Search This Blog

Monday, December 24, 2018

Christmas and Incarnation: What Does It Mean? Christmas readings and thoughts

Christmas is about the Incarnation, the central mystery and most profound revelation of Christianity. God becomes a human person, Jesus / Joshua: Yeshu'a (Yehoshu'a: "Yahweh is salvation").

Stunning. We who grew up with it are too used to it, perhaps, and "pop" religion brings Jesus down to a magical free-escape ticket from Hell, an nonjudgmental hippie or guru figure offering the certainty of "rapture" or even a Pentecostal nirvana-state in which to lose one's self in here and now. But Christianity is not a "get out of jail card" for a Narcissistic self, and the Incarnation is the most stunning revelation in any religion anywhere. If you don't "get" the Incarnation, you won't truly grasp the significance of the Crucifixion and Resurrection, both of which are dependent on the Incarnation.

The Incarnation is the most radical idea revealed to the world since Moses asked God His Name. The Incarnation is a teaching that stood Judaism on its head and split it in pieces from the moment Jewish leaders understood what Jesus of Nazareth was claiming, while Islam has ceaselessly ceaselessly fought against it with fire and sword and slavery and slaughter.

Christianity is unique to the three Monotheistic religions because it insists on the Incarnation, on God becoming Man. Judaism rejects this teaching with horror, as does Islam, to such an extent that Islam can be said to exist in order to deny the Incarnation. Islam exists on many levels, of course: politically as a Herrenvolk religion, designed to enable a few to rule masses of subjected peoples; it is an economy, too and originally a slave economy: it emptied cites through slavery and closed trade in the Mediterranean except for slavery, in the process destroying the Late Ancient/Early Medieval European world, funding the Viking Age and reducing the Cradle of Civilization to a vast dustbowl; and finally Islam exists as a political and juridical system. But as a religion per se, from its oldest existent writings on the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem down to its latest murder, Islam's main point is to deny the Incarnation.

Historical Christianity, traditional Catholicism and the Orthodoxies, teach that the Incarnation was necessary to transform our human nature by the Infusion of Grace the Incarnation made possible, for in taking on human Nature, God elevated it. God changed our natures. Transformed us "pro multis", those of us participating in this Salvation through Baptism and the other Sacraments. In the process, the world itself and all that's in it is also transformed. The Lord God, through His Incarnation, is still creating, He is Re-creating. As St. Anselm (see further below) put it, Creation's "lost beauty [is] endowed with inexpressible new grace." Christians are re-created. This is Salvation. Faith isn't a "leap in the dark" of fevered belief, especially not belief against evidence, but one's conscious intellectual acceptance of the truths that the Universal Church, East and West, has taught from the beginning.

Christmas should not therefore be merely the celebration of "God's birthday", the birth of Yeshu'a in Bethlehem. It's nothing less than the source-point of Yahweh Is Salvation, the Re-Creation of Creation. As the 1962 Missal translates part of the Offertory from the Latin: "O God, who in creating human nature, didst wonderfully dignify it, and hast still more wonderfully restored it, grant that, by the mystery of this water and wine, we may become partakers of His divine nature, who deigned to become partaker of our human nature."

And the Incarnation must necessarily be about Mary, too, whose fiat made the Incarnation possible. Mother and Child are inseparable. Then, and now, at Christmas. And the Cross.

The God Whom earth, and sea, and sky
Adore, and laud, and magnify,
Whose might they own, whose praise they tell,
In Mary’s body deigned to dwell.

O Mother blest! The chosen shrine
Wherein the Architect divine,
Whose hand contains the earth and sky,
Vouchsafed in hidden guise to lie.

Blest in the message Gabriel brought;
Blest in the work the Spirit wrought;
Most blest, to bring to human birth
The long desired of all the earth.

O Lord, the Virgin-born, to Thee
Eternal praise and glory be,
Whom with the Father we adore
And Holy Ghost for ever more.

Text: Venantius Fortunatus 530-609 (As found in my Little Office of the Blessing Virgin Mary; see also: https://www.hymnsandcarolsofchristmas.com/Hymns_and_Carols/god_whom_earth_and_sea_and_s.htm for sheet music, etc.)

A few of the Incarnation's meanings as found in the New Testament: The Elevation of the human race, Theosis as the Greeks call it, is what Saint Paul calls being made a new creation in Christ. More than a metaphor, it is absolutely necessary and central to salvation.
•    God’s Incarnation didn’t lower God but rather elevates human nature, enabling…
•    "Theosis" (Divinization) which by grace – not by nature – is our incorporation into Christ, raising us up to participate in His Divinity (as St. Peter teaches in 2 Peter 1.4). Usually described in the Western Church as an Infusion of Grace, our natures are changed, whereas Protestantism teaches Imputation of Grace: i.e., God assigns or imputes grace to us but doesn’t actually divinize or change our nature. (Luther explained the Protestant teaching via his famous "manure pile covered in snow" metaphor. C.S. Lewis carefully disagrees with this central Protestant idea in the 10th of his Letters to Malcolm, Chiefly on Prayer.)


This Theosis teaching is stated in many ways throughout the New Testament. Examples:
•    John 1:12 “But to all who received him, who believed in his name, he gave power to become children of God; 13 who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God.” (Obviously, a new creation)
•    2 Cor 5:17, “Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!” (Again, a new creation) 2 Peter 1:4 might well put it best; see also Romans, 6:4, 7:6, 12:2; Galatians 3:27; Ephesians 4:22-24; Colossians 3:8-12.

•    St. John refers to it explicitly. Gospel of John 3:3-8, the famous "born again" passages, read from the Historical Church's understanding instead of the Protestant one. One is born anew in Baptism, via the water and the Spirit, a new creation, born of the Spirit.
•    Two Old Testament examples: Isaiah 65:17; Ezekiel 36:25-26
•    Much is asked of this New Man, this New Creation. In general, note how Our Lord seems to demand the impossible of “ordinary” humans. In Matthew 5, during the Sermon on the Mount, Our Lord gives the Beatitudes, then says we are “salt of the earth” and “light of the world”, discusses how He has come not to do away with the Law and the Prophets, but to fulfill them. Christ discusses elevated behavior regarding anger, adultery, divorce, making oaths and not retaliating (“turn the other cheek”) and love our enemies. He ends with "You, therefore, must be perfect, as your Heavenly Father is perfect." (5:48) That is something manifestly impossible for “normal” human beings to do.
•   We are not "normal"; as St Paul puts it "And such some of you were; but you are washed, but you are sanctified, but you are justified in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the Spirit of our God." (1 Cor 6:11; note the order: baptism first, then the work of sanctification/moral living, then justification.)

The New Testament shows what the first generation of Believers preached of this New Creation, while the Medievals repeatedly give a strong sense of the stunning quality of the Incarnation.
•    St. Athanasius: "For the Son of God became man so that we might become God." (De inc. 54, 3: PG 25, 192B) and [CCC 460]
•    St. Thomas Aquinas: "The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods." (Opusc. 57, 1-4) [CCC 460]

From a sermon by Saint Anselm, bishop (1033/4–1109)
Blessed Lady, sky and stars, earth an rivers, day and night – everything that is subject to the power or use of man—rejoice that through you they are in some sense restored to their lost beauty and are endowed with inexpressible new grace. All creatures were dead, as it were, useless for human beings or for the praise of God, who made them. The world, contrary to its true destiny, was corrupted and tainted by the acts of human beings who served idols. Now all creation has been restored to life and rejoices that it is controlled and given splendor by those who believe in God.
The universe rejoices with new and indefinable loveliness. Not only does it feel the unseen presence of God Himself, its Creator, it sees him openly working and making it holy. These great blessings spring from the blessed fruit of Mary’s womb.
Through the fullness of the grace that was given you, dead things rejoice in their freedom and those in heaven are glad to be made new. Through the Son who was the glorious fruit of your virgin womb, just souls who died before his life-giving death rejoice as they are freed from captivity, and the angels are glad at the restoration of their shattered domain.
Lady, full and overflowing with grace, all creation received new life from your abundance. Virgin, blessed above all creatures, through your blessing all creation is blessed, not only creation from its Creator, but the Creator Himself has been blessed by creation.
To Mary God gave his only-begotten Son, whom he loved as himself. Through Mary God made himself a Son, not different but the same, by nature Son of God and Son of Mary. The whole universe was created by God, and God was born of Mary. God created all things and Mary gave birth to God. The God who made all things gave himself form through Mary, and thus he made his own creation. He who could create all things from nothing would not remake his ruined creation without Mary.
God, then, is the Father of the created world and Mary the mother of the re-created world. God is the Father by whom all things were given life, and Mary the mother through whom all things were given new life. For God begot the Son, through whom all things were made, and Mary gave birth to him as the Savior of the world. Without God’s Son, nothing could exist; without Mary’s son, nothing could be redeemed.
Truly the Lord is with you, to whom the Lord granted that all nature should owe as much to you as to himself.

And from Saint Lawrence Justinian, bishop (Lorenzo Giustiniani, 1 July 1381 – 8 January 1456)
While Mary contemplated all she had come to know through reading, listening and observing, she grew faith, increased in merits, and was more illuminated by wisdom and more consumed by the fire of charity. The heavenly mysteries were opened to her, and she was filled with joy; she became fruitful by the Spirit, was being directed toward God, and watched over protectively while on earth.
So remarkable are the divine graces that they elevate one from the lowest depths to the highest summit, and transform on to a great holiness. How entirely blessed was the mind of the Virgin which, through the indwelling and guidance of the Spirit, was always and in every way open to the power of the Word of God. She was not led by her own senses, nor by her own will; thus she accomplished outwardly through her body what wisdom from within gave to her faith.
It was fitting for divine Wisdom, which created itself a home in the Church, to use the intervention of the most blessed Mary in guarding the law, purifying the mind, giving an example of humility and providing a spiritual sacrifice.
Imitate her, O faithful soul. Enter into the deep recesses of your heart so that you may be purified spiritually and cleansed from your sins. God places more value on good will in all we do than on the works themselves.
Therefore, whether we give ourselves to God in the work of contemplation or whether we serve the needs of our neighbor by good works, we accomplish these things because the love of Christ urges us on. The acceptable offering of the spiritual purification is accomplished not in a man-made temple but in the recesses of the heart where the Lord Jesus freely enters.

"Imitate her, O faithful soul." Indeed.

Christmas. As with so much else that is from God, it is a bit more than perhaps we bargained for. Merry Christmas to all.

An Préachán

Saturday, December 8, 2018

Science News: Comet, Dino Eggs, Venusian Colonies, and more!

It's been a while since I sent around a "science news" report.

On Dec. 16th, Comet 46P/Wirtanenwill approach Earth less than 11.5 million km away–making it one of the 10 closest-approaching comets of the Space Age. It’s a small comet, with a nucleus barely 1 km wide, but such proximity makes even a small things appear large. The comet’s gaseous atmosphere is now as wide as a full Moon.
Despite its close approach, 46P/Wirtanen will never become a Great Comet like Comet Hayakutake in 1996 or Comet Hale-Bopp in 1997. Wirtanen’s relatively small core of dirty ice cannot produce enough gas and dust to create a really bright, flamboyant tail. The best case scenario is probably a big diffuse cloud of magnitude +3 or +4, barely visible to the unaided eye but an easy target for binoculars and small wide-field telescopes.
Sooner or later, one of these comets or asteroids won't miss. It's one of those government snafus that is so frustrating. All the money spent on Global Warming -- a least half of it should be spent on asteroid protection and CME defense -- a coronal mass ejection of the right magnitude and timing would create an EMP that would send us back to the Iron Age and billions would starve in a very, very short time.

An excerpt:
Funny that women's hotness gets them ahead and men's seems to leave them behind. But isn't that the way it is with so many gender stereotypes? Men are often the ones being discriminated against while women are always told it's only them.

Well, that explains a lot in my life.

There's also this:

An excerpt:
It really is all relative. A new study revealed that all humans are descendants of the same man and woman who lived 100,000 to 200,000 years ago. Our communal mom and dad got together after a “catastrophic event” almost wiped out the human race,  the Daily Mail reported of the study.
What was interesting was the Commentary: Monkeys throwing their poo! Creationists and anti-Creationists in full blood-sport. Of course the point is not that the Earth was created 6,000 years ago -- there are "Young Earth" Creationists who believe that -- but that humans are descended from one couple -- that's "worth the price of admission" if you've been following the century-old argument about human origins, whether they developed in Africa or in various places, all that.

Space:
This one here is space-related but so frustrating. We should have had blimps and dirigibles in Venus' atmosphere for some years now. Grrrr:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-6279161/NASAs-brilliant-plan-cloud-city-airships-atmosphere-Venus.html
For other interesting space news, see sciencedaily.com, like this article: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203111612.htm
An excerpt:
Astronomers using a combination of ground and space based telescopes have reported more than 100 extrasolar planets (exoplanets) in only three months. These planets are quite diverse and expected to play a large role in developing the research field of exoplanets and life in the Universe.

Then this:
We'll be mining asteroids pretty soon. The Japanese land craft on one a couple of months ago. https://www.space.com/41912-japanese-hopping-rovers-land-on-asteroid.html

Asteroid mining will transform the wealth of the world. It's a great future, if we don't wreck our civilization first.

Archaeology
In archaeology, the big news is Pontius Pilate's ring: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/30/world/middleeast/pontius-pilate-ring.html

And in the same vein for those into Biblical archaeology, there's this:
(This has to be one of the coolest archaeology stories I've seen all year. Check it out for the photo of the tiny weight, with its Hebrew character.)

And if you have the time, my favorite Biblical archaeologist, David Rohl, has a great video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEm-ovpMM5c
I have his book A Test Of Time: Volume One-The Bible-From Myth to History, 2001, and highly, highly recommend it. This video I've linked to has even newer info and wow, absolutely fascinating.
Inline image
I try, always and ever, to follow Dino news and this science daily site is excellent for that: https://www.sciencedaily.com/ Search for whatever you're interested in.
An excerpt:
According to researchers at Yale, the American Museum of Natural History, and the University of Bonn, birds inherited their egg color from non-avian dinosaur ancestors that laid eggs in fully or partially open nests. The researchers' findings appear Oct. 31 in the online edition of the journal Nature.
"This completely changes our understanding of how egg colors evolved," said the study's lead author, Yale paleontologist Jasmina Wiemann. "For two centuries, ornithologists assumed that egg color appeared in modern birds' eggs multiple times, independently."
The egg colors of birds reflect characteristic preferences in nesting environments and brooding behaviors. Modern birds use only two pigments, red and blue, to create all of the various egg colors, spots, and speckles.
Of course, the big questions is, did Tyrannosaurs have lips? This report, from last year, says no: https://www.livescience.com/58474-new-tyrannosaur-had-no-lips.html And this from the year before -- same website -- says yes: https://www.livescience.com/54912-did-t-rex-have-lips.html
The suspense builds.


I take it I don't need to go into details.
Rivaling the evolution of feathers in dinosaurs, one of the most extraordinary transformations in the history of life was the evolution of baleen -- rows of flexible hair-like plates that blue whales, humpbacks and other marine mammals use to filter relatively tiny prey from gulps of ocean water. Now, scientists have discovered an important intermediary link in the evolution of this innovative feeding strategy: an ancient whale that had neither teeth nor baleen.
This is, clearly, a massive mystery. What mammals ever had anything like baleen? How can genetics produce something it doesn't have code for? How can hair/fingernail materials grow in the mouth, replacing teeth? In this case, one might ask how'd these intermediaries could eat? But they weren't intermediaries of anything. Although the article says they're intermediary links, in classic "evolution speak", we're actually not talking about of some "intermediate" "missing link," for such don't exist. What exists are stable species, doing their thing for a million years or whatever, as in the Natural History of the equine family, Equidae, one of the best documented natural histories we have.

Each different version of the equus species was perfectly adapted to its environment as a species, doing its thing for however long. We can see they're intermediary between horses as we know them, and Eohippus, the first of the family. But they couldn't "evolve" anything; they just were. And quite successful at being. Nature didn't select them -- or anything else -- because nature has no consciousness. We have minds and extrapolate reasoning and finding the useful and the good and thus automatically transfer that to Nature, but Nature cannot think, or plan, or reflect, or know.

And it is more than just semantics. Poor Darwin. He rightfully hated the word "evolution" because it was solely used (back then) for human being evolving whatever (clothes styles, political systems, art). The word was foisted on him against his wishes, but then his preferred phrase, "Natural Selection" is an oxymoron self-contradiction. Nature can't select anything. He was told that, repeatedly. Also, of course, Darwin didn't understand ecosystems very well, thought that nothing in Nature was long-term, and he certainly didn't believe species actually existed. Yep. Wrote a book about the Origin of Species and didn't believe species was a thing. (It's sort of an inside joke, this. :) He thought all tigers, for example, were more or less tiger-like, depending on their place in an evolutionary arc from pre-tigers to post-tigers, each one a little more or less advanced at becoming something entirely different. All of them malleable, changing, shifting, improving according to the environment situation. It was merely human errata, human misconception, that labeled them all tigers.

But today we know species are stable. They resist change and tolerate only so much genetic mutation. For example, Luther Burbank (1849-1926) came up with Burbank's law about species: you can only breed "improvements" in individuals of a species up to a point, then they fall back to where their descendants fall back to where they were. Valuable info this is in trying to create new lines of seeds and livestock. If I were teaching high school science, I'd make 'em learn about Luther Burbank: an amazing scientist and creator of something like 800 plant varieties and strains. Like your russet potatoes? I love 'em. Guess where they came from? Burbank actually developed the strain, or I suppose improved it, to help the Irish, as it is somewhat blight resistant. What a guy! He'd definitely be in the forefront on genetic crop development, and an opponent of the Luddites who are against it.

But I digress. It's fun to tweak evolution and Global Warming, but "life goes on." Here are some more interesting science items.
The rhino, Elasmotherium sibericum, was thought to have become extinct between 200,000 and 100,000 years ago.
By radiocarbon-dating a total of 23 specimens, researchers found the Ice Age giant in fact survived in Eastern Europe and Central Asia until at least 39,000 years ago.
They also isolated DNA from the ancient rhino for the first time, showing it split from the modern group of rhinos about 40 million years ago.
The extinction of the Siberian unicorn marks the end point of an entire group of rhinos.
Rinos are certainly related to each other! They have that "family face", you might say.

And DNA seems to be the main road now to discuss Natural History of Species.
Moving on into Environment:
300-foot wall of sand engulfs city! Check it out. Wanna move to Mars? You'd have to get used to this.

Sand engulfs. So does snow. Remember this story about the 5,000-year-old Bronze Age "Iceman" now named "Otzi" whose body was found in the Austrian Alps? Here are some great photos and a bit of info:
http://boredomtherapy.com/hikers-snow-discovery/ Lightweight article, but fun. And Otzi left behind a curse, too! Like King Tut. Check it out.

Speaking of snow, we have this concerning climate:
Why is climate science stagnating? One thing we have seen over the years, in Climate Science nobody ever loses. As long as your estimated climate sensitivity is above 1.5C and not too much higher than 4.5C, your estimate will be accepted by the community as reasonable. If your sensitivity estimate is less than 1.5C, you’re a denier. If you make a truly ridiculous claim, such as predicting an ice free Arctic in the next couple of years, you might attract a pithy comment from Gavin Schmidt. But overall everyone’s career is safe, providing you churn out lots of papers which conform to the community view of what your results should be. There is no sense of urgency, no sense of concern, that the field of climate science is not advancing.
Similarly in Physics, according to Lee Smolin and now to Sabine Hossenfelder, your career is fine as long as your research proposal falls within the parameters of what everyone else thinks it should be.

Everyone knows I'm an unrepentant "climate denier" but t'is no matter. President Trump treats it as fluff and I see Macron is backing down in face of the incredible protests in France: http://fortune.com/2018/12/04/macron-fuel-tax-protests/ and https://euobserver.com/tickers/143591


I had thought Global Warming (a.k.a. Climate change, Weather, etc.) would go out quietly, with a whimper -- like the 1970s talk of a new Ice Age went out or the 1980s talk about landfills smothering us all. Maybe, though, this whole French thing is a sign it'll go out with a bang as fed-up working people demand an end to it.

Those with more wisdom than I have foreseen this, based on just who is "into" AGW and who isn't:

The liberal elites constitute only 13 percent of the electorate; by comparison, the Democratic-leaning blue-collar voters represent 27 percent. In addition, the liberal elites are whiter than the overall population (and much whiter than Democrats as a whole), more formally educated, and considerably wealthier.
This profile of the liberal elite is broadly consistent with the recent “Hidden Tribes” report from the left-of-center group More in Common, which found a similar but even smaller group of progressive activists were outliers on issues like political correctness and affirmative action in college admissions.

That's the real story of the revolt against the fuel tax.  The burden of saving the Earth will fall most heavily on those least able to pay for it.  European elites, congratulating themselves on their "courage" in foisting these burdensome carbon taxes on their people, just don't get it.
People get angry when asked to do with less for a goal that rich people are saying is for the best for everyone.
But whatever about AGW, much more seriously, the discipline of Western empirical "science" overall is in big trouble, and for a number of reasons, as detailed in this shocking article: https://amgreatness.com/2018/12/02/the-impending-death-of-science/
And excerpt:
There were approximately 2.5 million scientific papers published last year. Think about that. A researcher would have to read nearly 300 papers an hour, non-stop, just to keep up. And that is not accounting for the more than 50 million scientific papers that have been published since the 17th century. If the researcher somehow managed to read 600 papers an hour (that’s 10 scientific papers each minute) in order to catch up with the established scientific literature, it would still take him 20 years to consume all the papers written. Once again, this is assuming that he didn’t eat or sleep, and was somehow able to read and absorb 10 technical papers each minute.
Needless to say, the readership of any particular paper is abysmally low.
Now imagine taking the time to test and reproduce the results of each paper. It shouldn’t surprise anyone that scientific inquiry has suffered from a “reproducibility crisis” over the past few years. Some surveys have suggested that more than 70 percent of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist’s experiments. In one of the largest replication studies conducted, 60 percent of psychology studies examined failed the reproducibility test. A research project attempting to replicate social science experiments failed eight out of 21 times to obtain any observed effects consistent with the original findings. These findings deliver a devastating blow to the credibility of the current literature in both the natural and social sciences.
In theory, science has mechanisms in place to safeguard the knowledge it cultivates. But an overly bureaucratic and esoterically compartmentalized academia with perverse funding incentives will doom the practice of science no matter the methodological guardrails. These theoretical guardrails mean very little if they are not practically enforced. After all, the Soviet Union’s constitution had some beautiful, yet ignored, language about freedom of expression and the press.
But even if the guardrails are consistently enforced, it still takes time for incorrect scientific knowledge to be refuted. It takes time to review a study’s methodology, to reproduce the study, and then to test the refutation. This process can take years.
Groupthink is bad enough, but Politically Correct Group Think is a disaster.

Whatever. I'm still trying to recover from the visuals of that poor elephant meeting a hungry T-Rex.

An Préachán

France Under Lock Down over Global Warming?

Serious news from France. And also here:
An excerpt:
PARIS (AP) — Anticipating a fourth straight weekend of violent protests, France on Friday mobilized armored vehicles and thousands of police, cordoned off Paris’ broad boulevards and made plans to shut down tourist sites like the Eiffel Tower and Louvre.
The heavy security will put central Paris in a virtual lock down Saturday against what the interior minister called “radicalized and rebellious people,” who authorities believe will join members of the “yellow vest” movement that has been holding anti-government demonstrations.
Nationwide, about 89,000 police will fan out in the streets, an increase from 65,000 last weekend, when more than 130 people were injured and over 400 arrested as the protests degenerated into the worst street violence to hit the French capital in decades.

What is Macron going to do next? Seize the Internet?

The protestors want to "tax the rich". Hmmmm...what started this was a Macron tax designed to combat "Global Warming". Is this just some crazed French Leftists trying to overthrow the banking golden boy Macron (IIRC, he was basically a banker type)? Or is it a rising "populist" ("populiste"?) revolution against our Globalist "betters" who use AGW as an excuse to seize ever more and more control?

So, a bit of a review about Global Warming:
AGW (a.k.a. "Climate Change", an even looser term) seems to be part of the Globalist "Deep State" and their slaves in the mainstream media's overriding "narrative." There are better advocates than than Al Gore for their narrative, of course. But there are also great advocates against it. Here's Freeman Dyson, one of the GREAT physicists in the last 100 years, saying AGW/Climate Change is bunk
Then there's this, a polite and informative discussion with Dr. Patrick Michaels, director of the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute. If you watch no other Youtube discussion of AGW, please, do yourself a favor and take the few minutes required to watch this one:

Michaels is extremely credentialed. Massively so. Just someone who has all sorts of status and "cred" required. Check it out. Of course, "Alarmists" will say he's a bought and paid for stooge, but that's a vicious ad hominem and without foundation. It's also a bore. Deal with his comments and arguments, not attack him personally. Is Freeman Dyson a stooge getting paid under the table? And just who is pumping money into AGE? Governments, and they're pumping BILLIONS.

Those opposed to AGW/Alarmism (as the planet is getting somewhat warmer, "AGW" essentially means "Alarmism") include this guy: Ivar Giaever, the 1973 Nobel Prizewinner for Physics.

The pro-AGW/Climate Change Wikipedia has this list

Anyway, as for Michaels, I find it interesting he says the theory is right but the application is all wrong. Fascinating. (Note the Karl Popper quote: “If you can meet a difficult prediction with your theory, you can continue to entertain your theory.”)
Michaels points out that the 31 government-sponsored models of climate predictions are all wrong about how much warming is occurring; only one, the 32nd, and the Russian-sponsored one, is in agreement with the actual degree of warming we've seen occur. This sort of thing is factual, checkable, and so on. Like the claim that 97 percent of scientists agree about Global Warming. People check on that sort of thing. .https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/ Or if Forbes is to "Capitalist" for you, see the Fraser Institute.  (Canadians never lie, right? :)
The falsification (a.k.a. "parameterize") was revealed in 2016 in Science Magazine by a French climatologist, Frédéric Hourdin, titled “The Art and Science of Climate Model Tuning”. 9 July 2016; published online 2017  ‘Parameterize’ to “get an anticipated acceptable range of results”. Thus “it is the scientist, not the science, that’s determining how much it is going to warm,” says Michaels.

And this is of the most profound importance because people are fed up with it. Look at France! Macron is seizing total control, locking Paris up!  The Globalist Deep State is serious about forcing massive change on us despite our wishes, and using "fudged" (a.k.a. "parameterize") science to do it. This is seriously, seriously troubling.

And they may be pushing it too far.

Meanwhile, and far more importantly, Western Empirical Science is in serious trouble, as I noted in my earlier Science email. 

An Préacán