How Big Pharma calculates their testing, which of course is fraudulent

 Hi all,

I came across Dr. Tom Cowan talking about this here at bitchute.  

22:16 minutes in:

You have to read the fine print to see what they did. They have sophisticated – and not so sophisticated, ways of reporting data. For instance, they always use risk reduction instead of absolute numbers, and that guarantees numbers like 94 percent efficiency. Which is complete nonsense. What I mean by that is, if you did 100 people in the medicine group and 100 in the control group, and then for whatever symptom or outcome you're looking for, if 2 of the people in the control group got the disease or the symptoms, and 1 in the injection or medicine group got the symptoms-disease, most people would say that's a difference of between 2 percent and 1 percent; which is a 1 percent improvement. But they (Big Pharma) say that's a 33 percent improvement, because 1 plus 2 is 3, and 2 is 66 percent of 3, and one is 33 percent of 3, and so there's a difference of a 33 percent improvement. So obviously that's a 33 percent improvement. That's how they get to the 94 percent efficiency numbers. Most, all most all, medicine trials are reported that way these days because they don't want to tell you the actual numbers.

(23:00) And then when it comes to the side affects, they allow there was a .4 percent in the placebo and whatever, a .6 percent in the vaccine group, so that's only a difference of .2 percent, which would be a difference maybe of 80 percent if they did it the same way (as noted above). So they use absolute numbers with the side-effects, and relative risk with the benefit, so the whole thing is complete nonsense. They also do things like, they only look at symptoms two weeks out, after two weeks, knowing most of the symptoms will be in the first two weeks, and then there's a sort of recovery period, and so they know you'll have fewer symptoms starting at two weeks because of what they put in the injection and (it) had nothing to do with any prevention or treatment. (23:57) 

Interesting, isn't it? It's called "cooking the books" or it is also known as fraud. But they get away with it.

An P