Search This Blog

Friday, April 3, 2020

If you've lost Tucker Carlson... Is the COVID Narrative about to collapse?

Amici,

During the Vietnam War (notice how it is never called the "Kennedy War" or more apropos, "The Lyndon Johnson War"?) Walter Cronkite, the main CBS News evening news anchor (remember this was in the day when the MSM -- MainStream Media -- dominated all the news Americans got), supported the war, till one night Cronkite began to turn against it. Lyndon Johnson is reported to have said, "When you've lost Cronkite, you've lost America."

The same might apply to Tucker Carlson and the "narrative" about SARS COVID-19. Last night, April 2rd, at 16:46 into his broadcast, Carlson interviewed Alex Berenson, a former NY Times reporter and author of the book, Tell Your Children: The Truth About Marijuana, Mental Illness, and Violence, a book that impressed Carlson deeply.

Berenson's not being a scientist or epidemiologist will automatically turn off some. But as Carlson says, Berenson is a very informed layman, a good journalist, and someone who can point that the computer models telling us X-facts are not actually factual. (See further below for some examples of this non-factual info.) "Informed Laymen" reviewing such published facts are not idiots speaking ignorantly; instead, they act as an audit on people who are supposed to audit themselves, via "peer-reviewed" literature and "clinical tests", etc. In a crisis situation, as now, we need all the "audit" we can get.

Now, Berenson's book, Tell Your Children, is described as "An eye-opening report from an award-winning author and former New York Times reporter reveals the link between teenage marijuana use and mental illness, and a hidden epidemic of violence caused by the drug—facts the media have ignored as the United States rushes to legalize cannabis." A quick search online shows endless links just howling bloody murder about how such a proposition is not true. Haha, yeah, right. Making Pot legal is a big movement, lots of money is involved, and of course they'd hide its downsides to the fullest extent they could, just like the tobacco companies hid tobacco's.

Anyway, Carlson's interview and over-all "beginning to question the narrative" is a major "sea-change" event. Carlson has been promoting (over-promoting, some say) the COVID virus for a couple of months. So for him to begin to "question the narrative" is one of those "signs of the times" we need to be on the lookout for.

If interested, at 16:44 on his April 2 interview, Carlson begins interviewing Berenson, after an interview with Dr. Lipkin, who came down with the virus and is now recovering (I wrote about Lipkin earlier; he traveled to China I believe after the outbreak). Lipkin gave a reasonable, calm argument for the standard national lockdown to "bend the curve." The following is a transcript of the first section of Carlson's interview with Berenson.
Berenson:
And unfortunately, what we’re seeing and what we have been seeing for the past couple of weeks, is that the models that predicted really apocalyptic things in places like New York City and nationally and in the UK don’t seem to be matching what’s going on in reality. And in some cases, these epidemiological models are extremely new. They’ve gone extremely “south” in a matter of days and so I think we really have to ask what’s going on here, and whether or not there are strategies that might be less damaging to the economy that would do just as well because we’ve taken huge steps, we’ve put ten million people out of work – more actually, because that’s the official numbers – in just a couple of weeks, we’ve caused real societal real societal harm and disruption, and we’ve done it on the basis of models that don’t seem to line up with reality in real time.”  

This interview, perhaps, will be a turning point. President Trump listens to Carlson. Trump is said to have called off a strike in Syria because of an impassioned Carlson on-air plea. Also, Carlson has been saying -- as have a growing number of others, and the list keeps growing -- that the medical professionals can't be allowed to determine policy. Politics, as the old saying has it, is the art of the possible. We cannot maintain the quickly mounting unemployment and coming economic catastrophe that is looming.

Berenson also points out that the currently popular model is from Washington State, but notes that Oregon has a new model too, and it shows that things would not be much different had more normal protocols been put in place, such as sequestering/quarantining old folks and those with pre-conditions (people like me, for example, with my COPD) rather than locking everyone down.

I'm interested in Sweden. Sweden is not doing a lockdown, and apparently is doing no worse than Denmark, which is under lockdown.

I would be that a week from today, we'll be hearing a LOT more about this, and "President Fauci" & Co. (Fauci seem to say yesterday we can't let up the lockdown until there are no more deaths!) will be out of favor.

Meanwhile, other indicators are significant. This report shows how people most seriously affected by the disease have preconditions, and thus are more targeted approach is both reasonable and necessary.
An excerpt:
Why is this significant?
Two reasons:
  1. The government and media campaign to SCARE US ALL TO DEATH is being exposed by the truth. Yes, this is a serious disease. And yes, many people will die. But the average healthy person has A VERY, VERY SMALL CHANCE OF DYING from this coronavirus.
Also, see:

This is most interesting, isn't it?

Also:

No comments:

Post a Comment