Amici,
We keep arguing but in the end, we're mortally compromised because we accept the "rules of the con job", because we argue within the framework of "Big Medicine's" debate game, like playing a ball game by demented rules. For as long as we keep swallowing virology's 150-year-old lie that viruses cause disease, we're always, ever, eternally going to be battling NEW virus infections that will be hyped as "the latest thing" in the never-ending con job that "Big Medicine" and "Big Pharma" foists on us. The Bad Guys have every incentive to keep the con going.
For
myself, I never even imagined it was all a lie until I started honestly
listening to "the wackos" arguing that virus don't cause disease. I
though it stupid but I've always at least politely listened to "cranks",
and most of them were pretty "crankish" to coin a phrase. But what I've
learned over the past two years is just staggering.
Remove the tissue from its living matrix, which results in a profound effect: somehow you have to do a control to prove what you're looking at isn't a result of your just killing what you want to study.
And remember, you're making suppositions that may not be true!
Then soak it in alcohol and dehydrate it, or freeze it deep below zero, and mix it with heavy metal stains, shoot it with electron beams, producing gas bubbles or heavy-metal debris
Every step of the way, you have to control experiment to make certain you haven't deluded yourself; but remember, virologists stopped doing these controls and just assume that despite all this brutal preparation didn't change what your looking at!
That believing all this doesn't alter it is a pure act of willpower, not science. As Cowan says, "This is a profoundly disturbing and anti science.'
Second point: In the entire history of virology, they've never isolated or purified from the body fluids of ill people "viruses", i.e. the virons, the actual individual self-contained virion pieces of virus DNA/RNA as it must exist in the wild. This is why John Franklin Enders invented the ridiculous "cell-culture" isolation method in 1954. We can today isolate all sorts of things tinier than virus virion cases floating about using density gradient centrifugation or affinity chromatography (the method of separating a biomolecule from a mixture, based on a highly specific macromolecular binding interaction). But NOOOOoooo! Virologists instead insist on not using those methods, but rather they use the goo-making cell culture. Why? And they almost never run control experiments to check against the cell-culture isolation method. Why?
Covid
misrule continues apace, and the Biden regime keeps pushing for war
with Russia. The Canadian government looks to get nasty with the
Truckers, and the Olympic Games in China are hellish for the athletes
(Boo-hoo, what did they expect?), I read, while that devil Fauci keeps
pushing "vaccination" for kids.
We keep arguing but in the end, we're mortally compromised because we accept the "rules of the con job", because we argue within the framework of "Big Medicine's" debate game, like playing a ball game by demented rules. For as long as we keep swallowing virology's 150-year-old lie that viruses cause disease, we're always, ever, eternally going to be battling NEW virus infections that will be hyped as "the latest thing" in the never-ending con job that "Big Medicine" and "Big Pharma" foists on us. The Bad Guys have every incentive to keep the con going.
The
Church should be shouting from the rooftops how evil this is and
standing with the Truckers and anyone else fightinig for truth, as with
the NYC fire battalion chief's appeal to Cardinal Dolan.
But we pretty much only have the great Archbishop Viganò, God reward him.
Take only three points:
First:
Electron microscopes, which came "online" in the 1930s, only found
"viruses" because the researchers were looking for viruses, something
postulated in the 19th century but never proven to exist. From the
1930s, scientists found all sorts of stuff, but ALL of it dead (the
electron microscope can't see living matter), all colored with heavy
metals, all distorted in order to get clear images; but electron
microscopy cannot remotely show what it all looked like when alive.
As Dr. Tom Cowan explains in one of his videos, Do electron microscope pictures prove Sar-CoV-2 exists?, preparation for electron microscopy: process of making the electron microsopy pictures.
Remove the tissue from its living matrix, which results in a profound effect: somehow you have to do a control to prove what you're looking at isn't a result of your just killing what you want to study.
And remember, you're making suppositions that may not be true!
Then soak it in alcohol and dehydrate it, or freeze it deep below zero, and mix it with heavy metal stains, shoot it with electron beams, producing gas bubbles or heavy-metal debris
Every step of the way, you have to control experiment to make certain you haven't deluded yourself; but remember, virologists stopped doing these controls and just assume that despite all this brutal preparation didn't change what your looking at!
That believing all this doesn't alter it is a pure act of willpower, not science. As Cowan says, "This is a profoundly disturbing and anti science.'
Second point: In the entire history of virology, they've never isolated or purified from the body fluids of ill people "viruses", i.e. the virons, the actual individual self-contained virion pieces of virus DNA/RNA as it must exist in the wild. This is why John Franklin Enders invented the ridiculous "cell-culture" isolation method in 1954. We can today isolate all sorts of things tinier than virus virion cases floating about using density gradient centrifugation or affinity chromatography (the method of separating a biomolecule from a mixture, based on a highly specific macromolecular binding interaction). But NOOOOoooo! Virologists instead insist on not using those methods, but rather they use the goo-making cell culture. Why? And they almost never run control experiments to check against the cell-culture isolation method. Why?
BECAUSE THAT'S THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN "FIND" VIRUSES – BY MAKING THEM UP!
- Twenty years of effort, from the 1930s to the 1950s failed, and virology was a crashing science, a dead end. So, THEY JUST MADE UP what they wanted to prove.
Third: In the most extensive and,
admittedly crazily over-the-top, attempt in history to prove viruses
carry disease involved doing it directly, sick person to healthy person,
mouth to mouth, coughing in the healthy volunteers' faces and putting
snot, etc., from the sick into the healthy, they couldn't make it
happen. They even tried a bit of blood transfusion! This was in Boston
in 1919, and no one would let you try it today. (Well, maybe in China.
Or Fauci.) But try it they did and try as they might – and they had 100
naval volunteers and a LOT of people sick with the infamous, and deadly,
Spanish Flu – they couldn't make it happen.
- It was a dead an end as trying to find virions via electron microsopy!
This shouldn't even be being debated. Christine Massey's research via FOIA requests show
that NO FDA or Ministry of Health ON THE PLANET has purified virus particles! This Covid "plandemic" is a total clown show!
Bottom line:
The more one knows about this history of the charlatan 'science' called
virology, the more disgusting the virus theory of disease gets. Just. Stop. Attack the problem at its core and stop wasting time trying to move the ball in a game that is utterly rigged.
- Well, there is another option: embrace the suck by surrendering and going to Hell. The powers-that-be will happily dispatch you. Actually, Hell is what they're turning Earth into, fast. I see that they plan Global Warming passports for the near future.
An Préachán
