Coup d'état in the U.S.A.? Part III American History from 1960

A friend, commenting on who really runs the world, wrote me: "Maybe some day we will find out who is actually running the show."

Well, that's a great question. Who can answer it? I'll give a rough try, FWIW. I cannot help but be sarcastic, however, as world history since 1960 is absurd in the extreme. 

1. Satan and his peeps run the show in the overall scheme of things, of course, even now in the Vatican (people have known this for decades, even Paul VI famously asserted it about the "smoke of Satan..."; he wrote that in 1972; it was formally published in 2018). 
2. But I'm guessing the people on earth pulling the strings are the big bankers, and that would include BlackRock and Vanguard, who basically own most things. 
3. There's some old banking families that still are incredibly powerful, and George Soros (and now his son) probably fits in to that crowd one way or another. 
4. Whether the World Economic Forum is a joke or a serious Fascist-style takeover threat, remains to be seen.

Whatever else is true, the American people are no more sovereign in America than Charles is Sovereign in England. The American people don't want what they're getting. Yet they still get it good and hard. 

• This is a bitter irony because the idea underlying the existence of the U.S.A. is that its people are sovereign; i.e. not a king, nor an aristocracy, nor a plutocracy, nor a bureaucracy, and certainly not God (the U.S. Constitution pointedly does not mention God at all and excludes organized religion from any governmental role), but the people in general. The people are sovereign. This was the idea John Locke had and Jefferson, Madison, et al., promoted. Today, what we seem to have instead is an "Intelligence Service" bureaucracy government with a Potemkin Village "face" made up of the worst people imaginable, a "Kakistocracy"!

Take the following example. The American people proved what they wanted to do about the Vietnam War by voting in Nixon in 1968 and after he showed he was clearly getting us out of that war, they landslided him back in in 1972. His popular vote margin stood at +23.2%. The popular vote margin was 47,168,710 to McGovern's 29,173,222. Nixon carried every state except Massachusetts and the District of Columbia. (The District of Columbia is a joke; it's a Democrat Party prison-insane asylum: it should be dissolved or completely "demilitarized" with no "self-government" or vote for those who choose to reside there, and certainly no federal courts of any kind except the Supreme Court – all other lower federal court jurisdictions are created by Congress.)

Same again with Reagan in 1984. Popular vote for Reagan was 54,455,075 votes versus 37,577,185 for Walter Mondale. Reagan carried every state except Mondale's native Minnesota (and D.C. again, of course). In every other presidential election, the Republicans ran their establishment ("GOPe") candidates (Bob Dole, John McCain, the two Bushes) and either lost (first two) or narrowly won (second two). Clearly, the sovereign people rejected those clowns.

But the huge populist wins didn't matter. A Deep State coup d'état sent Nixon packing, and his vice president before him, so we had our first "installed" president, Gerald Ford (whom today we'd call a classic do-nothing GOPe "RINO" who lost his election bid in 1976). They tried to assassinate Reagan in 1981 only two months after he took the oath of office, and in his second term, they left him a total "lame duck" with Iran-Contra and a host of other garbage. As for Nixon, he himself did only a fraction of what Lyndon Johnson did, only Johnson was for more brutal and far-ranging in crime than Nixon. Nixon famously said, when asked about Kennedy's assassination, "I never wanted the office so badly that I'd kill for it." (Paraphrase, but pretty close.)

And that brings up Kennedy's assassination. The CIA hated him (see: Bay of Pigs), so did the Mafia. Nobody hated JFK, though, as LBJ did. JFK was a womanizer and drug addict (originally because of his hurt spine); the only admirable thing about Jack Kennedy next to his Navy service was his anti-Communist stance. LBJ, on the other hand, was a womanizer, thief, liar, personally more corrupt in government, far more corrupt, than the entire Kennedy family. But push came to shove. Jack was about to bunk out of Vietnam for a number of reasons – the British P.M. told him to get out, he didn't want to escalate American involvement – and esp after the South Vietnam's president, Ngô Đình Diệm, was brutally assassinated (a CIA-backed op) on November 2, 1963. A mere 20 days after Ngô Đình Diệm's death, Kennedy himself was killed. It was also about a week before Kennedy was going to accuse Lyndon Johnson of corruption. Gee, what a coincidence! Johnson was the most corrupt and downright evil man ever to be president, and dumber than Bill and Hillary combined; he was definitely in the pocket of the "military-industrial complex". (But you'd never hear that if you only read mainstream news.)

So there you have it. After Eisenhower's warning to the American people about the "Military-Industrial Complex" (now "Deep State") in this farewell address on January 17, 1961, we got an Asian war no one wanted or could explain, especially galling in light of what we ought to have learned in Korea a decade earlier. (Today we're friends with Communist Vietnam and ignore their atrocious human rights/religion violations.) Add to that any number of wars in the Mideast, one of which we left with our tail between our legs and tens of millions of dollars of military equipment behind, and now a war in Europe we seem hell bent on turning nuclear, no less – not to mention two coup d'états, the election of the two Bushes (ham-handed types much of the time, though the older was a naval aviator in WWII and the younger one once owned a baseball team, so there!), the senior Bush, George H.W. Bush, being the son of Nazi financier and WASP scion Prescott Bush, a banker, mind you, who became U.S. senator; replaced in 1992 by Bubba Clinton and his harpy lesbian wife, deadbeats who never worked a day in their lives, then a pot-head homosexual poseur whose father is unknown, and his "man wife" (c'mon; ever see Michelle's "package"?), also deadbeats who never worked a day in their lives – we don't even know what grades they got in college except reading Michelle's dissertation makes one realize 'she-he' has about a fifth-grade education level. And now we got a demented non compos mentis puppet who, back when he was actually alive, was also a deadbeat poseur who never worked a day in his life, and even plagiarized his academic and other writings, molested his own daughter, caresses and "handles" little girls on camera, and who shelters his crackhead porn-whore addicted son, both father and son clearly bought and paid for by the Chinese. The latter, to round this off nicely by returning to where we started, now owning the Vatican. (Smoke of Satan, indeed.)

And I haven't even mentioned abortion, yet. 

I mean, whoever is calling the shots for the U.S.A. must think we're all collective imbeciles for allowing this farcical farrago fatuity to continue five seconds! (The same, the exact same, could be said about the world's bishops in regards to Bergoglio.) Perhaps we are collective imbeciles, or perhaps we just have to be pushed far enough to finally snap and push back. I have no doubt "they" the Powers-that-Be are waiting for that very thing. We'll have to see. 

How much longer can this go on? Financially, these cretins though their mismanagement and endless wars have bankrupted the country. This can't go on forever. And the educational system is a catastrophe. Read this from Ann Barnhardt. Certainly, "If something cannot go on forever, it will stop." This laconic comment by Herb Stein, a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, may well describe our near-future. 

One way, or the other.

 

          AnP

More Covid Lies and Madness, Multiplied, and a Little U.S. History

Amici,

Covid. The news I'm hearing from friends about the "vaccine" distribution sounds like a classic S.N.A.F.U. situation all around, doesn't it? "Hey, we have a big deal, something really super important, so let's let government manage it!"

Yeah, that'll work. /sarc

Consider for a moment Anthony Fauci, who receives the biggest paycheck of anyone in government ($417,608 last year; and his budget is 10 times higher than when he first began), a guy landed in D.C. nearly 40 years ago, with the job to deal with AIDS, a disease still going strong, but just not talked about by the MSM. 2018 saw some 15,820 deaths of individuals having AIDS, although the CDC officiously says "These deaths may be due to any cause."  Oh? Is that true, now? And why doesn't the that say that about the Covid deaths, hmmm? Recent allegations are that the government has lied profusely about those. 

At least here one can sign a petition to force the government from forcing experimental "vaccines" on us.

Anyway, I'm assuming these are the Moderna or Pfizer mRNA "vaccines"? They're not "vaccines" at all, as Dr. Merrit (and others, such as Dr. Theresa Deisher) explained, and won't prevent a person from getting the virus. It doesn't prevent transmission. They actually create that "spike protein" pathogen in your body –  if it does even that. We don't really know that it does, actually. Only a few elites know what is really going on. Anyway, the spike protein is what kills you to begin with. However, we developed vaccines to begin with because we had no treatment for smallpox and polio. However, we have "cures" for Covid and other viruses in the Lysosomotropic drug family such as Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin. These work extremely well (if applied early, with no pussyfooting around). But the $69 BILLION vaccine business doesn't want you to know that! So, instead, they're going to rewrite everyone's DNA?

No, thanks.

Honestly, upon reflection, can anyone trust what the government says? My friends, this is a Serious Question. Think about it.

Some History:

• Early on in our lifetimes, President Eisenhower warned us in his farewell message about the military-industrial complex, or what we'd call today the "Deep State".
  
• The 1960 election was almost certainly stolen (people tend to focus on Chicago, but it was probably stolen in Texas, too; but according to the government and most historians, Jack Kennedy won).
  
• However, Jack Kennedy in power found out about "the Deep State"; it pushed him around and he was embarrassed by "Deep State" in the Bay of Pigs fiasco and then the assassination of Ngo Dinh Nhu, who was nothing less than the president of South Vietnam, our erstwhile ally). Then soon after that, Jack Kennedy himself was bumped off. And of course the government, about all this, said, "Nothing to see here; move along."
  
• Lyndon Baines Johnson then set up the hapless "show trial", the Warren Commission, to investigate the assassination – a murder which Johnson may well have arranged in the first place! – and of course the Warren Commission found "nothing to see here; move on". Then Johnson got us hopelessly "quagmired" in Vietnam – resulting in the strongest country on Earth bound hand and foot in a hopeless mess, a Fiasco SNAFU to beat all Fiasco SNAFUs, one that ended up killing 55,000 of our best young men – for Johnson to make out financially on his defense money kickbacks, according to various investigators.

• Then we get Nixon, whom they brought down because he ordered a cover-up on a crime he didn't order in the first place.
  
• Nixon, the coward, should have gone for a Senate trial and had his lawyers bring out ALL the dirty laundry of the Johnson Administration – which did far worse than Nixon's "plumbers" and, as well, what Vietnam was REALLY all about, and even go back to FDR's days when HE ordered the very stuff Johnson did to be carried out! (This is something Trump should do now, just unload on the Deep State, especially regarding this stolen election, which as I so often has said, will be ever more clearly proved in the coming months.)
  

• But no, "Tricky Dick" ran away.

• Then we got the utterly feckless Jerry Ford and Jimmy Carter. Carter had at least been a competent nuclear technician in the Navy, but he was hapless as president.
• Then when Reagan came in, everyone tried everything to get him out (I'll never believe the assassination attempt on Reagan was what it appeared to be, especially as it would have put the preppy, shallow George H.W. Bush, a "country club" Repub, into the presidential office), and so they tied up Reagan's second four years (he won 49 states, remember???) with the Iran-Contra idiocy. (N.B. The only reason the Republican elites let Reagan run was because he picked G.H.W. Bush as his veep.)
  
• Then we FINALLY got the feckless First Bush, "The Preppy One" (amazingly, also a WWII naval fighter pilot; one would never image him to be such) as president. He promptly lost to an empty headed, glad-handling/woman raping dirt bag, name Bill Blythe (oh, wait...).
• Then the feckless tool Clinton, a sexual clown of clowns, formerly Blythe, or whatever it was – and his harridan Commie wife.
• Then as if the FIRST Bush wasn't depressing enough, we got the feckless second Bush, eight years of that fiasco, and finally Obama, who literally sold out the country to the ChiComs and the Iranians. (Well, both Bushes and the Clintons were pushing China as well. Remember, only an utter, utter, utter economic IDIOT would move a country's manufacturing base to another country, because manufacturing makes ACTUAL wealth! 'Wealth' isn't money (unless the money is precious metals), 'wealth' is product, material goods that people what, things of value to them. So our high muckety-mucks are unspeakably stupid, or traitorous, or both.

• Now we've had an election stolen from us right before our eyes, even as we watched it on news shows and later on video, all as we literally watched accumulating tallies suddenly decrease and as we saw on video cameras boxes of ballots pulled out from under tables, etc. Now (as I predicted, I may boast) they're making even discussing the Vote Steal something illegal, trashing the First Amendment. They'll lock you up should you bring it up, but again, as I have said, evidence just keeps mounting and mounting. 

So, honestly, everyone, Amici, I ask you, in all seriousness: why would ANYONE trust the government?

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is on an anti-vax crusade, and has been for years. (I don't agree with all of that, but I'm open to evidence.) He says often that his father, Bobby Kennedy – "RFK" also assassinated way back in '68; he had dared to run against LBJ, of whom Nixon told Roger Stone: "Johnson and I both wanted the presidency, but I wasn't ready to kill for it" – think about that. Anyway, Bobby Kennedy used to tell his son, "Government lies to you."

Truer words were never spoken.

An Préachán

Truth About Islam and Fascism

Many folks, whether people of the Left or Middle, seem to argue that Trump's travel ban is xenophobic and racist and that it "demonizes" Islam. Also, that the travel ban (and many other issues) represent a turn of the United States toward "Fascism". 

The Mainstream Media is full of such commentary.

There's an underlying premise here in these arguments, and that is that all cultures are the same, in the end, because all people are the same, bottom line. Sort of like George W. Bush's idea that Muslims everywhere were really wanting "tolerant" Western-style democracies. (I'm sure the Left would find it abhorrent to have anything in common with Bush.) Or that Islam is a good thing, or at least no worse than, say, Methodist or Lutherans are. 

Bush insisted Islam was a good thing. After 9/11, Bush said "Islam" means "Peace". Of course it doesn't. It means "Submission." Somehow Bush didn't know that. (Or, more likely, didn't dare say it.)

In fact, today it is considered outrageous, colonial, racist, and God-knows-what-else to bring up any criticism of Islam.

This "we're all equal" is an underlying premise of all "multi-kulti" ideas. For example, a Leftist I know wrote, "sctotus has just approved trump's ban of travel from seven muslim countries. this is worse than islamophobia, it's demonisation of islam," [sic]

To that I'd answer in specifics:

A: The majority of Muslim nations are not on the travel ban.

B. Many exceptions exist even for the countries that are on the ban.

C. We don't need to "demonize" Islam. It does that itself. Check this article out:

An excerpt: This Cost of Non-Europe report argues that since 2004, terrorism has cost the EU about €185 billion in lost Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and around €5.6 billion in lost lives, injuries, and damage to infrastructure.

Now that is, of course, a bottom line that Western intellectuals and leaders have to finally come to terms with. And they must do so whether they like it or not, or whether it is politically correct or not. It is also a bottom line that the actual European-born people have to actually pay -- in money (and in blood)!

And it is insane. Europe is -- purely in financial terms, leaving aside all the personal pain and cultural disruption -- bleeding itself to death trying to keep local Muslims in control, and more Muslims out. The next couple of decades will decide whether Europe continues to exist at all, and that is the ultimate "bottom line".

So no, no non-Muslim needs to demonize Islam. Far too many Muslims (a minority, but a large minority) are only too willing to demonize it themselves. Therefore, it seems the underlying premise that Muslims are no different than anyone else is flawed. (This naturally refers to the aggregate, not various individuals you may know, or think you know.)

Personally, I've been studying Islam (and the monotheistic religions in general) for a solid 40 years now, and all I can say is that someone who has not read the famous philosopher, mystic, and theologian Al-Ghazali (the Gazelle) 1058 – 1111, or who isn't conversant with the battle between the Asherites and the Mutazilites that went on from the two centuries before Al-Ghazali, just doesn't know enough about Islam to say much of anything.

In fact, I'd go so far as to say it is cultural imperialism NOT to study and understand all this. If you don't study Islam, you don't respect it. Ultimately, far too many Westerners think both religion and philosophy unimportant -- all religions, all philosophy. They could not be more wrong.

This is extremely important. The Asherites won that battle and Islam became essentially an anti-intellectual creed, and this manifests itself today in myriads of ways. The famous Spanish Muslim philosopher Ibn Rushd (Averroes, 1126 - 1198), born only 15 years after Al-Ghazali died, his life is also extremely important to know, as how he suffered when the Asherites finally came to Muslim Spain. It's the reason ibn Rushd was the last famous Muslim philosopher.

The other issue I'd bring up is "Fascism". Mussolini coined the term post-WWI, when he, an old-time Communist, created the whole Fascist idea, crossing Socialism with Nationalism. Fascism isn't something of the "Right" but the Left. Hitler was once asked why, since he was a National Socialist, he didn't nationalize the German companies. He laughed and said he had nationalized the German people, and so didn't need to nationalize the companies.

And ironically, the first true Fascist state was created in the United States when then President Woodrow Wilson took the U.S. into World War I. It became a crime to criticize that decision, and U.S. citizens who were German-speakers were penalized and spied on, and children in school (not just German-speaking kids) were encouraged to spy on their parents. The Irish in the US were also singled out this way. 

Woody was a Democrat, too, not a Republican.

Of course, the word "fascism" hadn't even been coined yet.

Now we have massive evidence that the Obama administration "weaponized" the IRS, the FBI, the CIA, and so  on, to spy on Americans involved in political campaigns. People used to make fun of Trump for saying he was spied on. Turns out he was spied on. But this also happened "back in the day". Lyndon Baines Johnson used the FBI to spy on the Nixon campaign, but Nixon, in his turn, hired private contractors to do that, and he was caught and "Watergate" ensued, but LBJ, who "weaponized" the FBI then, and who got us massively involved in Vietnam, was never brought to account.

In other words, "fascism" is a useless term to toss around, except as a weapon. I used to like Garrison Keillor, the US public radio "Prairie Home Companion" funnyman. But then about four or so years ago, before he was brought down by a sexual harassment allegation, I heard him say of Republicans that they were "Brownshirts in pinstripes".

Nothing could be more grotesque, nothing more stupid, nothing more asinine.

Nothing, in short, could be more ignorant. And damning.

RC