Prof Kwasniewski's Futility, Pius IX, and Pope Francis' Criminality - Updated

Amici,

It's been all over the Catholic news, Professor Kwasniewski's Call for the Resignation of Pope Francis. (Read its full statement here at Lifesite.) I think it is not exactly an exercise in absolute futility, but it is badly flawed, and even actually incoherent, as Louie Verrecchio explains in great detail and insight here at AKA Catholic. 

If it has any value besides grandstanding for the ridiculous and anti-Catholic "Resist the Pope" movement, of which Prof Kwasniewski serves as the great cheerleader, I think that value lies in its listing the crimes of Bergoglio. And I mean actual civil law crimes. The document details crime after crime. Bergoglio is a monster. Period.

The Papacy

Look, the Catholic (Universal) Apostolic Church has spent 2,000 years strengthening the pope's role. The Orthodox autocephalous Churches prissily dismiss the obvious. The Protestants do too, all so they can be their own popes. Whatever. But the Church probably went overboard at Vatican I regarding the importance of the Papacy. 

• I never had the feeling Vatican I's Pastor Aeternus was quite correct, and Pius IX himself haughtily said, "I am the tradition," like Louis XIV said "I am the state". What hubris! But who am I to pick and choose? 
• Pius chose his poison and thus now we have to swallow it via a (I believe anti-)pope saying, "I am the Church, and I am changing it into something totally different, and there's no going back!" 
• Bergoglio pretends to be a Mormon Prophet President who can remake anything Catholic at a whim. It's insane. His toadies and creatures make out Bergoglio to be a prophet sent from God. Forsooth! 
• Yet what does Prof Kwasniewski want? The cardinals to be able to impeach a pope by two-thirds vote? Or a Supreme Court set up somehow, independent of the Papacy?
  

The great saints and doctors of the Church long before Pius IX made it plain enough: a formal heretic can't be Catholic, let alone pope. Should one manifest, we should refuse him obedience. (Hear that, Bishop Strickland?) Bergoglio clearly teaches heresy. Has done, is doing so. He's literally Hell-bent on it. Ergo, ipso facto, he is not now, and probably never was, a valid pope. You do not "resist" such a person, you utterly ignore him. He has no validity. 

Crimes

Beyond all that, however, my friends (and anyone reading this), Jorge Mario Bergoglio is guilty of actual civil crimes, specifically (but not limited to) protecting child molesters and rapists. And of course that nun-rapist "artist" Marko Rupnik. All of these monsters are obscenely evil. Bergoglio protects them. The 'Call for Resignation' goes to great lengths to list in some detail a large number of Bergoglio's crimes. Finally! The man ought to be arrested and imprisoned. 

1. In America, bishops in favor in Rome need not worry about covering up such evil. They can do as they please, as we see every day.
   
2. A bishop who is orthodox, however, finds "covering up sex crimes" a perfect way to be "cancelled", as was Bishop Robert Finn, forced out in 2015 for a minor situation that – compared to today's filth – was insignificant. 
3. Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, whom apparently everyone in the U.S. hierarchy knew for decades was an insane seminarian Xōchipilli, god of Aztec homosexuality, raping seminarians, who got away with it till Archbishop Viganò and Pope Benedict put him on ice, only to have the evil Toad-Ogre generalissimo from Argentina rehabilitate McCarrick and send him to China to sell out Chinese Christians.
   
4. BTW, Bergoglio needs to be charged with simony, as well, for he certainly betrayed the Chinese Catholics for filthy lucre.
   
5. Bergoglio only removed McCarrick finally when the putrid stink of it all began making his own toady press corps vomit. 

What I find astounding is how Bergoglio so clearly exhibits being a product of a Vatican II rotten Church hierarchy that allowed the sex scandal to metastasize for so long. Way back in 1985, a certain Father Thomas Doyle raised the alarm of clerical sex abuse but the hierarchy in the form of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (which ought not to have ever existed; thank you Vatican II for a wholly useless "teat on a boar hog") ignored Doyle. Then a few cases occurred until 2002, when all hell broke loose with Fr. John Geoghan exploding the clergy sexual abuse hell-on-earth in Boston. (The local bishop, Cardinal Bernard Law, had to admit receiving a letter in 1984 about Geoghan which, of course, he "round filled". It was Bishop Joseph Strickland whom I remember reading – in an article I cannot find now, since his cancellation dominates the news – told the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' annual meeting that nothing had really been done about this mess, which sealed his own "molestation" order (being cancelled by Bergoglio).

• This was probably in or shortly after 2016, when the National Catholic Register reports 'In late 2016, the plainspoken prelate changed his approach, from what he calls a “management bishop” to teaching the Catholic faith aggressively, including its controversial parts. He eventually began calling out others publicly when he considered their actions deficient, including Pope Francis.' 
• But Bishop Strickland didn't add two plus two together, and STILL says Bergoglio is pope, and thus abandoned his flock to Hell Hounds on the order of an anti-pope.

In any event, Bergoglio is part and parcel of this sex abuse mess. He became an Auxiliary Bishop of Buenos Aires in 1992. His higher career parallels the trajectory of abuse allegations. True, he himself has never personally been linked to sex abuse EXCEPT in covering up predators; obviously, he has no excuse about being ignorant of what was going on. It probably has something to do with Juan Perón's dictum, "For our friends: everything. For our enemies: not even justice." (Isn't that exactly how NY Judge Juan Merchan is treating Trump? Merchan is a Colombian ex-pat!) A priest compromised by abuse allegations is a much more useful tool and toady for an unscrupulous ladder climber like Bergoglio than one having a sterling reputation.

The Kicker

Whatever the case, the Kicker is that just as the horrific, insane abuse allegations and then the evidence of actual crimes became manifest, Catholics experienced tremendous difficultly accepting the reality. It was just too horrible. And now we have a "pope" who embodies the worse aspects of Vatican II, the modernist heresy, and grotesque repudiation of everything that is actually Catholic, ESPECIALLY the most Catholic thing of all, its Traditional rites. AND HE IS A CRIMINAL TO BOOT!

Thank you Pius IX for making this mess, you and your arrogant "I am the tradition". Had you just left it the way it was, a good pope would in no way be hindered in doing his job – defending and teaching the Deposit of Faith (i.e. Tradition) and "strengthening his brothers" – while a bad pope wouldn't be so "teflon" as to escape all consequences of being a tool of Satan. Which is what we've got now.

Bergoglio is a minion of Satan, and his new Synodal Church from which he and his cronies insist there's no going back from, is a Satanic anti-Church 'Ape of the Church', and I for one reject him and all his works, root and branch.

I categorically refuse to be driven mad by the obvious cognitive dissonance of trying to believe Wild Boar Bergoglio is a valid Pope. The modernist heretics behind Vatican II and the infamous "Spirit of Vatican II" manipulated the gullible John 23rd, elected the feckless Paul 6, killed John Paul I and hindered and misled John Paul II, and kicked out Benedict. These popes all had modernist tendencies but bore nothing in themselves of the outright apostasy Bergoglio evinces every hour of every day, seven days a week.

Enough of Bergoglio and his madness!

AnP

Update: from Lifesitenews

Vatican invites Gavin Newsom, other pro-abortion, pro-LGBT Democrats to speak at climate event

As with everything else regarding Bergoglio, nothing about this is Catholic. NOTHING. Bergoglio is favoring "Catholics" who are abortionists and the unrepentant sexually deviant and therefore damned – about a fake "climate crisis" that only exists as an excuse to depopulate, to 'cull", humans from the Earth! Bergoglio is insanely evil and he just keeps going and going without major opposition. 

This must be the Great Apostasy. 

How to Break Free from the Changeling (Synodal) Church

Well, Friends,

The fox is among the chickens now. Bergoglio, the anti-pope (definitely an anti-Christ is his miserable way; at least a Changeling "pope") has let the fox in among the hens. I would love to ask Dr. Peter Kwasniewski, perhaps the most famous (amongst Trads in the States) of the "Francis is really pope!" apologists, "Well, Professor, Bergoglio has just gutted the Catholic Church like gutting a fish; he's opened it with a sharp knife titled Fiducia supplicans to endless discrimination lawsuits, as "Gay, Inc." will be providing "couples" calling conservative parishes asking for a "blessing (with flowers, invited guests, special music, the works – but of course it isn't marriage, wink-wink, nod-nod) and who will be absolutely geared to sue the cassock off any priest who denies them. They can legally raise all Hell (literally) via Fiducia supplicans. So, Kwasniewski, what sayest thou now?"

Not very charitable of me, and I'm sure the Prof is a very nice man. But, his fence-sitting has betrayed us. 

John Zmirak at The Stream has sharply harped on this homosexuals-suing-the-Church here, adding his voice to many, many others who have argued this is some way. Myself, I would ask readers to pause a moment and reflect: How much money have the homosexuals cost us? Sure, they've cost the Changeling Church millions of members who have left or are leaving in utter disgust, and they've cost the Church her priceless reputation, respect, and MOST OF ALL, T.R.U.S.T. 

But just consider how much actual cashola they've cost the Church. One study I saw from 1986, I think it was, stated that only 26 percent of Roman Catholic clergy were heterosexual. Homosexual men prey on, or if somehow they resist, still lust heartily on, teenage boys. Grown men and teenage boys is the classic paradigm. It was that way in Ancient Greece's Golden Age (adult men had to train teens in the art of war, using weapons, etc., and over time this morphed into carnal activity). It was that way in China during periods of decadence, and it is that way in the Arab Muslim world, as first detailed for Westerners by Richard Francis Burton, the famous English 19th century explorer. 

So put them in among boys and the lusts of such perverts will wear down even the strongest willed of them. No one trying to break the chains of alcoholism takes a job in a liquor store or a bar. Sodomites have cost the Church literally billions of dollars – and again, the spiritual and morale disaster these degenerates have cost us is beyond staggering, and beyond counting..

Even the new Mass, the Novus Ordo, is effeminate, and encourages a flashy "performance" from the Cranmer's table (er, a.k.a. "altar"). It is like it was designed for narcissists.

Now Bergoglio has opened the floodgates to simply endless litigation and the "cancellation" of endless numbers of what true-believing, orthodox heterosexual priests remain.

And of course, here's the kicker: the laity won't remain. They've left Catholicism since 1965 by 100s of millions, literally. But now it is the turn of the remainders. The Remnant. You are a father or a mother of kids you want to raise in righteousness (justice, God-fearing and God-respecting), and after much searching you found a TLM or a N.O. that at least truly tries to be orthodox. And BANG! the bishop removes your parish priest for Non-Compliance to Gay Inc.'s demands. What are you going to do? By DEFINITION, the replacement can't be orthodox or a real believer (or he would fear God too much to do such a blasphemous thing). Solution: Vote with Your Feet. Leave. Soon, the mainstream Church will only have "Church Ladies" (a.k.a. "Karens"). The carnal vampires that are 'Gay, Inc." certainly won't fill the pews. Haha, NO ONE in his right mind would think they would, even for a second.

So, Amici, my friends, the only question is:

How do we break the "Roman Catholic Church" free from the Synodal "Changeling" Church? Will Bishop Strickland be the only one (I doubt it, but Grace accomplishes miracles) to stand up and say, "I announce and promulgate, as heir of the Apostles, that Jorge Mario Bergoglio has abandoned the chair of Peter and the See of Rome, and my banishment is null and void, and I call ALL the "cancelled" priests to me to accept faculties that I will bestow on them to confect the sacraments, either by the Novus Ordo or the ancient, glorious Vetus Ordo."

So, who will this be? Strickland? Schneider? Schneider's Archbishop, Tomasz Peta? Some African bishop, or bishop's conference? Probably one of the latter.

However it is to be done, it has to be done. And the sooner the better. No more Professor Kwasniewski fence-sitting.

          AnP

False Pope Creating a False Church because Good Catholics Will Not Stop Him

 Amici,

Whatever Jorge Mario Bergoglio is creating in Rome via his "Synod", now extended apparently a number of years (we'll never get rid of it! You KNOW it is "Vatican III") – whatever it is, it is not the Catholic Church.

How obvious is this? Just reading, even skimming, some of the stuff going on at that Synod strikes me as completely alien to EVERYTHING Catholic. So, clearly, the false pope is creating a false Church.

Can we be remotely surprised?

Yes, Bergoglio is creating a false Church via his "Synod on Synodality". And good men like Cardinals Burke, Müller, bishops such as Bishop Athanasius Schneider, and of course a host of Conservative Catholics (Fr. Gerald Murray and Robert Royal are exemplars) and Trad Catholics – too numerous to count, but Professor Peter Kwasniewski is an excellent example, are letting him do it.

They're letting Bergoglio get away with it because they insist he is a valid pope, and actually occupies the cathedra of St. Peter. As I've written a number of times, Bergoglio is painfully obviously not a pope, and has never acted like one, so therefore insisting he is a valid pope leads inevitably to cognitive dissonance. You'll go cross-eyed insisting this fool – and no, I'm not very nice to "Bergi" – is an actual pope. In fact, you'll lose your faith if you insist on maintaining the charade.

Video Tells All

Ever see see that video of Bergoglio nine years ago walking along a hallway, spying two young altar servers, one with his hands in the classic prayer position? Bergoglio says something, then stops, and physically pulls the boy's hands apart, saying "Are your hands bound together? Seems like they're stuck." That little scene, right there, affirmed my growing suspicions and I've never believed he was pope after that. (If I ever really believed it before.)

He wears a diabolical pectoral cross, too, as I've written here.  And the man has consistently proven he is not a pope, nor a Catholic, and not even a Christian. Yet all these good men noted above insist he is actually pope and must be "resisted". Don't they comprehend doing that is driving a stake through the heart of the papacy? If it survives Bergoglio's wrecking ball at all, it will be stunted, shackled, and marginalized. Thanks to them.

And so will the Church.

Now, Ann Barnardt and her friends insist Benedict XVI did not validly resign in the first place. I think they make excellent arguments. Archbishop Viganò makes the superb argument that Bergoglio accepted his election without intending to serve as pope's are supposed to; it would be like a marriage being declared invalid because one of the partners had no intention of keeping any of his vows in the first place. Both these arguments are splendid, indeed, but for me, I think it is simply, horrifically blatant that there's nothing papal about this lout. So, GET HIM OUT! And any argument that can effect that is a most excellent argument, indeed!

Otherwise, all these well-meaning folk will do as much damage to Holy Mother Church as Bergoglio himself, and ALL his perverted peeps, are doing.

          AnP

In His Sardonically Titled "Traditionis Custodes" Bergoglio Declares War Against Trads

 Friends, a chairde,

Judy Martin sent me the info on what Bergoglio has done and I've just read The Remnant Newspaper article by Prof. Peter Kwasniewski. I urge all to read it. One can feel his utter shock, his utter amaze, throughout. I am amazed, but not shocked. I'm too jaded for that, too cynical, too Irish. However, we need to thank the Lord of Hosts that Bergoglio is stupid enough, and brazen enough, and prideful enough to show his true colors at last as he throws the helm of Holy Church hard over into a Maelstrom of utter chaos.

Bergoglio moved too soon (maybe he was told he's not much longer to live?)

I urge everyone to read Prof. Kwasniewski's piece. And take note of this line: "Can we not see here the utter breakdown of the hyperpapalism that makes the pope a mortal god, a divine oracle, who gets to rewrite liturgy, theology, morals, and even the record of history in pursuit of ideology?" Bergoglio is indeed acting like a mortal god and divine oracle. No. We must say NO to this.

From the point of view of propping up a tottering institution, Bergoglio has made a dreadful mistake. As a disciple of Sun Tzu, I know when one wants to go to war, one has to carefully weigh the odds. This is essential. To do that, one must have a clear idea of the terrain and the opponent. The Germans and the Japanese didn't do this careful weighing before starting WWII because they were led by madmen, as Red China currently is. You don't start a war you can't win. The Southerners did that in 1861. Bergoglio is mad. As. A. Hatter. He can't win against the TLM firstly because it is clear, as Bishop Athanasius Schneider said some time ago, that the restoration of the TLM is a work of the Holy Ghost and cannot be stopped. But secondly, purely in human terms, the "Reform of the Reform" has simply advanced far, far too far for him to try to stop it. So, in effect and if I may quote Shakespeare, Bergoglio, with Até come hot from Hell has cried "Havoc!" and let slip the dogs of war.

Please be clearly advised:

Jorge Bergoglio has revealed himself to be an illegitimate pope, an anti-pope. Listen, my friends, this is no time for the usual mainstream Catholic Church's attempt to play "nice" with heretics. I don't care how many bishops accept Bergoglio's election: you judge the tree by its fruits. (St. Matthew 7:15-20) Maybe this cold, pitiless slap down by Bergoglio will finally "wake up" such people?

Plenty of the cowardly, unmanly bishops (many of them homosexuals) will support him but as Dr. Kwasniewski writes, Bergoglio's nasty tone in his letter and motu proprio, his mercilessness, his callousness, his heartlessness toward the feelings of tens of millions of Catholics is unprecedented; I suspect it will turn off all but the most card-carrying Modernist bishops. It is clearly an over-reaction generated by intense fear (and loathing). Understanding this fact is the key to successfully fighting it. Always remember the hallmark of the Modernist Revolution was not to be too brazen, too heavy-handed; instead, its gambit was to be content with disingenuous lies and side-attacks: asymmetrical warfare, in effect. That was often the method the Reformers used in the Protestant Reformation. Always a continual two steps forward and one step back, exemplified by the loquacious Vatican II double-speak documents. This Traditionis Custodes motu, however, throws such sly caution to the winds.

Bergoglio has "come out"

Bishops have to take sides. "Bergi" has come out; now they must, as well. No more "playing both ends against the middle." For example, Bishop Brennan in Columbus or Callahan in La Crosse, Wisconsin (who just removed Fr. James Altman's faculties), and of course "Nighty-night" Tobin in NJ and Cupich the Worm in Chicago, and that utter fool in San Diego, those will embrace Bergoglio's vomit. They'll actually jump at the chance to lap it up (Brennan might be cautious about St. Leo's; we'll just have to see. It depends on how much Brennan wants to kiss up to the Argentine.) But obviously to embrace vomit is to cover yourself with putrid regurgitation.

I suspect the backlash that's just starting today will be overwhelming. Bergoglio is out in the open now; no more hedging. Many, many commentators (like Taylor Marshall just recently) argued that Bergoglio wouldn't go "full nuclear" at all, but be more careful and insidious about it. Marshall argued that he had inside Vatican sources who said Bergoglio was going to only allow bishops to take over Trad parishes, and that the recent events in the Dijon archdiocese were the forerunner of that. Well, now, today, the egg is on their faces. Bergoglio actually flipped the nuclear switch. Yet as Marshall and others have so often said, however, were Bergoglio to go "full Stalin" all heck would break loose, and in that, at least, they're right.

Game Changer

My friends, amici, this is a game changer. All bets are now off. All the miserable "church-ladies" in Modernist parishes who tattle to the bishop when a parish priest does something too traditional, all that sort, have been "running" the average diocese in the U.S. for decades, but this, this is not such a "death by a thousand cuts" "war of position." This maneuver is to slap down the most faithful Catholics, most attending-church-Catholics, those Catholics having large families and living the Catholic life – most significantly of all, these are the Catholics who went to Holy Mass, or clamored for it, during the insidiously evil lockdowns.

I've written many times that the "official" Catholic Church, a toothless, emasculated organization (not unlike the "official" IRA, come to think of it) faced the Covid Fraud and just dried up and blew away. The Church that had faced emperor Diocletian, the Black Death, Nazism, Attila the Hun, the Viking slavers, Martin Luther, John Calvin, Huitzilopochtli, Queen Elizabeth Tudor, Xipe Totec, and Xochipilli, the Church that faced off the Know-Nothing Party in the 1840s – the Church that did all that, in the face of the fraudulent "plandemic" Covid, just closed shop and disappeared.

But the TLM part of the Church didn't surrender, and now this move of Bergoglio's is in no small measure punishment for the Trad Church's stand.

So, as so often happens, do one good thing and the Lord will give you a bigger good to shoulder. Support your TLM priests and orders, all of them; let them know you support them and Will. Not. Tolerate a Surrender to the Church of Bergoglio. He is not "mortal god" no "divine oracle". He should not be – in our minds – pope. He's out. The captain of a ship that tries to drive it onto the rocks must be relieved. A pope is supposed to support his bishops in holding and teaching the CATHOLIC Faith, which this "pope" clearly isn't, hasn't, and can't. Only God can truly remove Bergoglio in the full sense (and maybe the Argentine knows he's not got long to remain among us, this move is that desperate), but we can spiritually "vote with our feet" in Comrade Lenin's famous phrase, and not be part of this charade.

An Préachán