Amici,
There's
been no little controversy about Covid, and now the same can be said of
the vaccines recently introduced. Whether you take a vaccine or not is
up to you (or it should be), but YOU MUST be informed about them.
I've
finished listening to an interview between John Henry Weston of
Lifesite News and Pamela Acker, who was researcher in vaccines "back in
the day". Before she could get her Doctorate, she was tossed from her
program because she refused to go along with using aborted fetal
material.
I took the time to transcribe portion portions of it, and here they are.
In
today's episode of The John-Henry Westen Show, Westen interviews Pamela
Acker, one of the most knowledgeable people in the world on vaccines
and on what goes into them.
At about 33 minutes in; direct quotes:
Hek293 cells, that's human embryonic kidney. There's no actual aborted fetal material in the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines because they're not cultured or produced directly in the aborted fetal cells, although these are tested via hek293 cells. However, with the Astrazeneca and the Johnson and Johnson vaccine for Covid, as well as well as the rubella vaccine and the chickenpox vaccine, there are remainders of these aborted fetal cells that end up in the vaccines themselves. With these vaccines, you are injecting remnants of DNA and protein debris of the murdered baby into you.
...
The DNA in these cells is definitely
mutated, so this could be the source of the mutations in some of these
kids who are developing autism. So this is one possible mechanism for
why we are seeing that. And it is not outside the realm of possibility
biologically, but it makes sense if you think about it from Natural Law.
If you're going to do something as heinous as inject into yourself the
remains of somebody who murdered, there's going to be a natural
consequence to that. Like you can't just do that and not have any
negative effects, if that makes sense. (37:36)
She explains how we might be developing super-viruses. Injecting you with a lab-produced virus might combine with a naturally occurring "wild" virus that turns into a monster. Also, she stresses that when you read scientists say "We've been working on this stuff for decades, so don't be alarmed, it's not just "out of the box" research, that what that really means in that they've been working on this stuff for decades WITHOUT SUCCESS!!!
"Thus, this negative message has been spun in a positive way. "We've experience with it not working, is what we have."
Acker also talks about the Vaccine Injury Compenstation Program, the VICP.
"Vaccines are inciting you immune response in a very bizarre way when vaccinate yourself, you're yourself through the normal root; you're going through your muscles instead of through your mouth, you're giving yourself – in some cases – three or four or five or ten diseases at a same time. I mean, you would never as a child, have measles, mumps, rubella, polio, chickenpox, diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, all at the same time. But you get all those vaccines at one doctor's visit. So there's a lot of problems in determining just how many adverse events there are associated with vaccines in general. But vaccine manufacturers are not liable, and I think there's been special protections allotted to the Covid vaccines because, you know, if you do obviously rush something to production, I think there is some sort of liability that you might have in general, but because this is "an emergency" – a situation where you've been licensed to go ahead and do that – and cut your testing down to, ah, I learned today that Moderna, that they solicited adverse reactions for seven days. And I also about Pfizer vaccinating their placebo group with actual active vaccine! So we're not going to have any more long-term studies about these vaccines because we're not going to have a placebo group, which is mind-blowing to me as a researcher. And it's -- how do you commit that level of scientific fraud? It's scientific fraud, to just eliminate our control group. (47:52) We now have no way to say how safe this vaccine is."
And she talks about anaphylaxis, an allergic reaction to vaccines in which your airways start to close up, and you're in danger of dying from a severe allergic reaction. It happens one in a million with regular vaccines, but it happens 22 times more with the Covid vaccines. And what does that say about other reactions?
(56:45) "Nobody has claimed -- though they have very cleverly just not mentioned it, while trumpeting other areas of success -- but nobody that that receipt of the vaccine will actually cause the virus to stop spreading. The only claims made by both Pfizer and Moderna is that if you get the vaccine, you're less likely to get severe Covid symptoms than if you don't get the vaccine. And again, they're looking at the fraction of the cohort that they vaccinated -- so Pfizer vaccinated 43,000 people and they looked at approximately 200 people who developed symptoms. And Moderna, the same thing: 30,000 vaccinated, 200 who developed symptoms. And then they both made claims that their vaccines were some 90 percent effective. They've looked for this just over a few weeks. We don't know know that that this vaccine is actually protective or not. That's why they keep saying "keep wearing your mask!" So, why are you getting vaccinated?
(Pamela Acker has written a book: Vaccination, a Catholic Perspective available at https://www.kolbecenter.org/ .)
At
the interview's end, Pamela Acker says, "Don't get it; it's not good
for your soul or your body and I think that, as Catholics, if we don't
stand up now, I think we're losing the opportunities we're ever going to
have to stand up and rectify this wrong that has been going on for
decades. We're going to be accountable for that. We lived in this time,
we had an opportunity to do something, and if we don't, we will be held
accountable for that.... This is a hill worth dying on."
At about 33 minutes in; direct quotes:
Hek293 cells, that's human embryonic kidney. There's no actual aborted fetal material in the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines because they're not cultured or produced directly in the aborted fetal cells, although these are tested via hek293 cells. However, with the Astrazeneca and the Johnson and Johnson vaccine for Covid, as well as well as the rubella vaccine and the chickenpox vaccine, there are remainders of these aborted fetal cells that end up in the vaccines themselves. With these vaccines, you are injecting remnants of DNA and protein debris of the murdered baby into you.
...
The DNA is of greater concern because Dr. Theresa Deisher of Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute (Dr. Theresa Deisher holds a doctorate in Molecular and Cellular Physiology from Stanford University School of Medicine),
which came into existence in the early 2000s, they are also working on
solving this problem with ethical vaccines...the availability of ethical
vaccines; she has some tremendous work, a lot of it she has summarized
in talks on YouTube, where she has looked at the relationship between
the increase in use aborted fetal cell-derived vaccines that corresponds
to an increase in autism rates in the countries that she's looked at.
And this has been in some countries in Europe as well as the United
States. And she's seen that there's a dose-dependent response; so the
more aborted fetal cell vaccines that we use, the higher the incidence
of autism, the greater the increase there is in the incidence of autism.
So she (Deisher) said let's take a look at that. Let's see if
there's any sort of biologically plausible mechanism for that. So she
made the connection that when you put these aborted fetal DNA
contaminants into a living human being, something can occur – and this
does occur in vitro in cell culture in the laboratory – called
homologous recombination where the DNA that's being injected into t he
individual can line up with the DNA that it sort of corresponds to in
those individual cells, and then there's some enzymes that can come
along and they can swap those two pieces out. So you end up losing your
actual DNA and having the DNA from the aborted fetal cells incorporated
into your cells. And she (Deisher) was saying how this could
potentially explain why in some individuals with autism -- although not
all, because autism is a very multifaceted problem and there's no one
strict straight answer for why it develops in some individuals and not
in others. But in some individuals, you see hundreds of what are called de novo
mutations. These are mutations that came kind of out of nowhere, the
parents didn't have them and you shouldn't see like hundreds of
mutations in a child just from one generation. This child is very young,
probably, still as well they can't possibly accumulate all these
mutations. Well, they can if this mutated DNA – because if you recall
from back at the beginning of the talk, we talked about how in order for
cell lines to be immortalized – we're sticking viral oncogenes and
then these cancer-promoting genes, these mutations, into them, in order
to keep them growing in cell culture, you know, somewhat indefinitely.
(37:01)
An Préachán again:
Pamela
Acker says this is next-gen technology, and we do not have a clue about
the long-term effects, or even short-term! Quote: "That's
mind-boggling. I don't think we have any idea how wildly different
people's responses to this genetic information might be and thus how
wildly different their responses to the vaccine might be."
She explains how we might be developing super-viruses. Injecting you with a lab-produced virus might combine with a naturally occurring "wild" virus that turns into a monster. Also, she stresses that when you read scientists say "We've been working on this stuff for decades, so don't be alarmed, it's not just "out of the box" research, that what that really means in that they've been working on this stuff for decades WITHOUT SUCCESS!!!
"Thus, this negative message has been spun in a positive way. "We've experience with it not working, is what we have."
Acker also talks about the Vaccine Injury Compenstation Program, the VICP.
"Vaccines are inciting you immune response in a very bizarre way when vaccinate yourself, you're yourself through the normal root; you're going through your muscles instead of through your mouth, you're giving yourself – in some cases – three or four or five or ten diseases at a same time. I mean, you would never as a child, have measles, mumps, rubella, polio, chickenpox, diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, all at the same time. But you get all those vaccines at one doctor's visit. So there's a lot of problems in determining just how many adverse events there are associated with vaccines in general. But vaccine manufacturers are not liable, and I think there's been special protections allotted to the Covid vaccines because, you know, if you do obviously rush something to production, I think there is some sort of liability that you might have in general, but because this is "an emergency" – a situation where you've been licensed to go ahead and do that – and cut your testing down to, ah, I learned today that Moderna, that they solicited adverse reactions for seven days. And I also about Pfizer vaccinating their placebo group with actual active vaccine! So we're not going to have any more long-term studies about these vaccines because we're not going to have a placebo group, which is mind-blowing to me as a researcher. And it's -- how do you commit that level of scientific fraud? It's scientific fraud, to just eliminate our control group. (47:52) We now have no way to say how safe this vaccine is."
And she talks about anaphylaxis, an allergic reaction to vaccines in which your airways start to close up, and you're in danger of dying from a severe allergic reaction. It happens one in a million with regular vaccines, but it happens 22 times more with the Covid vaccines. And what does that say about other reactions?
(56:45) "Nobody has claimed -- though they have very cleverly just not mentioned it, while trumpeting other areas of success -- but nobody that that receipt of the vaccine will actually cause the virus to stop spreading. The only claims made by both Pfizer and Moderna is that if you get the vaccine, you're less likely to get severe Covid symptoms than if you don't get the vaccine. And again, they're looking at the fraction of the cohort that they vaccinated -- so Pfizer vaccinated 43,000 people and they looked at approximately 200 people who developed symptoms. And Moderna, the same thing: 30,000 vaccinated, 200 who developed symptoms. And then they both made claims that their vaccines were some 90 percent effective. They've looked for this just over a few weeks. We don't know know that that this vaccine is actually protective or not. That's why they keep saying "keep wearing your mask!" So, why are you getting vaccinated?
For those of you who wish to hear Dr. Deisher speak, Patrick Coffin interviews her here.
An Préachán
PS Bergoglio and old pope Benedict have taken their vaccine shots. Bergoglio said, "It must be done." Like Hell. I don't know what vaccine they were injected with, but if it was one of the ones mentioned here in this interview, they engaged in true abomination. And if they used some Russian or Chinese vaccine, I don't know but I would assume those were far less scrupulous than the ones mentioned here – which of course weren't scrupulous at all.
An P
No comments:
Post a Comment