Judge Emmet Sullivan's insane judicial acts in the past week have garnered a lot of attention, and I rejoice to see the great Sidney Powell has gotten a quick response from the Appellate Court.
But of course, the whole railroading/framing of General Flynn is only a part of a long-standing, deeply wide-ranging attack on the "American Right" or, as it actually is, the John Lockean "Classical Liberal" school of political thought that created the United States in the first place.
From what does the Left come, though? Originally, as most political histories (political histories that aren't Leftist, of course) will teach that Jean-Jacques Rousseau was the "father" of what has become Leftism. In some ways that's true. Rousseau was born in 1712 (in Geneva, Switzerland). If ever there was a seventh-century man, Jean-Jacques could be said to be it, as immoral as the Bourbons and as stupid, too.
But in 1717 something else was born, and that organization was the real "power-that-was" in fashioning Leftism and Communism, or whatever form Socialism takes. I refer, of course, to Freemasonry.
Today, in the U.S., I suppose the ChiComs are behind a
lot of the Left's antics. The Chinese Communist Party has bought up U.S.
politicians like it has bought up industry, agriculture, and real
estate – indeed, but beyond those obvious gambits that we talk about so much, it is
probably true that a lot of "sleeper cells" of various sorts are being
activated to do their mischief. The
Soviets were famous for their "sleeper cells", of course; the Chinese
are even more patient and "Long March" than the Soviets ever dreamed of
being. In any event, originally, it would have been Russian Soviets directing all that back in the 1920s and esp, once FDR was in office, they pretty much controlled the new "Administrative State" he created.
Joe McCarthy and Dick Nixon would later put a dent into all that in the '50s, but probably only a dent. (To the extent Nixon was successful, he gained the implacable hatred of the American media, which was only too happy to use Watergate to bring him down.) Jack Kennedy, for all his many, many faults, was at least a serious Cold Warrior (and close friend of McCarthy, BTW), and look what happened to Jack: taken out in an obvious KGB op that the government and media "powers-that-be" (as in Scotty Reston of the NY Times) hid in plain sight. About the over-all Communist game, Diana West has written extensively. She her American Betrayal, The Secret Assault on Our Nation's Character.)
Then, as the Russian Communists began to fade out, the ChiComs were only too glad take their place, ironically able to do so because of Nixon's "Opening" of China. Actually, we can thank both Nixon and Kissinger for this turn of events, but it was post Reagan presidents, Democrats (Clinton and Obama) and the Republican Bushes, who really made China's near total power in the world possible. The de-industrialization of the U.S. to the point that we didn't even make our medicines was not something that just happened, or followed naturally from unbridled Capitalism à la David Ricardo. It had to be planned, especially so as it happened so fast.
But behind all of the Leftists, whether Communist or Socialist, behind all the machinations, were the Freemasons. I know it has been made to sound "tinfoil hat" to bring them up, especially in the U.S., where they've been either not noticed at all, or made fun of, or perhaps the hospital Shriners, but in the 18th century they were an association of extremely influential elites, a truly trans-national organization in an age when the only other "trans-national" institution was the Roman Catholic Church! Freemasonry was contemporary to the rationalism of the 18th century, contemporary to the atheism (Deism) so fashionable in that century.
From what I understand; i.e. they would later foster the whole Communist/Socialist ideal, from back in the days of Karl Marx on, for whatever Black Arts/Utopian reasons they had conjured up in the 18th century – but they certainly would have been the original "Globalists" and "New World Order" types. Consider it: they were the only "Globalists" in town, the only Global Idealists for a couple of hundred years; until the Bolsheviks seized Russia and broadcast their intention to spread Communism across the world, nobody else even thought of such an outlandish set of ideals involving all nations, the entire world.
Today? I don't know what, if any, role they might play today in all this. The Left might have, like Frankenstein's monster, taken on a life of its own (Lenin wasn't polite to the Masons in Russia!). It might well just be running on its own steam now, a perpetual motion machine – like Captain Kirk's Doomsday Machine in the Star Trek episode of the same name, a weapon set in motion eons ago in a war long forgotten, but still running, and still deadly.
An Préachán
No comments:
Post a Comment