Amici,
A commentator ("coop") at Steve Kirsch's site posted the following comment:
Stanford is injecting children right now in a trial!
https://stanmed.stanford.edu/2021issue2/upfront/clinical-trail-children-covid-vaccines.html
“Since
May, researchers have tested whether the vaccine produces an immune
response and prevents COVID-19 in children 5 through 11 years old.
The Stanford study site is also evaluating vaccine dosages for children 6 months through 4 years old.
Final results for the older age group are expected later this year.
“Children
under 18 make up about a quarter of the U.S. population, so if we want
to get the virus under control, we really need to include them,” said
Yvonne Maldonado, MD, who is running the trials’ Stanford site.
Maldonado is the Taube Professor in Global Health and Infectious Diseases at Stanford."
AnP:
To which insanity, I responded:
“Children under 18 make up about a quarter of the U.S. population, so
if we want to get the virus under control, we really need to include
them,” said Yvonne Maldonado, MD, who is running the trials’ Stanford
site."
Point 1 Children have never been shown to be adversely affected in the
first place, as carriers or as ill children. Focusing on them therefore
is either ontologically stupid or it has nefarious purpose. There can
be no escaping either conclusion.
Point 2 According to standard virus theory, these waves of plagues come
and go naturally, they have well-recognized "life-cycles" that play out,
and have done for recorded history, and interfering with that natural
cycle causes the viruses to be both longer-lasting and more virulent.
Point 3 Prove the damned thing exists in the first place, you twit,
before your Big Pharma masters conjure up back-magic potions to deal
with it! Since "Covid" is only an "in silico" beast, solely computer
modeled, you have no argument for anything, except to exhibit your
ignorance. So, point four:
Point 4 Go soak your empty head, Yvonne.
Argument from Authority
Something quite significant needs to be understood. We lay a lot of
weight on arguments from authority, but such are only as good as the
authority, yet "authority" is often just old thinking that's been
bypassed, or is just entrenched because it makes certain people way too
much money. And therefore, to have garnered a high credential in some
academic institution often means you merely know how to parrot ideas
that are stale, wrong, or completely irrelevant to the current
situation. Think of modern-day Marxists. Almost all of them are "idiot intellectuals" ensconced in academia, unable to change a lightbulb but more than willing to pontificate on how you, yourself, should live.
ANYONE with experience in academia knows how that works, and
how petty and even feudal so much of higher education is!
Usually, established systems "self-select" to reinforce what
configurations (mental, spiritual, intellectual, etc.) they already
have. Over any length of time, it gets near impossible to reform or
reinvigorate such a system. Certain Churches obviously self-select over
generations, and the current Catholic Church under Bergoglio and those
who have been supporting him, the "Modernists" constitute a good example.
Never has there been a collection of fools and knaves as we have in the dying "Vatican II Church", that "tomb seething with worms" as Archbishop Viganò so aptly refers to it. What business of any sort but the most ideologically driven would shut down the most vibrant and growing segment of itself? Yet that is what Bergoglio has done.
Historically, one sees this same phenomenon in militaries: they're
always fighting the last war or resisting new ideas in general. Currently, the U.S. military is an utter fiasco. Brilliant officers are forced out, and replaced by toadies who insist men can get preggers. It's literally insane. Another military that isn't quite so "hardened of the arteries" then
comes along and cleans their clock, as the U.S. military's will be.
It also happens in the history of
business and politics, and of course, medicine.
But somehow, this pattern just keeps repeating. People seem naturally
disposed to live in mental ruts, going around and around like broken
records. They resist what audit systems exist. Congress is supposed to
be an audit system of government, as is judicial review, but look what
little good these do today! Only severe crises as what we're
experiencing from the whole Covid/Covid "vaccine" mess have the chance
to force change.
And indeed, the change must be "forced"! Think of the
changes the 1929 Stock Market Crash forced on the economy, or Pear
Harbor forced on the U.S. military, or the early Union defeats in the
Civil War. Examples from all areas could be multiplied ad infinitum.
If the absolutely
mismanaged and Global Authoritarianism of this two-year Covid farce
isn't enough of a crisis to force us to act, what in the world would?
AnP