Bergoglio, Fernández, Apes of the Ape Church and Kinsey's Imp

Amici,

Alright. This latest revelation about "Tucho" "Kissy" Fernández serves as a klaxon call to get rid of the Apes of the Ape Church.

We can throw up our hands at the general apostasy, or we can see this as an unique opportunity. 

First of all, words can barely express the contempt I have for this Simian Dystopic Duo of Begoglio and "Kissy", a spiritual orangutan and his pet baboon. Yesterday's revelation is that "Tucho" – Bergoglio's chief doctrinal sheriff and Flying Monkey in Chief – wrote a scurrilous and blasphemous book involving certain aspects of human carnal activity, some of the "research" derived from a 16-year-old girl. Fernández has now admitted he wrote the book but would not write it now. Oh, really? No celibate loyal to his vows could know this stuff, and no remotely true-believing clergyman would dare even think of writing such filth. (The news about the 16-year-old girl by itself should get him fired.)

N.B. This is Alfred Kinsey-level depravity. Kinsey was one of the original "sexologists" back in the 1950s, but Kinsey himself was a sexual deviant and his "research" was utterly flawed, taking place mainly among prisoners and the carnally disturbed. Kinsey, and his "work" was utter trash, but it influenced the "Sexual Revolution" that swept through the 1960s and '70s, the decades that formed both Bergoglio and then later, Fernández. All this makes Fernández Kinsey's imp. (Both imp and baboon! "Kissy" is a real winner.)

Dopamine and Physical Reality

Fernández's idea postulated that this carnal activity allows heightened spiritual awareness, such as the Mystics wrote about, and therefore was good. Even sacred or holy. Truth is, certain carnal behavior releases dopamine, a neurotransmitter that sends messages to nerve cells, and it often causes pleasurable feelings. It is essential on various levels, and helps physiologically in certain human traits (ability to plan, to strive, to find things interesting). Dopamine is like a drug causing pleasure, like magic mushrooms or LSD or I dunno, whatever. And addictive aspect exists with it, as it does with adrenaline (also involved here). It in no way causes true spiritual experiences, any more than mushrooms or marijuana could. Biologists say it makes carnal activity pleasurable so that we are more likely to reproduce ourselves.

• So, something as prosaically natural as the urge for animals to reproduce is used by Fernández and who knows how many others to "make up" or constitute a religious experience, but only involves an actually naturally occurring chemical reaction. Fernández's basic idea, then, is utter bunk. 
• And it is blasphemous, arguing that God can be found in natural chemical reactions in the body, especially ones involving sin. I've seen one blogger, "Alphonsus", make the comment at a LifesiteNews article that this insults the Blessed Virgin Mary, who certainly didn't need or experience any of this to have the closest relationship with God of anyone in all created existence. Spot on.
  
• And it struck me that not only was he right, but also how so very Muslim this nonsense is. Islam teaches that the afterlife, the Garden of Allah, consists of nothing but men romping through harems of virgins every day, and that is "Heaven". And indeed, Islam teaches that Muhammad resides there in Allah's Garden with innumerable females, AND that he daily rapes the Blessed Virgin Mary. (I am not making that up.)
  

How are Fernández's sick fancies any more demented than that? In fact, they are kin.

Truth is: the Vatican II changes via "The Spirit of Vatican II" were all based on lack of faith in God, that Faith derived from the Faith of our fathers, and then propped on two stilts: Sex craziness and the Modernist "making up God", "evolving God ourselves to suit our carnal lusts". That's it. All the rest was window-dressing.

Now what? A Machiavellian observation

One would think that this is so horrifying, so simply standout putrid, that bishops the world over would demand, DEMAND, Fernández be fired, forced to resign. Again, I think the revelation that a 16-year-old girl was involved would force this outcome. Anthony Stine of Return to Tradition is certain that that will not happen: that Fernández will be there until Bergoglio finds out whether God really exists. Probably true, but I am not so sure. That 16-year-old girl news is horrific. It depends on what the bishops do. Don't laugh. As we have seen with Fiducia supplicans, a strong reaction (for the Vatican II Church) has developed against that document. This reaction is worldwide, but strongest in Africa. The Fernández revelation is like the second of a one-two punch, however; how outraged will the bishops outraged of Fiducia be now? Double? Treble? This could be, in short, a cascade event (i.e. "an inevitable, often unforeseen chain of events potentially resulting in a dangerous system failure").

From a purely Machiavellian point of view, I suspect this could easily happen. Really, Bergoglio's stupid gambit of bringing in Fernández to begin with – and BTW, it was one of Bergoglio's first acts as pope to see that Fernández was made a bishop back in Argentina – was a mistake. Sure, "Tucho" will do his master's bidding, no matter what, but Fernández comes with a LOT of baggage. How many more skeletons besides that adolescent girl are stuffed into Tucho's closet? This new one by itself is so over-the-top!

Any hue and cry that Fernández be removed will take up time, attention, and eat up whatever goodwill remains regarding "Pope Francis" among all the "pope-splaners". It will also incite Bergoglio's infamous volcanic temper. How might he react? Fernández's revelation reveals Bergoglio, making him out sharp and clear as an Ogre, a true Beast, a Dragon in God's vineyard. How can Bergoglio push his evil agenda with all this attention on him, and all the ill-will on the part of increasing numbers of Catholics?

Conversely, if Fernández stays, as seems more likely – maybe – he'll be the proverbial albatross around Bergoglio's neck. More like a millstone. In this context, too, only more so, for as above: Fernández will take up time and attention, eating up whatever goodwill remains regarding the tarnished "Pope Francis" among all the "pope-splaners". Fernández's revelation reveals Bergoglio in sharp detail, making him out cold and clear as a hideous Ogre, a true Monster, a scaly Dragon in God's vineyard. How can Bergoglio push his evil agenda amidst all this attention and all the ill-will on the part of increasing numbers of Catholics?

Either way this goes, in other words, Bergoglio loses power, prestige (I can't believe he has any), and tolerance for his papacy. 

For Us Catholics

That's Machiavelli. For those of us who try to be practicing Catholics, Bergoglio and his peeps are painting us into a corner. We have no choice now but to deny this guy's validity as a pope. NO POPE would treat God's Church to all this Hell. NO POPE would monkey around with the Faith as these monkeys have done. And that, in itself, is quite liberating. With every increase in monkey poo they throw at us, we can cast aside the endless cognitive dissonance the Vatican II Church and the "Bergoglio-is-a-true-pope" types try to impose on us. By their own acts, they reveal themselves. By their fruit ye shall know them. Thank God for that.

God rules. Jesus Christ established the Church for our salvation. We can – and I'm sure my readers do – pray for God to cast out these rebels and to restore His Bride, the Church, to her pristine purity. As He told Elijah, "I have kept 7,000 who have not bent the knee to Ba'al.' (1 Kings 19:18)

Amen to that.

  An Préachán

Oh Brave New WEF World that hath such Bug Eaters in it...

Friends,

One part of the current push to spark off World War III reveals itself in the goofy propaganda about eating bugs as a solution of the world's food crisis.

• This push doesn't come from governments per se, but rather non-governmental organizations that run the modern world's governments, entities such as the World Economic Forum. When a popularly elected government appears, as with Trump in 2016 or now Meloni in Italy or the new Swedish government, "the powers-that-be" raise all Hell to oppose them. (They tried "lawfare" for four years to remove Trump.) The truth is, we essentially live in a world run by ideological mafias.
  
• And by the way, that's why the danger of nuclear war stands much greater now than during the "Cold War". Actual governments ran that "cold war", love them or hate them. Ideological mafias do not even have to pretend to represent "the people".
  
• Therefore, now everything government-related consists of string-pulling by private actors working against the popular will. This is the result. (The past had a lot of that too, as with Freemasonry and powerful clubs like the Bank of England running imperial Britain, but today, it is out of control, and our civilization might fall because of it.)

But famine is coming, right?

Remember, the world's food crisis is wholly artificially created.

1. The lie, the utter false witness that the planet's agricultural people – farmers – cannot maintain "sustainable" farming, stands as a bigger, more monstrous lie then that Joe Biden was legally elected, or that Jorge Bergoglio is the actual pope.
   
2. It remains far more deadly in its scope, and indeed it involves the same lie as Global Warming/Climate Change. They are parts of the same Frankenstein pastiche of lies the mafias use to manipulate "the people".
   
3. Covid was a great test case, proving that liars can control billions of people. Because of the supposed, non-actual, soapy-science Climate Change, non-governmental actors are creating famine.
   
4. Look at what the Dutch government, run by Klaus Schwab's minions, is doing to Dutch farmers, some of the best agriculturists in the world.

Famine always overthrows mere governments, and it has often enough canceled entire actual civilizations. Famine is deadly to humans on multiple levels. Creating famine involves precisely the sort of thing evil masterminds who want to completely change the world would do. And we have plenty of those in the World Economic Forum, with its minions carefully seeded throughout Western governments. The Netherlands is a prime example of this, as are other agriculturally rich nations.

Eating Bugs is not Kosher

Dr. Sam Bailey has a video up here that everyone should watch. She gives a number of reasons why we should not eat bugs, and you need to know them because the pressure is inexorably rising to eat them. But as I wrote above, it is essential to know the behind-the-scenes context for this madness.

Assuming we survive the Biden Regime's rush to nuclear war, therefore, we always have the question, "What's for dinner?" Bugs must not be on the list.

Why? The primary reason undergirding all the others: We find eating small squirmy things and creepy-crawlies aberrant because it is not natural to us. We have to be conditioned or "groomed" for it.

1. We can eat certain bugs if we have to, but NO HUMAN CULTURE around the planet does so unless necessity demands it. And these are almost always "primitive" hunter-gatherer – meaning hand-to-mouth – survival cultures. The invention of agriculture in the remote past sent us in an alternative direction. Eating bugs would be an intentional reversal of the past 6,000 years of human "progress".
   
2. Many animals have hunter-gather cultures, as well. Crows have a degree of language and society, and they will eat "crow food" (as it is called in the excellent Warrior Cats novel series for kids; i.e. maggots, rotting flesh, certain insects) when they have no plentiful supply of their preferred victuals. That's generally true of predators. Birds of prey we know will only eat carcasses if they have to; vultures, however, seek out carcasses to eat as that is their nature. The people of no human culture eats far-gone rotting things outside of fermentation. That motivates the whole "horror" of the zombie myth: monsters eating rotten corpses is repugnant to us.
   
3. Chimpanzees will eat termites, cleverly using sticks as tools to access the termites, but again, will they pass up more standard Chimp fare if it is available?
   
4. Main Point: Hunter-gatherer societies, whether of animals or humans, will resort to eating bugs should necessity require it, but only in dire straights. Because of our nature, we all naturally refrain from eating insects and insect larvae if we can possibly avoid it. 6,000 years of agriculture has shaped human nature.

Contrary to Nature

One of the casualties of the modern world is the concept of Natural Law. Much mocked and derided, both by sexual deviants demanding access to innocents as well as average mainstream people, modern pagans seem driven to deny Natural Law's existence.

1. Currently, the anti-pope Bergoglio and his Theodore McCarrick-trained pimps are arguing for an abandonment of traditional Christian sexual morality. Their reason? Science. They claim "science" has proven homosexuality's equality with heterosexuality. In fact, this idiocy derives from the pseudo-scientific claptrap the infamous Alfred Kinsey (1894-1956) ginned up in his fraudulent "studies". Kinsey was the biggest fraud in "science" between Louis Pasteur and Global Warming, and the fact that this is not widely known shows how far the integrity of modern science goes.
   
2. Today, we live in moral chaos. On many levels. Certainly sexual. It mirrors exactly what we know of Sodom. Currently, the craze is "transexism". However, men are not women, nor women men. No amount of hormone "therapy" or plastic surgery can change that. To insist one can change one's sex is delusional to the point of psychotic.
   
3. Homosexuality, in the same vein, is abhorrent to those raised in traditional cultures imbued by nature and the natural law, cultures that grew and put down strong roots. Homoseuality, in contrast, always appears later, like a fungal rot in an dilapidated house, as a civilization decomposes. (A minister in the Spanish government, Irene Montero, says children should be allowed to have carnal intercourse with anyone they want.) It is as wrong as having carnal relations with animals would be. It's depraved.
   
4. Yet many modern people, raised as they tend to be in sanitary, air-conditioned cubicles – too often intellectually sanitized! – and inundated with Kinsey-derived lies about all things sexual, definitely exhibit a moral incomprehensibility in these matters.
5. I strongly suspect the whole "Eat bugs!" propaganda is sort of "Kinsey in the next stage of our cultural metastasis.
   

God didn't make us to eat bugs

Though most modern pagans would mock it, the Natural Law speaks clearly regarding this moral aspect of food. Humans cannot eat grass, for example. We can't do it, we're not made for it. Therefore a law mandating that we eat grass would be immoral. (Natural Law in a nutshell.) Insect eating, while possible, isn't our nature. This is codified in ancient dietary laws. Eating bugs is definitely not kosher, for example. This Chabad website (an excellent source for all things Jewish) explains how eating bugs is definitely not kosher.

So, in the modern world where we have supposedly risen above hunter-gather societies – although still not above allowing ourselves to be ruled by idiot shamans and futurist charlatans – we have NO reason to resort to eating bugs. That is, unless our elites create famine, which is exactly what they're trying to do.

General Reasons for Not Eating Bugs

Dr. Sam Bailey mentioned other good reasons, as well. Such as:

1. You are what you eat. Insects are scavengers. They're nature's "clean-up crews" as Dr. Sam says. The same is true with bacteria, of course. But bacteria are small enough the insane Bill Gates-Klaus Schwab madmen can't make the argument for us eating bacteria directly. (We actually have more bacteria cells in our bodies than human cells, as it is. We could not live without them. Antibiotic drugs kill them as well as harmful bacteria.) Dr. Sam references a science paper that investigated what bugs being raised for food themselves eat, and it is of course totally revolting; it is not anything a human would want in themselves – but it is natural food for insects. Feces, dead bugs and animals, moldy food, raw meat: all good bug viands; insects doing their natural clean-up duties eat this stuff. N.B. Insects often harbor parasites; I've seen video where a researcher removed a long, long parasite from the abdomen of a large wasp: the parasite was longer than the wasp! All these would be "ground up" along with the insects that are raised for food.
   
2. Chitin Speaking of grinding up: Insects exoskeletons are made up of chitin. Mainly found in lobsters and the like, in insects, it "may be present in amounts ranging up to 60% in special parts such as the flexible portions" according to one online source. Humans cannot metabolize it easily, though as Dr. Sam says we have some enzymes that can break it down. But studies show we have allergic reactions to it, as well. She details some of that and I've easily found reports on the internet about such reactions, as well. It's not a secret except to those who don't bother to do a little research. No, nobody eats lobster shell, but it is not possible to separate the chitin in insect exoskeletons during processing the insects, so we would be inundated with chitin if we widely ate insects. One can conclude, as I do on my own, that eating insects would produce all sort of bad reactions in humans because although some humans do indeed eat insects in restricted circumstances, that is traditionally out of necessity, as noted above. No human culture, I shouldn't wonder, will be found that eats bug out of choice. Dr. Sam also raises this point, and clearly it is grounded in basic human nutrition and food digestion.
   
3. Protein Humans have enough of a high protein diet as it is. Eating bugs is touted for being good for high protein diets, but as Dr. Sam points out, humanity is widely suffering obesity. And in any event, a high protein diet is already easily available without having to eat insects.
   
4. Eating bugs IS NOT REMOTELY necessary. All the talk about not feeding the Earth's human population is a stercus tauri ginned up by the Bill Gates-George Soros crowd hyping Malthusian/Paul Erlich "we're all going to starve to death" bubulum stercus propaganda that Erlich, for one, has been promoting since he published his 1968 book, "The Population Bomb". All this is a deception, as much a falsehood at Global Warming/Climate Change. In fact, as I noted in the beginning of this essay, they're tied together.
   

These four reasons not to eat bugs could be fleshed out further or new reasons added. Together with the primary reason regarding famine creation, however, it is simple enough to understand: we're being lied to and we have to stop the lies. We have to say, enough! As I write:

• Just say no to Climate Change. Say no to Covid. Say no to the 100+ year fraud of virology. Say no to a host of manufactured crises that they keep springing on us. (I'm going to have to add "and famines" after "crises".)
  

Bottom Line: The manufactured crises definitely include eating bugs.

   An Préachán

Psalm 146 of the Douay-Rheims: verse 9:

Who giveth to beasts their food: and to the young ravens that call upon Him.