Bergoglio receives Pelosi, ignores the Dobbs decision. The Ogre has "jumped the shark"

Friends,

When the Dobbs v. Jackson U.S. Supreme Court decision was announced last Thursday, June 24, it was the biggest Supreme Court decision in decades, probably since the original Roe v. Wade (that itself was subsequently followed by a decision removed what restrictions Roe had imposed (Doe v. Bolton, also 1973), and then by Casey decision (Casey v. Planned Parenthood, 1992). N.B. For good review of what the Dobbs decision argued, see Margot Cleveland's comment at The Federalist in this article.

Bergoglio and Dobbs

But Bergoglio, the false, fake, fraudulent pope, the flagrant anti-pope, the Ogre, didn't publicly acknowledge it. Didn't even say, "Thank God that abortion will be at least a bit more restricted in the U.S. than it was." Didn't even say, "I heard something from the U.S." Nothing. Crickets. Actually, he response gives a new meaning to "The Sounds of Silence".

Or, at least that was so until "San Fran Nan" came to town. Nancy Pelosi visited Bergoglio in the Vatican. She went to Mass where the anti-pope was officiating, and a bevy of "con-celebrating" priests. (Sorry, I detest those clown shows.) Apparently, she received Holy Communion. In fact, her own archbishop, the Most Reverend Salvatore Cordileone, back in San Francisco banned her from receiving Holy Communion mainly because of the old witch's over-the-top support of abortion. So, "Pope Francis" gives it to her. By this act, the scapegrace sticks his crozier in the eye of the archbishop Cordileone , and pretty much all Catholics everywhere who worked to stop abortion.gives it to her. (I hope the good SF archbishop has a large, private, retirement fund, and wasn't expecting to be made a Cardinal, at least in this life!)

Notice how Bergoglio has alienated one section of the Church's ranks after another. Certainly, he's gone out of his way to alienate the Trads, but also the JPII "Conservative" Catholics, and every shade in between. He's seems to actually LOATHE real Catholics, i.e. Catholics who adhere to the Faith as taught for centuries and who worship the traditional way. As I say, he does the same to middle-of-the-roaders. The only people he seems to like are the deviants and Leftist government bureaucrats.

But the anti-abortion crowd contains all kinds, every shade and hue, except the most Leftward, anti-Christian "Catholics" that exist. He's backhanded everyone but the Hard Left. He's an awfully confident ogre!

Church online commentator Taylor Marshall has an interesting take on all this here. He says Bergoglio DID indeed, comment. How? By publicly receiving that future denizen of Hell, Nancy Pelosi (in theory, she can repent, but as with Fat 'Arry 8, or a skirt-chasing manager I used to have, the more one sins the less likely a repentance can be expected), in a public Mass. Marshall is outraged. Myself, I'm too Irish and jaded. It's what I expect these evil people to do. As soon as I read about it, I said to my wife, "Of course she did; just the thing for Pelosi and Bergoglio to arrange!"

Bergoglio is evil, plain and simple, and that's obvious by his actions, regardless of whether his election was valid. Pelosi sold her soul so long ago her face already looks like it's been gone since Jack Kennedy was president. And anyone, anyone, who tells you "It doesn't matter" or some sort of "God wills it" who (or what) the "pope", smack 'em for me.

But Marshall goes on a fine rant!

12:20 in: Taylor Marshall speaking initially in a alternate voice: "Yeah, but Tailor, you're so hard on Francis." (And then in full voice) We gave him a chance. 2013, 14, 15, 16, amoris, scandals, financial, sexual, McCarrick, lies, hiding, Pachamama, restriction of the Traditional Latin Mass, restriction of traditional sacraments, suppression of beautiful, holy, cloistered nuns, suppression of budding, beautiful, traditional religious orders, (smashes right fist into left palm repeatedly). Francis is constantly, constantly beating against the life and the growth of good things in the Church. And it is absolutely shameful.

"Yeah, but Taylor, just give him..." NO! We have given him chances. He has taken off his mask. He has shown us who he is. This is his response to you, right here. (Shows photo of beaming Nancy Pelosi and crazily grinning husband being greeted by the Ogre.) (13:20)

I pray to God his shames me. He comes out with – someone in Rome watching watching this right now, show this bit to Francis right now. I pray to God he says, "You know what? I'm going to troll those Trads. I'm going to troll Taylor Marshall; I'm going to come out and praise it (Dobbs) and praise it." Please do. I would love to eat crow on it. But as of right now, Wednesday after everything has been going down, this is what we get? This is a PR stunt. It is all over social media. (14:00)

(Later) "See, you can be a devout Catholic and be pro-Abortion." That is what this is all about. That is what this is all about. Total wickedness." (16:21)

AnP again:

Yes, indeed. Total wickedness. Of all the nasty, stupid, idiotic things certain popes did historically, this has to rank with Maffeo Barberini, Pope Urban VIII, (reigned August 1623 to his death in 1644), infamous today mostly for the Galileo affair, but actually, his siding with the French and Cardinal Richelieu, who sported the Protestants in the Thirty Years War, lost the Counter-Reformation. All because Barberini hated the Habsburgs.

In something of the same vein, Bergoglio is trying to lose the entire Church. So, I suppose he's even worse than Urban VIII! "Amoris, scandals, financial, sexual, McCarrick, lies, hiding, Pachamama, restriction of the Traditional Latin Mass, restriction of traditional sacraments, suppression of beautiful, holy, cloistered nuns, suppression of budding, beautiful, traditional religious orders, (smashes right fist into left palm repeatedly). Francis is constantly, constantly beating against the life and the growth of good things in the Church." That's is the wretched Bergoglio's legacy.

Can we all finally agree that this monster is no pope? He is vile, simply vile, and intolerable. Look at his latest ploy to eradicate the Latin Mass: new papal apostolic letter Desiderio Desideravi: On the Liturgical Formation of the People of God. Read about it here at OnePeterFive. 

It just never ends with "Bergi" and his gay and Commie creatures and hangers on.

No, no, infinitely no: the Argentinian is not pope and we're no more obliged to obey him than were we members of a very conservative anti-abortion Protestant congregation, should our minister invite an abortionist politician to our church to promote abortion. We'd toss both o them out. On their ears. Regarding Pelosi, it is as Taylor Marshall put it, "Pelosi, you didn't move the needle, you pulled the level, on making abortion on demand."

Marshall ends his talk with this observation:

"We need cardinals in Rome to like Cardinal Burke, and continue admonishments and to call for a trial, a system, to address tyranny and heresy those two questions have to be resolved." (36:50) He quote the famous 16th-17th century Cardinal Bellarmine, who wrote about how to go about formally removing a bad pope, who could be removed over heresy and tyranny (and Bergoglio has racked up multiple examples of both!

But I can't see them doing it. They blew their chance. They could have smacked Bergoglio down earlier, "reigned him in" when they owned the corral, i.e. when there was more of them above ground and not in the next life. Not many of that type are left: Bergoglio has been naming reprehensible replacements at every level. All the remaining orthodox Cardinals are waiting now for Bergoglio to grunt out what's left of his life in sinful mental squalor, and they'll not try to get him to convert. They would not dare to try to save his porcine soul, miserable as that must be. No. Let him croak. They're jockeying for who to replace him.

But unless the Lord God of Hosts Himself intervenes, Bergoglio 1 will be replaced by a younger Bergoglio 2. The old devil himself has seen to that. Although I strongly suspect that by dissing the Dobbs decision in the way he has, Bergoglio has crossed a line where the next stop is true schism.

         AnP

Part 2 A world without the Traditional Latin Mass: our culture's violence and hatred exemplified

Friends,

I'm considering why, today, in 2022, we have such outrageous, Hieronymus Bosch-freak show-level deviants rioting in the streets, demanding, DEMANDING, the right to murder babies and promoting deviant sexual carnality that always preceded a civilization's collapse.

1970 to 2022

One major social and cultural element that paralleled the moral collapse of Western society in the last half century was the trashing out of the Traditional Latin Mass.

1. This deconstruction of the Holy ("set apart") Liturgy began in 1964 with the closing of the Second Vatican Council, the official documents of which called for some liturgical change but only change deemed absolutely necessary.
2. It could be said to begin earlier when the Communist Frankfurter Schule's plan for social and familial dissolution began to show manifest progress.
3. It appeared over a decade after the U.S. in its attempt to keep Germany down, began to promote pornography and immorality in Germany (E. Michael Jones details this).
   
4. It manifested when the children born post-war, children who did not experience the privations and hardships of the Great Depression or World War II, came of age and found themselves awash in money and porn.
5. And most of all, it occurred in a Catholic Church trying to find a reason for its existence, unable to justify its conduct in either World War I or II, and prodded by Modernist theologians and their nouvelle théologie, the central tenant of which was everything evolves, even God.
   

All this lay behind the full occultation of the Traditional Latin Mass. (Thank God, like a full occultation of the moon, it did not – and could not – last.)

For decades after 1970, however, one simply could not find it. This sacred liturgy lived on in the memories of its forlorn, cast adrift adherents, of course, and in the Heavenly Liturgy which it represents. But it was otherwise non-existent except for the work of a handful, such as the incomparable Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who founded the SSPX in that pivotal year 1970.

But the people, the demos, the Church's hoi polloi, the public of the Church's res publica, kept the pressure on for its return. Finally, with that miserable effeminate recluse Paul VI finally dead, Pope John Paul II could let up on it a bit, although he met resistance and did not move too far. Pope Benedict XVI, though, opened the Church doors wide for it, and got deposed for it, too (believe it). Now the anti-pope Bergoglio is doing his damnedest to get rid of it again. He clearly hates it, and has gathered to his black standard those who loathe it. Currently, I see one of his American cronies, Wilton Gregory of D.C., is considering banning it from his archdiocese. Oh Lord God, save us from these imps and hobgoblins of Satan!

As far as I am concerned, as far as most traditional morality goes, a law that is immoral is no law, an order that is reprehensible (like, "Soldier! Shoot those Jews!") is no lawful order. Bergoglio and his homosexual lavender mafia have thus abdicated their positions in the Church by their actions, regardless of whether they were lawfully installed in the first place. (See this article at Ann Barnhardt's blog for an excellent essay on why Benedict's abdication is invalid.)

I think John Paul and Benedict acted the way they did regarding the TLM because they could easily see that the mainstream Church was collapsing in numbers: ever fewer active Catholics, ever fewer baptisms and marriages. Ever more divorces. Fewer and fewer laity believed in the Real Presence. These statistics were known. In 1963, 3/4s of Catholics attended Sunday Mass, by 1983, that was almost exactly reversed. So they pragmatically let the TLM in the back door. But for Bergoglio and his ilk, they're terrified of the TLM's success. That would invalidate their entire lives. "Latin Massers" may be still few in numbers compared to mainstream Catholics in raw numbers, but they still total in the many millions. They also have large families; the Mass and its adherents attract converts. (Bergoglio infamous called proselytizing "solemn nonsense".) AND they are much more likely to believe in the Real Presence and attend Sunday Mass without fail. They're a crack, elite unit of Catholics, a Catholic Marine Corps or Guards Army, and are leading the way to the Faith's Restoration. So of course, they have to be smacked down. Humiliated. Scourged.

It is highly significant that the evil Bergoglio has so far (as of this writing) said nothing about the Dobbs decision. No thanking God, no praise for this great work. (Haha, certainly no word of thanks to a certain Donald John Trump!) The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has commented, as have bureaucrats in the Vatican, but all that has so far been relatively muted. You don't need to be a Richard Feynman to realize they're not overjoyed by Dobbs. They are thus driving yet another nail in the mainstream/mainline Church's coffin because a large number of Catholic Christians have labored long to get ride of Roe, it's been the life's work and thousands, and now that it is gone, these heroes notice the crickets' muted chirping in the ruined choirs of the hierarchy.

What's so important about the TLM? Our Religious Hard-Wiring

What the Traditional Latin Mass did, besides wonderfully celebrate the Seventh Covenant, the New Covenant, the Most Holy Eucharist by participation in which we are saved (see St. John's Gospel, Chapter 6; St. Luke 22:19-20), was put people's mental framework in order. It reminded people – indeed, it actually leads people – into the threshold of the Divine World, the Other World of the Holy, the Sacred, the Divine Real Presence. 

That once-a-week hour worked on an individual on many levels. Almost all humans, of whatever culture, have some sense of the Sacred, the Holy, these words meaning literally: that which is 'set apart' from normal life. We seem to be hardwired to want that, although in theory this can be the only world we know. Maybe in small doses for most, but we want it. That's because we are hardwired to want God, to spend eternity with God, whether as adults we might reject God or not. Satan and his Fallen Angels were also made that way, and one of the worst pains of Hell is to still want that intimacy with the Divine yet be eternally denied it, eternally suffering Tantalus-like.

Now, I understand that not everyone has a strong sense of this desire for the Set Apart. Like curiosity or math ability, it is stronger in some than in others; but to be completely without it is somehow not to be human. And different Christian groups manifest different levels of desire for it. While never having been a Protestant, I grew up with them and believe I understand Protestantism inside and out. I work with them now, from time to time on editing projects. And in terms of the more "popular" versions, church-in-the-wildwood types I'm most familiar with, I can understand the desire to worship God out in the open air, as it were, so to speak, building an altar of unhewn stones and sacrificing the sheep and goats and oxen on it, setting the fire, and watching the smoke of the oblation ascend into the sky, "God-ward", my hands raised.

But then I also understand the innate desire to "Let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, lets us ascend unto Jerusalem, for I rejoiced when I heard them say, let us go unto the House of the Lord", to enter the outer courts, then the inner courts, getting ever closer to the Real Presence. (I can only imagine the music they had in the great Temple! Harps, lyres, lutes, the 12-string psaltery, the shofar horn, trumpets of various sorts, flutes/pipes, double oboes, timbrels-tambourines, sistrums, cymbals, bells.) I certainly understand what God inspired Solomon to create. King David represents the former, simpler open-air inclination, Solomon the high liturgical one. And I too desire to ascend, as it were. (There's a reason why, despite a few certain exceptions, usually Anglican in some way, that Protestantism never developed a monastic tradition.)

What this means "in the world"

Many mainstream Catholics react negatively to Trad Catholics, sneering, "You think you're better than us, don't you? That the sacraments are more valid in a TLM." I actually rarely hear that, but I can say that for us the entire Traditional liturgy is more "set apart", heightened, elevated God-ward for those of us bearing this appreciation. That is just a truism.

And of course, a man or woman or child who frequents such heights remains for life a bit more removed, a bit less attached, to the things of this world. The Divine World makes itself felt. It takes a much greater act of rejection of God to shrug it off. A Novus Ordo Mass with its talky vernacular, its marching-band everyone-in-lockstep praying, its overall more casual, more mundane spirit, its no damnation/painless salvation is just easier to leave, to put it simply. It's rejection lies more lightly on a soul.

Ergo...

Therefore, the evils of the world, all the "sex, lies, and videotape", or more traditionally the world, the flesh, and the Devil, present less of a counterpoint to the Novus Ordo than the TLM does. Only rarely does the Devil go in for a High Luciferian Satanism. His demons usually offer a much more mundane, casual, relaxed way in their temptation to evil. "No drama damnation", as it were, to match the modern "No drama salvation".

The one thing in which the TLM is definitely superior to the Novus Ordo, and it stands profoundly superior, is that it presents to this mundane world we reside temporarily in the Holy, the Sacred, The Other in its every fiber. The Holy Ghost worked through Churchmen for centuries to perfect that sense. Bugnini and the designers of the Novus Ordo consciously rejected all that because they thought it "medieval", and that modern man would not tolerate it. So, "the Bug" turned his back on it as fully as Luther did. (Luther did so for different reasons, but still.) And "modern man" was represented for the Bug and his would-be Reformers by the then archbishop of Milan, one mousey Giovanni Battista Montini, who carried a business man's brief case about with him. To them, Montini was the way, and the wave, of the future. Honestly, the future Paul VI carrying a briefcase excited a LOT of comment in the press.

It was just silly. And vacuous, as was so much of Vatican II and the infamous "spirit of Vatican II" that followed. And the new, practical, nonsensical, spiritually business man Church, the Vatican II Church and its "just business" liturgy sat uncomfortably without any continuity in the timeline of the Church's 2000-year past. No wonder if failed, and is about to pass with the death of Bergoglio. Either a more Bergoglio-than-Bergoglio will be elected, and if so I expect the College of Cardinals to fracture as that would be intolerable, or some more "conservative" prelate with be elevated, which whatever they might say about it, will represent the high-water mark of Vatican II. It begin a drain away, an ejection that will inevitably accelerate as the world crashes through war, starvation, energy blackouts, and the final putting down and execution of the latest eugenics idiots who run the World Economic Forum, 2030, the Great Reset, etc.

Sounds a bit fanciful?

After all, in the face of the absurd Covid fraud, the entire Vatican II Church basically dried up like a desert tumble weed, and blew away. How could it possibly deal with a real world crisis? War? Famine? The lights of this technological civilization going out?

  An Préachán

Part 1 A world without the Traditional Latin Mass: our culture's violence and hatred exemplified

Friends,

First, of course, all thanksgiving and praise to the Lord God Who provided this pro-life victory in the U.S. Supreme Court. All good things come from God; we're just instruments of His will. And of course we should thank President Donald Trump, the true U.S. President, exiled for now, and I do not doubt the the "powers-that-be" will stop at nothing to keep him out of power. However, he did what Reagan could not, and we need to appreciate his work in this.

But...

Why is it that today, in 2022, we have such outrageous, freak-show level deviants rioting in the streets, demanding, DEMANDING, the right to murder babies and promoting deviant sexual carnality that always preceded a civilization's collapse? Truly, is it not as though God replaced their living hearts with hearts of stone, and exactly, EXACTLY fulfilling St. Paul's famous observations in Romans 1:21-32. It is as though a divine hand has appeared and is writing on our civilization's wall.

How far we've come – how far we've fallen – since 1973. No riots of marauding sexual deviants filled the streets then, when Roe v. Wade was decided. And had the Supreme Court decided against Roe, there would have been no riots of marauding sexual deviants, ether. Now, though, look at how many people are today simply too degenerate to be imagined. Note the Roe date, 1973. The Novus Order Liturgy was foisted upon us by ecclesiastical fiat in late 1970. I think these dates are significant, as I'll explain below.

1973 to 2022

Hieronymus Bosch was a prophet. Since the the Dobbs Supreme Court decision last Friday, it seems like Hell has vomited its most disgusting Boschian entrails upon us. Have we seen anything like this since the Emperor Nero's prancing about? He's the patron saint of the homosexual movement and one of the first to "marry" a, well, non-woman. (A castrated boy.) Throughout this June, though, if one can stomach recalling it, throughout what they call "Pride" month, we've been inundated with the pukey, the vomity, the infantile and continual upchuck of the just simply Boschian-bizarre, insane cockroaches of modern sexual deviancy. (Haha, sounds like I'm referring to the Biden family or certain Catholic bishops and priests!)

Sodom and Gomorrah come again, indeed. One can easily imagine, were God to send a couple of angels to a "pride event" like the one in Chicago were people were just shot up (in that heavily gun-controlled city) – that the carnal zombies would, indeed, try raping them. It has to do with a lot more than the Dobbs v. Jackson decision, doesn't it? The reaction is too extreme, bizarre. The lizard 'ruler of the world' churns and wreathes in his hellish Pit.

Sure, Satan himself has take a blow to the head, Dobbs being a sort of upward palm to his crooked nose. He's reminded that even in what seems his hour of triumph, he's always and ever going to lose. So, of course, he lashes out. (It has to be frustrating, to always lose, and never lose with class.)

But part of it also goes back to that cadet academy of Satan, the infamous Frankfurter Schule in 1920s Germany, the group of Communists (many of them sexual deviants themselves) who promulgated the idea that the way to bring about their unholy and ultimately asinine and eternally exquisitely boring revolution was to destroy the Western family and Churches through sex stuff. Just spread lustful deviancy, make people morally and physically debilitated through carnal decadence and abasement, to simply dissolute the society to the point it collapsed. Roe v. Wade in 1973 was a "great leap forward" for that, actually. It in essence mandated worshiping Moloch nation-wide. It is extremely ironic that the sexually perverse are so proud of their perversions, when in fact they're just tools of long-dead Communist theorists. If you're going to throw away your soul, that's a poor reason for doing it

The Dobbs decision, however, is like taking a two-by-four (more like a four-by-four) and slamming it battery-ram style right to the face of all those years of effort. That's because Dobbs allows the people themselves, democracy-style, to debate these issues and actually decide on them through voting, as opposed to having all of it vomited on us by judicial fiat. Hence the brilliance of Clarence Thomas in saying the Dobbs opens the opportunity to reconsider a host of other imperial judicial fatwas, such as the idiotic Obergefell. (And of course of the rage of the Left at his comment is very enjoyable.)

Just as with the World Economic Forum and the Covid lockdowns, all of this has to be imposed on people from above. The people themselves would never vote for it. And of course it was the same for the Church's liturgical changes in the 1960s and '70s. We are constantly being imposed upon. Why do we let them?

One reason is that the Church has failed to stand up for us. I'll have more of that in Part 2.

   An Préachán