Amici,
Rampaging
Bergoglio is the Boar that has entered the vineyard to ravage it. How
else can he be described in his insane attack on Latin Massers? Below is a cri de coeur about this from Washington D.C., and I had to pass a bit of it on. It is, of course, one of many.
Very, very many. And they're not just from D.C. as is this one below,
but from Chicago and Savannah and wherever these ogres try their best to
Cancel Catholicism. No other way exists to describe it. They want to
cancel the Traditional Latin Mass because that IS Catholicism, the way
it has been since the beginning, a long-process organic development like
a great tree.
But
why? Why would they care? They care because the Traditional Latin Mass
threatens their "legacy", their lives' work. The Novus Ordo can't
compare to it for being Catholic. Although Latin Massers are still few
in number, their growth arc is amazing. All this attention accelerates that. Even an oaf like Jorge
Bergoglio can see it, or at least sense it. And thus, they have become
true Pharisees. For example, from what I understand, there's been a host
of letters written to Wilton Gregory imploring him not to cancel the
Latin Mass, etc., in D.C. Priests, too, have pleaded with him.
Theologians. Professors. All sorts. To no avail. So, here's one "cry of
the heart". An excerpt (it should be all highlighted):
The Mass suppression becomes effective September 21 of this year, giving TLM parishioners at churches such as Saint Mary Mother of God (where this writer has attended for over 26 years; the parish had the TLM from 1845 until 1969, then again from the mid-1980s until now) just nine weeks to pack up and say goodbye. To say goodbye to where I was married. To say goodbye to where I served as godfather for baptisms. To say goodbye to the Gregorian chant schola I have sung in for nearly three decades. To say goodbye to the church where I attended around 2,000 traditional Latin Masses, numerous baptisms, and many nuptial and Requiem Masses. To say goodbye to where I made many of my friends. To say goodbye to where TLM parishioners -- from Antonin Scalia to Pat Buchanan to Nellie Gray to James Buckley to young adults and large families -- spent countless hours at coffee and donuts socials after Sunday Masses. To say goodbye to the Blessed Karl Mass and the epicenter for March for Life TLMs. To say goodbye to my spiritual home.
AnP again:
How can I add anything to that? Anything to something so noble, so sad, as sad as when Virgil "poemed" the hero Aeneas exclaiming: “Sunt lacrimae rerum et mentem mortalia tangent.” “These are tears of things, and mortal matters touch the mind.”
The
author of the piece above will be going across the river to the diocese
of Arlington, Virginia, which "has the most amount of TLMs per parish
than anywhere in the world". The author says a couple of Masses there
will probably be canceled later, what with that bishop also being under
pressure from the Ogre Bergoglio – I think I'm going to change that to "Bergoglio the Accursed", because that is what he is, him and Cupich and this faggot Wilton Gregory –
all of them denizens of the Sodomical Modernist Hierarchy, all of them
"soul-mates" of the unspeakable former Cardinal McCarrick. (And before
him, there was the Satan-worshiping Joseph Bernardin, who died in late
1996.)
What Bergoglio and peeps are doing is also SO Matthew 23 (an excerpt)
Matthew 23
13 But woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; because you shut the kingdom of heaven against men, for you yourselves do not enter in; and those that are going in, you suffer not to enter.
14 Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites: because you devour the houses of widows, praying long prayers. For this you shall receive the greater judgment.
15 Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; because you go round about the sea and the land to make one proselyte; and when he is made, you make him the child of hell twofold more than yourselves.
(And on and on, a great 'rant' from God Himself!)
Honestly, this is SO
spiritually putrid. So obscenely Satanic. No other word for it. (Maybe
"Freemasonary"....) Again and again these bags of human sludge, seeping
into damnation themselves, proudly war like Dante's Demons on the Holy
Sacrifice of the Mass. How many souls have they lost? I reflect on it,
as Odin ponders the news of his ravens, I ponder my long memory and wonder
how I would have turned out differently had I had the TLM from the
mid-'60s to Benedict's Summorum Pontificum (July 2007).
Does this anti-TLM rage make sense to anyone? Catholicism – not just the "Roman" Catholicism – has TWENTY-THREE rites, most of them Eastern. So, why not a 24th, the TLM? Because they know the power of the TLM and that its return will destroy EVERYTHING they labored for. What does NOT make sense is for any Catholic of any orthodox sort to tolerate these clowns five seconds.
- Yes, on one level, this is just the last of the fading Vatican II-era prelates – Bergoglio was the first "pope" (if he's pope, I'm the Aga Khan! i.e. the Imām of the Nizari Ismāʿīli Shias) ordained a priest in the Novus Ordo rite – on their way to exist as fertilizer. Bergoglio is about already room temperature himself, it seems. So he's desperate to defecate all over the only part of the Church that is growing and faith-filled and YOUNG. He says the TLM Catholics are "rigid", "old" and all that claptrap, but the opposite is true. Everyone who is honest about the Church's situation knows this.
- So, all this hate from the Vatican (Traditionis Custodes,
Archbishop Roche's degrees, his answers to Dubia that weren't even
asked, and now Cupich's and Gregory's antics) constitute the detritus of
the Vatican II Council as it dissipates into putrescence.
- And Bergoglio thinks the next pope will be "Francis II". Bergi has tried his best to ensure that, and it might happen. But any strong ruler, certainly any overbearing one, makes so many enemies that his successor often repudiates him, as Khrushchev repudiated Stalin. And Bergoglio is our Stalin. Another example is how the American public voted to "cancel" Woodrow Wilson's era as president in 1920. The whole Vatican II Era is like the last, nightmare years of the Wilsonian Regime. It will be repudiated. So, I wouldn't be in the least surprised if Bergoglio's successor removes most of all this.
- And finally,
should a Bergoglio 2.0 be elected, he'll serve as a focal point of
Schism. In fact, a "conservative" pope will probably create a Schism,
with heretics starting their own version of Catholicism. The Church is
in Schism right now, just a not too openly declared one.
And
another reason for optimism is that the papacy can't survive the
Bergoglian Model: i.e. Tyranny, plain and simple, from Hell's dimension.
If fact, it is Anarcho-Tyranny, what the Democrats/Communists in the
U.S. are doing now, reigning by executive orders signed by a non compos
mentis puppet. If one pope can just by fiat cancel another pope's
rulings, the papacy must collapse. That's because it only works based
on Tradition, stare decisis in legal terms. Pope C has to try to
support Pope B's rulings, and Pope B had to try to build directly on
Pope A. But if Pope B can totally cancel the work of Pope A, then Pope C
can just turn around and cancel Pope B's decisions. Utter chaos. Each
new pope would create a new Church. And that is perhaps Jorge Mario
Bergoglio's biggest legacy to the Catholic Church. Creating a new Church is what he's attempting.
Most
prelates have to understand that. Only the most hard-core of his
followers (Cupich, Roche, the Tobin in NJ, that POS in San Diego, etc.)
would go the "Full Jorge". And then another aspect to this is that just
as Bergoglio the Accursed has done in China, where he has succeeded only
in driving the true Catholics even deeper underground, so the TLM is
not going away. This isn't the '70s. Go ahead and try to cancel it. Make
the SSPX 20x the size it is now, make Dom Alcuin Reid found monasteries
across Europe. He might well start a new Clunaic Reform! Go ahead.
I
for one will stand up and say to Bergi's face (he could care less about
me, obviously) that I reject him, his papacy, and his demands that I
(or any Catholic) accept Vatican II. Dar Crom, what CATHOLIC
Modernist has accepted the Vatican II documents over the past 60 years?
They just ignore them and make up whatever they want in the "spirit of
Vatican II". Vatican II has been made absurd by its most vocal defenders! How's that for irony?
But
many, many souls will be lost, as I wrote above. They're being lost by the second. As the Great Chastisement engulfs us, we must pray for them,
and one must even try to pray for the Scribes and Pharisees of today.
Pray for their conversion to Catholicism before they croak. Because
croak they will and they're not now Catholic, any more than is the Imām of the Nizari Ismāʿīli Shias.
An Préachán
Psalm 146 of the Douay-Rheims: verse 9:
Who giveth to beasts their food: and to the young ravens that call upon him.
No comments:
Post a Comment