empirical Science you can only disprove a theory. You can build up a probability of a hypothesis being correct, even to a very high degree, over time, but by the nature of the discipline, you can't "prove" a scientific theory as you can with math or metaphysics. 

To me, Covid smacks heavily of the Global Warming (now "Climate Change") hoax. Two peas in a modern science pod, a pod of a plant that would turn Western Empirical Science into a form of magic reserved for a specialized priesthood who decide in a star chamber what was true and what was not. One of the biggest conflicts in Global Warming early on was that the early proponents of it would not share their research, so other could test their hypotheses. Michael Mann of the University of Pennsylvania still won't, despite long years of expensive lawsuits. Covid info gets shared well enough, and that is one reason why criticism of it can be brought to bear, as Kaufman does.

Therefore, if you are interested in why you have gone through a sort of Hell for the past year or so, listen to Kaufman.

As far as I am concerned, the whole Covid "spiel" is just a con.

An Préachán

Famous Mainstream Vaccine Expert Issues Covid Vaccine Warning, and Dr. Carrie Madej and Dr. Andrew Kaufman

 Amici,

As you know, I don't have much (really, any) faith left in mainstream medicine now regrading the Covid vaccines, for a variety of reasons. However, I keep reading up on all positions, and this one is something EVERYONE who believes in the current virus-causes-illness meme and the vaccine regime resulting from it, needs to know about.

Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche is the expert, and he makes a very logical case within the usual virus-causing narrative of illness (founded by Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch, etc). To wit, mass Covid vaccinations across the population while the virus is widely infecting people will only succeed in creating a super virus. “The more we use these vaccines for immunizing people in the midst of a pandemic, the more infectious the virus will become,” Vanden Bossche writes. I've been wondering when this would come up, because, again assuming the standard narrative, this is exactly what one would expect the rampaging and highly mutable virus to do.

Now as I say, for myself, I think the whole Covid fiasco is The Great Reset/New World Order twaddle, a twin sibling to Global Warming, designed to condition us to a 1984 type of dystopia. For a discussion on that aspect of this, see this interview between Drs. Carrie Madej and Andrew Kaufman.

The first 25 minutes will shake your believe in government oversight of infectious diseases, as Dr. Madej recounts how the CDC and the local public health authorities dealt with her when she had patients who experienced a mini-surge in Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. (The authorities all illegally tried to force her to shut up and not treat her patients!) Once Dr. Madej and Dr. Kaufman start discussing vaccines, though, it's a true horror show. (As some years ago the Vatican discovered in Latin America: a vaccine for Tetanus, I believe, turned out to be sterilizing women! Intentionally so. This is now regarded as historically true.)

I'm just a "tin-foil hat" kook to folks until they themselves learn of actual cases like that. Vanden Bossche is as mainstream as they come, however, and what he's saying needs to be heard.

Read the whole article for contra views presented at the end. Note that Vanden Bossche is giving what I like to call "the Minority Report", and naturally the "Majority Report" people have to try to eviscerate him. Ying and Yang. (Or of course in classic Sun Tzu teaching, Chapter 5 of his Art of War, we're referring to the 'normal' force, cheng, and the the 'extraordinary' force, ch'i. Cheng and ch'i often interchange their roles during battle, and that switch could easily happen with Majority/Minority reports, if only people were honest.)

An Préchán