Great Interview: Covid is pure "in silico", a product of robots

My friends,

Did you-all know that when the famous/infamous Woodstock concert was on in New York state (August 15-18, 1969) the Hong Kong Flu was raging in the U.S.? By concert time, it had supposedly killed 100,000 U.S. citizens.  

But there were no lockdowns of any sort, and no "mask mandates" of any kind, and few, if any, of the people at the Woodstock concert, whether musicians, organizers, or attendees, gave a thought to it.

This is something I learned listening to Dr Sam Bailey talk to journalist Eric Coppolino here. 

Coppolino is an American journalist who has been studying viruses since the early 1990s, first specializing in the HIV/AIDS "narrative", and he says the HIV narrative never made sense, in that you could never put the pieces together so that it resembled what was constantly being reported on the news. (It was the HIV spiel that first alerted Kary Mullis to the "issues" Virology has, as well.) Then Coppolino read up on Dr. Milton J. Rosenau's famous (or they should be hyper-famous) 1919 experiments trying to infect volunteers with the Spanish Flu. Rosenau failed completely, and his "virus worldview" prevented him from what we today would call "thinking outside the box". Remember, the Spanish Flu was supposed to be the most transmissible virus on record. (Coppolino dug out Rosenau's century-old original notes!)

It has to be one of the most fascinating Covid-related discussions I've listened to.

Science versus Technology

It's a very wide-ranging discussion: Bailey and Coppolino discuss what occurred in the worlds of science and technology between Woodstock in 1969 and Covid today. They discuss the rise of electronic communications, from the telegraph through telephones, and now to digital, and how at each step we more thoroughly create Marshall McLuhan's global village while simultaneously turning each of us less individualistic and more and more robotic. In other words, we accepted the Covid narrative (i.e. so many of us did) mainly because we've been conditioned to.

But here's the kicker, as Coppolino brings out. There's a huge difference between "science" and "technology".

1. A scientist, still in the shadow of his philosopher origins, is out for knowledge, to know. ("Science" comes from "scio", to know.)
   
2. So, a scientist finds some curiosity in nature, develops a hypothesis about it, and sets out to prove (and also disprove) his hypothesis via various tests. After rigorous, exhausting testing pro and con his own idea, he then writes up his result and publishes it, so that other scientists can investigate it, and repeat the process. They must first replicate the original scientist's experiment. (This is definitely NOT how they do it with either Covid or Global Warming; with the latter, especially, the original research that supposedly "proved" the idea has been under lock and key for years.) 
   
3. Scientists do this because they are out to know, and knowledge belongs to all. They want to know the reality of what they're looking at because they have an underlying, and usually unquestioned or even unthought metaphysical idea that reality exists, it is real, it can be measured, weighed, known. (It was because of that metaphysics that Western Empirical Science produced the scientific revolution that transformed the world.
   
4. Since viruses have never been found at all, except at several removes (like John Franklin Enders' cell-culture "isolation" protocol, or the current computer genome sequencing), science can't speak to it. Scientists find X in the natural world and try to study it. They can't do that if X was created as a thought experiment, a supposition, as Pasteur thought up viruses.
5. In physics, they do try to find theoretical particles postulated to explain certain specific anomalies their research registers, as viruses were postulated to explain diseases in general, with a different virus for each disease. But after a century of finding NO viruses at all while recording a host of conditions and situations that can make you ill, surely virology has become a fool's game?
   

Little of this applies to Technology

A technician has completely different goals. He is out to make. Especially money.

1. He's out to create, especially something that makes him money. That's a very different endeavor. And as "scientists" are often sponsored and funded by Big Money types (as the Rockefeller family funded medicine), they are easily dragged cross the line into Technology.
   
2. Therefore, slowly over the decades, because of the tremendous amount of money to be made via advanced technology, science per se has been slowly eclipsed and consumed by technology. It's the ventriloquist dummy for technology.
   

Examples
Remember the Ghostbusters movie? The ghostbusters started out as science geeks who want to know about spirits, ghosts, all that. They tried various research formats. But when they discovered ghosts could be contained by a technological breakthrough they pioneered, they turned themselves into successful businessmen. This is a perfect example of science becoming a ventriloquist dummy. (And Dr. Venkman was a perfect example of such a dummy!)

Or consider another true scientist, Kary Mullis. He invented the original PCR machine in order to know about, and find via magnification, certain molecular things, in order to better understand them. But immediately the evil gnome Tony Fauci showed up, wanting to employ the PCR as a tool, a technology to diagnose AIDS by finding HIV, a non-existent virus postulated to cause AIDS in those afflicted with AIDS. Mullis told Fauci the PCR couldn't work like that and Fauci refused to back off, so a war between the two began. Fauci was "on the make" for big money, just like the Big Pharmaceutical companies are. Mullis died suddenly via a pneumonia at age 74, in August 2019, just before Covid supposedly broke out. (Tony Fauci, still employed at the age of 81, was four years older than Mullis.)

Speaking of Big Pharma, doctors, medical doctors, started out as artisans, basically educated eccentrics who tried to cure people of sickness. They either made their own medicines or worked with small-time chemists who in turn ran family chemist shops. By the end of the 19th century, some of those chemist families developed into large corporations, and "the tail began to wag the dog" as "Big Pharma" began to tell the physicians what they could, and couldn't do, in treating patients. Big Pharma did this in part by buying politicians, something it still does. In spades.

Enter Covid

On one level, Covid is just the latest in a serious of "Sky Is Falling" Chicken Little narratives, designed to gin up fear and stress in the general population in order for Big Pharma to sell more of their drugs. See the "Hong Kong Flu" mentioned above. Tucker Carlson discusses here on his show, how Big Pharma controls not only doctors, but also Big Media. Pfizer alone spent $4.2 billion on "advertising"in 2020, more than it did on R&D! It is just political payoff. No Big Media news organizations are going to investigate Pfizer!

Pre-Covid Covids

Of course, sometimes some new type of respiratory illness is actually involved, and these always appear with some advance in electrical communication; even the telegraph began to spread flu-type illness along the telegraph lines, from town to town! With modern-day Covid, it was 5G – with help from aerosolized Roundup herbicide via the use of "Biofuel", something the Biden Regime wants to expand. (Of course they do, idiots; poison us all.) With the Hong Kong Flu of 1968, it was because of IDCSP. Wait, what? You've never heard of IDCSP? That was the Initial Defense Communication Satellite Program that involved launching a fleet of 28 military satellites into the heart of the Van Allen belt at 18,000 feet. The last were placed in orbit on June 13, 1968, thus activating the net, and the Hong Kong Flu appeared the following July and lasted till 1970. That pandemic was preceded by the Asian Flu of February 1957 and lasted through the winter of '57-58. This Asian Flu had been immediately preceded by a few years of extensive and "spectacular scale" radar in the mid-1950s, like the DEW line (Distant Early Warning) and the White Alice Communications System (Alaska and Canada). (See the book Invisible Rainbow for details.)

• A scientist or tech would probably quote the old chestnut: correlation does not equal causation. Maybe, maybe not. It depends. You need to investigate. But when you have a series of events that follow one another like clockwork, you'd be a fool to quote that old saying. The Great Spanish Influenza of 1918-1919 fits perfectly into the pattern I've just outlined. It followed directly on the greatest extension of radio communication in history, which was caused by World War I.

And sure, the Covid "narrative" set out to scare people to death in order for Big Pharma to enrich itself. But even from the beginning, there were those of us who questioned the spiel.

Self-reflective, questioning, individualistic types smelt a rat from the first. Anyone remotely familiar with the egregious failings of modern science (i.e. Global Warming, the low-fat diets, etc.) ought to be skeptical entirely. Myself, slow on the uptake that I am, it took a couple of months for me to realize we were being played, though looking back, I realize I always suspected the videos of people coughing and collapsing in Wuhan to have been "fake news", something too theatrical, and awfully convenient in a crucial election year; I later decided it most certainly was "enemy action" when that Wuhan street scenario never repeated itself anywhere else, and when the big mortality in Lombardy wasn't repeated either in Italy or anywhere else, or the big die-offs in New York, PA, and NJ were not repeated outside of Democrat-controlled states. (Who knew the virus was so politically motivated?)

At no time was an actual bug, an actual virus, isolated. But that hardly mattered for along with Big Pharma/Big Med trying to make their usual windfall off of a new virus, now we had totalitarian types (World Economic Forum, the Chinese Communist Party) using public health as a wedge to overthrow elected governments.

Aren't we lucky?

In Part 2, I'll discuss Coppolino's explanation of "In Silico" and how Covid is a creation of robots.

  An Préachán