My response to "Stanford is injecting children right now in a trial!"

Amici,

A commentator ("coop") at Steve Kirsch's site posted the following comment:

Stanford is injecting children right now in a trial!

https://stanmed.stanford.edu/2021issue2/upfront/clinical-trail-children-covid-vaccines.html

“Since May, researchers have tested whether the vaccine produces an immune response and prevents COVID-19 in children 5 through 11 years old.

The Stanford study site is also evaluating vaccine dosages for children 6 months through 4 years old.

Final results for the older age group are expected later this year.

“Children under 18 make up about a quarter of the U.S. population, so if we want to get the virus under control, we really need to include them,” said Yvonne Maldonado, MD, who is running the trials’ Stanford site.

Maldonado is the Taube Professor in Global Health and Infectious Diseases at Stanford."

AnP:

To which insanity, I responded:

“Children under 18 make up about a quarter of the U.S. population, so if we want to get the virus under control, we really need to include them,” said Yvonne Maldonado, MD, who is running the trials’ Stanford site." 

Point 1 Children have never been shown to be adversely affected in the first place, as carriers or as ill children. Focusing on them therefore is either ontologically stupid or it has nefarious purpose. There can be no escaping either conclusion. 

Point 2 According to standard virus theory, these waves of plagues come and go naturally, they have well-recognized "life-cycles" that play out, and have done for recorded history, and interfering with that natural cycle causes the viruses to be both longer-lasting and more virulent. 

Point 3 Prove the damned thing exists in the first place, you twit, before your Big Pharma masters conjure up back-magic potions to deal with it! Since "Covid" is only an "in silico" beast, solely computer modeled, you have no argument for anything, except to exhibit your ignorance. So, point four: 

Point 4 Go soak your empty head, Yvonne. 

Argument from Authority

Something quite significant needs to be understood. We lay a lot of weight on arguments from authority, but such are only as good as the authority, yet "authority" is often just old thinking that's been bypassed, or is just entrenched because it makes certain people way too much money. And therefore, to have garnered a high credential in some academic institution often means you merely know how to parrot ideas that are stale, wrong, or completely irrelevant to the current situation. Think of modern-day Marxists. Almost all of them are "idiot intellectuals" ensconced in academia, unable to change a lightbulb but more than willing to pontificate on how you, yourself, should live.

ANYONE with experience in academia knows how that works, and how petty and even feudal so much of higher education is! Usually, established systems "self-select" to reinforce what configurations (mental, spiritual, intellectual, etc.) they already have. Over any length of time, it gets near impossible to reform or reinvigorate such a system. Certain Churches obviously self-select over generations, and the current Catholic Church under Bergoglio and those who have been supporting him, the "Modernists" constitute a good example. 

Never has there been a collection of fools and knaves as we have in the dying "Vatican II Church", that "tomb seething with worms" as Archbishop Viganò so aptly refers to it. What business of any sort but the most ideologically driven would shut down the most vibrant and growing segment of itself? Yet that is what Bergoglio has done.

Historically, one sees this same phenomenon in militaries: they're always fighting the last war or resisting new ideas in general. Currently, the U.S. military is an utter fiasco. Brilliant officers are forced out, and replaced by toadies who insist men can get preggers. It's literally insane. Another military that isn't quite so "hardened of the arteries" then comes along and cleans their clock, as the U.S. military's will be. 

It also happens in the history of business and politics, and of course, medicine. 

But somehow, this pattern just keeps repeating. People seem naturally disposed to live in mental ruts, going around and around like broken records. They resist what audit systems exist. Congress is supposed to be an audit system of government, as is judicial review, but look what little good these do today! Only severe crises as what we're experiencing from the whole Covid/Covid "vaccine" mess have the chance to force change. 

And indeed, the change must be "forced"! Think of the changes the 1929 Stock Market Crash forced on the economy, or Pear Harbor forced on the U.S. military, or the early Union defeats in the Civil War. Examples from all areas could be multiplied ad infinitum.

If the absolutely mismanaged and Global Authoritarianism of this two-year Covid farce isn't enough of a crisis to force us to act, what in the world would?

       AnP