Well, Friends,
The
fox is among the chickens now. Bergoglio, the anti-pope (definitely an
anti-Christ is his miserable way; at least a Changeling "pope") has let
the fox in among the hens. I would love to ask Dr. Peter
Kwasniewski, perhaps the most famous (amongst Trads in the States) of
the "Francis is really pope!" apologists, "Well, Professor, Bergoglio
has just gutted the Catholic Church like gutting a fish; he's opened it with a sharp knife titled Fiducia supplicans to endless discrimination lawsuits, as "Gay, Inc." will be
providing "couples" calling conservative parishes asking for a "blessing
(with flowers, invited guests, special music, the works – but of course it isn't marriage, wink-wink, nod-nod) and who will be absolutely geared to sue the cassock off any priest who denies them. They can legally raise all Hell (literally) via Fiducia supplicans. So, Kwasniewski, what sayest thou now?"
Not very charitable of me, and I'm sure the Prof is a very nice man. But, his fence-sitting has betrayed us.
John Zmirak at The Stream has sharply harped on this homosexuals-suing-the-Church here, adding his voice to many, many others who have argued this is some way.
Myself, I would ask readers to pause a moment and reflect: How much
money have the homosexuals cost us? Sure, they've cost the Changeling
Church millions of members who have left or are leaving in utter
disgust, and they've cost the Church her priceless reputation, respect,
and MOST OF ALL, T.R.U.S.T.
But
just consider how much actual cashola they've cost the Church. One
study I saw from 1986, I think it was, stated that only 26 percent of
Roman Catholic clergy were heterosexual. Homosexual men prey on, or if
somehow they resist, still lust heartily on, teenage boys. Grown men and
teenage boys is the classic paradigm. It was that way in Ancient
Greece's Golden Age (adult men had to train teens in the art of war,
using weapons, etc., and over time this morphed into carnal activity).
It was that way in China during periods of decadence, and it is that way
in the Arab Muslim world, as first detailed for Westerners by Richard
Francis Burton, the famous English 19th century explorer.
So
put them in among boys and the lusts of such perverts will wear down
even the strongest willed of them. No one trying to break the chains of
alcoholism takes a job in a liquor store or a bar. Sodomites have cost
the Church literally billions of dollars – and again, the spiritual and morale disaster these degenerates have cost us is beyond staggering, and beyond counting..
Even
the new Mass, the Novus Ordo, is effeminate, and encourages a flashy
"performance" from the Cranmer's table (er, a.k.a. "altar"). It is like
it was designed for narcissists.
Now
Bergoglio has opened the floodgates to simply endless litigation and
the "cancellation" of endless numbers of what true-believing, orthodox
heterosexual priests remain.
And
of course, here's the kicker: the laity won't remain. They've left
Catholicism since 1965 by 100s of millions, literally. But now it is the
turn of the remainders. The Remnant. You are a father or a mother of
kids you want to raise in righteousness (justice, God-fearing and
God-respecting), and after much searching you found a TLM or a N.O. that
at least truly tries to be orthodox. And BANG! the bishop removes your
parish priest for Non-Compliance to Gay Inc.'s demands. What are you
going to do? By DEFINITION, the replacement can't be orthodox or a real
believer (or he would fear God too much to do such a blasphemous thing).
Solution: Vote with Your Feet. Leave. Soon, the mainstream Church will
only have "Church Ladies" (a.k.a. "Karens"). The carnal vampires that
are 'Gay, Inc." certainly won't fill the pews. Haha, NO ONE in his right
mind would think they would, even for a second.
So, Amici, my friends, the only question is:
How
do we break the "Roman Catholic Church" free from the Synodal
"Changeling" Church? Will Bishop Strickland be the only one (I doubt it,
but Grace accomplishes miracles) to stand up and say, "I announce and
promulgate, as heir of the Apostles, that Jorge Mario Bergoglio has
abandoned the chair of Peter and the See of Rome, and my banishment is
null and void, and I call ALL the "cancelled" priests to me to accept
faculties that I will bestow on them to confect the sacraments, either by
the Novus Ordo or the ancient, glorious Vetus Ordo."
So,
who will this be? Strickland? Schneider? Schneider's Archbishop, Tomasz
Peta? Some African bishop, or bishop's conference? Probably one of the
latter.
However it is to be done, it has to be done. And the sooner the better. No more Professor Kwasniewski fence-sitting.
AnP
No comments:
Post a Comment