As promised, the segment on The Delta Variant "the Illusion of Demand"

Friends,

As I promised a few days ago, here is the Delta Variant segment of the testimony Reiner Fuellmich receives from David Martin, CEO and Chairman of M·CAM®, an international intangible asset underwriter and analyst firm spanning work in innovation finance, trade, and intangible asset finance.

Find the interview here on Brighteon. 

1. N.B. You'll need to know what GISAID is. From https://www.gisaid.org: The GISAID Initiative was established to champion (and enhance) rapid sequence data sharing for seasonal and pandemic influenza preparedness – a global public health imperative. GISAID's success exceeded our expectations and provides an important model for rapid data sharing for other pathogens with pandemic potential.
2. Second N.B. When David Martin says below that, "And the problem is, that because of the nature of the way in which we currently sequence genomes, which is actually a composting process, it's what we call in mathematics an interleaving. We don't have any point of reference to actually know whether or not the thing we're looking at is in fact distinct from either clinical or even a genomic sense." This is in fact what I reported on some time ago from Drs Tom Cowan and Andrew Kaufman: i.e., Covid has never had its genome "isolated" because modern "isolation" techniques involve inserting body fluid/mucus into a cell culture, growing the mix, then treating it in various ways (radiation, starvation, antibiotics), and finally sorting the resulting soup through a specialized computer, picking out the genetic bits one wants to find. Therefore, David Martin's comments here constitute an independent confirmation of  Cowan and Kaufman's description of the "isolation" method and how it doesn't work. -An P
   

The Delta Variant 

(My transcription) 56:16 mins in; DM (David Martin): There is no such thing as an Alpha or Beta or Delta variant. This is a means by which what is desperately sought is a degree to which individuals can be coerced into accepting something that they would not otherwise accept.

There has not been in any of the published studies on what is reportedly the Delta variant, there has not been a population ... calculated, which is the actual replication rate. What has been estimated are computer simulations. But unfortunately, if you look at GISAID, which is the public source of uploading any one of a number of variations, what you will find is that there has been no ability to identify any clinically altered gene sequence which has then a clinically expressed variation. And this is the problem all along, this is the problem going back to the very beginning of what's alleged to be a pandemic: Is we do not have any evidence that the gene sequence alteration had any clinical significance whatsoever. There has not been a single paper published by anyone that has actually established that anything novel since November of 2019 has clinical distinction from anything that predates November 2019.

(58:01)The problem with the 73 patents that I described, is that those 73 patents all contain what was reported to be novel in December and January of 2019/2020 respectively. So the problem is that even if we were to accept that there are idiopathic [i.e. "relating to or denoting any disease or condition which arises spontaneously or for which the cause is unknown."] pneumonias – even if we were to accept that there are some set of pathogen-induced symptoms, we do not have a single piece of published evidence that tells us that anything about the subclade SARS-CoV has clinical distinction from anything that was known and published prior to November 2019 in 73 patents dating to 2008.

[At this point, one of Reiner's staff has a question. DM reacts:]

This is where we see an enormous amount of reflexive behavior to media hype. There is no evidence, and I'm going to repeat this, there is no evidence that the Delta variant is somehow distinct from anything else on GISAID. The fact that we are now looking for a thing doesn't mean it is a thing, because we are looking at fragments of things, and the fact is that we could choose any fragment; I could come up with, you know, the 'Variant Omega' – tomorrow. I could say "I'm looking for this substrand of either DNA or RNA, or even a protein." And I could run around the world saying, "Oh my gosh, fear the Omega variant!"

And the problem is, that because of the nature of the way in which we currently sequence genomes, which is actually a composting process, it's what we call in mathematics an interleaving. We don't have any point of reference to actually know whether or not the thing we're looking at is in fact distinct from either clinical or even a genomic sense.

And so: We're trapped in a world, where unfortunately you go, as I have, and look as I have at the paper that isolated the Delta variant, and actually ask the question: is the Delta variant anything other the selection of a sequence in a systematic a shift of an already disclosed other sequence? The answer is: a it's just an alteration of when you start an stop the reading frame. There is no novel anything. (1:01:22)

(1:02:00) (Generalized transcription follows)

From patent materials, David Martin shows how if you actually look at the genome sequences the published sequences, we realize that depending on where you clip the actual sequence string, you'll have the same thing or a different thing, but it's nothing more than on where you decide to parse the clip! clip! And he points out how the patents plainly say these are artificial sequences! They're not natural. And these nucleotide sequences can overlap, etc. "It's a caprice determination" he says. This is important because, he says, "If we're going to find out what exactly is being injected into people, we're going to need exact sequences. Not a kind of or similar to; we need the exact sequence. But neither in the FDA or the EU – we have no way of verifying

 

David Martin pointed out that his researchers had heavy going through the patent records, because: "You have to reconstruct the genomes by hand. This was a manufactured illusion."

He also said, "They changed the pathogen from influenza to Covid in order to scare people to take the injections."

(1:14:07) David Martin:

"You need to create the illusion of demand, and there's nothing right now that does a better job right now that creates the illusion of demand than the urgency of an event that you've manufactured."

End transcription

Final note and summation

I sent around a link to an article by Vasko Kohlmayer here at American thinker yesterday and if you read the whole article, Kohlmayer makes the argument that the "vaccines" are not working (and using Boris Johnson and his health minister, Sajid Javid, as poignant examples) because the Covid variants are being naturally evolved so fast that the "vaccines" simply can't keep up.

• Kohlmayer is actually reporting here a mainstream medicine argument against over-vaccination. So, the author argues it is insane to keep vaccinating. He writes: “Trying to beat this disease with inoculations is like playing cat and mouse, where we can never catch up with ever-new variants of the rapidly morphing virus. In other words, because of its nature, the virus will always be one step ahead in the vaccination game.”

Theoretically, this should be the entire Western medical field's critique of the crazy "vaccination" push, but it most definitely is not. This strange fact ought to raise "red flags" everywhere, and with every government, but oddly, it does not. That in itself should scare everyone! Just what is going on?

The author of this Boris Johnson piece, Kohlmayer, sums up, writing:

The question is: what for? Why would anyone in their right mind want to get injected with the dangerous concoctions whose long-term effects are unknown that will not keep one from Covid or the quarantine?

And...

Why are so few people asking this question?

HOWEVER: this standard sort of medical wisdom is NOT what David Martin is saying in his testimony to Reiner Fuellmich. Martin is saying there are NO mutations and the whole thing is made up by Big Pharma, using already patented genomes and vaccines!

Please keep that in mind. A realist could say, naturally enough, that EITHER WAY, this whole, entire Covid "pandemic" and "vaccine" narrative is not just wrong, but desperately wrong, and dangerous.

All of this is extremely damning, my friends. Extremely.

That's why I take the time to write about it to you.

An Préachán