New research out that AGW may not be as bad as "the experts" beileved.
Hmmm....
Some links below about it, but my favorite comments is the from the bottom-linked article at Watts Up With That:
The buffoons admit alarmist projections were off by more than 300% but assure us that their calculations are now reliable… There is no connection to reality- or sanity- in CO2-driven climate modeling.
(Check out the Watts' article for a slew of such.)
First, the London Times (alas, behind a pay screen: get the gist here:
We were wrong; worst AGW affects can be avoided:
Haha, I love this title: "New Calculations Could Buy Us More Time.... Really? The Calculations could maybe buy the Global Warming fraud a bit more time, maybe...
Yeah? And who said they were right to begin with?
Uh-huh…
Here’s the actual article:
(Of course, you have to read through all the blah-blah to get the gist of it, which The Times article does.)
Finally, this one:
I like these two comments from this article:
rbabcock September 19, 2017 at 9:16 amFinally after years of predicting catastrophes and unspeakable horror not working… on to plan B.ReplyNeo September 19, 2017 at 10:03 amI’m sorry. “Settled Science” has no room for a “Plan B”.
All I can say is "'Denial' is not a river in Egypt."
An Préachán
