Democrats, Party of Infanticide and now Antisemitism?

The Democratic Party seems to be self-destructing. Here Laura Ingraham and Newt Gingrich discuss it a bit starting at 1:44 minutes in with Reparations, and then they move on into antisemitism, and finally the Border Crisis, were now it is expected the U.S. will be facing 1 million illegals swarming the border this year.

Gingrich (who is 75) has an interesting comment about Nancy Pelosi (soon to be 79) and her two closest House leadership people are also approaching 80 years of age (Steny Hoyer will be 80 in June), and Ilhan Omar and Rashide Tlaib (the antisemites) and AOC (the idiot Leftist) are like her grandchildren, pushing her aside, and the party Leadership just doesn't know how to handle them. All Pelosi can say of Omar is "she has a different use of words...".

So down into Hell itself go the Democrats.

I never thought I'd see Antisemitism in the U.S. like I'm seeing it now in the Democratic party.

It seems baby killing isn't enough; see Litesite  and also the Conservative Evangelical CBN news report on the Democrats blocking a bill that would protect babies who survive abortion. 

Of course, the MainStream Media is running a full-court press that the Democrats are not the party of Matricide and Infanticide – any internet search will deluge you with such articles – but with each vote the Dems make, it becomes ever clearer.

Now on top of that, they're becoming clearly antisemitic, and they don't give a hoot in Hell about it. 

Melissa Langsam Braunstein has an excellent column here about it.

An excerpt:

This fight has been a long time in the making, but things are changing quickly. It’s been only two years since Jewish women felt the need to publicly make the case that one could be both a Zionist and a feminist. Is it now time for a debate about whether one can be both a Jew (who believes in Israel’s right to exist) and a Democrat?

The political party that’s long attracted the support of 75 percent of American Jews has shown this week that their leaders won’t stand up for the community when it matters. It’s quite breathtaking, really. It’s not only bipartisan support for Israel that’s being debunked as much weaker than advertised, but also, quite troublingly, an acceptance of Jew hatred directed at fellow Americans. For the record, that hatred is not only being tolerated but embraced by congressional Democrats.

A chairde, this is NOT politics and usual.

Here's Rabbi Spero on it at American Thinker:

Down the road, this unwarranted but official congressional proclamation today against Islamophobia will muzzle any rightful criticism of sharia or terrorism as a manifestation of bigotry, with calls for censure of those shining the light on the dangers to us from Islamism.  Omar commits verbal anti-Semitism, and in consequence, America is warned not to be Islamophobic.  Talk about creating victory out of defeat, as well as how our side allows itself to be held guilty for sins done by others.

The Jewish organizational community, almost entirely liberal and Democrat, has not pressured the Democrat leadership in any way near the degree they would have if the victim of hate had been black, Islamic, Hispanic, or LGBT.  Furthermore, there has been no unified call by the 36 Jewish Democrat members of Congress against Omar.  Most liberal Jews seem unconcerned when anti-Semitism comes from the political left, their home base. 

It's also no surprise that Jewish organizational clout has diminished, since the Democrat leadership knows full well that Jewish votes and funding will continue as before.  They always do.  It seems that most Jews need the Democratic Party more than the party needs them.  Most are more afraid of American conservatives than they are of the Muslim Brotherhood, more afraid of Republicans than anti-Semitic groups on the Left, more fearful of whites than minorities.  It's not logical, but emotional.  A terrible error...and perhaps a form of prejudice.

The Rabbi is right, of course: most American Jews vote Democrat and have a horror of American Conservatives, Republicans, and Whites, and of course they have an inveterate fear of White, Conservative Republicans mainly because of their children to converting Christianity. That's the source of their opposition to the American Right. The classic, old-fashioned stereotype of a Republican is a Protestant churchgoer. So, still carrying that mental baggage in their souls, a cultural detritus they picked up a half century or more ago, they'd rather their kids be atheists or worship the Idol of Socialism in either its Red or Green form than run any threat of conversion. 

And also a part of this, of course, is that many of them are from families that originated in Russia and neighboring areas, where Socialism was a big thing "back in the day" – but a new age has dawned and unless they take off the blinders they've worn now for generations, they're going to be in serious trouble with the insane bulldozing American Left, which is as Antisemitic as the British Left. 

See also another American Thinker piece:

An excerpt:

The Democrats will not produce a meaningful resolution denouncing anti-Semitism. The vile hater, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, will not be named. Her position on the powerful Foreign Relations Committee will be as secure as ever. The resolution will dilute anti-Semitism by conveniently placing it among other hatreds.

Such duplicity is reminiscent of the New York Times burying the Holocaust in the back pages.

They covered it, just not where you could see it. The Times, like the Roosevelt administration and the British Foreign Office, knew of  the Holocaust since 1942 and chose to ignore it.

The Democratic Party has once again abandoned the Jews. The Jews, however, refuse to abandon the Democratic Party. 

I grew up in a Democratic home in Chicago where Franklin Roosevelt was revered as if he were some form of deity.

Little did my parents and grandparents know the Roosevelt’s State Department worked tirelessly with the British Foreign Office to obstruct and delay the rescue of  European Jews so that Hitler could continue to kill them as the clock ran out and, consequently, eliminate the problem.  Like today’s Democrats, they created mechanisms to give the symbolic appearance of being concerned about the plight of the Jews while doing nothing until the last days of the war.

Little did my family know that Roosevelt fumed at Casablanca about the Jews being overrepresented in the professions and worried that if not restricted by quotas, after the war, North Africans would have the same “justifiable” resentment toward Jews as did Germans. Roosevelt exaggerated the role of Jews in the professions just as he exaggerated the threat of loyal Japanese Americans.

An Préachán again: Yes, indeed. FDR. But if I get started on that lout, I'll be writing for hours.

An Préachán