Search This Blog

Saturday, July 17, 2021

In His Sardonically Titled "Traditionis Custodes" Bergoglio Declares War Against Trads

 Friends, a chairde,


Judy Martin sent me the info on what Bergoglio has done and I've just read The Remnant Newspaper article by Prof. Peter Kwasniewski. I urge all to read it. One can feel his utter shock, his utter amaze, throughout. I am amazed, but not shocked. I'm too jaded for that, too cynical, too Irish. However, we need to thank the Lord of Hosts that Bergoglio is stupid enough, and brazen enough, and prideful enough to show his true colors at last as he throws the helm of Holy Church hard over into a Maelstrom of utter chaos.

Bergoglio moved too soon (maybe he was told he's not much longer to live?)

I urge everyone to read Prof. Kwasniewski's piece. And take note of this line: "Can we not see here the utter breakdown of the hyperpapalism that makes the pope a mortal god, a divine oracle, who gets to rewrite liturgy, theology, morals, and even the record of history in pursuit of ideology?" Bergoglio is indeed acting like a mortal god and divine oracle. No. We must say NO to this.

From the point of view of propping up a tottering institution, Bergoglio has made a dreadful mistake. As a disciple of Sun Tzu, I know when one wants to go to war, one has to carefully weigh the odds. This is essential. To do that, one must have a clear idea of the terrain and the opponent. The Germans and the Japanese didn't do this careful weighing before starting WWII because they were led by madmen, as Red China currently is. You don't start a war you can't win. The Southerners did that in 1861. Bergoglio is mad. As. A. Hatter. He can't win against the TLM firstly because it is clear, as Bishop Athanasius Schneider said some time ago, that the restoration of the TLM is a work of the Holy Ghost and cannot be stopped. But secondly, purely in human terms, the "Reform of the Reform" has simply advanced far, far too far for him to try to stop it. So, in effect and if I may quote Shakespeare, Bergoglio, with Até come hot from Hell has cried "Havoc!" and let slip the dogs of war.

Please be clearly advised:

Jorge Bergoglio has revealed himself to be an illegitimate pope, an anti-pope. Listen, my friends, this is no time for the usual mainstream Catholic Church's attempt to play "nice" with heretics. I don't care how many bishops accept Bergoglio's election: you judge the tree by its fruits. (St. Matthew 7:15-20) Maybe this cold, pitiless slap down by Bergoglio will finally "wake up" such people?

Plenty of the cowardly, unmanly bishops (many of them homosexuals) will support him but as Dr. Kwasniewski writes, Bergoglio's nasty tone in his letter and motu proprio, his mercilessness, his callousness, his heartlessness toward the feelings of tens of millions of Catholics is unprecedented; I suspect it will turn off all but the most card-carrying Modernist bishops. It is clearly an over-reaction generated by intense fear (and loathing). Understanding this fact is the key to successfully fighting it. Always remember the hallmark of the Modernist Revolution was not to be too brazen, too heavy-handed; instead, its gambit was to be content with disingenuous lies and side-attacks: asymmetrical warfare, in effect. That was often the method the Reformers used in the Protestant Reformation. Always a continual two steps forward and one step back, exemplified by the loquacious Vatican II double-speak documents. This Traditionis Custodes motu, however, throws such sly caution to the winds.

Bergoglio has "come out"

Bishops have to take sides. "Bergi" has come out; now they must, as well. No more "playing both ends against the middle." For example, Bishop Brennan in Columbus or Callahan in La Crosse, Wisconsin (who just removed Fr. James Altman's faculties), and of course "Nighty-night" Tobin in NJ and Cupich the Worm in Chicago, and that utter fool in San Diego, those will embrace Bergoglio's vomit. They'll actually jump at the chance to lap it up (Brennan might be cautious about St. Leo's; we'll just have to see. It depends on how much Brennan wants to kiss up to the Argentine.) But obviously to embrace vomit is to cover yourself with putrid regurgitation.

I suspect the backlash that's just starting today will be overwhelming. Bergoglio is out in the open now; no more hedging. Many, many commentators (like Taylor Marshall just recently) argued that Bergoglio wouldn't go "full nuclear" at all, but be more careful and insidious about it. Marshall argued that he had inside Vatican sources who said Bergoglio was going to only allow bishops to take over Trad parishes, and that the recent events in the Dijon archdiocese were the forerunner of that. Well, now, today, the egg is on their faces. Bergoglio actually flipped the nuclear switch. Yet as Marshall and others have so often said, however, were Bergoglio to go "full Stalin" all heck would break loose, and in that, at least, they're right.

Game Changer

My friends, amici, this is a game changer. All bets are now off. All the miserable "church-ladies" in Modernist parishes who tattle to the bishop when a parish priest does something too traditional, all that sort, have been "running" the average diocese in the U.S. for decades, but this, this is not such a "death by a thousand cuts" "war of position." This maneuver is to slap down the most faithful Catholics, most attending-church-Catholics, those Catholics having large families and living the Catholic life – most significantly of all, these are the Catholics who went to Holy Mass, or clamored for it, during the insidiously evil lockdowns.

I've written many times that the "official" Catholic Church, a toothless, emasculated organization (not unlike the "official" IRA, come to think of it) faced the Covid Fraud and just dried up and blew away. The Church that had faced emperor Diocletian, the Black Death, Nazism, Attila the Hun, the Viking slavers, Martin Luther, John Calvin, Huitzilopochtli, Queen Elizabeth Tudor, Xipe Totec, and Xochipilli, the Church that faced off the Know-Nothing Party in the 1840s – the Church that did all that, in the face of the fraudulent "plandemic" Covid, just closed shop and disappeared.

But the TLM part of the Church didn't surrender, and now this move of Bergoglio's is in no small measure punishment for the Trad Church's stand.

So, as so often happens, do one good thing and the Lord will give you a bigger good to shoulder. Support your TLM priests and orders, all of them; let them know you support them and Will. Not. Tolerate a Surrender to the Church of Bergoglio. He is not "mortal god" no "divine oracle". He should not be – in our minds – pope. He's out. The captain of a ship that tries to drive it onto the rocks must be relieved. A pope is supposed to support his bishops in holding and teaching the CATHOLIC Faith, which this "pope" clearly isn't, hasn't, and can't. Only God can truly remove Bergoglio in the full sense (and maybe the Argentine knows he's not got long to remain among us, this move is that desperate), but we can spiritually "vote with our feet" in Comrade Lenin's famous phrase, and not be part of this charade.

An Préachán
 


Friday, July 16, 2021

Patent lawyer/auditor discovers Covid was patented years ago, as were vaccines

 Friends,

I never thought of this, but incredibly, Big Pharma and the mega-rich behind the Covid pandemic have been busily patenting their genetic inventions for decades, and an American expert in the patent field reveals the extent of their fraud. None of you will like this news, but you need to know the unbelievable extent we've all be scammed over Covid.

Wednesday, July 14, 2021

Biden's Angry Rant Speech in Philly

Everyone,

U.S. pResident Joe Biden gave an angry, unbalanced speech in Philadelphia yesterday about voter fraud, making wild claims about the Republicans passing laws against voter fraud to be acts worse than the Civil War. See this Conservative Treehouse article for details. 

As the author, "Sundance" writes, "the need for control is a reaction to fear". The Left's endless need for control is a reaction to their fear of being rejected, or their evil schemes revealed, and in this case, fear the stolen election of 2020 will become common knowledge and of course they fear the nation-wide explosion that would cause.
An excerpt:
The need for control is a reaction to fear.  That fear was what Biden displayed above all other attributes.  A fear that more American people will begin to see the false construct of his installation.  A fear that those who perpetrated the fraud of his election will be exposed because the scale of their manipulation is far too great to continue hiding.

The fear that a small amount of actual investigation, with more audits looming, will reveal how a few key corrupt counties coordinated a massive election fraud.  Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, the location of Tuesday’s sanctimonious diatribe -delivered by a naked emperor- was the location of the largest fraud.  Other locations include: Clark County (NV), Fulton County (GA), Maricopa County (AZ), Wayne County (Mich) and Milwaukee County (Wisc).

The angry speech was full of projection, denial and extreme defensiveness.

An P again:
It is no wonder Biden's so agitated because "the wheels are coming off" the fraudulent election of 2020. Three states look to have full audits of the necessary counties, and if the fraud is found, only one more state needs "flipped" to destroy the Biden pResidency. Not only is news coming out of the Arizona audit every day that indicates massive fraud occurred in Maricopa County (one of the, if not THE, most populous counties in the country); then in both Georgia and Pennsylvania, more evidence of fraud is being uncovered – and remember, the evidence was there from the beginning, but the Department of Justice (DOJ) under Bill Barr refused to look into it, even stopping federal investigators and prosecutors who did want to investigate, such as William M. McSwain, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. 

So, perhaps in this case, the Democrats have finally gone too far. They got Jack Kennedy elected in a squeaker in 1960, with old Joe Kennedy saying, "I didn't pay for a landslide!" and they have a long and incredible history of election thievery – the Republicans have some history of that but nothing to compare to the Democrats. Yet in 2020, the Dems had to steal just too much to make it work. Now it is all unraveling. 2020 is not 1960: there's too many ways for information to leak out these days. But as usual, the Democrats are "behind the times". 2020 is not 1960: there's too many ways for information to leak out these days. But as usual, the Democrats are "behind the times". And naturally, the more they threaten and bluster, like Biden is doing, the more guilty they look. 

Good!
N.B. It is ironic that Biden makes such claims as it was the Democrats not accepting Lincoln's win in 1860 that precipitated the U.S. Civil War: they didn't practice voter fraud in that election any more than they usually did; they just didn't accept Lincoln winning. (They barely, just barely, accepted Trump's win in 2016 and vowed he would not be re-elected.) Later, after that war, it was the Democrats who prevented Blacks from voting via the notorious "Jim Crow Laws", and it was Democrats who worked against Black Civil Rights for a century. And it is the Democrats who blame the Republicans for suppressing the Black vote!

But remember that Democrats have been in the forefront of voter fraud since the beginning. Slave owners would not sign the U.S. Constitution of 1787 until the Northern states adopt the infamous 3/5s clause, which counted Black slaves as 3/5s of a white man for deciding how many congressmen each state would have. Blacks were chattel slaves, not in possession of any rights whatsoever (unlike Catholic Brazil, for example), but they were numerous. So counting them via the 3/5s clause, the Southern States cheated the Northern States from the very beginning of the country.

And all of that was before they became Communists!

An Préachán

Tuesday, July 13, 2021

New Ivermectin study proves it completely effective: time to end the Covid madness

 Friends,

This has been coming for a long while, actually:

Look at the dates on those.

For decades, they've been prepping us for what Robert F. Kennedy Jr. calls "the onset of a really dark totalitarianism."

For example, consider this LifeSiteNews article about France. 

An excerpt:

Negative tests are only valid for 48 hours. In an added twist, PCR tests will no longer be funded by the social security system as of October, except when prescribed for symptomatic patients: people who do not want to be vaccinated and who still want to lead a normal life would need to pay for three COVID tests per week. This measure, said Macron, is intended to push people to accept vaccination.

Macron introduced these new restrictions because, he said, “vaccination levels are not sufficient.” 

“Everywhere in France, we will recognize those with civic spirit and only impose restrictions on the non-vaccinated, rather than on everyone.”

And then there's Australia and New Zealand. The news from those countries is all insane totalitarianism. 

Just howl, howl, howl. The whole thing is a fraud – not only doesn't Covid not exist as they've never isolated it, they just pass around a "genome" they got, ultimately, from the Chinese – but NO ONE has an actual SARS 2 Covid virus in their national labs – Freedom of Information suits have proved that again and again, and it is one of the reasons a traditional type of vaccine has not been concocted for Covid: there are no "weakened strains" of the main virus to develop a standard vaccine from, because no lab has the virus isolated. But also the PCR test, as reconstituted by the infamous Christian Drosten, been showed to be both fraudulent in itself, but easily manipulated.

Now the poor French are going to have to pay for their "thrice-weekly" PCR tests!!!

The U.S., government seems to be ready to seize private communication, as reported by this Gateway Pundit article. :

An excerpt:
Biden Regime to Monitor Private Communications, Calls on SMS Carriers to “Dispel Misinformation About Vaccines That is Sent Over Social Media and Text Messages”
By Cristina Laila
Published July 12, 2021 at 2:09pm
4902 Comments

An excerpt:
The Biden regime is now calling on SMS carriers to “fact-check” text messages in an effort to stop ‘misinformation’ about the Covid-19 vaccine.

Last Tuesday White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said the Biden Administration will be sending goons door-to-door to harass unvaccinated Americans.

Biden confirmed that during his remarks last week and said his admin will focus on communities where vaccination rates are low.

“We need to go community-by-community, neighborhood-by-neighborhood, and oft times door-to-door, literally knocking on doors,” Biden said.

TRENDING: Lawless Texas Democrats Escape to Washington DC on Private Jet, Maskless with Crate of Beer -- Rules Are for The Little People

Now the Biden regime and its Democrat allies are going to monitor private communications to “dispel misinformation about vaccines that is sent over social media and text messages.”

Democrat goons are already attacking TPUSA’s Charlie Kirk for his messaging campaign around vaccine efforts.

“Organizations that are feeding misinformation and trying to mischaracterize this type of trusted-messenger work, I believe you are doing a disservice to the country and to the doctors, the faith leaders, community leaders, and others who are working to get people vaccinated, save lives, and help end this pandemic,” WH Covid response coordinator Jeff Zients said at a news conference last week.

Politico reported:
    Biden allied groups, including the Democratic National Committee, are also planning to engage fact-checkers more aggressively and work with SMS carriers to dispel misinformation about vaccines that is sent over social media and text messages. The goal is to ensure that people who may have difficulty getting a vaccination because of issues like transportation see those barriers lessened or removed entirely.

    “We are steadfastly committed to keeping politics out of the effort to get every American vaccinated so that we can save lives and help our economy further recover,” White House spokesperson Kevin Munoz said. “When we see deliberate efforts to spread misinformation, we view that as an impediment to the country’s public health and will not shy away from calling that out.”

    Charlie Kirk, the pro-Trump co-founder of the conservative student organization Turning Point USA, said on Fox last week that he was embarking on a “massive public relations campaign” around vaccination efforts, which he compared it to an “Apartheid-style open air hostage situation.” (Turning Point’s other founder, Bill Montgomery, died last year from coronavirus-related complicatio

    Turning Point USA has also sent out SMS messages urging people to sign petitions on the topic. In one message, viewed by POLITICO, Kirk contends, “Biden is sending goons DOOR-TO-DOOR to make you take a Covid-19 vaccine. Sign the petition to: No medical raids in America.”

The rabid left already has complete control over the internet and censors social media posts and blog posts so it was a matter of time until they started censoring text messages.


An P again:
One wonders what they don't want anyone to know? Perhaps this important Ivermectin study?


An excerpt:

COVID-19 cure already discovered? Ivermectin ‘can end this pandemic’
July 9, 2021
by Chris Melore

WASHINGTON — A COVID-19 treatment capable of ending the pandemic once and for all may already be available for use. A team of researchers, including three U.S. government senior scientists, are calling for governments around the world to start treating coronavirus patients with Ivermectin. Their findings reveal the drug not only prevents people from contracting COVID, but also defeats the virus and saves lives.

“We did the work that the medical authorities failed to do, we conducted the most comprehensive review of the available data on ivermectin,” says Dr. Pierre Kory, president and chief medical officer of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), in a media release. “We applied the gold standard to qualify the data reviewed before concluding that ivermectin can end this pandemic.”

Researchers conducted a comprehensive review of 27 reports from clinical, in vitro, animal, and real-world studies. These include 15 randomized controlled trials, which are the preferred scientific method of the World Health Organization, the U.S. National Institutes of Health, and the European Medicines Agency.

Those findings reveal treating COVID-19 patients with Ivermectin resulted in large drops in coronavirus deaths. The recovery time from an infection and the time it takes to clear COVID from someone’s system also saw significant reductions among patients on Ivermectin.

Additionally, three randomized controlled trials and five observational controlled trials which included nearly 2,500 healthy participants discovered using Ivermectin noticeably reduces the risk of contracting COVID-19.
Many countries are already using Ivermectin, but why not everywhere?
...
The findings appear in the American Journal of Therapeutics.

An P again:

Maybe it is news like this they don't want you to know. As for me, I'd rather live in Hell than in Macron's France.

An Préachán


Monday, July 12, 2021

Fascinating but deeply disturbing interview about what's happening in the world

Amici,

At Dr. Tom Cowan's website here, find: Conversations with Dr. Cowan & Friends| Ep 23: Shimon Yanowitz

Overall, their discussion is fascinating but terrifying. I highly recommend it.

An Préachán

Monday, July 5, 2021

A serious misunderstanding of how science works...leads to disaster

 Friends,


There's a huge fight over a science mag's publication of shocking article on "Vaccine"-caused deaths. The science mag is peer-reviewed, etc., titled Vaccine. The details are linked to below. But first I think it necessary to remind everyone just how science – Western Empirical Science – is supposed to work.
  1. Western Empirical Science is not some esoteric religion, some Star Chamber occult thing, nor is it some deep dungeon magic. It's not supposed to be voodoo and it doesn't involve a "high priesthood" of "the pure" or "the enlightened." 
  2. "The Scientific Method" is not something only lab-coated clerics engage in.
  3. Everyone – anyone – trying to learn something new proceeds with "the scientific method" whether they know it or not. Say you want to learn to play golf. You do what?
  4. You observe golfers and their equipment. After some observation, you develop a theory on how it is played. Then you inspect the equipment and try to use it (i.e., you experiment with it) according to your theory. If your theory doesn't work, you discard it and create a new theory. And remember, the harder you are on yourself, both theory and practice, the better you'll learn to play the game.
  5. Criticizing yourself is essential in anything. Say you want to be a writer – THAT involves a LOT of self criticism. Finally, you open yourself up to the inspection and criticism of others, professionals or excellent amateurs. You cannot afford to be too proud to accept the most exacting criticism. No scientist can afford a fragile ego.

All of this is "The Scientific Method".
  1. A scientist observes some natural phenomenon. 
  2. Then he develops a theory (called a hypothesis) on why it occurs, then he tests his hypothesis.
  3. A true scientist, and an honest one, will not just take a hammer to his delicate hypothesis, he'll take a sledgehammer!
  4. If after the most rigorous testing and criticism, his hypothesis holds up, THEN he publishes his findings so other scientists can take sledgehammers to his work.
THAT's the Scientific Method. It's just a formal codification of what people do naturally.

(N.B. The only exception is when one is developing a commercial product intended to turn a profit and the developers want to keep the formula secret from competitors; but even in this case, the final product still has to be inspected by various government agencies. Medicine and vaccines would fall into this category, although after its own extensive testing, the government abrogates to itself even more rigorous testing of this "public health" product. Or it should. That's what the )
 
Now, NONE of this sort of practice defined the "science" behind either Global Warming (a.k.a. Anthropogenic Global Warming, Climate change, etc.), nor has it been applied to the Covid vaccines (or even to Covid itself).

With Global Warming, the best example is the thoroughly discredited Michael Mann of Penn State University; a "Distinguished Professor of Atmospheric Science," according to that institution. Mann is the inventor of the infamous "hockey stick" graph about run-away Global Warming. Mann has refused to allow other scientists to review his research (unless they're in his cabal, of course), and has sued the pants off of a number of people who called him out on it. He's lost some of those lawsuits and maintains at least one ongoing for years now, running for close on two decades. Michael Mann is the "poster boy" for how a true scientist is NOT supposed to be!

And notice how "Warmists", advocates of Global Warming, discredit anyone (scientist or not) who disagrees with them. They call them "Climate Deniers" as though they were "Holocaust Deniers." That is not science, either. Science is supposed to be all about the evidence, and the evidence has to be tested again and again, by many people other than the ones who developed the theory. Global Warming is especially egregious in that it was put together by computer models – as Covid has, as well, as I've reported on – and 20 years or more after the models were published, none of what they predicted as come true. The Global Warming theory is utterly disproved, yet it still continues as public policy in many countries. It's absolute garbage, but governments have "bought in" to it, regardless.

Now, regarding Covid, I've been researching it ever since it appeared (I've about 40 years experience as a researcher in various fields) and never in history has there ever been a fraud like it. It is definitely worse that Global Warming. But right now, regarding Covid, the fox is in the hen house about Covid "Vaccine"-related deaths and serious illness.

The U.S.'s CDC's "VAERS" system (Vaccine Adverse Event Reaction System) is reporting, as of now, nearly seven thousand "Vaccine"-caused or related deaths, plus a staggering number of injuries short of death: see here for details. Just incredible. And for some years before the Covid Show went prime time, it was understood that only about 10 percent of vaccine-related illness/death were reported to VAERS, so there's potentially tens of thousands of Covid "vaccine"-related deaths.

Now the scientific magazine Vaccine has blown up over its publication of an scientifically researched article talking about this issue via a report drawing on Dutch and Israeli evidence. Almost immediately after publishing the article, the "powers-that-rule" the science world forced the magazine to retract the article, and various editors, etc., have resigned. You can read about the kerfuffle here at Just The News. (N.B. Just The News is a Conservative American news site, but it is "mainstream" and not remotely in "tinfoil hat" territory.) This is a classic example of "shooting the messenger" because you don't like the news he brought.

Whatever the details of the nitty-gritty of this specific story, "the wheels are coming off" the whole Covid Spiel, the Covid "narrative". The MSM ("MainStream Press"), with the one-time exception of Tucker Carlson, has nor reported on the vaccine mortality rate for Covid, A, and B, the "vaccines" for Covid have become the "tail wagging the dog" in the sense that the "vaccines" have become far, far more of a news item than the original Covid!

You'll be seeing ever more of this over the summer, and into the return of "Flu Season" this fall. For anyone interested in a detailed but readable overview, read David Solway's article at LifeSiteNews.

Here's an excerpt from Solway, highlighting a recent and important UK government vaccine report:
An P again:
The current rumor is that the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) is about to formally approve the "vaccines", formally making them no longer experimental. That would allow everyone to be forced, against their will, to take the potions. Your employer, or state or national government, could try to compel you to be vaccinated. You could perhaps be imprisoned for not surrendering your body to genetic experimentation.

All that means is that "the powers-that-rule" have decided NO human will be allowed to exist who is not a genetically altered human. It's something out of science-fiction: Transhumanism.  (WARNING FOR HUMANITY / Covid-19 vaccine & transhumanism / by Dr Carrie Madej; lots of info on Moderna and its history and its vaccine: 63 days from lab experiments to human testing, which is a record; and Madej notes that this is the first drug/medicine/vaccine of any kind that Moderna has created.)

Maybe Dr. Carrie Madej isn't the kook mainstreamers make her out to be?

An Préachán





Thursday, July 1, 2021

The Game of Statistics and the Deaths of 104 Babies

 Amici,

You might have heard or read of a recent New England Journal of Medicine article on a study about spontaneous abortions and Covid "vaccines". The news was that out of 800-some pregnant women studied (827 to be precise), precisely 104 lost their babies after being "vaccinated". That's 104 dead babies which resolves to 12 percent of the total group of 827 studied. The New England Journal of Medicine says 12 percent mortality is acceptable compared to other vaccines, etc.
  • In other words: The whole point was to say, "See, the Covid "vaccines" aren't as bad as all that."
Now, remember old Canadian Dr. Roger Hodgkinson's profound comment: "Statistics never apply to individuals. YOU may be IT! And if you're it, it puts a very different complexion on the event, does it not?" Consider how heart-broken those 104 women who lost their babies must be.
  • And yet, there's more to this story. MUCH more. The manipulation of statistics.
  • The Story Falsifies the Information
This story illustrates how the game of statistics is played. "Spontaneous Abortion" is a phrase that is used to refer to failed pregnancies ending BEFORE 20 weeks; AFTER 20 weeks of pregnancy, such a tragic event is called a "stillbirth".
  1. So in this published study, of the 827 pregnant women, only 127 women were in their first 20 weeks of pregnancy.
  2. Now comes the Kicker: ALL 104 "vaccine"-induced spontaneous abortions were suffered by women in their first 20 weeks!
  3. And that means that's a "vaccine" mortality rate of 82 percent. Again: it is ALL of the total 104 babies of the entire study.
Think about this means. But there's more! When you dig through the report, you find that "A total of 700 participants (84.6%) received their first eligible ("vaccine") dose in the third trimester." Wait...what? What kind of idiotic test sample was this? A "sample" made up of two widely disparate groups of pregnant women! Clearly, the sampling was completely skewed, fraudulently so. It was "weighted" just as would be some hackneyed political poll. (Most political polling is propaganda designed to manipulate people.)
  • So much for "science".
Conclusion
Being a pregnant woman and getting a Covid "vaccine" isn't smart, whatever trimester one is in. Not remotely. Especially – sadly, obviously – if you're under 20 weeks. It is flat-out murderous to your baby. (And evidence is building that the "vaccines" can apparently cause sterility, especially in women, though only time will show the extent of how true this is. Remember: should you think this sounds nuts, that it has been proven in the past that certain "vaccines" were used in some Third-World countries to actually sterilize the women there, so there is precedent.)

Yet if it is possible to have a "bigger issue" in this story, one has to step back reflect on the consideration that if they're willing to lie about something as straightforward, and important, as this 827 women study, what else are they willing to lie about regarding the entire Covid narrative?

Elephants remember
So do cats
Throughout the Covid Year (now "Years"?) we've been lied to on an incredible scale. Remember those early scenes from Wuhan China that showed masked people collapsing on the streets? That's never happened anywhere in the world. (To this day, we don't really know how many Chinese died, or even what they died of, as Wuhan is one of the most polluted places on Earth, and the first city to be wired for 5G.) But the images of collapsing people used to spread terror 'round the world.

Remember all the screaming how the high death rates in Tuscany and New York City, yet comparable mortality did not evince itself elsewhere? I had a German acquaintance back at that time last year just yelling at me over the phone about those Tuscany deaths proving Covid was a new Black Death – and nothing remotely came of it. (Needless to say, he's never apologized and we no longer are on speaking terms.)

Or remember the dire warning about how long the Covid virus could live on hard surfaces, and you had to be continually disinfecting your hands (very hard on the skin, that). I know that Tungsram, the Hungarian lighting company, started to spend millions on developing ultraviolet light disinfectant devices, but I don't know if the "bottom fell out of the market" for such or not. No one discusses this now, so I suppose there is no market for such items.

Or what about the whole mask business? I remember very well that during the California wildfires last year, the various CA and US government public health agencies (CDC, etc.) were urging caution, telling everyone how dangerous the smoke was and that Covid masks would not prevent you breathing in fire dust and soot, etc., from a forest fire. It was laughable. They betrayed themselves! But the media kept quiet about it, and the "Sheeple" took no notice. (A virus is supposed to be FAR smaller than fire soot particles, you see. So, if a mask cannot offer protection from that, then how is it supposed to stop a virus?)

And speaking of masks, how is it that "the average mask-wearer in the street" doesn't know what medical people know full-well: that in hospitals, hospital masks (the most usual Covid mask type for the general public) are not supposed to be worn after 20 minutes. 20 minutes of use and they're used up. That's the standard rule; masks have to be changed after twenty minutes. But here we are, adults and kids wearing these masks all day, and usually each mask for multiple days. (I only rarely change masks, but then I only rarely have to wear them. It's like a bizarre voodoo ritual, mask wearing; so much of the "Covid narrative" strikes me as "magic".)

Felines remember all this nonsense and want to know more. Is there lying? Definitely. Who is lying? The public health people, the governments, the Big Pharma. The Mainstream Media, as well (MSM). Why are they lying? Money is the motivation for Big Pharma, certainly; Moderna's first medical product was its Covid "vaccine" and it has made the computer tech/software company eight billion dollars. As for the others...? The Media support a certain social-political cultural narrative, and government is now, and always has been, interested in gaining ways to control and manipulate entire populations.

Cats look behind the scenes, as at this New England Journal of Medicine story. Behind the scenes cats hear mice moving about and chewing on the wood. But Canines drown all that out with their barking and barking at the Sheeple, "Move on, move on! Nothing to see here" and the Sheeple usually do, indeed (for now) "move on".

Bottom line: the New England Journal of Medicine article is yet another example of how nothing about the Covid narrative is right, my friends.

An Préachán
N.B. 
(Infor from: Jefferey Jaxen, investigative journalist in conversation at THEHIGHWIRE.com; Jaxen reported that a letter had been sent to the editor of the NEJM in April about this. Embedded in an article here at The Eponymous Flower.)

Tuesday, June 29, 2021

Guess I'm a cat person...!

 An Essay


Friends, Romans, countrymen! All people, like Gaul, are divided into three parts! These are the three personality types that dominate human beings.

Each personality type is named after an animal totem that best exemplifies that type: "'Sheeple', Canines, Felines." Please note that some individuals will exhibit perhaps more than one of the types earlier in life, but one specific type usually comes to eventually dominate, most often early on, and especially as a person ages. However, extraordinary circumstances might "awaken" a sleeping trait, so beware.

"Sheeple", "Canines" and "Felines"

The Sheeple are of course the majority, the sheep-people, bah-bahing through life. They're followers, following each other one-by-one till they form a group, always following their leaders (who are usually Canines, rarely a Feline). Sheeple are by far the most numerous of the three types. Perhaps they're mostly born that way, though I am certain the modern state-imposed educational apparatus does its very best to stamp out any potential Felines (Felines are just too dangerous; see below). The modern educational system is definitely NOT going to turn out Socrates, Aristotle, or Thomas Jefferson, not if it can prevent it. (Richard Feynman, the famous American physicist, has a quote about that, somewhere.)

Sheeple or Buffalo?
Essential to being a Sheeple is that Sheeple don't question orders; they obey. They'll obey people in authority, whether or not those people deserve that authority over others. Any "argument from authority" is OK by them. Or I mean, that's the usual way sheeple are – perhaps a clever Feline can get them to question orders. Perhaps Canines can push Sheeple far enough that they "break" and "stampede." Difficult, to be sure, but not impossible. Sheeple are usually not going to cause trouble, but then again, circumstances can arise – rarely – when the Sheeple turn into rampaging buffaloes. For a short time.

Now, don't get me wrong: Sheeple have minds, souls, the innate dignity of being human; they can be smart or dumb, "educated" in modern society's understanding of "education", or not. They can be knowledgeable about particular things, and competent in keeping a technological civilization running whether as plumbers, technicians, or engineers. They can be good people, they can be bad people, they can be the worst of people, they can be the best of people – well, in absolute moral terms. They can, of course, be the "best" people in a shallow wealthy society sense, naturally enough; but if so, they inherited their wealth and position rather than garnered it by being inventive entrepreneurs. Sheeple just aren't (usually) risk-takers.

Wolf or Guard Dog?
The Canines are either shepherds or wolves. Fewer in number than Sheeple, they dominate – or try to – the other two groups. Canines are always leaders of the Sheeple and are proud they're not Sheeple! But then again, many Canines question their orders no more than the Sheeple do; HOWEVER, unlike the Sheeple, the Canines have a higher likelihood of rebeling against authority. Sometimes moral Canines will do this in order to do what is right and needful because they're good shepherds and moral leaders; alas, usually they rebel in order merely to seize the power of authority for themselves.

Canines have a certain edginess about themselves. They think they're dominant, "top dogs" or "alphas" and "leaders of the pack." Or at least they seem born with the urge to become policemen, soldiers, or those nasty kinds of bureaucrats who love bossing other people about. You've all met the type. (I had an uncle by marriage who was a nice guy except when he put his Army uniform on. Then he became the worst kind of military martinet.) Canines can be smart or dumb as well, they can be good or bad, they serve as your friendly neighborhood cop or, also, the local Stasi agent. (Again and again we've seen regular, everyday American policemen – even elected sheriffs – abuse their authority during the Covid "lockdowns".)
Canines can be exemplary clergymen "leading their flocks" or they can be classic Pharisees. But again, though they take up their time bossing people about, they do not often ask that pesky question: "Why?" (Unless it is: "Why am I following this leader's orders? Why don't I jusr shoot him and become leader myself?")

The Cats
The Felines do ask "Why" because they are the Cats, and, like their whiskered animal totem, they're curious. Few in number, they are inherently driven by the notion that "the unexamined life is not worth living", as Socrates ("patron saint of Felines"), liked to say. Felines want to know the "Why" of everything. And by definition they are more suspicious of authority than either Sheeple or Canines. That's just who they are, who they are born to be – if society doesn't beat it out of them! This curiosity of theirs naturally makes them the utter pests of the Sheeple and the Canines, especially the latter, for the Sheeple are usually clueless about being curious although they find the Cats quite harmless while the Canines are smart enough to know they're lacking something in life. (It's partly why so many Canines are emotionally unbalanced, too, naturally enough!) Also, to be sure, the Canines definitely DO NOT like their shibboleths questioned. My personal experience over 60 years confirms that Canines can become quite aggressive when you question the current narrative (whatever that might be at a given time) whereas Sheeple just smile and say, "Fancy that."

Canines will therefore react badly to pesky Felines, as they did with Socrates himself, after all. They put him to death for, really, just asking questions. (Doesn't this remind you of the current "race" narratives being fostered or Covid situation? It is out of control in politics, where curiosity about, say, the 2020 election can get you into serious trouble with the authorities. Canines are very clearly trying to "shut down" any Felines who question "the Party Line"; we see that in a number of countries and states. It will get worse.)

Felines make up many – though not all, by any means – of the world's philosophers: but I would think they make up most of the artists, the inventors, the gamblers, entrepreneurs, and risk takers. They also make up the quiet dreamer types noted for being an excellent teacher in the classroom or "problem solver" in business. Once upon a time, they made up the majority of journalists and scientists, but that is definitely no longer true. The academic disciplines of science and journalism drive them out as surely as any military or journalism traditionally drives them out, and business will also drive them out, with vengeance.

Why? In part because the Cats embarrass the "hacks" and "time servers" in business, science or the military, or the propagandists in journalism; and in part if they're ever actually listened to by Canines in government, Felines can change the world.

Canines can't have that. It would disturb the "peace of mind" of the Sheeple, don't you know. (I'm being sarcastic.)

Examples:

The Military:
General Patton and Napoleon Bonaparte are perfect examples of exemplary Cats who engaged in the usually Canine Profession of the Military. They were fantastic generals. Thus, of course, they were not popular with their contemporary generals. They were Felines in the military art and they embarrassed their Canine friends. They were hated. (Napoleon dealt with that by making himself an emperor but failed to establish a lasting regime. He was eventually exiled and died not long after. A wide-spread belief is that Napoleon was murdered. George Patton, however, was murdered even before he went into exile; i.e. retired to the U.S.)

Such leaders are usually few, and they end up badly. This is true in the history of any military, for example, Ancient Rome. But just look at the Japanese military during WWII and consider Admiral Raizō Tanaka and General Tomoyuki Yamashita, the "Tiger of Malaysia". Brilliant military leaders indeed, these two garnered famous victories against impossible odds. (The Americans called Tanaka "Tenacious Tanaka".) However, these two men were loathed by the leaders of Japan's military. And alas, the Canine idiots had the power, and thus they sidelined both of these extremely capable officers. Yamashita was brought back in a hopeless situation toward the end of the war and ended up accused of war crimes and executed in 1946. Admiral Tanaka peaceably retired post war and lived quietly in obscurity until 1969. 

Finally, two quick examples from U.S. history: U.S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman were brilliant generals in the American Civil War, but both men had actually been driven out of the Peacetime Army before the war. (The extraordinary circumstances of the war allowed them back in.) The Canines in the Peacetime Army didn't want them because the two cats were just too clever. And also, I am sure, neither Grant nor Sherman liked being bossed about by Canine "hacks", and  the two clever generals were probably utterly bored in the Peacetime Army. (Similarly, had the French Revolution not happened, Napoleon would have never risen to be a colonel of artillery. Canines and Felines take advantage of extraordinary circumstances.)

Examples could be multiplied, but it is also true that we'll never know about all those cats who were caged by canines before they were allowed to gain any recognition for their "catness", or hammered down into the Sheeple.

In Part Two of this essay, I'll consider the situation regarding the discipline of science, because that is affecting all of us at the moment, and will continue to do so, in ever more profound, and dire, ways.

An Préachán

Friday, June 25, 2021

Joe Biden whispering into the microphone at a presser...and a Lovecraft movie

The other day, China Zhou Biden gave "the worst speech ever", as a friend put it.

But Biden's whispering into the microphone at a presser the next day is even worse! Bonchie covers it here at RedState and has the video clip, looped. Absolutely utterly creepy! And watch Biden's eyes – he's clearly drugged out of his (the little bit that's left, that is) mind.

What we're enduring is like a horror movie! In fact, here's the trailor of 1970's (an ominous year for Trad Catholics) The Dunwich Horror. This was one of the better adaptations of H.P. Lovecraft – it gets the alternative universe "feel" of Lovecraft's writings. (H.P.L. was a Weird Tales writer back in the '20s and '30s and if he wasn't actually possessed, he was certainly "under the influence".) However, the film is better plotted than the short story of the same name, and it seems a prophetic movie when you consider Biden & Son.  (The Bidens seem more than a little possessed themselves.) At 1:08 in, when the girl opens the door, that's like one imagines opening the door into Biden's hidden lair. An doesn't the young actor Dean Stockwell look something like Hunter Biden? At two minutes in, that's the Feds breaking through the wall, coming to visit! (Probably to give "the Jab", right?) The FBI in full form! 

Just wow, a chairde. Sc-Fi and Horror writers were often prophetic!

An P

Abp. Viganò discusses failure of Vatican II Novus Ordo Mass

 In a recent interview, Archbishop Viganò noted something that bears repeating (well, he said a lot that bears repeating, but this stood out to me).

Excerpt (highlights mine):
Those who prepared the conciliar documents to have them approved by the Council Fathers acted with the same malice that the drafters of the liturgical reform adopted, knowing that they would interpret ambiguous texts in a Catholic way, while those who were to disseminate and utilize them would interpret them in every sense except that.

In fact, this concept is confirmed in everyday practice. Have you ever seen a priest who celebrates the Novus Ordo with the altar facing East, entirely in Latin, wearing the fiddleback (Roman) chasuble and distributing Communion at the Communion rail, without this arousing the ire of his Ordinary and confreres, even though, strictly speaking, this way of celebrating would be perfectly legitimate? Those who have tried — certainly in good faith — have been treated worse than those who habitually celebrate the Tridentine Mass. This demonstrates that the continuity hoped for in the Council’s hermeneutic does not exist, and that the break with the pre-conciliar Church is the norm to which one must conform, to the satisfaction of conservatives.

An P again:
For those who don't know, here is an image of the fiddleback (Roman) chasuble:


And this below is an example of the so-called "Gothic chasubles", which you're more familiar with, unless you attend the TLM:

The fiddleback or Roman chasuble is obviously designed for the priest to be facing ad orientem, toward the east and God, whereas the Vatican II Gothic one is for the priest facing ad populum, toward the people. The Roman chasuble is a portable icon screen, fulfilling the role the iconostasis does in the Eastern Liturgies. Iconostases and Roman chasubles serve as the curtain in the Jerusalem Temple, the confection of the Eucharistic sacrifice being the highest and holiest sacrament.

Before Vatican II's liturgical changes (implemented over a decade), it was easy to believe something holy was occurring, indeed, nothing less than the Incarnation of God brought forward time into our midst; after the Novus Ordo reigned supreme, however, it would take a miracle to believe in Transubstantiation. This is because the liturgy remains the Church's main teaching device.

Viganò states in the interview:
Now, if Vatican II was a revolutionary act, both in the way it was conducted and in the documents it promulgated, it is logical and legitimate to think that its liturgy is also affected by this ideological approach, especially if we bear in mind that it is the chief means by which the faithful and clergy are catechized. It is no coincidence that Luther and the other Protestant and Anglican heretics used the liturgy as their main method to spread their errors among the faithful.

An interview very worth reading.

An Préachán










Thursday, June 24, 2021

Did Joe Biden threaten to nuke Americans?

 Has the Demented Idiot-in-Chief finally gone too far?

An excerpt:
Earlier today, as RedState reported, Joe Biden launched into another dementia-laden rant where he talked about nuking Americans and shooting deer in kevlar vests. No, I’m not being facetious. That actually happened (see Biden Accidently Makes Best Ever for Second Amendment in Speech Promoting Gun Control Initiatives).

An P again:
Has 'Zombie Zhou Bi-dumb' finally gone too far? He's a dithering demented senile moron, and before the onset of his dementia, he was a moron, a proven plagiarist, and he's ever been the definition of a corrupt politician, using his position to collect massive amounts of money illegally. (It's a family thing with him and his son; it's just come out that Hunter Biden used his father's credit card to pay for $25,000 to a Russian prostitute. That must have been some whore!)

As the author of this piece, Bonchie, goes on to say:
The truth is that if enough Americans felt the government had become tyrannical and rose up against it with arms protected by the Second Amendment, things would be a lot more complicated and gray than “well, the military has nukes.” We’ve seen that reality play out in foreign countries many times. Further, the very fact that Biden would threaten such is yet more proof the Second Amendment must be protected.

The fact is, however, that despite Biden being insane, this speech was quite intentional. As one Commentator to the RedState article put it:
Larrycas • 10 hours ago
It wasn’t a dementia-laden rant. His handlers wrote it and passed it around for redline edits. Many people looked at it and approved it. And the addle-brained Xiden practiced it. These people are insane.

Insane they are. Both the Global Warming fraud and the Covid hoax shows both how far they're willing to go to push their plans, and how far we've fallen that we let them do this.

And remember, this gibberish from Biden is more than equaled by absolute utter gibberish from the Chairman of the Joint Chief, Mark Milley, who went on a ridiculous rant about Critical Race Theory, White Supremacists, and boasted of having read Marx. Sundance at The Conservative Treehouse has a great article here.  

Remember Obama replaced the top military leaders of pre-Obama times, and replaced them with political operatives like Milley. The very Leftist French Republic in the decades before WWI also emasculated their military. Look what that got them. As another RedState commentator wittily put it, should a "woke" military give the order to fire on Americans:
 Usernotfound Colonel Race • 9 hours ago
Even if they did, an officer who got promoted for their gender confusion and pink hair is not likely to be very effective.
No, they're not. And China knows this. Expect an invasion of Taiwan any day.

Friends, this can't go on much longer. How it all comes undone, and whether we'll all be undone with it, we'll have to see. If they make "vaccines" mandatory, that will be a sign that they won't tolerate anyone who rejects their poison (pun intended). Tucker Carlson, commenting on the bizarre school board meeting the other night wherein angry parents confronted the school board members on Critical Race Theory, and the board chairman suddenly declared the session to be an unlawful assembly (simply jaw-dropping insanity, but it happened and so far they've gotten away with it) and the local sheriffs arrest two parents. Of this Carlson said, "They're gonna get a revolution if they keep acting like this."