Friends,
Abortion
is the jewel in Satan's Crown. It's a "twofer". It damns the people
involved in it and it kills a human being in the womb. Why, why do we
allow it at all? In the U.S.A., that murder rate since 1973, comes to
about 65 million dead babies now.
Think of that. It's nearly unbelievable. But it is true.
If
nothing else, abortion conveniently saves the demons from having to
temp yet another human to go to Hell. (In the U.S. as noted, 65 million
fewer temptations.) But it also spreads, metastasizes cancer-like, a
thick, nearly impenetrable damnation through the human societies that
tolerate it. It damns from the people immediately involved all the way
through to legislators and judges who give it their (dare I say it)
"blessings".
Background
The
human condition in the Western World was going from bad to worse
previous to the Roe v Wade decision in 1973. U. S. Supreme Court decisions
going back the 1950s, such as the 1957 Roth v the United States, began to give pornography a leg up in the culture wars, and the following year's, One, Inc. v. Olesen,
is considered "landmark" in the ascent of homosexuality's rule over us.
One ignorant Supreme Court justice's idiot comment about pornography,
"I know it when I see it" (in 1964's Jacobellis v. Ohio)
conclusively demonstrated that America's highest lawyers were moral
numbskulls.
Note: It was Justice Potter Stewart who wrote, "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it...". Dead Justice Stewart, porn, like propaganda, is easily defined. They have no ambiguity. "Art" ambiguous, with more than one possible meaning, thus causing one to think, to ponder, to wonder. Propaganda exists to indoctrinate. Porn exists solely to titillate, however, to arouse the carnal appetites, and for no other reason.
Today we see many of the nation's lawyers are amoral mountebanks, or simply Communist apparatchiks. The Roe v Wade decision conclusively proved they were utterly, wholly, metaphysically ignorant, as well. And I remember seeing a talk show, Peter Robinson's Uncommon Knowledge, in fact, wherein the late Justice Antonin Scalia said that natural law had absolutely no place in Supreme Court decisions!
Explains a lot, doesn't it?
All the flooding Sexual Revolution guano of the later '50s and all of the '60s culminated in abortion being given carte blanc
in the U.S. Satan's jewel in the crown had been a long time being
excavated and then polished, but with its enthronement, "everything went
to Hell". The Church, the modern Church, the Vatican II Church was then
fully born. The new, awful liturgy was enacted at the beginning of
Advent in 1970. Can it be a coincidence that abortion followed exactly
three years later, in January 1973?
As Fr. James Mawdsley so aptly put it, the Holy Mass suffered a horrible "transgender mutilation".
That's what the Novus Ordo Mass is, a transgender mutilation of the
ancient, God-grown Traditional Latin Mass, a liturgy God began founding
before He created the world, and which was foreshadowed and planned and
shaped for throughout the Old Testament. Now we are so far down the
well that we have an anti-pope charlatan promoting (ceaselessly,
desperately), what Fulton Sheen called, "The Ape of the Church", our
Vatican II anti-Church. Its a "Church" where the Holy Spirit speaks, but only through committees staffed by Communist cronies of the "pope".
As
for myself, I cannot help but think the Novus Ordo Mass paved they way
and steam-rolled the pavement once it was embraced, of abortion. Just one
example: In the old Mass, the TLM, the priest makes the Sign of the
Cross 70 times, many of those at the altar over the unconsecrated and
then the consecrated Host, and using the Consecrated Host. That has to carve a profound mark on the
priest's soul. Wouldn't such a priest be more likely to be willing to
embrace the Cross for the sake of the unborn, then, as opposed to a
Novus Ordo priest, whose talky, relatively signless Mass exists to
"reaffirm" and "soothe" and "accompany" his congregation?
Every
time one sins, one gives Satan a bit of authority over the sinner.
Grievous, mortal sin gives Satan pretty much absolute authority. Notice
how Confession is required to break it but notice how Confession isn't
stressed any more? (A lot of Confessions in the Vatican II Church are
held like psychological counseling sessions, face to face with the
priest, etc.) How sin itself isn't stressed from the pulpit? A priest
giving hell-fire and brimstone sermons will be "cancelled" if he
persists.
Is it any wonder Satan's Jewel in the Crown shines so brightly?
An Préachán
No comments:
Post a Comment