Article: Pope Francis’ fight against the Latin Mass is ‘a fight against the Church’

Amici,

LifeSiteNews has a great essay up that a German priest, Fr. Heimerl, wrote, titled "Pope Francis’ fight against the Latin Mass is ‘a fight against the Church’" Read it here. It is extremely insightful, and I highly recommend it.

A huge THANK YOU for this article, LifeSite, and to Fr. Heimerl ! The Old Mass, the TLM, could in no way represent the "NuChurch" that the Modernists at Vatican II wanted to create, so it had to go. Of course it did. THAT'S why Bergoglio so hates the TLM. It stands in his way. And he will stop at nothing to achieve what he wants. Rumor has it he fully intends to officially, full-stop, BAN the Traditional Latin Mass. That'll put the fox among the chickens. His time to create his Synodal Church is short, and every day might be his last. The Argentine Luther had to wait till he could stuff Benedict into the back of a van, but he charges on full steam ahead now.

A Schism is coming. A Schism is coming because it already exists, and has existed de facto since Vatican II; it just took a while for us to "get our bearings". Like someone just waking up in a strange environment, or after an operation, it takes a moment to get one's bearings. It took even Archbishop Lefebvre a few years to fully realize what was happening and the extent of the betrayal. And it WAS a betrayal of the Catholic faithful. A betrayal by the cocky Modernists who knew most Catholics were so conditioned to "pray, pay, and obey" that they would soldier along with it, at least up to the point. (Everyone has a breaking point.) So, no wonder about Ottaviani and Bacci, powerful orthodox Cardinals Fr. Heimerl mentions who confronted Paul VI about all this, but ultimately didn't call for his excommunication. Raised as loyal sons of the old Church, they could not bring themselves to do the needful.

Now, today, however, we have NO EXCUSE. Sixty years of facing lavender firing squads taking potshots at us, we know all too well what's happening. No. More. No more bleating sheep-like, "Baa, baat the bishop says so-and-so!" No more Disney princess bishops at all or histrionic priests flamboyantly auditioning at the Cranmer table "altars". No more "Prayers of the People" that seem to channel Leftist party talking points or the trendy social causes du jour. No more tolerating the destruction of the Holy Catholic Church. Zero tolerance. Start it saying in your own minds. Then tell family and friends, then priests and bishops. Say a prayer for the strength to grasp it and to admit it.

Some bishops, even one, will have to openly declare Bergoglio in Schism. I doubt Burke or Müller would. Maybe they might over women deacons; Viganò would. And sure, Bergoglio would rage, and excommunicate left, right, and center, but it is clear to anyone with two cents of a brain that Bergoglio himself is the innovator, the challenger, the heretic.

And that even as it morphs into the "Synodal Church", the Vatican II Church has finally manifested itself as the infamous, but prophesied, "Ape of the Church".

Thanks again to LifeSiteNews amd Fr. Joachim Heimerl.

        AnP

Article on How Depraved Bergoglio Is, and His End Game, by Henry Sire

Amici,

So, now we know. It was all a gambit to change the method the College of Cardinal elects a holder of the papal office. No more Josef Ratzingers or Karol Wojtyłas. Just either ogres like Bergoglio or wimps like Paul VI from now on out.

Friends, with the whole Bergoglio freak show is reaching its apex; Henry Sire, the Church historian, has an article at OnePeterFive published that is truly, really, and most sincerely a "must read" for Catholics. 

It reveals much about how unscrupulous a Machiavellian politician Bergoglio is now and in fact has always been, and how simply ruthless and wildly dangerous the man is to the Catholic Church, and to anyone, really, who gets in his way. Read the article for details. 

Lots and lots of details and particulars to be reflected upon, but wow: Sire reveals the end-goal, what all the pain Bergoglio has put us through is about: and that is to change the way popes are elected. Excerpt:

This was the disclosure of a plan to change the rules for the papal conclaves so as to introduce the participation of lay people, including women. What this showed us was that the point of the preceding Synod had not been the document to emerge from it, but the process itself. It was designed to soften up the Church for a revolution in the papal election. Thus we had had bishops making declarations like: “It will be impossible from now on to hold a Synod without lay participation.”

Popes elected by laity mixed with cardinals? Women? And you know it would be "Catholic" women equivalent to Harvard's president, Claudine Gay (important news regarding here).

Sire makes no predictions except to say it will only get worse. I myself, for whatever it is worth, would say that should this actually eventuate, the Schism in the Church will be finally formalized; i.e. a good number of Cardinals will not participate, or conclave among themselves and elect a pope that way, one against the mainstream Church. Think about it. Who in the Church would accept a "Bergoglio-pope" imposed without the smoke and mirrors, all the chaff and counter-measures veiled via a traditional "election"? This would be truly slapping Catholics "in your face" and smashing them into "shut up and take it" territory. 

Such a carefully lavender Mafia groomed individual would be naturally very naive and pliable, or easily blackmailable, or yet another "modernist" like Bergoglio, and probably callous and shallow in the extreme. It's one thing to argue Bergoglio was – or was not – validly elected. It's another to change the election process of a thousand years and simply install someone no one can trust to do anything but wreak more havoc. It would be like the Deep State cockroaches running Joe Biden suspending the Electoral College and just declaring Biden re-elected. (They're actually close to this now, trying to install illegal aliens into the U.S. military and allowing them to vote in federal elections.)

This rebellion against such an "election" would include more than Traditional Catholics, but we Trads are the tip of the halberd here. As Sire writes:

A corollary of this is (Bergoglio's) drive against tradition. Pope Francis realises perfectly well that the only real obstacle to his revolution comes from traditionalists in the Catholic Church, the only element with any backbone prepared to recognise that the emperor has no clothes. Hence the campaign he has waged throughout his pontificate against so-called “rigid” and “backward” Catholics, whom he derides at every opportunity.

So, there you have it, my friends. The Church's eleven Purgatorial years of this buffoon blatantly imposing ecclesiastical Hell-on-Earth finally making sense: it was all a gambit to change the method the College of Cardinal elects a holder of the papal office. A method to establish the "Ape of the Church" forever.

One thing would be true, at least. The "Conservative" Catholics and "mainstream Trads" won't be throwing the words sedevacantism/sedevacantist and schism/schismatic around as bombs at  those of us who have seen this fiasco from the get-go.

           AnP

Anti-Church Bergoglio openly declares heresy in Candlemas discourse; British priest video must be seen

 Amici,

Okay, this is it. On Candlemas, February 2, in a general audience, no less, The Great Heretic, a.k.a. Pope Francis, a.k.a. Bergoglio, a.k.a. Pachamamapapa, gave an address in which he openly preached out-and-out heresy. See the LifeSiteNews article here for details. 

An example:

Continuing his theme, Pope Francis posed himself a question about membership of the communion of saints. “‘Father, let us think of those who have denied the faith, who are apostates, who are the persecutors of the Church, who have denied their baptism: are these also at home?’,” he asked.

“Yes, even these, even the blasphemers, all of them. We are brothers: this is the communion of saints. The communion of saints holds together the community of believers on earth and in heaven.”

“Let us think, dear brothers and sisters: in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature; only the way of being together with each one changes, but nothing and no one can break this bond,” Pope Francis said.

AnP again:

Forsooth, dar Crom, who knew? Apparently, God Himself can't "separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature; only the way of being together with each one changes, but nothing and no one can break this bond" and apostates and blasphemers and persecutors of the Church (who, himself?) all "go to Heaven", "Heaven" meaning eternal being in the intimate presence of God, enjoying the Beatific Vision.

Right.

• And as I understand it, this is NOT about repentant apostates and blasphemers and persecutors. To repent, one has to know one is a egregious sinner, and Bergi's Anti-Church has no egregious sinners, none, that is, except "rigorous" Trad Catholics.

This fat-head moralizing "We're all 'saved'" drivel is sparking utter outrage and many are denouncing Bergoglio for preaching true heresy. He's been doing that in myriad ways, of course, since his installment.

• (N.B. I can't say "election", not because I have any authority to say it was a fraud, but common-sense insists Bergoglio is not a true pope for, after all, "By their fruits ye shall know them", St. Matthew 7:20.) But this time, in a rather formal setting, in his chair, he reads out this complete anti-Gospel. Bergoglio is not just an anti-pope, he's the rightful "pope" of the anti-Church.

Let me repeat that: Jorge Mario Bergoglio isn't a proper pope of the Catholic Church, but he sure is the pope of the Anti-Church.

Bishop Fulton Sheen used to preach this was coming, and here he discusses the anti-Church in "Signs Of Our Times": Ven. Fulton Sheen on Anti-Christ & Crisis in the Church & Society (1947 - radio).

Bishop Sheen talks about the anti-Church, the "Ape of the Church" as the Devil is the "Ape of God" at 8:15 minutes in.

"It didn't begin with Francis." – Father James Mawdsley

But we've a new voice saying what needs to be said, as well.

Excerpt from the above link:

"What is happening is evil beyond description. Sit back and consider, the highest power on Earth is attacking the greatest good on Earth, precisely when it is his job to defend and preserve tradition and pass it on to the next generation."

Many thanks to The Remnant Newspaper site for allowing us to listen to Father James Mawdsley, a "British traditional Catholic priest who was once imprisoned and tortured in a Burmese jail, is openly challenging Pope Francis’ efforts to suppress the Church’s ancient Roman liturgy". Fr. Mawdsley does NOT mince words here. Read the article but be absolutely sure to listen to Fr. Mawdsley's video, toward the bottom of the article. If ever there was a "must hear" video, it is this one. (How different the Church would be if had many more priests like this!)

Another excerpt: (3:25 minutes in) "Nobody has the right to attack Tradition. The bulk of Catholics don't care because they don't know what's happening here. They don't come to Mass anymore anyway. For 70 years they've been robbed. We might not understand if we simply think the pope is attacking the old Mass. The fact is, the pope is attacking God's revelation. That should matter to everybody. To reject tradition is to reject Christ. We know it would be evil to change the Scriptures. ... The truth of Christ comes through both Scripture and Tradition, and just as it would be evil to change the Scriptures, so it is to obstruct Tradition."

Then, referring to the hierarchy, Fr. Mawdsley quotes St. Matthew, 23:13:

“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the door of the kingdom of heaven in people’s faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to."

Apparently this video was released before yesterday's Candlemas outrage was uttered. If so, it is truly prophetic.

Pass this all along to family and friends, priests especially. If somehow you have access to a bishop, he needs to hear this, and he needs to remember Saint John Chrysostom's warning that most bishops go to Hell. It's one thing for an arch-heretic to dance his pompous masque; it is another for bishops to sway to the music.

An Préachán